Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarification of rules for positioning comment and interval in cell methods strings (#274)

2021-10-07 Thread taylor13
I hadn't thought of that being necessary.  On reflection, I don't really see a 
need to allow the parenthetical information to appear anywhere except at the 
end of any phrase specifying a method (but of course each method phrase could 
have parenthetical information, so multiple parenthetical statements could 
occur in cell_methods).  Thus, in your example above you might have:  ``time: 
mean where sea_ice (but only sampled when polar bears are on the ice in the 
immediate vicinity)``.  As others have said, I think this is what we originally 
had in mind.  It is too bad that for some CMIP6 data the checker throws an 
error, but I suspect that any other software currently reading CMIP6 files will 
not actually try to interpret information in parentheses, so perhaps we 
shouldn't be concerned.

I agree we should worry about difficulty parsing, but don't think anything 
discussed above would be too difficult. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/274*issuecomment-938147020__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!nvLYQMYaZ_LYioPve0F8mHZBTZywkShu1eP1UozCUk7HtVPv75r3-1FifPmoz0tZRx15HHXeMAQ$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarification of requirements on calendar attribute of a bounds variable (#265)

2021-10-07 Thread Martin
@davidhassell , @sethmcg : I think it may be possible to have auxiliary 
coordinate bounds for a cell which is missing it's central value, but I don't 
think the question if really relevant here in either case. The `missing_value` 
and the `_FillValue` should apply to both the auxiliary coordinate and to the 
bounds, and be specified as attributes of the auxiliary coordinate variable. I 
don't think this requires any modification of Jonathan's suggested text, or is 
there some objection that I am missing?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/265*issuecomment-938021471__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!k_fRJ-CvltbEZGSZxuiVezMV6_bzeVv6dOKJ-3YXibePawMyl8YKsnOqb5g81by2d2oeKhWaIzg$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Updating definition of coordinate variable to account for NUG changes (#174)

2021-10-07 Thread Martin
@davidhassell : this issue is still in need of a moderator -- is your offer 
from March 2020 still open? As far as I'm aware, the issues is still 
unresolved. I've revised the top comment to note an additional problem with a 
broken link in section 1.3 of the convention.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/174*issuecomment-938014943__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!jzgZxoelqZXPY2BMvYwYY31Ysa-rikTOIHIxARWF3HodUMDM9Dlf90XgOEJTtJtdN3EAaCqqKHA$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarification of rules for positioning comment and interval in cell methods strings (#274)

2021-10-07 Thread Martin
@taylor13 : apologies for the long silence on this issue. With the approach 
your approach, would you permit multiple comments, e.g. `mean (in the immediate 
vicinity of polar bears) where sea_ice (excluding swimming bears)`? 

I can see the attraction of making a mis-placed comment a warning rather than 
an error, but we need to be sure that it does not introduce more complexity for 
software parsing the strings.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/274*issuecomment-938005181__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!lUL8ExK10VqIjTdHJX_4ZueX4T7Cx5QLGYIN8RkM_5RDRnwGxT-rYWW0JG4XR3uFFiFFGKRt9c4$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] DOIs for CF Convention releases? (#127)

2021-10-07 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Thanks, @JonathanGregory. I only looked in this repository for open issues, so 
I missed it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127*issuecomment-937816841__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!mNR7NLglINDSbS3QuYUX-JF27bAMoITu6sO4EwlvXFaQx2DOJLlt7oqXvbyewYOpIcUk8BI2KAE$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] DOIs for CF Convention releases? (#127)

2021-10-07 Thread JonathanGregory
Dear @zklaus 

There is an [open 
issue](https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-convention.github.io/issues/182__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!iEjodabCgXX7UCEgD4k7fCnGM1gdzbMeMaLri_x_3tY0RmwDL8v8aErkAkx4GpLMuhQgNNVGX2w$
 ) in the website/governance repo about the licence which the conventions 
should have.

Jonathan

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127*issuecomment-937813864__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!iEjodabCgXX7UCEgD4k7fCnGM1gdzbMeMaLri_x_3tY0RmwDL8v8aErkAkx4GpLMuhQgpnXgAZ8$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] DOIs for CF Convention releases? (#127)

2021-10-07 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
And one more thing came up: When publishing on Zenodo one *must* provide a 
license and to my own surprise I could not figure out which license CF 
conventions are published under. If this is an oversight on my part, please 
help me out. If not, this is probably something that deserves its own ticket.

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127*issuecomment-937785205__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!k-MzVWsrRCrJy4DyouCWy2OFAHbcH0tj2X0a8MgWmayhbyTU-g5cvldXClVietO9IVSIkFwNwDo$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.


Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] DOIs for CF Convention releases? (#127)

2021-10-07 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
To illustrate a possible way of setting this up, I created an upload on the 
Zenodo sandbox. It can be found 
[here](https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://sandbox.zenodo.org/record/932985*.YV7MHiVS_mE__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!i-hKTs37bbN5jZUNQUkHrwwMv88KuWwFZVLsyoxwPUIq-glkRfffYJLz7Bt-70E6SQAfYVZjl4A$
 ). Note that, while it does list a DOI there, it is not actually registered as 
a DOI because it is in the sandbox.

This is only the PDF version with links in the sidebar on the right under 
"Related identifiers" to both the corresponding github tag and the 
corresponding HTML version website.

It would be easy to add as additional files in the Zenodo record the HTML 
version, as well as a zipped version of the repository as with the normal 
Zenodo Github integration.

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/127*issuecomment-937666423__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!i-hKTs37bbN5jZUNQUkHrwwMv88KuWwFZVLsyoxwPUIq-glkRfffYJLz7Bt-70E6SQAfGrgqMes$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.