[CentOS] Chroot Install
Good Morning, I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is detected correctly as ide_cf and all partitions are shown. But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia ide installation i am searching for a way to either add these, or to prepare the device from my box within a chroot environment. Any ideas? Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS automatically blocks port 80 out-of-the-box
David Lemcoe wrote on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:12:33 -0400: So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry. Yes, this message contains in-reply-to/references. The others did not. Which means that there is no threading available for them. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with browser
Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote: Hello everyone I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete system update of 71 applications recently and after the update completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot browse get error domain not found, besides ftping is working fine web servers are working fine how can i fix this or roll back to my previous configuration of system. You should examine the log files in /var/log/maillog, isolate the exact error message, and then post it. Assuming you're using sendmail, I would check the file /etc/mail/sendmail.cf for the value of the relay # Smart relay host (may be null) DS and see if it's set a value which makes sense for your situation. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS automatically blocks port 80 out-of-the-box
David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote: Let me clarify. When I install the web server packages on a Cent install. You have to do that yourself. You know, do what a sysadmin does? :-) Glenn --Original Message-- From: Brian Mathis Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS Mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list Sent: Apr 7, 2009 19:00 Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS automatically blocks port 80 out-of-the-box On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, David M Lemcoe Jr. fo...@lemcoe.com wrote: Maybe I just haven't installed enough distros, but the times I've installed CentOS, I've had to remember that by default, iptables is blocking inbound port 80 requests. This leads me to believe that I have a non-OS firewall error because I can ping but not http request. Is there a particular reason for this? Or is it a fail on my end? Thanks, David Not every server is a web server. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
Craig White wrote: doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 That mostly looks to be a waste of time to me, specially given that Red Hat have made it public that FreeIPA might not really ever be a RHEL product line, and if it does make it, the packaging format etc will be very different from whats out there at the moment. And to the idiot who wrote that article on howtoforge : ( how do they find such brain dead morons ? ) directly url'ing the testing repo is really not recommended. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
From: Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me... Same here. New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side makes the separation between (light) windows and a (dark) desktop less clear... No body complained when the graphics were in testing and posted on the list. So a majority of desktop users must like it... Anyway, desktops tastes vary a lot from people to people; you cannot please everybody. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS automatically blocks port 80 out-of-the-box
David Lemcoe wrote: So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry. as Kai already pointed out - it has the in-reply-to headers, so thats one issue fixed. Would still be nice if you could trim your posts. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 3rd party DNS
Dnk wrote: Please reply off list as this is ot from CentOS. ... so you should use the [OT] tag in the subject line - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with browser
From: Tariq Ismail Dalvi tariqda...@gmail.com I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete system update of 71 applications recently and after the update completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot browse get error domain not found, besides ftping is working fine web servers are working fine how can i fix this or roll back to my previous configuration of system. Do you have a caching dns? Did you check /etc/resolv.conf? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Issues with vsftpd install
After taking forever to update lists, it worked just fine :) thanks! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:54 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Issues with vsftpd install ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Scott Silva wrote: on 4-6-2009 6:50 AM John Doe spake the following: Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me... Same here. New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side makes the separation between (light) windows and a (dark) desktop less clear... JD No body complained when the graphics were in testing and posted on the list. Unfortunately I missed it. :( ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS automatically blocks port 80 out-of-the-box
So now I know to use the GMail app for Blackberry. Nice to know. On 4/8/09, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: David Lemcoe wrote: So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry. as Kai already pointed out - it has the in-reply-to headers, so thats one issue fixed. Would still be nice if you could trim your posts. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500: According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on x86 and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf And as I already mentioned in my first posting this file *got* touched. The last modified date got changed, but not the file itself. Comparing it with a file on another machine doesn't reveaL any obvious differences. Specifically, the default entry that should get used as a template is exactly the same, even with the tabs, only the root path is different. Comparing the /boot directories I recognize now that I have 3 kernels left on a machine where it worked, but 4 on the machine where grub.conf didn't get updated. This is obviously not set in /etc/sysconfig/kernel. Is this a yum setting? I remember there is configuration how many kernels to keep, but I can't find it. /etc/yum.conf The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem, kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3. Kai -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
I have heard rumours from some Red Hat employees that IPA will be integrated into Spacewalk this was about 1.5 months ago which would also make sense since Spacewalk is supposed to be their single point of management tool. But as I said it's rumours. Regards Per Qvindesland --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA FROM: Fabian Arrotin TO: CentOS mailing list DATE: 08-04-2009 13:26 Craig White wrote: doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 which I'm not totally adverse to doing but I have to ask, is there something packaged? (I've looked in 'testing' and in 'extras' and in epel) Has anyone followed some other instructions? Craig I spoke with Simo Sorce at the Fosdem event regarding that (having IPA/FreeIPA rpms sitting in the Extras repository) Due to the fact that Red Hat made it clear now that the actual RHEIPA will be discontinued (at least in its actual form and will probably change to something else ...) we still don't know what direction to take. Rebuilding FreeIPA is probably possible too but how long will that be possible ? FreeIPA isn't looking at being backward compatible and don't focus on RHEL interopability. It can probably work for a certain time, but surely not as long as an Enterprise timelife ... That's maybe worth discussing it though. On the other hand, centos-ds is in the testing repo for a while and there were not a lot of feedback : the plan is/was to move it to extras when enough testing/reports have hit the -devel list ... -- -- Fabian Arrotin idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` test -z $idea echo sorry, init 6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Chroot Install
Marcus Moeller wrote: But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia ide installation i am searching for a way to either add these, or to prepare the device from my box within a chroot environment. What drivers / modules are these ? - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Issues with vsftpd install
David Lemcoe wrote: When I went yum install vsftpd.i386, I get this: TypeError: unsubscriptable object From what I can see, this looks like an error with Python 2.4, but I don't know what to do Any help? Run yum clean metadata and try again. Ralph pgpZAvzOQUJfE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Chroot Install
Marcus Moeller wrote: Good Morning, I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is detected correctly as ide_cf and all partitions are shown. But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia ide installation i am searching for a way to either add these, or to prepare the device from my box within a chroot environment. Any ideas? Best Regards Marcus Hi This may be of interest to you: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall I haven't gotten around to fixing up some of the remarks made by others, but you should get the general idea. Glenn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror
