Re: [ccp4bb] Phaser 2.8.3: Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients generated from dataset lacking anomalous signal

2024-02-09 Thread Eleanor Dodson
If I remember  for coefficients with FOM and a precise PHI calculated, A =
FOM*cos(phi) B = FOM*sin(phi) C=D=0

If you have a probability curve for PHI. 0 to 360  such as you get from
experimental phasing, A B C D mirror this bimodal curve better ..


On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 09:58, Nitin Kulhar <
9dfccc771c91-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear sir
>
> Thank you for clearing that. I checked back to see that HLC/D are
> invariably 0 for all reflections, with the non-zero HLA/B supposedly having
> been originated from the probability distribution of phases *calculated*
> by phaser. Hopefully, I have not misunderstood it.
>
> Thanks and regards
> Nitin Kulhar
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:07 PM Randy John Read  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients are just a way of storing phase
>> probability information, and they can come from different sources including
>> atomic models. Phaser puts in HL coefficients because they could be handy
>> under some circumstances for combining the phase information from
>> experimental phasing. You might notice that only A and B are non-zero for
>> the molecular replacement HL coefficients. That’s because the phase
>> probability distribution is unimodal for calculated phases, whereas it’s
>> generally bimodal for experimental phases (thus requiring more
>> coefficients).
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Randy Read
>>
>> > On 8 Feb 2024, at 14:32, Nitin Kulhar <
>> 9dfccc771c91-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all
>> >
>> > Is anomalous diffraction necessary for determining experimental phases
>> and the Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients (HLA, HLB, HLC, and HLD)?
>> >
>> > MR solution from Phaser 2.8.3 (interfaced in ccp4 8.0.000 suite) seems
>> to be generating HLA/B/C/D coefficients from an x-ray diffraction dataset.
>> >
>> > Wavelength:
>> > 1.54179 Angstrom.
>> >
>> > Sample:
>> > •
>> > Protein-small molecule ligand complex crystal.
>> > • No anomalous scatterer in the protein, the ligand, or the
>> crystallization condition.
>> >
>> > Data reduction:
>> > Xtriage and aimless analyses did not indicate significant anomalous
>> signal.
>> >
>> > I would appreciate any help in understanding the reasons for these
>> observations.
>> >
>> > Thanks and regards
>> > Nitin Kulhar
>> > PhD student
>> > c/o Dr Rajakumara Eerappa
>> > Macromolecular Structural Biology Lab
>> > Department of Biotechnology
>> > Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
>> > Kandi, Sangareddy
>> > Telangana, India - 502284
>> >
>> > Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by
>> one of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.
>> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>>
>> -
>> Randy J. Read
>> Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
>> Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500
>> The Keith Peters Building
>> Hills Road   E-mail:
>> rj...@cam.ac.uk
>> Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.
>> www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
>>
>>
> Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one
> of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] Phaser 2.8.3: Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients generated from dataset lacking anomalous signal

2024-02-09 Thread Nitin Kulhar
Dear sir

Thank you for clearing that. I checked back to see that HLC/D are
invariably 0 for all reflections, with the non-zero HLA/B supposedly having
been originated from the probability distribution of phases *calculated* by
phaser. Hopefully, I have not misunderstood it.

