Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

2008-10-06 Thread Mikael Fridh
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 05:34:16PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
 On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:

 I always welcome people who wish to help make our wiki better and 
 up-to-date.  The java page is referenced quite often not only in the 
 forums but in all other channels.

 You might want to coordinate with MikaelFridh whose name appears as the 
 maintainer of that section of the java article.

 I do see such an indication (of a name appearing as a 'maintainer') of a 
 sub-part.  But MikaelFridh has not touched it in months, and seemingly 
 lacks an enabled 'mailto' as no envelope appears next to his EditName [ 
 ;) ]. He was added to the top for edit rights, did a couple changes, and 
 then seemingly abandoned the 'Maintainer' role.  I will remove the  
 sub-section 'Maintainer' indication on that section next time I am in 
 that page, absent him picking up the torch again.

Perhaps Author would have been better than Maintainer.
In lack of feedback (I rarely use forums) I haven't
touched the article since updating/verifying it.
With immediate feedback I would have fixed it right away.

I will update the article now but Johnny is welcome to update it
further as he now have access. I'm not totally digging the structure but
there was too much there already for me to rearrange it or verify the
other parts of the article. I think keeping 1.6 current covers must use
cases atleast.

Perhaps the actual building/installing step should be one single section
but with smaller alternative stubs inline for each Java version. Since all in
all, the instructions are similar regardless of JVM version and it might
make it easier to maintain, what do you think?

 REQUEST: As to the matter of adding edit rights after a request here, I 
 would ask that the person asking, affirm that they are 'reachible' 
 through the wiki mecahnism, and have set up their account with the 
 'userprefs':
 Publish my email (not my wiki homepage) in author info
 clicked on, such that this envelope would appear in the 'Info' log.

Userprefs fixed in my profile...

--
Mike
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Akemi Yagi wrote:
 I have been wondering on this subject.  Why not make the menu (info
 and other options) available to people who do not have edit rights?

Removing that was done on purpose to give the people who aren't
interested in editing a cleaner wiki experience (or something, ask
dag). 

=:)

Cheers,

Ralph


pgprK4letljzL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

2008-10-06 Thread Alan Bartlett
Reverting back to the main purpose of this conversation . . .

Range, please give the OP, JohnnyWahnstroem, edit access to this page so
that we may have it kept (along with orc_orc's care of the first section)
fully maintained and thus remove what currently is a cause of requests for
help in the fora.

Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
 Sounds like a very good idea to remove the Frontpage from the general
 EditGroup. Are there maybe any other pages we should remove from
 general editing ?

No idea. Probably the guidelines page :)

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpDlTI2eH7kY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Review and maintenance of the JavaOnCentOS article.

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Johnny Wahnstroem wrote:
 Hello everyone!
 
 In a CentOS forum thread[1], I was asked by forum member AlanJBartlett
 if I would like to take on the care and feeding of the latter (section
 3?) part of the JavaOnCentOS article. 

Go ahead.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpc3EoqW0QiD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 a) I have changed the account creation page:
http://wiki-m.centos.org/UserPreferences. Please view that page
while logged out of wiki-m.

Yes, I know that the attachment is missing (the attention sign). This
will work on http://wiki.centos.org/.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpEgx50IIZWT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 06/10/2008, Ralph Angenendt
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 ... which will hopefully be the last part.

 Sorry that it took that long, but I didn't have too much time on my
 hands over the last two months or so.


snip

And even more important: Who wanted to be on the Editorial Team? Being
 on it means that you are supposed to subscribe to *all* pages on the
 wiki (meaning that you'll get a changelog diff for all changed pages via
 mail). And it means that you should at least skim through those diffs to
 see if there is a violation of the wiki guidelines (or if some spammer
 still does his spamruns manually). So please raise your hands *NOW*.


Hand re-raised. (By this pedantic Englishman. There's many a spelling 
punctuation error in existence that I could correct when passing by a page .
. .  :-D )

My referees/application supporters: Akemi Yagi (toracat) and Phil Perry (Ned
Slider).

Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Tim Verhoeven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki.
   Please review that page and add to the Guidelines concerning Wiki
   content part:
   http://wiki-m.centos.org/HowToContribute/EditingCentOSWiki

Perhaps mention that the contents are being monitored and might be
changed/modified by members of the Editorial Team if needed ?  Of this
is not necessary because everyone with the edit access can do so?

 And even more important: Who wanted to be on the Editorial Team? Being
 on it means that you are supposed to subscribe to *all* pages on the
 wiki (meaning that you'll get a changelog diff for all changed pages via
 mail). And it means that you should at least skim through those diffs to
 see if there is a violation of the wiki guidelines (or if some spammer
 still does his spamruns manually). So please raise your hands *NOW*.

 Hand raised. (P.S. I'm using this regex .* for the list of subscribed 
 pages).

Another hand raised.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Akemi Yagi wrote:
  n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki.
Please review that page and add to the Guidelines concerning Wiki
content part:
http://wiki-m.centos.org/HowToContribute/EditingCentOSWiki
 
 Perhaps mention that the contents are being monitored and might be
 changed/modified by members of the Editorial Team if needed ?  Of this
 is not necessary because everyone with the edit access can do so?

The part everyone with access can is one of the reasons for opening up
the wiki, so I think that doesn't really need to be mentioned. What do
others think?

Ralph


pgp0UNlGbmpdB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Akemi Yagi wrote:
  n Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  b) While doing so I have changed the Guidelines page for the wiki.
Please review that page and add to the Guidelines concerning Wiki
content part:
http://wiki-m.centos.org/HowToContribute/EditingCentOSWiki

 Perhaps mention that the contents are being monitored and might be
 changed/modified by members of the Editorial Team if needed ?  Of this
 is not necessary because everyone with the edit access can do so?

 The part everyone with access can is one of the reasons for opening up
 the wiki, so I think that doesn't really need to be mentioned. What do
 others think?

One thing about this is when there is a dispute between/among
contributors.  How would we settle the case?  Who would make the
final decision?  The dispute can happen within the Editorial Team as
well.

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Marcus Moeller
 And even more important: Who wanted to be on the Editorial Team? Being
 on it means that you are supposed to subscribe to *all* pages on the
 wiki (meaning that you'll get a changelog diff for all changed pages via
 mail). And it means that you should at least skim through those diffs to
 see if there is a violation of the wiki guidelines (or if some spammer
 still does his spamruns manually). So please raise your hands *NOW*.

I would like to offer my help, too. I am already tracking wiki changes atm.

Best Regards
Marcus
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the wiki Part III(?) ...

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Akemi Yagi wrote:
 One thing about this is when there is a dispute between/among
 contributors.  How would we settle the case?  Who would make the
 final decision?  The dispute can happen within the Editorial Team as
 well.

Shoot the offenders. I think this should be a) either played out here or
b) tried to be settled via common sense. 

Cheers,

Ralph


pgp97v3wgjE3F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Claudio Castro

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los repositorios 
de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en nuestro país el año 
pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero igual es válido:


http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Christian Araquistain
Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca también
impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros servidores de
pronto ... :(
Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según la nota no
baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?

Muchas gracias por la mano !!!

Saludos ...

(¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )


2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Hola gente,
 Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
 servidores?