Blake Hudson wrote: Google indicates Requested Range Not Satisfiable is actually an HTTP error (not specific to yum). The description of the error indicates that my browser (yum) requested a segment of the file that does not exist... e.g, bytes 10-1000 of a 100 byte file. I'm thinking that this file is possibly corrupt or the mirrors think the file is larger than it actually is? just a guess... or there is a proxy ( even a transparent one ) that isnt playing nice. perhaps shift to using only ftp:// mirrors, is one option - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:26 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: Craig White wrote: doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 which I'm not totally adverse to doing but I have to ask, is there something packaged? (I've looked in 'testing' and in 'extras' and in epel) Has anyone followed some other instructions? Craig I spoke with Simo Sorce at the Fosdem event regarding that (having IPA/FreeIPA rpms sitting in the Extras repository) Due to the fact that Red Hat made it clear now that the actual RHEIPA will be discontinued (at least in its actual form and will probably change to something else ...) we still don't know what direction to take. Rebuilding FreeIPA is probably possible too but how long will that be possible ? FreeIPA isn't looking at being backward compatible and don't focus on RHEL interopability. It can probably work for a certain time, but surely not as long as an Enterprise timelife ... That's maybe worth discussing it though. On the other hand, centos-ds is in the testing repo for a while and there were not a lot of feedback : the plan is/was to move it to extras when enough testing/reports have hit the -devel list ... obviously Simo is in a position to know about these things. I guess the thing that surprises me is that I went to the Red Hat road show last September and they were promoting FreeIPA as the up and coming technology and so I was rather shocked that it seemed impossible (to me anyway) to build a reasonably current version on CentOS (and by extension, RHEL). I will install CentOS-DS but I suspect that what I will find is that it is a stable version of Fedora-DS which is fine, but I have Fedora-DS running somewhere else already and by itself, it didn't give me any goosebumps and was more painful to setup than OpenLDAP. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:24 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Craig White wrote: doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 That mostly looks to be a waste of time to me, specially given that Red Hat have made it public that FreeIPA might not really ever be a RHEL product line, and if it does make it, the packaging format etc will be very different from whats out there at the moment. And to the idiot who wrote that article on howtoforge : ( how do they find such brain dead morons ? ) directly url'ing the testing repo is really not recommended. I just sort of used that as a guideline and used EPEL first, Fedora-10 source second for packages to try to build because of things I noticed in the changelogs, etc. I managed to get all the requisites handled except for popt-devel which I discussed but that didn't seem to be the deal breaker. Now that I recognize that the current version of freeipa wasn't meant to be built on RHEL, I will change course because I don't want to make that my mission if they don't. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: Craig White schrieb: Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to justfiy. In that case, shelling out the 7-something grand for RHE-IPA is probably also not an option, I assume. Reminds me of the old joke whose punchline goes something like, we've already determined what you are and now we're just haggling over the price. I myself have an older server which doesn't support hardware virtualization. Perhaps you're right, I set up something in virtualization and use Fedora but the churn rate of Fedora is just too much, especially for an authentication server. But maybe this is of help: http://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 I listed that URL in my first post on this thread. I used that as a semi-guide but got build requisites from EPEL Fedora-10-SRPMS instead just to have a shot at building 1.2.0 instead of the 1.0.0 version discussed on that page. Thanks Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm
Hi, I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing. Thanks, Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm
Jeff Fisher wrote: Hi, I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing. Thanks, Jeff SRPMs are syncing to mirrors and some packages are still missing (for example anaconda) ... they'll land on the mirrors very soon [TM] -- -- Fabian Arrotin idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` test -z $idea echo sorry, init 6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT iSCSI best practices
Hi, I have an HP MSA 2000i as SAN (iSCSI) and since I'm starting with SANs, I'm seeking for advice. We are currently using HP Proliant 380 G5 + MSA 70 (SAS, direct-attached storage) for our production servers. At first, I thought I'd be using the SAN only for non-critical operations, like temporary additional storage for disk-based backups and snapshots, so I planned on using my existing network equipement to connect the SAN. Now I'd like to use it as storage for some blade servers that I want to use for virtualisation, so reliability is more important. I'd just like to evaluate the risk, to make sure I plan correctly. The SAN is a dual controller, dual-port, with a mix of RAID10 and RAID 50 arrays, so this is pretty solid. However, if I'm using only one switch to connect the initiators to this SAN, is it more risky than relying on the non-redundant RAID controllers that are in my HP servers? If it is recommended that I use multipathing, I guess that means 2 switches, additionnal nics but also another interconnect in the blade enclosure? If you need more information, just let me know :). Thanks in advance, Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iFolder on Centos
I tried it a year or so ago and had some luck building version 3.6, but was having issues with the web admin bombing out trying to administer users. What I remember from then was I pulled in a bit of the mono stuff from fedora, pulling in dependencies as I found them from fedora or openSUSE (if needed). To avoid the trouble it would probably be simpler to run openSUSE 10.3 in a virtual machine and install it on there as there are released packages for that version of the 3.7.2 version. There is a guide on how to build install it on ubuntu ... this should at least give some clues as to what the dependencies are and any gotchas. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/iFolderEnterpriseServer Regards, Paul On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote: On 7-Apr-09, at 6:39 PM, Jeremy Rosengren jeremy.roseng...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:01 PM, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone had a go with the iFolder stuff on Centos 5? I saw there used to be repos for Centos 4, but those are out of date. Didn't iFolder die a long time ago? -- j ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos They resurrected it, new version, new site, etc. D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iFolder on Centos
Doh, I could not find the source code on the www.ifolder.com website for the current version ... the only place I could find recent source code was the opensuse build factory. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dl9pf/openSUSE_10.3/src/ Anybody have a link to the sources they are distributing on the iFolder website, I would be interested in seeing. Regards, Paul On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Paul Berger subso...@dimpixels.org wrote: I tried it a year or so ago and had some luck building version 3.6, but was having issues with the web admin bombing out trying to administer users. What I remember from then was I pulled in a bit of the mono stuff from fedora, pulling in dependencies as I found them from fedora or openSUSE (if needed). To avoid the trouble it would probably be simpler to run openSUSE 10.3 in a virtual machine and install it on there as there are released packages for that version of the 3.7.2 version. There is a guide on how to build install it on ubuntu ... this should at least give some clues as to what the dependencies are and any gotchas. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/iFolderEnterpriseServer Regards, Paul On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote: On 7-Apr-09, at 6:39 PM, Jeremy Rosengren jeremy.roseng...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:01 PM, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone had a go with the iFolder stuff on Centos 5? I saw there used to be repos for Centos 4, but those are out of date. Didn't iFolder die a long time ago? -- j ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos They resurrected it, new version, new site, etc. D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: Craig White schrieb: Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is 50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to justfiy. In that case, shelling out the 7-something grand for RHE-IPA is probably also not an option, I assume. Reminds me of the old joke whose punchline goes something like, we've already determined what you are and now we're just haggling over the price. I myself have an older server which doesn't support hardware virtualization. Perhaps you're right, I set up something in virtualization and use Fedora but the churn rate of Fedora is just too much, especially for an authentication server. But maybe this is of help: http://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5 I listed that URL in my first post on this thread. I used that as a semi-guide but got build requisites from EPEL Fedora-10-SRPMS instead just to have a shot at building 1.2.0 instead of the 1.0.0 version discussed on that page. Thanks Craig I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball. I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am missing the bits that glue it all together. The actual core services (LDAP (either variant) Kerberos PAM samba etc) are simple enough to install on CentOS but the stuff that makes it just work is very difficult for me to get my head around and thus I've never actually got a setup working well enough to risk on my clients. The excellent how-to for amavis http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd is just wonderful. Congratulations and thanks to the author - it just works. We need more of this!! Back to secure authentication and having a single (replicated) place for all the users/groups/policy It seems enterprises have the bucks and folk to learn all the mumbo-jumbo needed to get it working, or the other scenario is integrating with microsoft based ads, neither of which fits my needs. I have purchased text books on LDAP etc and still cannot get a recipe that works for a small enterprise with maybe two or three servers, one or two locations and less than 50 people. I end up doing all the admin by hand - samba is working, the clients can simply log in once on their windoze machine but oh the back ground work to keep it going.sigh. Any good documents or apps out there? Rob begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:rkam...@kampensonline.com tel;work:407-896-9556 x6344 tel;fax:407-896-7607 tel;home:407-876-4854 tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:01:43 -0400: Hmmm... Maybe the *64 systems are different? No, they are the same in this respect. I'm not seeing any difference. There is a difference between systems (no matter which arch) when the /etc/grub.conf symlink got created. On all my systems it seems to be identical in date with the grub files in /boot/grub which seems to be the date of installation. But on the system I have this problem it's some months later. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Chroot Install
