[CentOS] [WTA] Automatically blocking on failed login
Hello All, I had problems with the security server, the server is frequently attacked using bruteforce attacks. Is there an application that can perform automatic blocking when there are failed login to the ports smtp, pop3 port, and others? I am currently using CentOS 5.5 in some servers Thanks in advanced... -- -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
Thanks for the help, a solution to this problem is to update the bios, and after using the newest version of bios I can use AHCI mode on the sata controller, and indeed this is the problem. But I had to install windows server to update the bios, then installed again using Linux. -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id On 05/12/2010 02:52 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 11:38 +0530 schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: Greetings, On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, David Suhendrikda...@pnyet.web.id wrote: @Rajagopal: This result: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda5 /dev/hda5: Timing buffered disk reads:8 MB in 3.08 seconds = 2.60 MB/sec First of all it should report /dev/sda and not /dev/hda It is a horrible speed for modern disks. Modern SATA disks show around 50-80 MB/Sec I am sure ide0noprobe=no (or zero -- check docs) in the kernel mline will surely speed up in addition to other suggestions will dramatically speed up. As will setting the operation mode in mode in BIOS from compatible to SATA. First thing i do on all HP servers when they are shipped. Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
I tried to change the configuration of a compatible sata in bios to AHCI, but my hard drive is not detected. I do not have a smart array controller. I do this AHCI features need smart array controller? I've been looking for a reference, but did not find. Any suggestions? -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id On 05/12/2010 02:52 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 11:38 +0530 schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: Greetings, On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, David Suhendrikda...@pnyet.web.id wrote: @Rajagopal: This result: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda5 /dev/hda5: Timing buffered disk reads:8 MB in 3.08 seconds = 2.60 MB/sec First of all it should report /dev/sda and not /dev/hda It is a horrible speed for modern disks. Modern SATA disks show around 50-80 MB/Sec I am sure ide0noprobe=no (or zero -- check docs) in the kernel mline will surely speed up in addition to other suggestions will dramatically speed up. As will setting the operation mode in mode in BIOS from compatible to SATA. First thing i do on all HP servers when they are shipped. Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
@Rajagopal: This result: # hdparm -tT /dev/hda5 /dev/hda5: Timing cached reads: 9952 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4980.51 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:8 MB in 3.08 seconds = 2.60 MB/sec @Timo: 458930-B21 HP 750GB 7.2k HP MDL SATA I don't have idea for this case :( -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id On 05/10/2010 03:19 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus David Suhendrik spake: Dear All, I've a new server HP DL 180 G6 with quad core processor, ram 4 GB, hdd (WDC) 1x750GB Sata. I was confused when installing CentOS 5 64bit on that server, I take about two hours to format the ext3 file system. is this normal? Hi, could you provide the exact model number of that HD? I think it could be a 4K issue. We ran into this, too, some months ago: http://www.hv23.net/2010/02/wd10ears-performance-larger-block-size-issues4k/ HTH, Timo Because when I compare with other sata hard drive in another computer file system format is not too long like that. And when I copy the file on the local hard drive for longer time when compared with the copy of the file on another server. How to debug on this issue? -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL58GGfg746kcGBOwRAj/DAKC1qjx6s5KsxrfogqFQDaX8DxiGYACdEgzi zQbtaxXCAKLsd2PZNyMTwXw= =yg+z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Formatting file system too slow on CentOS
Dear All, I've a new server HP DL 180 G6 with quad core processor, ram 4 GB, hdd (WDC) 1x750GB Sata. I was confused when installing CentOS 5 64bit on that server, I take about two hours to format the ext3 file system. is this normal? Because when I compare with other sata hard drive in another computer file system format is not too long like that. And when I copy the file on the local hard drive for longer time when compared with the copy of the file on another server. How to debug on this issue? -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?