 El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los repositorios de
 CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en nuestro país el año pasado, les
 dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero igual es válido:

 http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


 Saludos,

 --


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Claudio Castro

Christian Araquistain escribió:
Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca también 
impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros 
servidores de pronto ... :(
Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según la 
nota no baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
 
Muchas gracias por la mano !!!


Saludos ...
 
(¯`·._.·[TÜ®ÇO]·._.·´¯ )



2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en nuestro
país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero igual es
válido:

http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es






___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
  
Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el tzdata 
versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2 funcionó OK. 
Para la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS 
todavía no, ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.

Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.


Saludos

--

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Sergio Belkin
El día 6 de octubre de 2008 12:17, Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca también
 impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros servidores de
 pronto ... :(
 Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según la nota no
 baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
  Muchas gracias por la mano !!!

 Saludos ...
  (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )


 2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en nuestro
país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero igual es
válido:


  http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el tzdata
 versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2 funcionó OK. Para
 la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS todavía no,
 ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.
 Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.


 Saludos

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Yo lo que hice fue bajarme de
http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/ el .deb y convertirlo
con alien... y funcionó ;-)

-- 
--
Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Christian Araquistain
Si en el links aparece como ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2008g.tar.gz lo
baje e hice todo lo que dice y anda joya, ahora una consulta haber si me
pueden dar una mano, resulta que yo tengo plantado un ntp server yo lo
aplique sobre este y funciono ok, ahora los clientes de él, es decir todos
los server que actualizan contra él siguen con bardo, tengo que correrles
esto a uno por uno ?

Muchas gracias.

Saludos ...

(¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

2008/10/6 Sergio Belkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 El día 6 de octubre de 2008 12:17, Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 escribió:
  Christian Araquistain escribió:
 
  Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca también
  impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros
 servidores de
  pronto ... :(
  Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según la nota
 no
  baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
   Muchas gracias por la mano !!!
 
  Saludos ...
   (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )
  
 
  2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Hola gente,
 Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
 servidores?
 
 El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
 repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en nuestro
 país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero igual es
 válido:
 
 
 
 http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html
 
 
 Saludos,
 
 --
 
 
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 
 
 
 
  
 
  ___
  CentOS-es mailing list
  CentOS-es@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 
 
  Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el tzdata
  versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2 funcionó OK.
 Para
  la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS todavía
 no,
  ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.
  Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.
 
 
  Saludos
 
  --
 
  ___
  CentOS-es mailing list
  CentOS-es@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 

 Yo lo que hice fue bajarme de
 http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/ el .deb y convertirlo
 con alien... y funcionó ;-)

 --
 --
 Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com
 Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
 Sergio Belkin -
  ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Claudio Castro

Christian Araquistain escribió:
Si en el links aparece como 
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2008g.tar.gz lo baje e hice todo lo 
que dice y anda joya, ahora una consulta haber si me pueden dar una 
mano, resulta que yo tengo plantado un ntp server yo lo aplique sobre 
este y funciono ok, ahora los clientes de él, es decir todos los 
server que actualizan contra él siguen con bardo, tengo que correrles 
esto a uno por uno ?
 
Muchas gracias.


Saludos ...

(¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

2008/10/6 Sergio Belkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

El día 6 de octubre de 2008 12:17, Claudio Castro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca
también
 impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros
servidores de
 pronto ... :(
 Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según
la nota no
 baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
  Muchas gracias por la mano !!!

 Saludos ...
  (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )


 2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en
nuestro
país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero
igual es
válido:



 http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es







 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el
tzdata
 versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2
funcionó OK. Para
 la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS
todavía no,
 ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.
 Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.


 Saludos

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Yo lo que hice fue bajarme de
http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/
http://www.marga.com.ar/%7Emarga/debian/tzdata/ el .deb y
convertirlo
con alien... y funcionó ;-)

--
--
Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com http://www.openkairos.com/
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com http://sebelk.blogspot.com/
Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es






___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
  
Si, a los clientes tbm debés actualizarlos, porque es un problema del 
tzdata..no del servidor NTPd, le están informando mal la zona horaria.


--

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Christian Araquistain
Ok lo imaginaba jaja pero queria dilatar la mala noticia :D

Muchas gracias.

Un abrazo.

Saludos ...
(¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Si en el links aparece como
 ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2008g.tar.gz lo baje e hice todo lo que
 dice y anda joya, ahora una consulta haber si me pueden dar una mano,
 resulta que yo tengo plantado un ntp server yo lo aplique sobre este y
 funciono ok, ahora los clientes de él, es decir todos los server que
 actualizan contra él siguen con bardo, tengo que correrles esto a uno por
 uno ?
  Muchas gracias.

 Saludos ...

 (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

 2008/10/6 Sergio Belkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

El día 6 de octubre de 2008 12:17, Claudio Castro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca
también
 impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros
servidores de
 pronto ... :(
 Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según
la nota no
 baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
  Muchas gracias por la mano !!!

 Saludos ...
  (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )


 2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en
nuestro
país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero
igual es
válido:




 http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es






  

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el
tzdata
 versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2
funcionó OK. Para
 la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS
todavía no,
 ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.
 Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.


 Saludos

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Yo lo que hice fue bajarme de
http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/

 http://www.marga.com.ar/%7Emarga/debian/tzdata/http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/
 el .deb y
convertirlo
con alien... y funcionó ;-)

--
--
Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com http://www.openkairos.com/
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com http://sebelk.blogspot.com/

Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Si, a los clientes tbm debés actualizarlos, porque es un problema del
 tzdata..no del servidor NTPd, le están informando mal la zona horaria.

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Alejandro
Gente,

Yo tengo un ticket creado con REDHAT Argentina, durante todo el dia de hoy,
no me contestaron nada mas que estaban trabajando en eso, asi que con suerte
estara pronto.

Saludos,
Alejandro
www.linuxiso.com.ar

2008/10/6 Christian Araquistain [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Ok lo imaginaba jaja pero queria dilatar la mala noticia :D

 Muchas gracias.

 Un abrazo.

 Saludos ...
 (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

 2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Si en el links aparece como
 ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2008g.tar.gz lo baje e hice todo lo
 que dice y anda joya, ahora una consulta haber si me pueden dar una mano,
 resulta que yo tengo plantado un ntp server yo lo aplique sobre este y
 funciono ok, ahora los clientes de él, es decir todos los server que
 actualizan contra él siguen con bardo, tengo que correrles esto a uno por
 uno ?
  Muchas gracias.

 Saludos ...

 (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )

 2008/10/6 Sergio Belkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

El día 6 de octubre de 2008 12:17, Claudio Castro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
 Christian Araquistain escribió:

 Claudio, como estas ? espero que muy bien la verdad es que aca
también
 impacto y como tengo un ntp server se cambiaron todos nuestros
servidores de
 pronto ... :(
 Una consulta el lugar de donde decis de bajarlo, es decir según
la nota no
 baja el file vos pudiste bajarlo ?
  Muchas gracias por la mano !!!

 Saludos ...
  (¯`·._.·[TÜ(R)ÇO]·._.·´¯ )


 2008/10/6 Claudio Castro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hola gente,
Alguien de Argentina noto el problema de adelanto de hora en los
servidores?