Dear Glenn, This may be of interest to you: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall I haven't gotten around to fixing up some of the remarks made by others, but you should get the general idea. Thanks for that. I am going to check and maybe fix some of the topics if it's okay for you. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:39:27 -0400: The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem, kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3. It seems to default to kernel* as I have clearly seen xen kernels announced for removal. All the yum.conf files are the same on my machines. I lied about what I wrote about the kernels that got kept. It's always 5 on the amchiens that have existed for some time. This fits with the installonly_limit = 5 in all yum.conf files. On the one machine with the problem it's 4 kernels, I think it hasn't reached more yet. Anyway, it remains a mystery why grub.conf didn't get updated here. I will check again with next kernel ... Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.3 samba: getent does not return data from the active directory (ads)
Have you browsed the LDAP entries in ActiveDirectory to see if they match similar entries for working windows hosts. Under the computer entry, look carefully at dnsHostname and servicePrincipalName. For a server, there are many many entries for these two variables. CIFS/x2, HOSTx2, LDAPS?/, . and so on. On 4/7/09, Jason Ellison info...@gmail.com wrote: CentOS 5.3 getent does not return data from the active directory (ads) I have installed and configured kerberos and samba so that the server can be a member of an existing Active Directory (AD). Correct configuration of kerbos was verified using kinit and klist. The samba configuration was verified by using smbclient -k -L server. winbind was verified by using wbinfo -g. The problem seems to be nsswitch accessing winbindd to get group information via the getent group command. I added winbind to the /etc/nsswitch.conf file like so: [r...@nagios ~]# grep winbind /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind I verified that all dynamic libraries are being accessed correctly by using strace getent group. Below is the debug output of winbindd when issuing various commands that interact with it. The commands are noted in (parenthesis). (winbindd -i -d 9) 00a0 status: NT_STATUS_OK (getent group command issued) accepted socket 17 [17171]: request interface version [17171]: request location of privileged pipe accepted socket 18 [17171]: setgrent [17171]: endgrent (getent passwd command issued) accepted socket 17 [17172]: request interface version [17172]: request location of privileged pipe accepted socket 18 [17172]: setpwent [17172]: endpwent (winbindd -i -d 9) 00a0 status: NT_STATUS_OK (wbinfo -g command issued) accepted socket 17 [17158]: request interface version [17158]: request location of privileged pipe accepted socket 18 [17158]: list groups get_sam_group_entries: BUILTIN or local domain; enumerating local groups as well Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam' Attempting to register passdb backend ldapsam_compat Successfully added passdb backend 'ldapsam_compat' Attempting to register passdb backend NDS_ldapsam Successfully added passdb backend 'NDS_ldapsam' Attempting to register passdb backend NDS_ldapsam_compat Successfully added passdb backend 'NDS_ldapsam_compat' Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd' Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam' Attempting to find an passdb backend to match tdbsam (tdbsam) Found pdb backend tdbsam pdb backend tdbsam has a valid init get_sam_group_entries: Returned 2 local groups get_sam_group_entries: BUILTIN or local domain; enumerating local groups as well get_sam_group_entries: Returned 0 local groups get_cache: Setting ADS methods for domain COMPANY ads: enum_dom_groups NOTES: [r...@nagios ~]# uname -a Linux nagios.hq.company.local 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:53:14 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [r...@nagios ~]# rpm -qa samba krb* nss* nss_db-2.2-35.3 nss_db-2.2-35.3 krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5 nss-tools-3.12.2.0-4.el5.centos nss_ldap-253-17.el5 krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5 samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5 krb5-auth-dialog-0.7-1 nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5.centos nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5.centos nss_ldap-253-17.el5 krb5-workstation-1.6.1-31.el5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is giving me some grief. See errors below. Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution. Can someone suggest how to overcome the following error(s) Thanks a bunch! Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.rit.edu/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.newnanutilities.org/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. Error Downloading Packages: kernel - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686: failure: RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. I've tried several times, one of the retries I re-did yum clean all to see if I had bad metadata, and it re-downloaded ALL 250 packages again but still encountered the same error. I tried again using yum clean metadata and that didn't help either. Advice appreciated. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - pgpb3qWoUmH4U.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote: I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is giving me some grief. See errors below. Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution. Can someone suggest how to overcome the following error(s) Thanks a bunch! Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable You probably have a (transparent?) proxy server on the way. Requested Range Not Satisfiable for all the others since the remaining public centos mirrors are listed as 'current' Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp9uOeZbiRD4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote: I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is giving me some grief. See errors below. Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution. Can someone suggest how to overcome the following error(s) Thanks a bunch! Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable You probably have a (transparent?) proxy server on the way. Requested Range Not Satisfiable for all the others since the remaining public centos mirrors are listed as 'current' No proxies here. possibly someone upstream from here has one... -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - pgp9xkendV7bm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote: I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is giving me some grief. See errors below. Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution. Can someone suggest how to overcome the following error(s) Thanks a bunch! Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable You probably have a (transparent?) proxy server on the way. Requested Range Not Satisfiable for all the others since the remaining public centos mirrors are listed as 'current' No proxies here. possibly someone upstream from here has one... There's already a thread on this issue - Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror I worked around the issue by updating the kernel through RPM vs yum, then performing the yum upgrade. The issue is not a proxy (as we do not have one installed, nor one upstream) - and, as you mentioned (and was the case with me), the upgrade worked fine on several boxes on the same network. The problem appears to be with the CentOS repos, affecting anyone on CentOS 5.2 with an older kernel trying to upgrade directly to 5.3 (as far as I can tell). --Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:47:12AM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote: I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is giving me some grief. See errors below. Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution. Can someone suggest how to overcome the following error(s) Thanks a bunch! Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB 05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable You probably have a (transparent?) proxy server on the way. Requested Range Not Satisfiable for all the others since the remaining public centos mirrors are listed as 'current' No proxies here. possibly someone upstream from here has one... There's already a thread on this issue - Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror but since the file appears to download fine, it wouldn't be a case of not on mirror, would it? I worked around the issue by updating the kernel through RPM vs yum, then performing the yum upgrade. The issue is not a proxy (as we do not have one installed, nor one upstream) - and, as you mentioned (and was the case with me), the upgrade worked fine on several boxes on the same network. The problem appears to be with the CentOS repos, affecting anyone on CentOS 5.2 with an older kernel trying to upgrade directly to 5.3 (as far as I can tell). --Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - pgpdNmatt1T5q.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 6
-server-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/krb5-server-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.3.4-60.c4.2.s390x.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090408/a436176a/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:45:16 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0411 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x)
device-mapper-multipath - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090407214516.gj27...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0411
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0411.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/device-mapper-multipath-0.4.5-31.c4.1.s390.rpm
s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/device-mapper-multipath-0.4.5-31.c4.1.s390x.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090408/8eee514c/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:07 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0377 Important CentOS 5 i386
java-1.6.0-openjdk Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090408115607.ga14...@tantra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
92250f129f891e606526191b05dbc8a5
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
d91f9b0403e4f76e5f67b1320abbc0a4
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
2054f8f63d48dde3953fc17f4dc06051
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
b18c3e8520f7cc50d0b4b275bb13563c
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
e0fa3132369886b0796d2bed6b92c631
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
f778919ca9a6fb97790d40391e6dfab3
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:08 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0377 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090408115608.ga14...@tantra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
2972326d07d2fe644a8083cf44186466
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
0e57b7097af0eac977f8bfe6c92dcf7c
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
f7c58c64a55df032e28ad991924cf0bd
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
8cbdf28ca4a2db5f96b5efaeba1e8b04
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
6e9daaaeecf4184f57e6adbd1a04503a
