[cctalk] Re: Greaseweazle part 2

2023-06-24 Thread Tony Duell via cctalk
Still trying to make sense of this thing.

The problem is that one very important thing is missing. I refer to
DODUMENTATION. I don't fall for this modern rubbish that a product
with a thin manual is easy to use. No, the thicker the manual the
better. It will probablt answr my questions. But the Greaseweazle has
no documentation at all other than the built-in help, (which is what
I'd expect, a reminder of the options if you know the product and
can't remember the exact term used to, say, check the drive speed).

If I type 'gw' at a command prompt I get the following, which at
least gives the options.

--


C:\classic_computer\greaseweazle\greaseweazle-1.13>gw
Usage: gw [--time] [action] [-h] ...
  --time  Print elapsed time after action is executed
  -h, --help  Show help message for specified action
Actions:
  infoDisplay information about the Greaseweazle setup.
  readRead a disk to the specified image file.
  write   Write a disk from the specified image file.
  convert Convert between image formats.
  erase   Erase a disk.
  clean   Clean a drive in a zig-zag pattern using a cleaning disk.
  seekSeek to the specified cylinder.
  delays  Display (and optionally modify) drive-delay parameters.
  update  Update the Greaseweazle device firmware to latest (or
specified) version.
  pin Change the setting of a user-modifiable interface pin.
  reset   Reset the Greaseweazle device to power-on default state.
  bandwidth   Report the available USB bandwidth for the Greaseweazle device.
  rpm Measure RPM of drive spindle.


-

I can basically understand that


So lets see how to write an image to a disk . I type gw write -h and get :

-

C:\classic_computer\greaseweazle\greaseweazle-1.13>gw write -h
usage: gw write [options] file

Write a disk from the specified image file.

positional arguments:
  file input filename

options:
  -h, --help   show this help message and exit
  --device DEVICE  device name (COM/serial port)
  --drive DRIVEdrive to read (default: A)
  --diskdefs DISKDEFS  disk definitions file
  --format FORMAT  disk format
  --tracks TSPEC   which tracks to write
  --pre-erase  erase tracks before writing (default: no)
  --erase-emptyerase empty tracks (default: skip)
  --fake-index SPEED   fake index pulses at SPEED
  --no-verify  disable verify
  --retries N  number of retries on verify failure (default: 3)
  --precomp PRECOMPwrite precompensation
  --dd DD  drive interface DD/HD select (H,L)

DRIVE: Drive (and bus) identifier:
  0 | 1 | 2   :: Shugart bus unit
  A | B   :: IBM/PC bus unit

SPEED: Track rotation time specified as:
  rpm | ms | us | ns | scp | 

TSPEC: Colon-separated list of:
  c=SET   :: Set of cylinders to access
  h=SET   :: Set of heads (sides) to access
  step=[0-9]  :: # physical head steps between cylinders
  hswap   :: Swap physical drive heads
  h[01].off=[+-][0-9] :: Physical cylinder offsets per head
  SET is a comma-separated list of integers and integer ranges
  e.g. 'c=0-7,9-12:h=0-1'

FORMAT options:
acorn.adfs.160acorn.adfs.1600   acorn.adfs.320
acorn.adfs.640acorn.adfs.800acorn.dfs.ds
acorn.dfs.ss  akai.1600 akai.800
amiga.amigadosamiga.amigados_hd atari.90
atarist.360   atarist.400   atarist.440
atarist.720   atarist.800   atarist.880
coco.decb coco.decb.40t coco.os9.40ds
coco.os9.40ss coco.os9.80ds coco.os9.80ss
commodore.1541commodore.1571commodore.1581
dec.rx01  dec.rx02  dragon.40ds
dragon.40ss   dragon.80ds   dragon.80ss
ensoniq.1600  ensoniq.800   ensoniq.mirage
gem.1600  ibm.1200  ibm.1440
ibm.160   ibm.1680  ibm.180
ibm.2880  ibm.320   ibm.360
ibm.720   ibm.800   ibm.dmf
ibm.scan  mac.400   mac.800
mm1.os9.80ds.hd32spt  mm1.os9.80ds.hd36spt  msx.1d
msx.1dd   msx.2dmsx.2dd
occ1.dd   occ1.sd   olivetti.m20
pc98.2d   pc98.2dd  pc98.2hd
pc98.2hs  raw.125   raw.250
raw.500   sci.prophet   sega.sf7000
tsc.flex.dsdd tsc.flex.ssdd zx.trdos.640

Supported file suffixes:
.a2r   .adf   .ads   .adm   .adl   .d64   .d71   .d81   .d88   .dcp   .dim
.dsd   .dsk   .edsk  .fdi   .hdm   .hfe   .ima   .img   .imd   .ipf   .mgt
.msa   .raw   .sf7   .scp   .ssd   .st.td0   .xdf



And this is where I get lost..

What are all the file suffixes (extensions?) Does the program
determine the file type from that?What does each 

[cctalk] Re: Any RSX-11 fans able to identify file types?

2023-06-24 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 6/24/23 12:38, Wayne S wrote:
> Chuck, why not post the catalog snd we’ll all take a look? 
> Power of the internet!

Okay, I guess that's okay.   Here's the data from the MFD:

https://icedrive.net/s/Q56ZY2Sv4g62Gi9vZ9jzNQ2CD6Bu

Since this is customer data, I can't publish the contents of the files
themselves.

Does anyone recognize this stuff?

--Chuck



[cctalk] Re: Any RSX-11 fans able to identify file types?

2023-06-24 Thread Wayne S via cctalk
Chuck, why not post the catalog snd we’ll all take a look? 
Power of the internet!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 23, 2023, at 18:58, Chuck Guzis via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> I've got a few backup sets (potentially incomplete) done on MicroRSX
> that were created with BRU on RX50 media.  I've cranked out some code to
> itemize the contents, but the file types are a mystery.  I suppose that
> one has to live in that world to know (e.g. MSL)
> 
> The sets appear to be (parts) of an incremental backup scheme; I think
> I've got at least one copy of the complete set.
> 
> Would anyone be willing to have a look at the (ASCII) file catalog and
> suggest the application that may have created the files?
> 
> Email me offlist if interested.
> 
> --Chuck


[cctalk] Re: PCs Limited XT

2023-06-24 Thread Bill Degnan via cctalk
I think that the tubo mode is not happening, it's running like a regular
XT.   I have seen it go into Turbo mode once or twice, so there is a
marginal chip somewhere that needs to be replaced.  That's my final
decision.

Either way, I have filled the hard drive up with various software from the
time period and put it out for people to use in the museum.  If you're in
the south-eastern PA area, feel free to stop by and check it out.

The PC Limited machine from the VCForum I think is the same one as this
one.  I think the guy gave up on it and donated to the museum.  It needed a
new power supply, hard drive controller, disk drive to get it running
again.  I put MS DOS, removed the botched IBM DOS someone had attempted to
load.

Really, you're right.  It's just a cheap clone, but it's a cheap clone that
happens to be one of the first PCs made by what would become Dell Computer,
worth saving and keeping running!

B

On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 1:36 PM John Herron via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 6:59 PM Bill Degnan via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 6:33 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> > > > It boots fine, did I say it did not boot? I don't remember.   There
> is
> > no
> > > > arcnet card, it's not the later model PCs LIMITED box, does not match
> > the
> > > > red label logo that came out in 1986
> >
> >
> > Well, I appreciate that people answered my question.  I sometimes ask
> > questions and then proceed to work on it until I figure it out.  There
> is a
> > THESYS "MULTI/RAM card and that was the card with the password ROM.  I
> > found the dip switch "PW" and turned it off.   Problem solved.  The Turbo
> > error #04 is still a mystery, but it does not prevent me from using the
> > system.  I am thinking there's an incorrect but incidental switch
> setting.
> > It could be a RAM chip but I have no proof.  Chkdsk returns an full 640K.
> >
>
> I'm very curious if it gets figured out or if there are any publications
> maybe around the time to help identify the parts Dell would have used. I
> could be thinking too simply for the college years he built them in his
> dorm so I'd imagine common off the shelf parts and generally just an IBM
> clone. I would think some other similar era computers would also have that
> error code.
>
> I started reading another person's post with a similar error on vcfed
> forums but I don't think they ever really solved it. There was an attempt
> to dump the bios to see what it might be checking (beyond my depth of
> knowledge).
>
>  I guess that would let you know if it's a bios or other device printing
> the error. I assume you've booted it with no addon cards and still see the
> message.
>
> >
>


[cctalk] Re: PCs Limited XT

2023-06-24 Thread John Herron via cctalk
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 6:59 PM Bill Degnan via cctalk 
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 6:33 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk  >
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Bill Degnan via cctalk wrote:
> > > It boots fine, did I say it did not boot? I don't remember.   There is
> no
> > > arcnet card, it's not the later model PCs LIMITED box, does not match
> the
> > > red label logo that came out in 1986
>
>
> Well, I appreciate that people answered my question.  I sometimes ask
> questions and then proceed to work on it until I figure it out.  There is a
> THESYS "MULTI/RAM card and that was the card with the password ROM.  I
> found the dip switch "PW" and turned it off.   Problem solved.  The Turbo
> error #04 is still a mystery, but it does not prevent me from using the
> system.  I am thinking there's an incorrect but incidental switch setting.
> It could be a RAM chip but I have no proof.  Chkdsk returns an full 640K.
>

I'm very curious if it gets figured out or if there are any publications
maybe around the time to help identify the parts Dell would have used. I
could be thinking too simply for the college years he built them in his
dorm so I'd imagine common off the shelf parts and generally just an IBM
clone. I would think some other similar era computers would also have that
error code.

I started reading another person's post with a similar error on vcfed
forums but I don't think they ever really solved it. There was an attempt
to dump the bios to see what it might be checking (beyond my depth of
knowledge).

 I guess that would let you know if it's a bios or other device printing
the error. I assume you've booted it with no addon cards and still see the
message.

>