El problema se debe a no contar con el último tzdata en los
repositorios de CentOS y al cambio horario que sufrimos en
nuestro
país el año pasado, les dejo la noticia, para Ubuntu pero
igual es
válido:




 http://ubunlog.blogspot.com/2008/10/arreglar-error-time-zone-argentina.html


Saludos,

--


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es






  

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Hasta ahora la solución más rápida que encontré fue instalar el
tzdata
 versión 2008F de un repositorio de Fedora 9. En CentOS 5.2
funcionó OK. Para
 la gente de Debian ya está el paquete actualizado y para CentOS
todavía no,
 ya que RHEL todavía no  ha publicado nada.
 Para bajarlo de la nota esa..reemplaza la F por una G y baja.


 Saludos

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Yo lo que hice fue bajarme de

 http://www.marga.com.ar/~marga/debian/tzdata/http://www.marga.com.ar/%7Emarga/debian/tzdata/
http://www.marga.com.ar/%7Emarga/debian/tzdata/ el .deb y
convertirlo
con alien... y funcionó ;-)

--
--
Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com http://www.openkairos.com/
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com http://sebelk.blogspot.com/

Sergio Belkin -
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Si, a los clientes tbm debés actualizarlos, porque es un problema del
 tzdata..no del servidor NTPd, le están informando mal la zona horaria.

 --

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


RE: [CentOS-es] Adelanto horario Argentina

2008-10-06 Thread Aldo Erick Sanchez

Como configuro el jconnector de java para MySQL y Tomcat, lo puse en la carpeta 
lib pero no funciona, ya instale el jdk pero al parecer falta configurarr 
archivos en la carpeta catalina de tomcat
_
Realiza búsquedas en Internet y llévate hasta ¡Un Auto! 
http://www.ganabuscando.com/Default.aspx___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS] Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread kapil singh
Hello all,

Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
nicely with
centos 5 .

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Kapil Singh Kushwah
Linux System/Network Administrator
Hotwax Media Inc.
Indore,(M.P) INDIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread partha chowdhury

kapil singh wrote:

Hello all,

Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
nicely with
centos 5 .





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
please provide the exact problem you are facing i.e the log files, short 
description of scenario,what steps you did to solve it and whether 
google was any help.without any details from you , no one will be able 
to help you.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread Marcelo M. Garcia

kapil singh wrote:

Hello all,

Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working 
nicely with

centos 5 .

--
Thanks and Regards,
Kapil Singh Kushwah
Linux System/Network Administrator
Hotwax Media Inc.
Indore,(M.P) INDIA




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi

I use CentOS 5.2 (i386) with automount without problems.

What kind of problems are you having?

Regards

Marcelo

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT Mailing List Spam

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Bob Hoffman wrote:
 You would think the program they use to present the information would
 obscure that mail address. Really no reason to show it forever is it?

So you haven't looked. pipermail *does* obscure the addresses.

Ralph


pgpNIp9In8xlb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Proposed New Mailing List

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Vandaman wrote:
 It will be interesting if things went like so :-
 
 - a CentOS Ivory Tower List for those on top of Ivory Towers.
 - a CentOS OT list full of 419 scammers, salesmen/affiliates posts
 - a CentOS n00b list for n00bs

Nobody ever proposed that.

Ralph


pgpZbLkvL6kBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 4

2008-10-06 Thread centos-announce-request
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081006/4723d433/attachment-0001.bin

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 4
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Johnny Hughes wrote:
 Vandaman wrote:
  Dac Chartrand wrote:
  
  Yum is broken.
  
 
 Please check your version of python and mysql as I can not imagine that
 mysql itself is effecting yum, at least not the way CentOS builds it.

It probably is. As already mailed: I suspect a VPS with a strong
limitation on the threads which can be started. yum with fastestmirror
uses up quite a bit of threads, mysql can do so too. 

Turn of fastestmirror and try again.

Ralph


pgpAQVc1sFevn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] find

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Akemi Yagi wrote:
 find . -type f -exec grep -il !* {} \;  -exec grep -i !* {} \; -exec echo \;

 alias it to, say, findword and run:  findword text
 
 Sorry, I missed the ! in the above paste:
 
 find . -type f -exec grep -il \!* {} \;  -exec grep -i \!* {} \; -exec echo \;

If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS), 

grep -ri foo dir/to/search/in

seems much shorter to me.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgp8H4cyTd3CJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cebit and Centos

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
 Didi wrote:
 I just read this
 http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/news/cebit_open_source_linux_magazine_and_linux_foundation_announce_call_for_projects

 Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
   
 I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit

I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
people are interested, we really might try for a booth there. 

Ralph


pgpowh5DHXHCo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Dac Chartrand wrote:
 Greetings. After doing:

 $ yum install mysql-server
 $ /etc/init.d/mysqld start

 Yum is broken. Example:

 $ yum list php
 Loading fastestmirror plugin
 Loading priorities plugin
 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * utterramblings: www.jasonlitka.com
  * base: mirror.nuvio.com
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/yum, line 29, in ?
 yummain.main(sys.argv[1:])
 [..snip..]
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/threading.py, line 416, in start
 _start_new_thread(self.__bootstrap, ())
 thread.error: can't start new thread

Are you running on a VPS? Do you have the yum-fastestmirror plugin
enabled? If so: mysql *and* yum (with fastestmirror) take up quite a few
threads on your system. Many vpses limit the number of threads which can
be run in a vps instance.

Try turning off yum-fastestmirror and look if yum works again.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgp6utvQh8rPP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
nate wrote:
 I didn't mean don't use yum, I meant if you want a really
 stable system don't use 3rd party repos. Stick to what
 is in base, or use a distribution that has the apps/versions
 that are closer to what your needs are.

That doesn't have anything to do with this problem.

Ralph


pgpHUz0ye4oFv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Dac Chartrand wrote on Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:44:10 -0400:

 Well, here's where I disagree

You already admitted that you have a non-standard setup. Besides of that 
it's a VPS of unknown origin and type. Do you consider this standard? 
Nobody here can know which parts are non-standard. But it's obvious that 
there is more non-standard than you think. Remember, others do not have 
this problem.

What's non standard in my install other  
 than PHP? Furthermore, uninstalling PHP does nothing?

I already told you what *I* would check *first*. This may not be the right 
track, but nevertheless: Did you?

Apart from that, as you have inherited a VPS. What is that? Do you rent 
it from a hosting provider? If so, and keeping in mind that there's 
obviously a problem with opening more threads (fastestmirror will open 
simultaneous download threads to several repo's to find out the fastest): 
Have you considered asking your provider the obvious?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Nightly yum update did an upgrade

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:58:40 -0500:
 
  No, the updates aren't nicely separated into ones that will break the 
  services you happen to need and ones that won't.
 
 Nice picture. I imagine them sitting around the table and rolling some 
 dice to determine which ones to break this time.

That's an easy one: bind or samba. But not in a fifty-fifty fashion,
it's bind more often :)

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpFMzE3gZaYV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:50:39 +0200:

 That is not true.

Well, my point was that he's not using a standard setup, that includes not 
only repo's. I already pointed out in my first reply that he may hit some 
limit, but he didn't follow up on that. In case there are no limits one of 
the few options left is that some third-party software affects behavior. 
Normal operation of fastest-mirror in a normal environment doesn't exhibit 
this behavior, that's what I wanted to clarify.


Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 RobertH wrote on Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:39:26 -0700:
 
  Why does disabling something that the centos website says is highly
  recommended (multiple times) fix this issue?
 