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f778919ca9a6fb97790d40391e6dfab3
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:00:24 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0408 Important CentOS 5 i386 krb5
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090408120024.ga14...@tantra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0408 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2609a32892ed37fdaad370cc940f28ca krb5-devel-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
84040410edba9c62bf72c6502832ae1c krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
0712f0f378124cb0a64dd338586f3ec8 krb5-server
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
Rob Kampen wrote: I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball. I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am missing the bits that glue it all together. The actual core services (LDAP (either variant) Kerberos PAM samba etc) are simple enough to install on CentOS but the stuff that makes it just work is very difficult for me to get my head around and thus I've never actually got a setup working well enough to risk on my clients. I have started with SME: http://wiki.contribs.org/Main_Page This is a good NT Domain + equiv on Centos 4.7 and they have Centos 5.2 (I hope now 5.3) in beta. I have not looked enough into their roadmap to see what is being done with LDAP... Another effort on Fedora is Amahi.org. This is more a home product with a WorkGroup orientation. The inclusion of home apps like streaming music makes it very attractive. SME is a well organized effort, originally back? by Mitel. Amahi started as a one-man effort (though the one man behind it has impressive credentials) and has developed a 'plugin' community. Craig well knows the efforts of a couple of k12 guys to get some SAMBA integration together (http://majen.net/smbldap/). This seems to have stagnated. I am hoping that SME continues to evolve. Their VoIP version is the perfect place to get serious with LDAP. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
Blake Hudson wrote: Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. Do the mirrors sync in a way that lets the filename become visible before the sync is actually complete? I worked around the issue by updating the kernel through RPM vs yum, then performing the yum upgrade. The issue is not a proxy (as we do not have one installed, nor one upstream) - and, as you mentioned (and was the case with me), the upgrade worked fine on several boxes on the same network. The problem appears to be with the CentOS repos, affecting anyone on CentOS 5.2 with an older kernel trying to upgrade directly to 5.3 (as far as I can tell). I've had mixed results, even from boxes on the same network, behind the same proxy. Perhaps coincidentally all x86_64 versions 'just worked' with only the 'yum update glibc\*' done first. The 32-bit versions mostly had some missing packages that I had to exclude to get the first update to run, then after a 'yum clean all' and a few retries they would find the rest. Apparently the clean is necessary to make a box change its mind about a previously determined fastest-mirror - but I thought it was supposed to still check others for missing packages. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM but since the file appears to download fine, it wouldn't be a case of not on mirror, would it? I worked around the issue by updating the kernel through RPM vs yum, then performing the yum upgrade. The issue is not a proxy (as we do not have one installed, nor one upstream) - and, as you mentioned (and was the case with me), the upgrade worked fine on several boxes on the same network. The problem appears to be with the CentOS repos, affecting anyone on CentOS 5.2 with an older kernel trying to upgrade directly to 5.3 (as far as I can tell). --Blake Well, while it is on the mirror - Yum will not download/install it. I was able to download fine via wget and install via rpm. I believe the yum error Package does not match intended download is likely a better indicator of the problem and the following Requested Range Not Satisfiable errors are a byproduct - perhaps an error in yum or a library it uses. I just found a thread entitled Update fails with Package does not match intended download on the Centos PHPbb forums and it has a fix (have not tried myself). The fix is to disable the fastestmirror plugin by editing the /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19479forum=37 I also found reference to the same error and problem during the CentOS5 - 5.1 release. I'm not sure what the fastest mirror plugin is doing (perhaps caching old data?), but it does not seem that it is being tested thoroughly by Q/A during these respins. Perhaps this clue will help others... --Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I build it it keeps failing here: Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ‘TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const’: Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching function for call to ‘TrueCrypt::GraphicUserInterface::GetSelectedData(wxChoice* const)’ I realize that this is likely a problem with truecrypt or me but I am interested to know if anyone here has built it. thanks -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball. I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am missing the bits that glue it all together. The actual core services (LDAP (either variant) Kerberos PAM samba etc) are simple enough to install on CentOS but the stuff that makes it just work is very difficult for me to get my head around and thus I've never actually got a setup working well enough to risk on my clients. I have started with SME: http://wiki.contribs.org/Main_Page This is a good NT Domain + equiv on Centos 4.7 and they have Centos 5.2 (I hope now 5.3) in beta. I have not looked enough into their roadmap to see what is being done with LDAP... Another effort on Fedora is Amahi.org. This is more a home product with a WorkGroup orientation. The inclusion of home apps like streaming music makes it very attractive. SME is a well organized effort, originally back? by Mitel. Amahi started as a one-man effort (though the one man behind it has impressive credentials) and has developed a 'plugin' community. Craig well knows the efforts of a couple of k12 guys to get some SAMBA integration together (http://majen.net/smbldap/). This seems to have stagnated. I am hoping that SME continues to evolve. Their VoIP version is the perfect place to get serious with LDAP. indeed, I do know about the k12ltsp efforts and the result was somewhat predictable. All of the networks that I have setup and maintain use LDAP for authentication (Linux/Macintosh/Windows) and use a Samba PDC/BDC, DNS, DHCP, etc. and in fact, use the same users $HOME directory regardless of which OS they log into. I have also adapted automounts for Linux Macintosh users into LDAP but Windows users mount shares via login scripts. I have also been using WPKG for automatic software installation on Windows systems. I don't have much interest in SME myself. FreeIPA seemed to have the whole bundle. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I ] build it it keeps failing here: ] ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm ] TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const?: ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching function ] for call to ?TrueCrypt::GraphicUserInterface::GetSelectedData(wxChoice* ] const)? ] ] I realize that this is likely a problem with truecrypt or me but I am ] interested to know if anyone here has built it. yes. i did, and don't remember encountering any problems at all. i can say, you need to make sure to download the appropriate pkcs-11 headers (they tell you where to get them in documentation included with the source code). B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I ] build it it keeps failing here: ] ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm ] TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const?: ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching function ] for call to ?TrueCrypt::GraphicUserInterface::GetSelectedData(wxChoice* ] const)? ] ] I realize that this is likely a problem with truecrypt or me but I am ] interested to know if anyone here has built it. oh... sorry about that... i was half-ignoring your actual error... it looks like it might be a problem with your wxWidgets install (you need wxWidgets too... also mentioned in the documentation) i have 2.8.9 installed, myself... B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball. I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am missing the bits that glue it all together. The actual core services (LDAP (either variant) Kerberos PAM samba etc) are simple enough to install on CentOS but the stuff that makes it just work is very difficult for me to get my head around and thus I've never actually got a setup working well enough to risk on my clients. I have started with SME: http://wiki.contribs.org/Main_Page This is a good NT Domain + equiv on Centos 4.7 and they have Centos 5.2 (I hope now 5.3) in beta. I have not looked enough into their roadmap to see what is being done with LDAP... Another effort on Fedora is Amahi.org. This is more a home product with a WorkGroup orientation. The inclusion of home apps like streaming music makes it very attractive. SME is a well organized effort, originally back? by Mitel. Amahi started as a one-man effort (though the one man behind it has impressive credentials) and has developed a 'plugin' community. Craig well knows the efforts of a couple of k12 guys to get some SAMBA integration together (http://majen.net/smbldap/). This seems to have stagnated. I am hoping that SME continues to evolve. Their VoIP version is the perfect place to get serious with LDAP. Has anyone looked at the version of ClarkConnect now in beta? This is similar to SME but perhaps a more modern approach (and with separate free/commercial versions...). The blurb claims that the initial setup provides LDAP authentication for easy expansion. That's something I've thought every Linux distro should have had for years, but I don't know if it actually works. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
Craig White wrote: All of the networks that I have setup and maintain use LDAP for authentication (Linux/Macintosh/Windows) and use a Samba PDC/BDC, DNS, DHCP, etc. and in fact, use the same users $HOME directory regardless of which OS they log into. I have also adapted automounts for Linux Macintosh users into LDAP but Windows users mount shares via login scripts. I have also been using WPKG for automatic software installation on Windows systems. I don't have much interest in SME myself. FreeIPA seemed to have the whole bundle. The place where SME becomes interesting is where someone who doesn't know Linux wants a server for a home or small office setting mostly running windows - and they want to install and maintain it themselves instead of having you do it for them. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:36 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Craig White wrote: I don't have much interest in SME myself. FreeIPA seemed to have the whole bundle. The place where SME becomes interesting is where someone who doesn't know Linux wants a server for a home or small office setting mostly running windows - and they want to install and maintain it themselves instead of having you do it for them. makes sense to me - I'm just not interested in using it myself. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
