Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: ligand enrichment

2009-02-19 Thread Charlie Bond

Yingjie Peng wrote:
..
After I have solved my strucutre, I have found my target ligand bound 
at the potential binding site. Also, I have
found that there are two more ligand molecules bound along the path 
from solvent to the binding site. I think this
can enrich the ligand to binding site, enhancing the local 
concentration of the ligand, thus reducing the Km of the

ligand.


I'm not sure if this is anything like what you see, but sometimes more 
than one ligand molecule unexpectedly binds in the active site. e.g.

http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1GX
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15102853?dopt=Abstract

Cheers,
Charlie



--
Charlie Bond
Professorial Fellow
University of Western Australia
School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences
M310
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009
Australia
charles.b...@uwa.edu.au
+61 8 6488 4406


[ccp4bb] Off-topic: ligand enrichment

2009-02-16 Thread Yingjie Peng
Dear guys,

Sorry for the off-topic question.

After I have solved my strucutre, I have found my target ligand bound at the
potential binding site. Also, I have
found that there are two more ligand molecules bound along the path from
solvent to the binding site. I think this
can enrich the ligand to binding site, enhancing the local concentration of
the ligand, thus reducing the Km of the
ligand.

I am wondering if anybody can give some suggestions on how to solve this
problem clearly. If there is any
similar case, it will be better.

Thank you in advance.

Best wishes,

Yingjie

Yingjie PENG, Ph.D. student
Structural Biology Group
Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (SIBCB)
Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences (SIBS)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai 200031
P. R. China
86-21-54921117
Email: yjp...@sibs.ac.cn


Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: ligand enrichment

2009-02-16 Thread Edward A. Berry

Yingjie Peng wrote:
..
After I have solved my strucutre, I have found my target ligand bound at 
the potential binding site. Also, I have
found that there are two more ligand molecules bound along the path from 
solvent to the binding site. I think this
can enrich the ligand to binding site, enhancing the local concentration 
of the ligand, thus reducing the Km of the

ligand.


I've heard this kind of explanation for alternate binding sites before,
but I am skeptical. To the extent that the bound ligands are in equilibrium
with the bulk phase, the local activity of the ligand will be the same as in
the bulk phase- i.e. the bound ligands don't count in figuring the effective
concentration. If anything they lower the activity, competing with the
active site if the concentration of ligand is not  [enzyme].

There would be a local buffering effect, so if the enzyme is gated by
a nerve impulse or absorption of a quantum of light so that it is
usually inactive and turns on suddenly, the local binding sites could
release their load in response to the local depletion faster than ligand
could diffuse in from the bulk- Then during the next off period all the
local binding sites recharge.  This would be like the function of a
bypass capacitor in a digital electronic circuit. But during steady-state
turnover I don't see how the bound ligand could help any.

It may be easy to get ligand in physiologically irrelevant low-affinity
sites due to the high concentration of protein in crystallization experiments.
The protein is a good fraction of 1 mM, whereas physiologically important
binding sites are often in the nM to uM range. So if you add a 3-fold excess
of your ligand, and one equivalent binds at the specific site, there will
still be 100 uM or so free ligand, which may bind at low affinity non-specific
sites. Whether this loosely bound ligand will be well-ordered enough to
identify in the density is another question.

Just my thoughts on the matter,
Ed


Re: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: ligand enrichment

2009-02-16 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Yingjie,
I agree with Ed Berry that I do not believe that nearby binding sites
influence the Km (~Kd) which depend on bound and unbound concentrations.
However, there could be a strong kinetic effect, e.g. these secondary
binding sites could act as stepping stones when the path to the primary
binding site would otherwise be difficult to pass. The crystal structure
of the potassium channel provides a beautiful example of this.
 
Best regards,
Herman 




From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On
Behalf Of Yingjie Peng
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:09 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Off-topic: ligand enrichment


Dear guys,

Sorry for the off-topic question.

After I have solved my strucutre, I have found my target ligand
bound at the potential binding site. Also, I have
found that there are two more ligand molecules bound along the
path from solvent to the binding site. I think this
can enrich the ligand to binding site, enhancing the local
concentration of the ligand, thus reducing the Km of the
ligand. 

I am wondering if anybody can give some suggestions on how to
solve this problem clearly. If there is any
similar case, it will be better.

Thank you in advance.

Best wishes,

Yingjie

Yingjie PENG, Ph.D. student
Structural Biology Group
Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (SIBCB)
Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences (SIBS)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
320 Yue Yang Road, Shanghai 200031
P. R. China
86-21-54921117
Email: yjp...@sibs.ac.cn