 Because he has a non-standard setup. In case you didn't recognize: 
 stopping mysqld also fixes his problem! He installed some software that 
 affects threading and it's likely other things (that he didn't notice yet) 
 are also affected. It's still weird, though. If you do not overwrite any 
 base files you won't hit this problem.

That is not true. He is running on a VPS which probably does limiting on
threads he can use. mysqld uses up quite a bit of threads, and yum's
fastestmirror plugin uses up even more. So he hits a limit there - and
yes, this happens with standard repositories (the php doesn't account
for that behaviour). It's all the fault of the VPS he is running on.

Ralph


pgpvuecNmK06G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand


 I don't recall accusing you of that, you mention above you
 inherited that system, it's possible that whoever had it before
 you screwed it up before you got it.


Sorry, the statement of feeling 'accused' falls under reply-to-all. I didn't
mean that you accused me. I just felt that thread was heading in an odd
persecutive direction considering I am looking for support, not a trial by
fire.

That said. I appreciate all the help and insight provided. By everyone.

Turning off fastmirror solves the problem for me. I will keep my eye on the
system and report any other weirdness that may be suspect, as suggested.

Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Apart from that, as you have inherited a VPS. What is that? Do you rent
 it from a hosting provider? If so, and keeping in mind that there's
 obviously a problem with opening more threads (fastestmirror will open
 simultaneous download threads to several repo's to find out the fastest):
 Have you considered asking your provider the obvious?


Inherited means a provider (networkredux.com) is sponsoring a project of
mine (sf.net/projects/sux0r) with a free VPS so I can host the demo and
other development initiatives. I was using shared hosting before as provided
by them. I like them, they are helpful, I would recommend them regardless of
the issue I am currently having.

I wrote the provider. They looked into it. I didn't give any answer about
threads. All they could say is that this behavior didn't  happen on their
other similarly configured systems and as fastmirror solved the problem they
consider the issue closed.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Ralph Angenendt
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:


 Try turning off yum-fastestmirror and look if yum works again.


Yes. This solves the immediate problem.

Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand


On 6-Oct-08, at 1:52 AM, John wrote:


Could please you possibly do a list of all the installed RPMs on the
system in question. Just for cause do a grep to list any packages like
rf = rpmforge, jason or litka centos


There no longer any rpm packages with jason or litka, there are a  
few with centos


$ rpm -qa | grep -i centos
filesystem-2.4.0-1.el5.centos
basesystem-8.0-5.1.1.el5.centos
procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos
setuptool-1.19.2-1.el5.centos
nss-3.12.1.1-1.el5.centos.1
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
yum-priorities-1.1.10-9.el5.centos
centos-release-notes-5.2-2
gzip-1.3.5-10.el5.centos
initscripts-8.45.19.1.EL-1.el5.centos
httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3
httpd-manual-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3
yum-fastestmirror-1.1.10-9.el5.centos
yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1

See end of email for list of all packages.


Just by thought and maybe this is going to far off the subject. If  
it is

I appologize. What lets yum run the correct way when fastest mirror is
not loaded as a plugin? That there in sense does not sound right at  
all.
The thing that makes me think is a possible botched yum update that  
yums

meta data was hijacked and in turn got packages that were bugged or
malwared? IE...The Lateness of the update from the mirrors. Makes me
think. I know I know it's just a question.


I'll keep my eye out for this. For the record, the one and only non- 
standard repo I used was http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ -  
It was recommended in the CentOS forums. People seem to know the guy  
and trust him from what I read. Later, I removed all the packages I  
installed from that site (*.jason) and re-installed similar packages  
from CentOS-Testing repo.


-=-=-

$ rpm -qa
filesystem-2.4.0-1.el5.centos
basesystem-8.0-5.1.1.el5.centos
libtermcap-2.0.8-46.1
ncurses-5.5-24.20060715
sed-4.1.5-5.fc6
libsepol-1.15.2-1.el5
gawk-3.1.5-14.el5
elfutils-libelf-0.125-3.el5
sqlite-3.3.6-2
gdbm-1.8.0-26.2.1
libattr-2.4.32-1.1
libgpg-error-1.4-2
libgcrypt-1.2.3-1
libcap-1.10-26
groff-1.18.1.1-11.1
m4-1.4.5-3.el5.1
iputils-20020927-43.el5
procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos
libXau-1.0.1-3.1
mingetty-1.07-5.2.2
wireless-tools-28-2.el5
mailcap-2.1.23-1.fc6
sharutils-4.6.1-2
cyrus-sasl-plain-2.1.22-4
ed-0.2-38.2.2
cpio-2.6-20
unzip-5.52-2.2.1
crontabs-1.10-8
mailx-8.1.1-44.2.2
unixODBC-2.2.11-7.1
netpbm-10.35-6.fc6
finger-0.17-32.2.1.1
rootfiles-8.1-1.1.1
findutils-4.2.27-4.1
passwd-0.73-1
rhpl-0.194.1-1
libsemanage-1.9.1-3.el5
curl-7.15.5-2.el5
SysVinit-2.86-14
sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5
vim-minimal-7.0.109-3.el5.3
sendmail-cf-8.13.8-2.el5
sendmail-doc-8.13.8-2.el5
talk-server-0.17-29.2.2
quota-3.13-1.2.3.2.el5
gnupg-1.4.5-13
setuptool-1.19.2-1.el5.centos
tmpwatch-2.9.7-1.1.el5.1
wget-1.10.2-7.el5
lynx-2.8.5-28.1
cyrus-sasl-gssapi-2.1.22-4
sgml-common-0.6.3-18
tcsh-6.14-12.el5
MAKEDEV-3.23-1.2
python-elementtree-1.2.6-5
python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-2
nano-1.3.12-1.1
libgcc-4.1.2-42.el5
glibc-2.5-24
glibc-devel-2.5-24
cpp-4.1.2-42.el5
gcc-4.1.2-42.el5
chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2
audit-libs-1.6.5-9.el5
perl-5.8.8-15.el5_2.1
libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.6
libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1
libtiff-3.8.2-7.el5_2.2
procps-3.2.7-9.el5
nss-3.12.1.1-1.el5.centos.1
gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1
tcp_wrappers-7.6-40.4.el5
diffutils-2.8.1-15.2.3.el5
pkgconfig-0.21-2.el5
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2
keyutils-libs-1.2-1.el5
iptables-1.3.5-4.el5
telnet-0.17-39.el5
tzdata-2008e-1.el5
libselinux-1.33.4-5.el5
python-2.4.3-21.el5
shadow-utils-4.0.17-13.el5
device-mapper-1.02.24-1.el5
openssl-0.9.8b-10.el5
util-linux-2.13-0.47.el5
libuser-0.54.7-2.el5.5
bind-libs-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2
cracklib-2.8.9-3.3
e2fsprogs-1.39-15.el5
libselinux-python-1.33.4-5.el5
dbus-1.0.0-7.el5
net-tools-1.60-78.el5
openssh-4.3p2-26.el5_2.1
mcstrans-0.2.7-1.el5
samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1
gd-2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1
python-iniparse-0.2.3-4.el5
samba-swat-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1
openssh-server-4.3p2-26.el5_2.1
authconfig-5.3.21-3.el5
sudo-1.6.8p12-12.el5
m2crypto-0.16-6.el5.2
ntsysv-1.3.30.1-2
rpm-4.4.2-48.el5
rpm-python-4.4.2-48.el5
bind-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2
caching-nameserver-9.3.4-6.0.2.P1.el5_2
logwatch-7.3-6.el5
aspell-0.60.3-7.1
aspell-en-6.0-2.1
perl-DBI-1.52-1.fc6
keyutils-libs-devel-1.2-1.el5
libselinux-devel-1.33.4-5.el5
openssl-devel-0.9.8b-10.el5
yum-priorities-1.1.10-9.el5.centos
perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0007-1.fc6
mx-2.0.6-2.2.2
nmap-4.11-1.1
php-common-5.2.6-2.el5s2
postgresql-libs-8.2.9-1.el5s2
postgresqlclient81-8.1.11-1.el5s2
php-gd-5.2.6-2.el5s2
php-bcmath-5.2.6-2.el5s2
php-5.2.6-2.el5s2
krb5-devel-1.6.1-25.el5_2.1
gpg-pubkey-e8562897-459f07a4
setup-2.5.58-1.el5
termcap-5.5-1.20060701.1
zlib-1.2.3-3
mktemp-1.5-23.2.2
info-4.8-14.el5
readline-5.1-1.1
db4-4.3.29-9.fc6
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-4
glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6
expat-1.95.8-8.2.1
libidn-0.6.5-1.1
libjpeg-6b-37
beecrypt-4.1.2-10.1.1
grep-2.5.1-54.2.el5
less-394-5.el5
hesiod-3.1.0-8
elfutils-libs-0.125-3.el5
libusb-0.1.12-5.1
xorg-x11-filesystem-7.1-2.fc6
slang-2.0.6-4.el5
libXdmcp-1.0.1-2.1
libXpm-3.5.5-3
ethtool-5-1.el5
elfutils-0.125-3.el5
rsync-2.6.8-3.1

Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Dac Chartrand wrote:

 On 6-Oct-08, at 1:52 AM, John wrote:

 Could please you possibly do a list of all the installed RPMs on the
 system in question. Just for cause do a grep to list any packages like
 rf = rpmforge, jason or litka centos

 There no longer any rpm packages with jason or litka, there are a  
 few with centos

As said: Your problem isn't with non-standard repositories, your problem
lies in the way your hoster handles the VPS by limiting the number of
threads on the guests.

Ralph


pgp9D8LBQqdLX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand


On 6-Oct-08, at 9:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:


Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:48:36 -0400:


I didn't give any answer about
threads.


I don't know what this means, but I hope you are now aware that the  
issue

stems from a limit on threads/processes?


Haha, woops, typo. I meant They (the provider) didn't give any  
answer about threads.


And yes, I am now aware that the that the issue stems from a limit on  
threads/processes.


Thank you for your help.

---
http://www.trotch.com/




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-06 Thread Karanbir Singh

Damian S wrote:

Just one final thing (hope it helps someone in future), according to Dan
Walsh, much better (more fine-grained) than setting the allow_execmem
boolean is to do this:
chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t /opt/ejabberd-2.0.2_2/bin/beam.smp


And file this as something the rpm packager needs to look at for 
ejabberd, its not a bug in CentOS.



--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:48:36 -0400:

 I didn't give any answer about
 threads.

I don't know what this means, but I hope you are now aware that the issue 
stems from a limit on threads/processes?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Dac Chartrand


On 6-Oct-08, at 9:34 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:

As said: Your problem isn't with non-standard repositories, your  
problem

lies in the way your hoster handles the VPS by limiting the number of
threads on the guests.


Ok, understood.

Thank you for the help and clarification.

---
http://www.trotch.com/




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org

Dac Chartrand wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:37:27 -0400:

 Haha, woops, typo. I meant They (the provider) didn't give any  
 answer about threads.

Ok, that makes it clear :-) I would think that putting some senseful 
limits on a VPS is a normal business procedure. So you are certainly right 
with your statement I would recommend them regardless of the issue.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Boot disk order: h/w vs. grub

2008-10-06 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:48 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess I'm wondering if there's some more permanent way around this
 issue.  Do I need to overwrite the MBR on hd0?  Should I reconfigure
 the system so the PATA drives are not connected to the m/b at all
 (i.e., usb enclosures)?  Is this a bug in grub?  All this is assuming
 that I do not get rid of the PATA drives and/or get a new m/b that has
 something else

 It seems strange that this should be such a pain, even though in a
 rather oddball way it makes sense.

 Thoughts?

I had a situation similar to yours.  When I had a mix of PATA and
SATA, I just could not boot the thing.  Played with the BIOS settings,
grub entries such as hd(0,0), etc etc.  I finally gave up on it and
went for lilo which had no issue booting the same system.  I'd be
happy to go back to grub if I could get it to work.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] need ur kind advice

2008-10-06 Thread fabian dacunha
Dear All,

apprecite ur kind help n advice

I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
great.
i am concerned about security so i have a shorewall firewall on the
machine runnign squid n works grt

now i would like to know the follwing

1) does anyone one know of any good antivirus software i could install on
the centos OS squid server so as to scan for viruses so i cd periodically
scan the server

thnks and apprecite

regards

fabian




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] need ur kind advice

2008-10-06 Thread Bo Lynch

On Mon, October 6, 2008 12:06 pm, fabian dacunha wrote:
 Dear All,

 apprecite ur kind help n advice

 I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
 great.
 i am concerned about security so i have a shorewall firewall on the
 machine runnign squid n works grt

 now i would like to know the follwing

 1) does anyone one know of any good antivirus software i could install on
 the centos OS squid server so as to scan for viruses so i cd periodically
 scan the server

 thnks and apprecite

 regards

 fabian




 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Fabian,

Check out ClamAV. Its free and does the job.
www.clamav.net/
Bo

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] find

2008-10-06 Thread MHR
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),

 grep -ri foo dir/to/search/in

 seems much shorter to me.


Without the -H you don't get the file names

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] find

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
MHR wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If you are using GNU grep (well, you are using CentOS),
 
  grep -ri foo dir/to/search/in
 
  seems much shorter to me.
 
 
 Without the -H you don't get the file names

Hu?

| [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v #
| conf.d/ssl.conf:VirtualHost _default_:443
| conf.d/ssl.conf:/VirtualHost  
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -rHi virtu conf* | grep -v #
| conf.d/ssl.conf:VirtualHost _default_:443
| conf.d/ssl.conf:/VirtualHost  

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpVMQekUVj2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Fwd: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core]

2008-10-06 Thread James B. Byrne


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core
From:James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, October 6, 2008 12:26
To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:  John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


On Sun, October 5, 2008 20:39, John Newbigin wrote:
 Also make sure you have the latest firmware and set the hard disk mode
 in the BIOS to Raid (Which will enable AHCI).

 John.

By the time I received this message I had already installed the ia_64
version of CentOS-5.2 with the BIOS set to IDE emulation.  If now I change
the BIOS to use RAID then the system cannot see the SATA drive at all.

Is it possible to change the BIOS setting to RAID and subsequently load
the necessary drivers from the boot DVD without having to reinstall the
entire system?

If so, then what is the procedure?

Regards,

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3



-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] need ur kind advice

2008-10-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Bo Lynch wrote on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:24:59 -0400 (EDT):

 Check out ClamAV. Its free and does the job.
 www.clamav.net/

install via rpmforge.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] find

2008-10-06 Thread MHR
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hu?