Benjamin Karhan wrote: A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I ] build it it keeps failing here: ] ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm ] TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const?: ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching function ] for call to ?TrueCrypt::GraphicUserInterface::GetSelectedData(wxChoice* ] const)? ] ] I realize that this is likely a problem with truecrypt or me but I am ] interested to know if anyone here has built it. yes. i did, and don't remember encountering any problems at all. i can say, you need to make sure to download the appropriate pkcs-11 headers (they tell you where to get them in documentation included with the source code). thanks. I think I got the pkcs stuff ok and the build cruised right through where they are needed (it is pretty obvious when it cant find them). In any case the failure occurs in a file that doesn't include or apparently need pkcs11.h. roger wells B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
Benjamin Karhan wrote: A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I ] build it it keeps failing here: ] ] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function ] ?TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm ] TrueCrypt::EncryptionOptionsWizardPage::GetEncryptionAlgorithm() const?: ] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp:45: error: no matching function ] for call to ?TrueCrypt::GraphicUserInterface::GetSelectedData(wxChoice* ] const)? ] ] I realize that this is likely a problem with truecrypt or me but I am ] interested to know if anyone here has built it. oh... sorry about that... i was half-ignoring your actual error... it looks like it might be a problem with your wxWidgets install (you need wxWidgets too... also mentioned in the documentation) i have 2.8.9 installed, myself... thanks again. I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check around to see if there is a problem there. roger wells B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
Alford, Seth wrote: I'm looking for the anaconda source rpm. Yes, I know, it's available from the upstream vendor. http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12378998/com/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm.html this site seems to have it: ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/Linux/distributions/centos/5.3/os/i386/CentOS/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm warning: anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897 Name: anaconda Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 11.1.2.168Vendor: CentOS Release : 1.el5.centos Build Date: Wed 11 Mar 2009 10:38:13 AM PDT Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: chamkaur.karan.org Group : Applications/System Source RPM: anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.src.rpm nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] thanks again. ] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check ] around to see if there ] is a problem there. i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine... it did)... anyways, just FYI i pass the following to configure in my package build of wxWidgets: --enable-unicode --with-motif=no --with-gtk=yes i suppose i should upgrade to 2.8.10... must be getting lazy... i'll let you know if i run into problems with 2.8.10 itself... B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:19:42PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM but since the file appears to download fine, it wouldn't be a case of not on mirror, would it? I worked around the issue by updating the kernel through RPM vs yum, then performing the yum upgrade. The issue is not a proxy (as we do not have one installed, nor one upstream) - and, as you mentioned (and was the case with me), the upgrade worked fine on several boxes on the same network. The problem appears to be with the CentOS repos, affecting anyone on CentOS 5.2 with an older kernel trying to upgrade directly to 5.3 (as far as I can tell). --Blake Well, while it is on the mirror - Yum will not download/install it. I was able to download fine via wget and install via rpm. I believe the yum error Package does not match intended download is likely a better indicator of the problem and the following Requested Range Not Satisfiable errors are a byproduct - perhaps an error in yum or a library it uses. I just found a thread entitled Update fails with Package does not match intended download on the Centos PHPbb forums and it has a fix (have not tried myself). The fix is to disable the fastestmirror plugin by editing the /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/fastestmirror.conf http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19479forum=37 I actually tried yum --disableplugin=fastestmirror and it did not make any difference. Since the error says did not match intended download I'm guessing that some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded file had the wrong sum. I'm further guessing that it may be an error in the metadata (if that's where it's store, I don't really know). I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file from one of the mirrors, did rpm -uvh on it followed by yum -y update and it all applied without complaint. I also found reference to the same error and problem during the CentOS5 - 5.1 release. I'm not sure what the fastest mirror plugin is doing (perhaps caching old data?), but it does not seem that it is being tested thoroughly by Q/A during these respins. Perhaps this clue will help others... --Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgpEla3rYrhNJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following: My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current drivers suitable for use with DKMS and CentOS? Any hints appreciated. Thanks. You might want to ask for a newer version on the rpmforge mailing list: http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest You could always try and make a newer version yourself using the old one as a template. Here is some help; There is a CentOS wiki how to build kernel modules (see section 2 for DKMS): http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file from one of the mirrors, did rpm -uvh on it followed by yum -y update and it all applied without complaint. Please do NOT install the kernel with the -Uvh option. This will update (overwrite) the currently installed version. Always use -ivh. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel update doesn't update grub.conf
on 4-7-2009 2:16 PM Robert spake the following: William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500: /etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some reason it is not, correct it, or look directly in /boot/grub/grub.conf and see if the kernel was added there. Sorry, I was talking about /boot/grub/grub.conf. I wasn't aware that one could assume I was talking about /etc/grub.conf. Well, JIC, make sure yoyr /boot/grub entries look like this. ls -l /boot/grub/[gm]* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root8 May 9 2008 /boot/grub/grub.conf - menu.lst -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1108 Apr 2 21:33 /boot/grub/menu.lst I'm not sure why it's set this way, probably some historical reason. I only mention because I don't even know which the update process affects. If they aren't linked, I guess that might cause a problem. I have long been amazed at that relationship. Mine is not the same as yours. (CentOS 5.3 totally updated) [r...@mavis download]# ls -l /boot/grub/[gm]* /etc/grub.conf -rw--- 1 root root 2378 Apr 2 15:07 /boot/grub/grub.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Aug 7 2008 /boot/grub/menu.lst - ./grub.conf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Aug 7 2008 /etc/grub.conf - ../boot/grub/grub.conf [r...@mavis download]# So, while menu.lst is the real file and grub.conf is a symlink to it on your system, the opposite is true on mine. I have no idea how that happened. I do know that when I do a manual edit, I don't go through a who's on first routine. I just edit one of them and move on to the next windmill. That has been there since RedHat switched from lilo to grub. Either there was some hard coded stuff they didn't want to mess with, or the anaconda team and the grub conversion team didn't communicate very well. That had to be back at least to RedHat 7.0, if not in the 6's. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote: ... Since the error says did not match intended download I'm guessing that some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded file had the wrong sum. I'm further guessing that it may be an error in the metadata (if that's where it's store, I don't really know). did you try yum clean all before continuing with your manual download solution? /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truecrypt 6.1a
Benjamin Karhan wrote: A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said: ] thanks again. ] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check ] around to see if there ] is a problem there. i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine... it did)... anyways, just FYI i pass the following to configure in my package build of wxWidgets: --enable-unicode --with-motif=no --with-gtk=yes these arguments to ./configure seem to be key. I had just built it with --with-x11 --with-gtk like their install-gtk.txt file didn't get it done either. Only after pasting your flags (above) making, and installing wxWidgets would truecrypt compile link. Thank you very much. i suppose i should upgrade to 2.8.10... must be getting lazy... i'll let you know if i run into problems with 2.8.10 itself... B. Karhan si...@pop.psu.edu PRI/SSRI Unix Administrator ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FreeIPA
snip Has anyone looked at the version of ClarkConnect now in beta? This is similar to SME but perhaps a more modern approach (and with separate free/commercial versions...). The blurb claims that the initial setup provides LDAP authentication for easy expansion. That's something I've thought every Linux distro should have had for years, but I don't know if it actually works. I'm waiting for it to come out of beta to see how it works. I run the previous version at home and I love it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Michael Simpson wrote: My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new graphics are beautiful and i agree with her. Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it already then. Great work and thanks to all involved! -- //Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Missing 5.3 updates?