Check sendmail or other mta service's and shutdowk / kill process... Regards, David - Original Message - From: Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2009 1:44:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help? On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, ML wrote: Hi All, Is anyone versed in Zimbra? I have most things working except some MTA issue. I tried posting on the Zimbra forums after reading the docs, but my post was labeled as SPAM and the moderators have not replied to my private message to get my post reviewed. Who uses this type of method for getting help anyway? Aren't the days of Bulletin Board BBS's gone? Anyway... I installed ZCS for the first time today. Most things are running except I cannot send or receive mail. I get MTA errors. I assume that it is not running. When I send I get unable to connect to MTA. How do I diagnose the issue? The ``already in use'' message below probably means that you have the sendmail or some other MTA already running on the system which needs to be disabled. It's been a while since I looked at Zimbra, but I do know it wants to take over the system, using it's own MTA (Postfix), OpenLdap, MySQL, and IMAP so these must be disabled. in /var/log/zimbra.log: Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9282]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/spool Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9289]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/main.cf Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9290]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/master.cf Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9291]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/master.cf.in Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9294]: warning: not owned by postfix: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/./spool/maildrop/E18EC1C1048D Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9295]: warning: not owned by postfix: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/./spool/pid/master.pid Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9308]: starting the Postfix mail system Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/master[9309]: fatal: bind 0.0.0.0 port 25: Address already in use Nov 2 17:57:28 indie saslauthd[9316]: detach_tty : master pid is: 9316 Nov 2 17:57:28 indie saslauthd[9316]: ipc_init : listening on socket: /opt/zimbra/cyrus-sasl-2.1.23.3z/state/mux Nov 2 17:57:28 indie zimbramon[2574]: 2574:info: Starting stats via zmcontrol Nov 2 17:57:59 indie zmmailboxdmgr[10822]: status requested Nov 2 17:57:59 indie zmmailboxdmgr[10822]: status OK Nov 2 17:57:59 indie zmmailboxdmgr[10894]: status requested Nov 2 17:57:59 indie zmmailboxdmgr[10894]: status OK Nov 3 01:58:00 indie postfix/postqueue[10943]: fatal: Queue report unavailable - mail system is down Nov 2 17:58:09 indie zmmailboxdmgr[11484]: status requested Nov 2 17:58:09 indie zmmailboxdmgr[11484]: status OK I have not done anything with Postfix at allU am sure it is the Fatal Bind message above, do I need to configure Postfix? I thought Zimbra did that on install? -Jason ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Bill -- INTERNET: b...@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792 The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. -- John Stuart Mill, 1859 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Running SSH on a different port
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers See unassigned port, and You should to use it Need more secure only allow access ssh from intranet or by VPN. CMIIW Regards, David ./nobody Michael Kress wrote: ML wrote: So I added Port 2977 Under Host * So I have: Host * Port 2977 Never post your real port number here. Otherwise you don't need to hide it from the public. Right? ;-) Regards Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.4 DVD
Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit Regards, David ./nobody mark wrote: Robert wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Matt wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so excuse me if this has been answered My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially announced the other day. Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso, with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...? The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The ISOs are based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released after the initial release of RHEL 5.4. But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD version? Dates aside, the official Release Notes at http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4 contains checksums for each of the isos. It seems to me that you should be able to apply those md5 and sha1 sums to the DVD.iso file, no matter the source, and be reasonably comfortable with the result. Already did all that - I was trying to minimize updates, since we'll be using the DVD for a while mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backing up a centos serveR? how to ? Newbie question..