 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -ri virtu conf* | grep -v #
 | conf.d/ssl.conf:VirtualHost _default_:443
 | conf.d/ssl.conf:/VirtualHost
 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd]$grep -rHi virtu conf* | grep -v #
 | conf.d/ssl.conf:VirtualHost _default_:443
 | conf.d/ssl.conf:/VirtualHost


Doh!  Of course - -r implies multiple files, so without -h you _will_ get them.

Homer moment.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] find - text

2008-10-06 Thread tony . chamberlain

A while ago I sent mail about wanting to find all files that had a certain
text string in it and changing it to something else.  People mentioned
that there is a system tool to do it (gnome has it too).  I ran this, for
example to find all files WITH prog in the name, and then I did a ps
and I saw simply

 find . -iname '*prog*'

then I did something similar, all file names but with prog in it, and
found basically two lines (one was child process of the other, so I assume
it was a pipe or something):

 find . -type f
 grep -i -c prog

this does a grep for case insensitivity for prog, so basically the tool
uses find and grep.

I could do something like

  find . -type f | 
  while read fil
  do
  sed -i 's/prog/name/g' $f# change prog to name
  done


A couple problems here.  If what I am changing is the same length then it
may be ok.  But consider this quick (example) C program state.c

 int main( int argc, char **argv )
 {
printf( Ohio\n );
 }

if I compile it to state and then print it prints Ohio.  If I do (on the
compiled file state)sed -i 's/Ohio/Utah/' state then it will print
Utah.  However, if I change the length   sed -i 's/Ohio/Michigan/' state
it will of course SIGSEGV because it changed some of the object code.
(Actually even doing the same length can be dangerous).

What I want to do is either provide another option to the find (which I
can'e seem to find), or pipe the files it finds to something like file
to get only ASCII files (non-object code).  However, I am not sure how
to do this.  On most files, the file command will return something with
text in it, but not all files.  For instance, sometimes it returns
application or shell script but it is still OK to do the sed on these.

Is there some easy way to take a file name and determine whether sed -i
can safely be done on it (i.e., it is ASCII and not some sort of binary
file)?


Tony


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 22:10, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Perhaps you should use a distribution that includes all of the
 packages you need rather than trying to bolt a bunch of
 3rd party stuff on to CentOS.

Agreed.

 I install a bunch of 3rd party packages myself, though they
 are all built from source, and all installed/tested via RPM,
 I never, ever directly use 3rd party repositories. Never
 have had a problem. I even download mysql from mysql.com and
 build it from source, even go so far as rebuilding php
 to link against the newer mysql(in CentOS 4's case). No
 problems.

How is this not trying to bolt a bunch of 3rd party stuff on to CentOS?

And I don't agree with you that using 3rd party repositories is not
advisable. Many 3rd party repositories have very high quality
standards and many useful packages. Not using them means a lot more
work in packaging and updating that others will do for you if you use
them.
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] find - text

2008-10-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Well, in your specific case you could replace it only in files that
are *.c or *.h, you can easily use an additional parameter to find
to accomplish that:

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:34,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  find . -type f |
  while read fil
  do
  sed -i 's/prog/name/g' $f# change prog to name
  done

Use instead:

find . -type f -name '*.[ch]' | ...

Maybe not what you're looking for, but from your examples that's how I
would approach it.

HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

2008-10-06 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi,

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:43, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 so maybe I should disable SELinux
 and be done with it.

 That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even installed on any
 of the systems I manage(roughly 350). Not worth the trouble.

That's a very bad advice.

SELinux is very useful as a security measure in Linux, and since RHEL5
(and CentOS 5) it has reached a good balance in terms of usability vs.
security. I admit that making it work under the previous versions was
very tricky, but with CentOS 5 it just works.

Of course you eventually have to tweak it to make it work for 3rd
party programs (such as in the OP's case). In that case, this page may
help you do it:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux

SELinux is certainly complex and there is a steep learning curve, but
it's certainly worth learning how to use it and keeping it enabled.

Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Thanks.. [CentOS] need ur kind advice

2008-10-06 Thread fabian dacunha


Thanks guys

really apprecite ur quick response

regards

Faban


 On Mon, October 6, 2008 12:06 pm, fabian dacunha wrote:
 Dear All,

 apprecite ur kind help n advice

 I have a Centos 5 server running only squid for sometime and its workin
 great.
 i am concerned about security so i have a shorewall firewall on the
 machine runnign squid n works grt

 now i would like to know the follwing

 1) does anyone one know of any good antivirus software i could install
 on
 the centos OS squid server so as to scan for viruses so i cd
 periodically
 scan the server

 thnks and apprecite

 regards

 fabian




 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 Fabian,

 Check out ClamAV. Its free and does the job.
 www.clamav.net/
 Bo

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.





-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: RIP settings for private netblocks

2008-10-06 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote:

 I will deal with NAT issues for these hosts at a later time.  For now I am
 concerned only with hosts that should not reach or be reached from the
 public Internet in any case and therefore do not need a public IP or NAT.

You can accomplish this much easier by simply using
a firewall. I like OpenBSD firewalls in layer 2
bridging mode. Put the firewall in-line between the
router and the rest of the network, no other network
changes needed.

If your not well versed in routing I wouldn't recommend
going around making a bunch of changes to a system that
I assume has been more or less working for more than
a decade.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: OT: RIP settings for private netblocks

2008-10-06 Thread James B. Byrne

On : Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:50:37 +0200, Mr Shunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

[snip]

 Presently the setting for rip is:

 router rip
  version 2
  passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
  network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
  no auto-summary

 is that aaa.bbb.ccc.0 a *public* IP class?

Yes. It is a routable 'c' class address.

 if it is with the conf below:

 router rip
  version 2
  passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
  network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
  network 192.168.0.0
  network 10.0.0.0
  no auto-summary

 you inject private addresses to the other (public?) router...

 if aaa.bbb.ccc.0 is another *private* class the configuration
 should be ok...

 maybe i misunderstood your question ...


This is possibly because I an so unfamiliar with routing that I lack the
terminology to ask it more clearly.

Our internal networks date back to the spring of 1995 and at the time we
used portions of our assigned C class netblock for all hosts.  This
arrangement has survived to the present day.

I wish to move to a private netblock for internal use but I am
operationally constrained to do so gradually.  What I want to do is in the
interim allow host 1 with the public IPv4 addr of aaa.bbb.ccc.171 to
co-exist on the same lan segment as a host with an address of
192.168.2.151 say.  On said segement there is but one gateway to the
Internet, located at IPv4 aaa.bbb.ccc.1.  The rest of the settings are as
in the first example above.  If I add 192.168.0.0 to the list of networks
handled by RIPv2 at the router (and configure the router Eth0 with a
suitable virtual IP from the same network, say: 192.168.71.1) , will
internal traffic originating at a host with an address of 192.168.2.71
reach an internal host at 192.168.61.151 and can 192.168.2.71 also reach
aaa.bbb.ccc.171?

I will deal with NAT issues for these hosts at a later time.  For now I am
concerned only with hosts that should not reach or be reached from the
public Internet in any case and therefore do not need a public IP or NAT.

I do not know if that is any clearer or not.  Basically, I do not wish to
start physically segregating the internal lan into private and public
segments using an internal router.  I want both address spaces to co-exit
on the same switch until the transformation is finalized and then we will
look at whether it makes sense to segregate.