Just wondering (I hate asking this, but in case they slipped by) if there is an ETA on some missing updates (as newer ones are appearing) including: firefox-3.0.7-1.el5 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0315.html thunderbird-2.0.0.21-1.el5 (the latest 5.3 RPM is 2.0.0.18 whereas the latest 5.2 RPM is 2.0.0.19) http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0258.html NetworkManager-devel-0.7.0-4.el5_3 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0361.html systemtap-0.7.2-3.el5_3 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0373.html xulrunner-1.9.0.7-3.el5 (for firefox) http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0397.html mod_nss-1.0.3-7.el5_3.1 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0403.html openswan-2.6.14-1.el5_3.2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0402.html xen-3.0.3-80.el5_3.2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0401.html I've checked a number of mirrors for these updates and haven't found them. Thanks, Erik ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de: Steve Snyder wrote: It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but where are the source packages? The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release itself are missing. Coming later. Please let the mirrors handle the load of people updating their machines first. When the first wave of updates have gone down, the SRPMS will be put onto the mirrors. Regards, Ralph Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source is what the GPL focuses on. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Holmes holmesm...@googlemail.com wrote: Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source is what the GPL focuses on. Please read the first few messages in the beginning of this thread, that already cover this. And obviously a project as big as CentOS has dealt with the GPL before, and they know what they are doing. This is a matter of pragmatism and obviously not willful disobedience by the CentOS project. And we're only talking like maybe week or so here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where's v5.3 source RPMs?
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:36 +0100 Michael Holmes wrote: Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source is what the GPL focuses on. I'm not any kind of a legal expert, but I suspect that the concept of reasonable effort comes into play here. If you requested GPL source for something by snailmail letter it's not a GPL violation if it takes the post office a few days to deliver the letter and the guy on the other end a little longer to package and ship a CD or tape to you. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Morten Torstensen wrote: Michael Simpson wrote: My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new graphics are beautiful and i agree with her. Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it already then. Great work and thanks to all involved! It is beautiful artwork, but my vision is so skewed contrast-wise, that I cannot look at the screen with it showing. I need low contrast backgrounds. I wear sunglasses insides a lot, and suffer a lot outdoors. An Ophthalmologist once told be to be thankful I don't have the opposite condition, as I can always 'darken' a room with sunglasses. So I don't complain, just adjust my surroundings as much as I can... Of course, I tend to have a dozen apps open on each workspace so it is rare to actually SEE the background :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote: ... Since the error says did not match intended download I'm guessing that some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded file had the wrong sum. I'm further guessing that it may be an error in the metadata (if that's where it's store, I don't really know). did you try yum clean all before continuing with your manual download solution? yes. several times. No go. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 (niv) -- pgpp0KzBMz8GT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:48:39AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file from one of the mirrors, did rpm -uvh on it followed by yum -y update and it all applied without complaint. Please do NOT install the kernel with the -Uvh option. This will update (overwrite) the currently installed version. Always use -ivh. Oops. Of course, you're right. (I knew that... ;) -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgpmNivl14ayT.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote: Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? This issue was just raised in the main IRC channel as well. By temporarily adding a line to /etc/hosts on the machine seeking to pull updates, of the follow form, it will fail on over to the next suggested entry: 127.0.0.2 centos.mirror.nac.net Remember to pull it out again in a few days. -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
Original Message Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: R P Herrold herr...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:58:09 PM On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote: Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? This issue was just raised in the main IRC channel as well. By temporarily adding a line to /etc/hosts on the machine seeking to pull updates, of the follow form, it will fail on over to the next suggested entry: 127.0.0.2 centos.mirror.nac.net Remember to pull it out again in a few days. -- Russ herrold Yes, unfortunately the mechanism within yum to try another mirror automatically seems to be broken in this instance. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about yum can take a look? -Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:12:25 PM Original Message Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade From: R P Herrold herr...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:58:09 PM On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote: Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? This issue was just raised in the main IRC channel as well. By temporarily adding a line to /etc/hosts on the machine seeking to pull updates, of the follow form, it will fail on over to the next suggested entry: 127.0.0.2 centos.mirror.nac.net Remember to pull it out again in a few days. -- Russ herrold Yes, unfortunately the mechanism within yum to try another mirror automatically seems to be broken in this instance. Perhaps someone with more knowledge about yum can take a look? -Blake Any reason these bad mirrors are not pulled out of the rotation? I had no idea that a single old mirror would stop yum in its tracks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote: Downloading Packages: (1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41 http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://mirror-status.centos.org/ is listing http://centos.mirror.nac.net/ as 2 days late, so you might have been hitting an incomplete mirror. Wouldn't surprise me. But I've tried this probably 10 times in the last 2-3 hours, would I always be that unlucky? And if so, how would I avoid that mirror? This issue was just raised in the main IRC channel as well. By temporarily adding a line to /etc/hosts on the machine seeking to pull updates, of the follow form, it will fail on over to the next suggested entry: 127.0.0.2 centos.mirror.nac.net Remember to pull it out again in a few days. But note that if you are using a proxy, the proxy is where the name lookup is done. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Blake Hudson wrote: Any reason these bad mirrors are not pulled out of the rotation? I had no idea that a single old mirror would stop yum in its tracks. They are. The offending mirror was identified as stale by the mirrorlist system, and has aged out at this point ... the timeout which serves well generally may need to be tweaked around release time, but then too much load falls on too few when people start 'jumping the gun' seeking to get the 'latest and greatest' with manual tuneing. 'Latest and Greatest' gotta-havit-ism is a disease, of course, but one so afflicted cannot be swayed by reason and advice to take a deep breath and wait a couple days. CentOSian's are not immune -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme. Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for people to use directly from their machines ? - KB ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Dear Karan, I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme. Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for people to use directly from their machines ? Have to talk to Ralph as he is responsible for the packaging process. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Karanbir Singh wrote: I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme. Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for people to use directly from their machines ? We have to put the backgrounds somewhere else, as the default-* stuff is already taken by TreeFlower. I will have an updated artwork package soon for the GDM/KDM stuff which somehow (tar xzf doesn't work on a tar.bz2, d'oh) fell out of it. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3462. Backgrounds would have to go into the desktop-backgrounds-basic package anyway ... Cheers, Ralph pgpIGES61BvAp.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] New Centos 5.3 gnome backgroup