may be rsync help You Or u can try raid 0[mirrorig] for replicate failover triying drbd and heartbeat but I've tested and unsuccessfull on my zimbra machines Regards, David ./nobody John Doe wrote: From: RoLaNd RoLaNd r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com excuse my newbie question but how can i backup my centos server? i have a dozzen of virtual hosts over it as well as substantial database entries.. i've backed up the following directories using rsync: workspace/ /etc/httpd/ /etc/apache-tomcat-6.0.20/ /usr/lib/mysql/ /var/lib/mysql For mysql, I would use mysqldump instead of rsyncing the whole mysql directories... Something like: mysqldump DATABASE | gzip -9 DATABASE-DATE.gz JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't download large files
Tait Clarridge wrote: :( wget? I've tried download using other utilities on my windows pc's, on my desktop [Ubuntu] I using rsync and scp to download, but get same problem :( Btw John, thank You for your advise... Really confused :( What filesystem type are you attempting to download to on each OS? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Tait, On my server I've LVM with ext3 as filesystem are used. I've tested download from notebook (ubuntu, ext3) and PC (windows, ntfs). But still problem here :( -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't download large files
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: David Suhendrik wrote: John R Pierce wrote: David Suhendrik wrote: Hi All, I've finish setup vsftpd as anonymous FTP server, and I also setup apache for web service on my linux box. yesterday, I'm tried to put CentOS 64 bit image (.iso) size is 4.5GB and tried to download from my computer. Apache and vsftpd work great, but I get some problem with download size.. When I download CentOS iso image [4.5GB], download process always stopped at 4.2GB with errors: == SIZE CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... 4557455360 == PASV ... done.== REST 4294967295 ... done. == RETR CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... done. Length: 4557455360 (4.2G), 262488065 (250M) remaining 94% [++ ] 4,294,967,295 --.-K/s in 0.001s CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso: File too large, closing control connection. *Well, FWIW, 2^32 = 4 ,294 ,967 ,296* I've used SCP on 4GB files without a problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi John, I've tried using rsync and scp but the problem has no left and make me confused... Any idea? And I need to know cause of my problem :( Hi Just curious, are you using ext2? If I remember right, a long time ago, I had similar problems with Debian. Regards mg. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Marcelo, my linux box using LVM and ext3 as filesystem. I don't get any issue about this... Please tell me how to fixed -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't download large files
Frank Thommen wrote: :( wget? I've tried download using other utilities on my windows pc's, on my desktop [Ubuntu] I using rsync and scp to download, but get same problem :( Btw John, thank You for your advise... Really confused :( This might be either a problem on the server you are downloading from (try an other one) or maybe of a firewall at your site (we had similiar problems and corrupted packages due to a firewall bug). Cheers frank ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Frank, I've iptables running on my server..., When I tried to shutdown iptables and download again still after 4.1 GB, download can't continue and file unusable... -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Can't download large files
Hi All, I've finish setup vsftpd as anonymous FTP server, and I also setup apache for web service on my linux box. yesterday, I'm tried to put CentOS 64 bit image (.iso) size is 4.5GB and tried to download from my computer. Apache and vsftpd work great, but I get some problem with download size.. When I download CentOS iso image [4.5GB], download process always stopped at 4.2GB with errors: == SIZE CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... 4557455360 == PASV ... done.== REST 4294967295 ... done. == RETR CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... done. Length: 4557455360 (4.2G), 262488065 (250M) remaining 94% [++ ] 4,294,967,295 --.-K/s in 0.001s CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso: File too large, closing control connection. -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't download large files
John R Pierce wrote: David Suhendrik wrote: Hi All, I've finish setup vsftpd as anonymous FTP server, and I also setup apache for web service on my linux box. yesterday, I'm tried to put CentOS 64 bit image (.iso) size is 4.5GB and tried to download from my computer. Apache and vsftpd work great, but I get some problem with download size.. When I download CentOS iso image [4.5GB], download process always stopped at 4.2GB with errors: == SIZE CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... 4557455360 == PASV ... done.== REST 4294967295 ... done. == RETR CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ... done. Length: 4557455360 (4.2G), 262488065 (250M) remaining 94% [++ ] 4,294,967,295 --.-K/s in 0.001s CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso: File too large, closing control connection. *Well, FWIW, 2^32 = 4 ,294 ,967 ,296* I've used SCP on 4GB files without a problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi John, I've tried using rsync and scp but the problem has no left and make me confused... Any idea? And I need to know cause of my problem :( -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't download large files
John R Pierce wrote: Hi John, I've tried using rsync and scp but the problem has no left and make me confused... Any idea? And I need to know cause of my problem :( google seemed to indicate tis a WGET problem, not a server problem. wget's from the vinage of RHEL4 at least seemed to have problems with REST (resumes) in the 2GB range causing issues at 4GB. dunno why, didn't dig any deeper. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos :( wget? I've tried download using other utilities on my windows pc's, on my desktop [Ubuntu] I using rsync and scp to download, but get same problem :( Btw John, thank You for your advise... Really confused :( -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
