CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
That is interesting -- and seems to validate Java, CFMX for J2EE optimization, and the multiple-server instances clustering capabilities of JRun. It would be interesting (at least to me) to see how well an Xserve would perform/scale in comparison, I have heard rumors (FWIW) that 2,4,and 8 processor versions of Xserve are coming. Dick On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 11:33 AM, Stacy Young wrote: There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/ cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
I would love to see that as well...Awesome product... -Original Message- From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:04 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief That is interesting -- and seems to validate Java, CFMX for J2EE optimization, and the multiple-server instances clustering capabilities of JRun. It would be interesting (at least to me) to see how well an Xserve would perform/scale in comparison, I have heard rumors (FWIW) that 2,4,and 8 processor versions of Xserve are coming. Dick On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 11:33 AM, Stacy Young wrote: There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/ cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 14:41 US/Pacific, Ken Wilson wrote: In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states that trusted cache was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun but it does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to skew the results in favor of the CFMX flavors from the outset? Right after the I can't speak to that, except to say that my experience so far has been that the systems have been configured as close to identical as possible for all of the performance briefs released so far. release of CFMX I seem to recall some folks discussing that file system access was noticeably slower under CFMX (particularly to Fusebox folks with lots of cfincludes) which makes me wonder what a more equivalent comparison between CF5 and CFMX would reflect. I think the Fusebox / cfinclude issue was to do with first pass compiling being very slow. Once .cfm pages are compiled (to Java and then to .class), they are loaded into memory in the JVM. There is no further disk activity (beyond checking timestamps and that only if trusted cache is OFF). Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc. tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473 aim/iChat: seancorfield -- http://www.macromedia.com An Architect's View -- http://www.macromedia.com/go/arch_blog ColdFusion MX and JRun 4 now available for Mac OS X! http://www.macromedia.com/go/cfmxosx ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states that trusted cache was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun but it does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to skew the results in favor of the CFMX flavors from the outset? Right after the release of CFMX I seem to recall some folks discussing that file system access was noticeably slower under CFMX (particularly to Fusebox folks with lots of cfincludes) which makes me wonder what a more equivalent comparison between CF5 and CFMX would reflect. Ken -Original Message- From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief There's a new performance brief on DesDev for CFMX. It seems CFMX for J2EE on Linux smokes all other platforms...and is even more impressive when compared to CF5 on Linux...now I wonder what the metrics would look like on RedHat Advanced server using BEA's JRockit JVM (although not supported) !! Or better yet, CMFX for BEA running on RH AS! Another 10-25% gain? http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/coldfusion/whitepapers/cfmx_jrun_per f_brief.pdf ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