Thanks and regards
Nitin Kulhar

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:07 PM Randy John Read  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients are just a way of storing phase
> probability information, and they can come from different sources including
> atomic models. Phaser puts in HL coefficients because they could be handy
> under some circumstances for combining the phase information from
> experimental phasing. You might notice that only A and B are non-zero for
> the molecular replacement HL coefficients. That’s because the phase
> probability distribution is unimodal for calculated phases, whereas it’s
> generally bimodal for experimental phases (thus requiring more
> coefficients).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Randy Read
>
> > On 8 Feb 2024, at 14:32, Nitin Kulhar <
> 9dfccc771c91-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all
> >
> > Is anomalous diffraction necessary for determining experimental phases
> and the Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients (HLA, HLB, HLC, and HLD)?
> >
> > MR solution from Phaser 2.8.3 (interfaced in ccp4 8.0.000 suite) seems
> to be generating HLA/B/C/D coefficients from an x-ray diffraction dataset.
> >
> > Wavelength:
> > 1.54179 Angstrom.
> >
> > Sample:
> > •
> > Protein-small molecule ligand complex crystal.
> > • No anomalous scatterer in the protein, the ligand, or the
> crystallization condition.
> >
> > Data reduction:
> > Xtriage and aimless analyses did not indicate significant anomalous
> signal.
> >
> > I would appreciate any help in understanding the reasons for these
> observations.
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> > Nitin Kulhar
> > PhD student
> > c/o Dr Rajakumara Eerappa
> > Macromolecular Structural Biology Lab
> > Department of Biotechnology
> > Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
> > Kandi, Sangareddy
> > Telangana, India - 502284
> >
> > Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by
> one of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.
> > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>
> -
> Randy J. Read
> Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
> Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500
> The Keith Peters Building
> Hills Road   E-mail:
> rj...@cam.ac.uk
> Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.
> www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
>
>

-- 


Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one 
of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


Re: [ccp4bb] Phaser 2.8.3: Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients generated from dataset lacking anomalous signal

2024-02-08 Thread Randy John Read
Hi,

Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients are just a way of storing phase probability 
information, and they can come from different sources including atomic models. 
Phaser puts in HL coefficients because they could be handy under some 
circumstances for combining the phase information from experimental phasing. 
You might notice that only A and B are non-zero for the molecular replacement 
HL coefficients. That’s because the phase probability distribution is unimodal 
for calculated phases, whereas it’s generally bimodal for experimental phases 
(thus requiring more coefficients).

Best wishes,

Randy Read

> On 8 Feb 2024, at 14:32, Nitin Kulhar 
> <9dfccc771c91-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> Is anomalous diffraction necessary for determining experimental phases and 
> the Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients (HLA, HLB, HLC, and HLD)?
> 
> MR solution from Phaser 2.8.3 (interfaced in ccp4 8.0.000 suite) seems to be 
> generating HLA/B/C/D coefficients from an x-ray diffraction dataset.
> 
> Wavelength: 
> 1.54179 Angstrom. 
> 
> Sample: 
> • 
> Protein-small molecule ligand complex crystal. 
> • No anomalous scatterer in the protein, the ligand, or the 
> crystallization condition.
> 
> Data reduction:
> Xtriage and aimless analyses did not indicate significant anomalous signal. 
> 
> I would appreciate any help in understanding the reasons for these 
> observations.
> 
> Thanks and regards
> Nitin Kulhar
> PhD student
> c/o Dr Rajakumara Eerappa
> Macromolecular Structural Biology Lab
> Department of Biotechnology
> Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
> Kandi, Sangareddy
> Telangana, India - 502284
> 
> Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one of 
> the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM. 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

-
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500
The Keith Peters Building
Hills Road   E-mail: 
rj...@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.  
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/


[ccp4bb] Phaser 2.8.3: Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients generated from dataset lacking anomalous signal

2024-02-08 Thread Nitin Kulhar
Dear all

Is anomalous diffraction necessary for determining experimental phases and
the Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients (HLA, HLB, HLC, and HLD)?

MR solution from Phaser 2.8.3 (interfaced in ccp4 8.0.000 suite) seems to
be generating HLA/B/C/D coefficients from an x-ray diffraction dataset.

Wavelength:
1.54179 Angstrom.

Sample:

   1. Protein-small molecule ligand complex crystal.
   2. No anomalous scatterer in the protein, the ligand, or the
   crystallization condition.

Data reduction:
Xtriage and aimless analyses did not indicate significant anomalous signal.

I would appreciate any help in understanding the reasons for these
observations.

Thanks and regards
Nitin Kulhar
PhD student
c/o Dr Rajakumara Eerappa
Macromolecular Structural Biology Lab
Department of Biotechnology
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad
Kandi, Sangareddy
Telangana, India - 502284

-- 


Disclaimer:- This footer text is to convey that this email is sent by one 
of the users of IITH. So, do not mark it as SPAM.



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/