The sound is bad, / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance is the only one, who can make active changes to the centos.org domain, as he “owns it”. Nobody else in the team is able to add nameservers, for instance. Recently he put an anonymizing service on the domain, so that nobody from the outside can see who that domain belongs to. / So sad.. -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
Ralph Angenendt wrote: On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote: The sound is bad, / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance is the only one, who can make active changes to the centos.org domain, as he “owns it”. Nobody else in the team is able to add nameservers, for instance. Recently he put an anonymizing service on the domain, so that nobody from the outside can see who that domain belongs to. / Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want to check dates on things you mail somewhere. Ralph ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks Ralph, I'm post here, just for make sure... Andd may be anyone don't know about issue.. I love CentOS, and not interest other distro's. -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
Christoph Maser wrote: Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt: On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:43 +0700, David Suhendrik wrote: The sound is bad, / Lance vanished from the project some time in 2008. Everybody needs time off from projects from time to time, so there was no real need to worry about that. What there was to worry about is the following: Lance is the only one, who can make active changes to the centos.org domain, as he “owns it”. Nobody else in the team is able to add nameservers, for instance. Recently he put an anonymizing service on the domain, so that nobody from the outside can see who that domain belongs to. / Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want to check dates on things you mail somewhere. Ralph Btw the homepage says: More information will follow soon. [..] Last Update: August 1, 2009 04:34 UTC by Donavan Nelson Today is September 14th, so what does soon mean here? Chris financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos =D, Someone make me confused, and just a make sure here... I'm so sorry for this... -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
Ralph Angenendt wrote: On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:01 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote: Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt: Ummm. That mostly has been resolved around a month ago, you might want to check dates on things you mail somewhere. Btw the homepage says: More information will follow soon. [..] Last Update: August 1, 2009 04:34 UTC by Donavan Nelson Today is September 14th, so what does soon mean here? 5.3 soon? :) Ralph ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I'm litle [kids] hihihih -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Remote backup of server
Les Mikesell wrote: Alan McKay wrote: Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet, but you might want to have a look at a product called BackupPC, which is based on rsync but puts a really nice front end on it. Not sure if it can work over SSH though. Just read the fine manual to find out. Yes, backuppc can work with or without ssh - and besides hard-linking the identical files it also compresses them. May be anyone using Clustring metode an improving DRBD and HA for this case? -- no Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
Title: no Hi All, I'm just tried to install and build replicate failover PDC using DRBD and HA, but i can't load DRBD kernel module. Now i'm using CentOS 5.3 up to date. This DRBD's installed: kmod-drbd83-xen-8.3.2-6.el5_3 kmod-drbd83-PAE-8.3.2-6.el5_3 drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 kmod-drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 Anyone resolved this? Thanks before... -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
Title: no Alan Sparks wrote: David Suhendrik wrote: Hi All, I'm just tried to install and build replicate failover PDC using DRBD and HA, but i can't load DRBD kernel module. Now i'm using CentOS 5.3 up to date. This DRBD's installed: /kmod-drbd83-xen-8.3.2-6.el5_3 kmod-drbd83-PAE-8.3.2-6.el5_3 drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 kmod-drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3 /Anyone resolved this? Thanks before... -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Way not enough info in your message to answer you. Have you created your /etc/drbd.conf files? Are you running the 'service drbd start'? What error message if any do you see? Anything in syslogs? More details please. -Alan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks Alan, This is error message when start service DRBD $ sudo /etc/init.d/drbd start Starting DRBD resources: Can not load the drbd module. I don't get any error message, and i think problem is DRBD kernel module, not ?? $ sudo cat /proc/drbd cat: /proc/drbd: No such file or directory -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
Alan Sparks wrote: David Suhendrik wrote: Thanks Alan, This is error message when start service DRBD $ sudo /etc/init.d/drbd start Starting DRBD resources: Can not load the drbd module. I don't get any error message, and i think problem is DRBD kernel module, not ?? $ sudo cat /proc/drbd cat: /proc/drbd: No such file or directory -- Regards, David And you've checked dmesg, and /var/log/messages? And you created a correct /etc/drbd.conf? What have you actually done to this point? -Alan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Alan, Please let me know your estimate? Im sure with my drbd.conf and i don't get any message about drbd both on dmesg and message. I concern with this error message: $ sudo /etc/init.d/drbd start Starting DRBD resources: Can not load the drbd module. Indicate if DRBD module not loaded by kernel, may be missing module or anything i don't know..., what do you think? -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM, David Suhendrikda...@pnyet.web.id wrote:
Akemi,
$ sudo rpm -qa --qf %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n kernel\* |
sort
kernel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i386
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
$ sudo rpm -qa --qf %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n | grep drbd
drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3.i386
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name drbd.ko`
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 242152 Sep 3 11:22
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5PAE/kernel/drivers/block/drbd.ko
That's all, next?