We are taking about dozens of hosts, not thousands.  But we do have legacy
systems that require devoted multiple virtual IPS on a single interface so
the number of IPs in use is several times the number of hosts.

I hope this question makes my desires clearer and provides sufficient
background detail for sensible commentary.

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cebit and Centos

2008-10-06 Thread Chris Geldenhuis

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
  

Didi wrote:


I just read this
http://www.linux-magazine.com/online/news/cebit_open_source_linux_magazine_and_linux_foundation_announce_call_for_projects

Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
  
  

I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit



I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
people are interested, we really might try for a booth there. 


Ralph
  



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

Hi Ralph,

I usually stay in a Bed  Breakfast room in Hannover - much less 
expensive than the hotels. last time I was there (2003) my very nice 
room in near the lake cost 42 Euro per day and included a good 
continental breakfast.


ChrisG
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread Dougal Ballantyne
Hi Kapil,

Are you seeing a segfault and also core dump of the automount process?

Dougal Ballantyne
Axon ITC

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Marcelo M. Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 kapil singh wrote:

 Hello all,

 Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
 nicely with
 centos 5 .

 --
 Thanks and Regards,
 Kapil Singh Kushwah
 Linux System/Network Administrator
 Hotwax Media Inc.
 Indore,(M.P) INDIA


 

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 Hi

 I use CentOS 5.2 (i386) with automount without problems.

 What kind of problems are you having?

 Regards

 Marcelo

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: OT: RIP settings for private netblocks

2008-10-06 Thread James B. Byrne
James B. Byrne wrote:

 You can accomplish this much easier by simply using
 a firewall. I like OpenBSD firewalls in layer 2
 bridging mode. Put the firewall in-line between the
 router and the rest of the network, no other network
 changes needed.

The difficulty with this is that it requires yet another host, a
reconfiguration of the existing wiring plan, and dealing with a number of
other issues which directly arise from the first two requirements.

We already use IPtables, and we already have some of our older hosts
secured behind sshd linux boxes so that network traffic to them is only
carried en clair across direct x-wired patch cables.

 If your not well versed in routing I wouldn't recommend
 going around making a bunch of changes to a system that
 I assume has been more or less working for more than
 a decade.

Which is why I asked the question if by making a single change to the
network parameter of the Cisco Router could I avoid:

1. Physically segmenting my LAN
2. Having to commission an additional host or reconfigure an existing host
to multi-homed.

Routing is something I do not go at very often and I do not trust my
memory for such things in consequence.  The manuals and books that I have
give sketchy coverage of this aspect and use examples much more narrow in
scope than I contemplate.

It would be a gross over-statement to say that I am unfamiliar with the
concepts of routing.  But I am asking for specific guidance on specific
software (CISCO ISO 12.x) and hardware (CISCO 26xx series) from someone
with experience in these matters.  I recognize that this is not the
precise forum to ask, thus the OT.  On the other hand, I trust that my
situation cannot be very dissimilar to those faced previously by many
system administrators who also happen to run CentOS.

Regards,

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core]

2008-10-06 Thread James B. Byrne

 There is no ia64/ CentOS-5.2

x86_64


The substantive question remains unanswered.  Can I install the new disk
drivers for SATA AHCI from the 64 bit CentOS-5.2 boot dvd without having
to reinstall the entire OS or not?

Regards,

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core]

2008-10-06 Thread John R Pierce

James B. Byrne wrote:

There is no ia64/ CentOS-5.2



x86_64


The substantive question remains unanswered.  Can I install the new disk
drivers for SATA AHCI from the 64 bit CentOS-5.2 boot dvd without having
to reinstall the entire OS or not?
  



you probably just need to force them into the initrd, while the system 
is still set to IDE, then set for ahci and reboot, and it likely will work.


however, off the top of my head, I don't remember the correct 
incantation for this also, the precise AHCI SATA driver varies by 
chipset.





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: RIP settings for private netblocks

2008-10-06 Thread Ross Walker
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM, James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On : Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:50:37 +0200, Mr Shunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 [snip]

 Presently the setting for rip is:

 router rip
  version 2
  passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
  network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
  no auto-summary

 is that aaa.bbb.ccc.0 a *public* IP class?

 Yes. It is a routable 'c' class address.

 if it is with the conf below:

 router rip
  version 2
  passive-interface [[FastEthernet]]0/0
  network aaa.bbb.ccc.0
  network 192.168.0.0
  network 10.0.0.0
  no auto-summary

 you inject private addresses to the other (public?) router...

 if aaa.bbb.ccc.0 is another *private* class the configuration
 should be ok...

 maybe i misunderstood your question ...


 This is possibly because I an so unfamiliar with routing that I lack the
 terminology to ask it more clearly.

 Our internal networks date back to the spring of 1995 and at the time we
 used portions of our assigned C class netblock for all hosts.  This
 arrangement has survived to the present day.

 I wish to move to a private netblock for internal use but I am
 operationally constrained to do so gradually.  What I want to do is in the
 interim allow host 1 with the public IPv4 addr of aaa.bbb.ccc.171 to
 co-exist on the same lan segment as a host with an address of
 192.168.2.151 say.  On said segement there is but one gateway to the
 Internet, located at IPv4 aaa.bbb.ccc.1.  The rest of the settings are as
 in the first example above.  If I add 192.168.0.0 to the list of networks
 handled by RIPv2 at the router (and configure the router Eth0 with a
 suitable virtual IP from the same network, say: 192.168.71.1) , will
 internal traffic originating at a host with an address of 192.168.2.71
 reach an internal host at 192.168.61.151 and can 192.168.2.71 also reach
 aaa.bbb.ccc.171?

 I will deal with NAT issues for these hosts at a later time.  For now I am
 concerned only with hosts that should not reach or be reached from the
 public Internet in any case and therefore do not need a public IP or NAT.

 I do not know if that is any clearer or not.  Basically, I do not wish to
 start physically segregating the internal lan into private and public
 segments using an internal router.  I want both address spaces to co-exit
 on the same switch until the transformation is finalized and then we will
 look at whether it makes sense to segregate.

 We are taking about dozens of hosts, not thousands.  But we do have legacy
 systems that require devoted multiple virtual IPS on a single interface so
 the number of IPs in use is several times the number of hosts.

 I hope this question makes my desires clearer and provides sufficient
 background detail for sensible commentary.

You can do this, no prob, make sure the private IPs terminate at the
firewall/proxy with NAT'ing and don't get RIP'd to the edge router
beyond.

I would probably only route 1 set of private IP addresses though,
pick 192.168.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/8, but not both. You can subnet 10.0.0.0
into as many subnets you want with variable subnetting. Use vlans on
the routers/switches, one vlan for the public IPs, one for the private IPs
and as hosts are migrated from public to private IPs you will remove
them from vlan A and add them to vlan B, if you use DHCP it makes
things sooo much easier as all you need to do is change the vlan
assignment.

Here I have a class B allocated from 10.X.X.X for each office site, and
separate class Cs for each network within those sites.

Turn subnet auto-summation off too.

If you want more detailed config info email me off-list.

-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: RIP settings for private netblocks

2008-10-06 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote:

 1. Physically segmenting my LAN
 2. Having to commission an additional host or reconfigure an existing host
 to multi-homed.