Dear Ralph, I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme. Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for people to use directly from their machines ? We have to put the backgrounds somewhere else, as the default-* stuff is already taken by TreeFlower. I will have an updated artwork package soon for the GDM/KDM stuff which somehow (tar xzf doesn't work on a tar.bz2, d'oh) fell out of it. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3462. This will at least make CentOSCubes work again. Maybe we could also include the new Classic theme. I am going to prepare a KDM theme and some splashes, too. Backgrounds would have to go into the desktop-backgrounds-basic package anyway ... That's true. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0377 Important CentOS 5 i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
92250f129f891e606526191b05dbc8a5
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
d91f9b0403e4f76e5f67b1320abbc0a4
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
2054f8f63d48dde3953fc17f4dc06051
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
b18c3e8520f7cc50d0b4b275bb13563c
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
e0fa3132369886b0796d2bed6b92c631
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
f778919ca9a6fb97790d40391e6dfab3
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0377 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 java-1.6.0-openjdk Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
2972326d07d2fe644a8083cf44186466
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
0e57b7097af0eac977f8bfe6c92dcf7c
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
f7c58c64a55df032e28ad991924cf0bd
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
8cbdf28ca4a2db5f96b5efaeba1e8b04
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
6e9daaaeecf4184f57e6adbd1a04503a
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f778919ca9a6fb97790d40391e6dfab3
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0408 Important CentOS 5 i386 krb5 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0408 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2609a32892ed37fdaad370cc940f28ca krb5-devel-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
84040410edba9c62bf72c6502832ae1c krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
0712f0f378124cb0a64dd338586f3ec8 krb5-server-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
28bd36aeaae0efe5de182447634c4826 krb5-workstation-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
Source:
cb1039c1903e811401085ddce072799b krb5-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0408 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 krb5 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0408 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
cc9a6e98408190018ba4cdac98f5def6 krb5-devel-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
68745f39a1f6c67e77abd3ad29f4767d krb5-devel-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.x86_64.rpm
b7921417ced4424b73a79b03a04e2ec3 krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.i386.rpm
7ca76d137a1da22c71e309ef16b566ed krb5-libs-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.x86_64.rpm
469a39697ba4269c38ae7d0c43cabbd1 krb5-server-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.x86_64.rpm
0322eca8fc03f087a677efb1bdb36f93 krb5-workstation-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cb1039c1903e811401085ddce072799b krb5-1.6.1-31.el5_3.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0411 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 device-mapper-multipath Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0411 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0411.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
edfafd1c56e5a78029210fb384c8154e
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-23.el5_3.2.x86_64.rpm
6fdc3055526bead8dc9540f281c22db3 kpartx-0.4.7-23.el5_3.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
1a952e486922bd56aa53455c9629f83d
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-23.el5_3.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0352 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-base Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0352 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0352.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
49f41716f947d27d15f88018b04ae100
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
8e7ccfaafd1bc367fcdd89d5a047d4cf
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
bbb45d588d2954e9914903a24710cc29
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
ccced7125f324182bb948ca73796a560
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f448f867c25b1fd798bd7a4faf70b141
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0352 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gstreamer-plugins-base Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0352 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0352.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2a59484ca24a755eaa30258d517591eb
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
283bfce858c3065e412d38ed97e853cc
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
Source:
f448f867c25b1fd798bd7a4faf70b141
gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.20-3.0.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema con PDC LDAP + Samba.
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:55 +0200, Arturo Limón wrote: Me ocurre lo siguiente. Esto, por ejemplo, sale bien: smbclient -L localhost Password: Anonymous login successful snip Pero si lo hago lo mismo con root: smbclient -L localhost -U root% session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE La password es correcta, porque es la misma que utilizo para acceder al sistema, la he puesto y repuesto con smbpassw -w ... ya no sé qué más mirar. estas seteando el password de manera incorrecta en el root. cuando creaste el arbol ldap para tu samba, debiste seguramente crear dos usuarios ldap por defecto, root y nobody (al menos las smbldap-tools las crean por defecto) el password root en cuestion q te solicita NO ES el del usuario root del sistema, sino del usuario root de tu arbol ldap. si estas usando smbldap-tools puedes usar smbldap-passwd root para cambiar el password del root o si es un dominio sin users y PCs todavia correr nuevamente smbldap-populate (se quejara q los objetos ya existen) q al final tb te pide setear el password de root. el smbpasswd -w no setea ningun password, ese password es mas bien del objeto ldap q tiene derechos completos de escritura y lectura en tu arbol ldap (por convencion generalmente cn=Manager ) q en ldap comunmente esta seteado en el rootdn, el password en cuestion q ingresas con smbpasswd -w es el rootpw (si ves tu configuracion de samba, tu ingresas el usuario administrador de ldap con 'ldap admin dn' pero en ninguna parte esta el password, cuando haces smbpasswd -w el password q ingresas es almacenando en el archivo secrets.tdb de samba para ser accedido de ahi. Si has cambiado ese password, el samba nunca podra leer ni escribir nada en el ldap. También ocurre que ... getent passwd | grep root root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin si has configurado en el authconfig q reconozca a los usuarios ldap como users del sistema tendria sentido (usuario root del sistema y usuario root en el ldap). getent no es 100% acurate en muchos casos al menos en mi experiencia. por ahora concentrate en sacar adelante tu dominio. -- Black Hand ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Problema con PDC LDAP + Samba.
Hola a todos.
Estoy experimentando con el montaje de un PDC con LDAP y Samba.
Aparentemente está instalado y los daemos correspondientes corriendo, pero
algo no va bien.
Me ocurre lo siguiente. Esto, por ejemplo, sale bien:
smbclient -L localhost
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[CENTRO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5]
Sharename Type Comment
- ---
Comun Disk Carpeta general del centro
Profesores Disk Carpeta general de profesores
Alumnos Disk Carpeta general de alumnos
appsDisk Aplicaciones
netlogonDisk Network Logon Service
profilesDisk Profile Share
profdataDisk Profile Data Share
print$ Disk Printer Drivers
IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5)
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[CENTRO] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5]
Server Comment
----
LINUXSRV Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5
WorkgroupMaster
----
CENTRO LINUXSRV
Pero si lo hago lo mismo con root:
smbclient -L localhost -U root%
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
La password es correcta, porque es la misma que utilizo para acceder al
sistema, la he puesto y repuesto con smbpassw -w ... ya no sé qué
más mirar.
También ocurre que ...
getent passwd | grep root
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin
Entiendo que debería salir una vez nada más, no entiendo por qué sale dos.
Para rematar, desde un equipo Windows XP es imposible añadir dicho equipo al
dominio, me da error de usuario / contraseña.
Agracederé enormemente cualquier ayuda al respecto.
Mis ficheros de configuración son.