You missed 2 commands:
uname -mri
/sbin/modinfo drbd
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ok, i;m sorry =D
$ sudo uname -mri
Password:
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5PAE i686 i386
$ /sbin/modinfo drbd
modinfo: could not find module drbd
So?
--
Regards,
David
./nobody
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem kernel module DRBD on CentOS 5.3
Alan Sparks wrote:
David Suhendrik wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:22 PM, David Suhendrikda...@pnyet.web.id wrote:
Akemi,
$ sudo rpm -qa --qf %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n kernel\* |
sort
kernel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i386
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.i686
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5.i686
$ sudo rpm -qa --qf %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n | grep drbd
drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3.i386
ls -l `find /lib/modules -name drbd.ko`
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 242152 Sep 3 11:22
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5PAE/kernel/drivers/block/drbd.ko
That's all, next?
You missed 2 commands:
uname -mri
/sbin/modinfo drbd
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ok, i;m sorry =D
$ sudo uname -mri
Password:
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5PAE i686 i386
$ /sbin/modinfo drbd
modinfo: could not find module drbd
So?
Based on this and earlier emails, it appears you've got a lot of
confusion on where the modules are installed. Your running kernel is
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5PAE, but the module is installed under
2.6.18-128.1.16.el5PAE (an older kernel).
First suggestion is remove the kmod-drbd modules you've previously
installed (perhaps before a kernel update?) and reinstall the
kmod-drbd83-PAE package. Try:
yum remove kmod-drbd83-xen kmod-drbd83-PAE kmod-drbd83
yum install kmod-drbd83-PAE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
All,
Many thanks for many suggestions
Now drbd can load and chould start
This is my result:
$ sudo rpm -qa | grep kernel
Password:
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
$ uname -r
2.6.18-128.7.1.el5PAE
$ sudo rpm -qa | grep drbd
kmod-drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3
kmod-drbd83-PAE-8.3.2-6.el5_3
drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3
kmod-drbd83-xen-8.3.2-6.el5_3
$ sudo locate drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.14.el5PAE/weak-updates/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5PAE/kernel/drivers/block/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.16.el5PAE/weak-updates/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.2.1.el5PAE/weak-updates/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.4.1.el5PAE/weak-updates/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.7.1.el5/extra/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.7.1.el5PAE/extra/drbd83/drbd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen/extra/drbd83/drbd.ko
$ cat /proc/drbd
version: 8.3.2 (api:88/proto:86-90)
GIT-hash: dd7b86d4bff5ca8c94234ce840e build by
mockbu...@v20z-x86-64.home.local, 2009-08-29 14:02:48
Ok, next step i'll configure both node and hopefully for next support
after i ask, i'll using search engine before ask..., anyway really
apreciated for Milist and Alan, Wes, Akemi and all participants
I love CentOS full =D
--
Regards,
David
./nobody
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.4 is out!
Christopher Chan wrote: Obligatory: When will Centos 5.4 be ready? /me goes down into reinforced concrete bunker and locks all hatches and doors. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos / *RHEL 5.4 released / CentOS 5.4 schedule*/ /Hello, It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html And before you ask: CentOS 5.4 will be released in 2-4 weeks or so, when it's ready Pasi Kärkkäinen/ Confused, and ready for upgrading =D -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?
Title: no Dear All, I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora, hopefully this isn't make a flame, and just to curious.. Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^' -- Regards, David ./nobody ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