That's the beauty of bridging, *NO* changes are required to
your lan. There are no IP addresses on the firewall's interfaces.

Worst case you can disable the firewall by replacing it with
a crossover cable.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Eclipse 3.2.1-19 package on Centos 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread Tom [toms400]
Hi, I'm using Centos 5.2 and trying to use Eclipse's embedded browser without
success.  Could this be due to any of the patches that were commented
out in 3.2.1-18?

When trying to use the embedded browser, I get the error: No more
handles (java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no swt-mozilla-gtk-3235 in
java.library.path).I have a gre.conf, have set MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME,
and LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but continue to get that error.

If you have any ideas, I'd be very grateful.
Thanks
-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cebit and Centos

2008-10-06 Thread Lance Davis

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Chris Geldenhuis wrote:


Ralph Angenendt wrote:



 I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
 Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
 people are interested, we really might try for a booth there.


Last time I went we drove over in a motorhome and slept in the car park 
... in February ...


Cheers
Lance

--
uklinux.net -
The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cebit and Centos

2008-10-06 Thread Karanbir Singh

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
  

I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit


I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
people are interested, we really might try for a booth there. 


If a couple of people want to help out, it should be good for us to get 
a booth there. You want to go ahead and fill out the request form ?


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cebit and Centos

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 Maybe Centos want's to try to get a stand.
   
 I would be willing to help man a booth at CeBit

 I absolutely *hate* CeBit (have you looked at the hotel prices in
 Hannover during CeBit?). Please take this to centos-promo and if enough
 people are interested, we really might try for a booth there. 

 If a couple of people want to help out, it should be good for us to get  
 a booth there. You want to go ahead and fill out the request form ?

Sure, can do that.

Cheers,

Ralph

pgpm4YzOHpX2a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Eclipse 3.2.1-19 package on Centos 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Tom [toms400] wrote:
 Hi, I'm using Centos 5.2 and trying to use Eclipse's embedded browser
 without success.  Could this be due to any of the patches that were
 commented out in 3.2.1-18?

Broken by design:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452113

Cheers,

Ralph

pgpzegu90wsHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mysqld breaks yum, help?

2008-10-06 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 22:10, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 And I don't agree with you that using 3rd party repositories is not
 advisable. Many 3rd party repositories have very high quality
 standards and many useful packages. Not using them means a lot more
 work in packaging and updating that others will do for you if you use
 them.
 http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Probably the majority of the people in this mailing list use one or
more 3rd party repositories. After you read the above, please read
this one too:
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
yum-priorities can help you prevent your box from being hosed. Please use it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Discussion: automount problem in 5.2

2008-10-06 Thread kapil singh
Hello,

I am sending withconfiguration files and details.


On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Dougal Ballantyne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Hi Kapil,

 Are you seeing a segfault and also core dump of the automount process?

 Dougal Ballantyne
 Axon ITC

 On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Marcelo M. Garcia
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  kapil singh wrote:
 
  Hello all,
 
  Automount is not working well with centos 5.2, but the same is working
  nicely with
  centos 5 .
 
  --
  Thanks and Regards,
  Kapil Singh Kushwah
  Linux System/Network Administrator
  Hotwax Media Inc.
  Indore,(M.P) INDIA
 
 
  
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
  Hi
 
  I use CentOS 5.2 (i386) with automount without problems.
 
  What kind of problems are you having?
 
  Regards
 
  Marcelo
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Kapil Singh Kushwah
Linux System/Network Administrator
Hotwax Media Inc.
Indore,(M.P) INDIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied

2008-10-06 Thread Dirk H. Schulz

Ned,

--On 5. Oktober 2008 11:07:54 +0100 Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Dirk H. Schulz wrote:

Hi folks,

I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work
well with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error:

warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied
problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied


- snip


You're correct in your assumption that this is an SELinux issue. You need
to write a custom policy to allow connection and writing to the socket.

How to do this is covered in the SELinux Wiki guide here:

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux#head-faa96b3fdd922004cdb988c1989e56
191c257c01

and luckily for you, the example used is for postgrey/postfix so you can
use the example provided.

Hope that helps.


That did it. Thanks alot!

Dirk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] How to upgrade GNOME in CentOS?

2008-10-06 Thread Sadaruwan Samaraweera
Hi,
I need to know is there a way to upgrade the current version of GNOME to the
newest version ?

-- 
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to upgrade GNOME in CentOS?

2008-10-06 Thread Ross Cavanagh

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:

Hi,
I need to know is there a way to upgrade the current version of GNOME 
to the newest version ?


--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
The gnome website has a fair bit of information about it. For the latest 
versions for your distro you can visit


http://www.gnome.org/~davyd/footware.shtml

if you want to add the latest version, you probably want to check out... 
http://www.gnome.org/projects/garnome/


-Ross-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] vsftpd

2008-10-06 Thread Mad Unix
Hi ALL

I'm using vsftpd as  FTP server, and I'd like to chroot my FTP users
to their home dir. How can I do it? i.e. jailing them in their home
dir...
at the moment I have the following issues the user when they login to
ftp server they go to the main directory /var/ftp/

/etc/passwd
...
sdc:x:501:501::/var/ftp/sdc:/bin/bash
ase:x:502:501::/var/ftp/ase:/bin/bash
jsc:x:503:501::/var/ftp/jsc/:/bin/bash


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ftp]# pwd
/var/ftp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ftp]# ls -al
total 28
drwx--x--x  6 root ftpusers 4096 Oct  6 13:46 .
drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Oct  5 15:42 ..
drwx--  3 ase  ftpusers 4096 Oct  6 20:30 ase
drwx--  3 jsc  ftpusers 4096 Oct  6 17:27 jsc
drwx--  2 pons pons 4096 Oct  6 16:22 pub
drwx--  5 sdc  ftpusers 4096 Oct  6 17:19 sdc

chroot_list_enable=YES
# (default follows)
chroot_list_file=/etc/vsftpd/chroot_list
chroot_local_user=YES
#
# You may activate the -R option to the builtin ls. This is disabled by
# default to avoid remote users being able to cause excessive I/O on large
# sites. However, some broken FTP clients such as ncftp and mirror assume
# the presence of the -R option, so there is a strong case for enabling it.
#ls_recurse_enable=YES
#
# When listen directive is enabled, vsftpd runs in standalone mode and
# listens on IPv4 sockets. This directive cannot be used in conjunction
# with the listen_ipv6 directive.
listen=YES
#
# This directive enables listening on IPv6 sockets. To listen on IPv4 and IPv6
# sockets, you must run two copies of vsftpd whith two configuration files.
# Make sure, that one of the listen options is commented !!
#listen_ipv6=YES

pam_service_name=vsftpd
userlist_enable=YES
tcp_wrappers=YES
###added for TLSand SSL permission
ssl_enable=YES
allow_anon_ssl=NO
force_local_data_ssl=NO
force_local_logins_ssl=YES
ssl_tlsv1=YES
ssl_sslv2=YES
ssl_sslv3=YES
rsa_cert_file=/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.pem
rsa_private_key_file=/etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.pem
local_root=/var/ftp
#userlist_file=/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
userlist_file=/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
#userlist_file=/etc/vsftpd/user_list
pasv_enable=YES
anon_max_rate=10485760
local_max_rate=0
max_clients=500
max_per_ip=4
passwd_chroot_enable=YES
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos