Re: [ccp4bb] workstation crystallography

2014-11-11 Thread Ho Leung Ng
The more recent integrated graphics chips, starting from the Intel HD3000,
have adequate performance for crystallography. Really, most crystallography
applications are less computationally demanding than video games now. I
think the most important issue is to make sure your hardware plays nicely
with your favorite linux distribution.


Aloha,
Ho


Ho Leung Ng
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry
h...@hawaii.edu


Re: [ccp4bb] workstation crystallography

2014-11-11 Thread David Schuller
I will comment on specific features you might look for in a 
crystallographic workstation, rather than brand names. I usually build 
from parts rather than buy intact machines.


CPU: 3+ GHz per compute core is good these days. For a standard single 
user desktop, 4 CPU cores is fine. More cores will allow you to run 
multiple independent jobs, but will not speed up a single job. Server 
chips may have 6 or 8 cores (or maybe even more, but then they start 
cutting the clock speed). It's up to you to decide what kind of workload 
this machine is likely to experience. (Those server CPUs will lack 
on-chip graphics, but see the next point)


Graphics:
1) First question: do you want stereo 3D? If so, that places 
restrictions on which graphics cards and which monitors are supported.


2) If the answer to 1 is no, then you have more freedom. I would not 
recommend on-CPU graphics for a couple reasons.
a) Better graphics performance with separate graphics cards. Any 
mid-range or better card should do.
b) An add-in graphics card will allow the CPU to run faster. This is 
because the "turbo" feature built into modern CPU/GPU chips will slow 
down the compute cores based on the total thermal load of all CPU/GPU cores.


Monitor: Get one with LED backlighting. Lasts longer and is more efficient.

RAM: More RAM is good, and it is relatively cheap at present. 8 GB 
minimum, recommended 16 GB.


Storage ("disk" is now an anachronism): I strongly recommend a quality 
SSD, at least for the OS. It makes a noticable difference in speed. 120 
GB or more for the OS. If you need multi-terabytes of storage space for 
data (and who doesn't?), get hard drives for that.


Ports: Gigabit (at least) ethernet to get on the network.
USB3.0 for connecting peripherals like portable drives. By next year I 
will be recommending USB3.1, which will have higher data throughput, 
higher power throughput and convenient symmetrical connectors.


Cheers,


On 11/11/14 08:27, abhishek jamwal wrote:

Dear ccp4 bb members,

I need to buy a desktop workstation for the purpose of running 
crystallography related applications. I have short-listed HP's Z420 
and Dell's T7600, I chose this because their configuration description 
looks impressive (8 cores, 16 threads, 3.6 GHz processor etc.). 
However, I have no practical idea about their performance.


Can anyone , who has experience with these workstations comment on 
 performance ? And whether these workstations are optimal/suboptimal 
for the desired purpose ?


what other options do I have apart from dell and hp ? Please suggest.

*Is desktop iMac a good option for this purpose ?*


many thanx in advance


abhishek








--
===
All Things Serve the Beam
===
   David J. Schuller
   modern man in a post-modern world
   MacCHESS, Cornell University
   schul...@cornell.edu



Re: [ccp4bb] workstation crystallography

2014-11-11 Thread Roger Rowlett
I'm running home-built Ubuntu boxes with old, plain-vanilla CPUs (e.g., 
Q9300 or core i3/i5/i7) and 6-8Gbyte of RAM, and a cheap Nvidia video 
card (e.g. GT 9xxx or GT 620).This is more than sufficient to do routine 
structure solution. Any contemporary desktop or laptop computer should 
be sufficient, although if running Linux I have not had good luck with 
integrated Intel graphics. (If you want stereo display, you have to 
choose a compatible graphics card and video monitor.) It's not like the 
old days, where you needed special, dedicated hardware (remember Silicon 
Graphics?) to get the graphics and computing performance required. 
Current technology is more than sufficient for routine work.


___
Roger S. Rowlett
Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: rrowl...@colgate.edu

On 11/11/2014 8:27 AM, abhishek jamwal wrote:

Dear ccp4 bb members,

I need to buy a desktop workstation for the purpose of running 
crystallography related applications. I have short-listed HP's Z420 
and Dell's T7600, I chose this because their configuration description 
looks impressive (8 cores, 16 threads, 3.6 GHz processor etc.). 
However, I have no practical idea about their performance.


Can anyone , who has experience with these workstations comment on 
 performance ? And whether these workstations are optimal/suboptimal 
for the desired purpose ?


what other options do I have apart from dell and hp ? Please suggest.

*Is desktop iMac a good option for this purpose ?*


many thanx in advance


abhishek









[ccp4bb] workstation crystallography

2014-11-11 Thread abhishek jamwal
Dear ccp4 bb members,

I need to buy a desktop workstation for the purpose of running
crystallography related applications. I have short-listed HP's Z420 and
Dell's T7600, I chose this because their configuration description looks
impressive (8 cores, 16 threads, 3.6 GHz processor etc.). However, I have
no practical idea about their performance.

Can anyone , who has experience with these workstations comment on
 performance ? And whether these workstations are optimal/suboptimal for
the desired purpose ?

what other options do I have apart from dell and hp ?  Please suggest.

*Is desktop iMac a good option for this purpose ?*


many thanx in advance


abhishek