*smb.conf:*
[global]
unix charset = LOCALE
workgroup = CENTRO
netbios name = LinuxSrv
admin users = Administrador @Domain Admins
interfaces = eth0, lo
bind interfaces only = Yes
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1
enable privileges = Yes
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
log level = 5
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
max log size = 50
smb ports = 139
name resolve order = wins bcast hosts
time server = Yes
printcap name = CUPS
show add printer wizard = No
logon script = scripts\logon.bat
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon drive = X:
domain logons = Yes
preferred master = Yes
wins support = Yes
add user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u
delete user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u
add group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g
delete group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupdel %g
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g
delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u
%g
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u
add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u
ldap suffix = dc=centro,dc=lan
ldap machine suffix = ou=People
ldap user suffix = ou=People
ldap group suffix = ou=Group
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap
ldap admin dn = cn=Administrador,dc=centro,dc=lan
idmap backend = ldap:ldap://127.0.0.1
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
map acl inherit = Yes
printing = cups
ldap passwd sync = yes
security = user
[homes]
comment = Carpetas particulares de usuario
valid users = %S
read only = No
browseable = No
[Comun]
comment = Carpeta general del centro
path = /data/comun
read only = No
[Profesores]
comment = Carpeta general de profesores
path = /data/profesores
read only = No
[Alumnos]
comment = Carpeta general de alumnos
path = /data/alumnos
read only = No
*/etc/openldap/slapd.conf*
include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
allow bind_v2
pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid
argsfile/var/run/openldap/slapd.args
databasebdb
suffix dc=centro,dc=lan
rootdn cn=Administrador,dc=centro,dc=lan
rootpw {SSHA}
directory /var/lib/ldap/autenticar
index objectClass eq
index cn,sn,uid,displayName pres,sub,eq
index uidNumber
[CentOS-es] Prubleas con el puntero del mouse
Cambié de Debian a CentOS pero resulta que al instalar CentOs 5.1 no muestra el puntero del mouse. atte begin:vcard fn:John Drummond Aravena n:Drummond Aravena;John org:ADM-Planning Consultores;Area Apoyo TI email;internet:jdrumm...@adm-planning.cl title:Analista Sistemas Computacionales x-mozilla-html:TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] chroot
Échale un vistazo a este link espero te sirva http://www.tail-f.com.ar/2008/12/23/sistemas-operativos/gnu-linux/instalar-bind-en-linux.html El 8 de abril de 2009 7:43, Angel Daniel Martínez daniel.marti...@maxcom.com escribió: Buenos días. Deseo configurar el chroot, para un usario que tendrá permisos de realizar SFTP, al servidor de centos 5.2. Espero me puedan ayudar. Angel Daniel Martínez Ibarra Infraestructura y Operaciones de T.I. daniel.marti...@maxcom.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema con PDC LDAP + Samba.
Muchas gracias por tu correo BlackHand Creo que con lo que me cuentas empiezo a aclararme. Inicialmente, pasé todos los usuarios que había en /etc/passwd a LDAP mediante los scripts de migración (migrate ...). Supongo que por eso me aparecen duplicados. Así pues no sé si es correcto considerar que hay tres tipos de usuarios: usuarios recogidos en /etc/passwd; usuarios Posix creados en LDAP (como los que se podrían crear desde phpldapadmin o ldapadd) y usuarios Samba en LDAP. Por lo que he visto con phpmyadmin, los usuarios creados con Samba tienen SID, los migrados no, obviamente, por lo que entiendo que no son utilizables en Samba; hay que crearlos mediante las smbldap-tools. De todas formas, los usuarios Samba han de tener uid correspondiente a Unix ¿es así? ¿Hay que mantener un paralelismo usuarios Posix - usuarios Samba, o eso lo hacen las smbldap-tools? Otra cosa, es que no tengo claro cómo añadir usuarios Samba a grupos Samba; lo he tratado de descifrar en phpldapadmin, pero no acabo de verlo. Gracias por tu ayuda. Saludos cordiales. Arturo Limón. El 8 de abril de 2009 14:22, BlackHand yo...@blackhandchronicles.homeip.net escribió: On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:55 +0200, Arturo Limón wrote: Me ocurre lo siguiente. Esto, por ejemplo, sale bien: smbclient -L localhost Password: Anonymous login successful snip Pero si lo hago lo mismo con root: smbclient -L localhost -U root% session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE La password es correcta, porque es la misma que utilizo para acceder al sistema, la he puesto y repuesto con smbpassw -w ... ya no sé qué más mirar. estas seteando el password de manera incorrecta en el root. cuando creaste el arbol ldap para tu samba, debiste seguramente crear dos usuarios ldap por defecto, root y nobody (al menos las smbldap-tools las crean por defecto) el password root en cuestion q te solicita NO ES el del usuario root del sistema, sino del usuario root de tu arbol ldap. si estas usando smbldap-tools puedes usar smbldap-passwd root para cambiar el password del root o si es un dominio sin users y PCs todavia correr nuevamente smbldap-populate (se quejara q los objetos ya existen) q al final tb te pide setear el password de root. el smbpasswd -w no setea ningun password, ese password es mas bien del objeto ldap q tiene derechos completos de escritura y lectura en tu arbol ldap (por convencion generalmente cn=Manager ) q en ldap comunmente esta seteado en el rootdn, el password en cuestion q ingresas con smbpasswd -w es el rootpw (si ves tu configuracion de samba, tu ingresas el usuario administrador de ldap con 'ldap admin dn' pero en ninguna parte esta el password, cuando haces smbpasswd -w el password q ingresas es almacenando en el archivo secrets.tdb de samba para ser accedido de ahi. Si has cambiado ese password, el samba nunca podra leer ni escribir nada en el ldap. También ocurre que ... getent passwd | grep root root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash operator:x:11:0:operator:/root:/sbin/nologin si has configurado en el authconfig q reconozca a los usuarios ldap como users del sistema tendria sentido (usuario root del sistema y usuario root en el ldap). getent no es 100% acurate en muchos casos al menos en mi experiencia. por ahora concentrate en sacar adelante tu dominio. -- Black Hand ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] chroot
Mario Villela Larraza escribió: Échale un vistazo a este link espero te sirva http://www.tail-f.com.ar/2008/12/23/sistemas-operativos/gnu-linux/instalar-bind-en-linux.html El 8 de abril de 2009 7:43, Angel Daniel Martínez daniel.marti...@maxcom.com mailto:daniel.marti...@maxcom.com escribió: Buenos días. Deseo configurar el chroot, para un usario que tendrá permisos de realizar SFTP, al servidor de centos 5.2. Espero me puedan ayudar. Angel Daniel Martínez Ibarra Infraestructura y Operaciones de T.I. daniel.marti...@maxcom.com mailto:daniel.marti...@maxcom.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Hola aqui está explicado. http://celtha.blogspot.com/2008/09/vsftpd-enjaulando-usuarios.html Saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Prubleas con el puntero del mouse
Instala CentOS 5.3 en lugar de 5.1. Es muy factible que se resuelva el problema. El mié, 08-04-2009 a las 09:23 -0400, John Drummond Aravena (ADM-Planning) escribió: Cambié de Debian a CentOS pero resulta que al instalar CentOs 5.1 no muestra el puntero del mouse. atte ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Joel Barrios Dueñas Director General Alcance Libre http://www.AlcanceLibre.org/ 52-55-5677-7130 signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
