Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
Sounds like the OP's issue is XML, not HTML, where the CDATA blocks can't be nested. Not sure there's a solution for that one ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339878 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
I'll throw together a segement code later for those interested. It's really more basic than that. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Jason Fisher ja...@wanax.com wrote: Sounds like the OP's issue is XML, not HTML, where the CDATA blocks can't be nested. Not sure there's a solution for that one ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339879 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339842 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
RE: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
Could you use CFJSON instead http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 To: cf-talk Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339861 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
Yea I'm remembering why I chose to use cfwddx when I build this specific app, but I'm wishing I had used something else like that. Have you used that much with international or special character sets, writing to database, etc? Before I change serialization techniques I want to find the right one this time. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: Could you use CFJSON instead http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 To: cf-talk Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339870 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
RE: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
I haven't used it in that way no, but as JSON is so widely used (JQUERY for example) I would imagine it can cope with anything. Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 December 2010 00:43 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization Yea I'm remembering why I chose to use cfwddx when I build this specific app, but I'm wishing I had used something else like that. Have you used that much with international or special character sets, writing to database, etc? Before I change serialization techniques I want to find the right one this time. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: Could you use CFJSON instead http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 To: cf-talk Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339871 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
I'm pretty sure I've stored HTML fragments inside WDDX packets just fine, and never had an issue. Mind you, I haven't use WDDX in probably ~8 years ;o) Mark On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: I haven't used it in that way no, but as JSON is so widely used (JQUERY for example) I would imagine it can cope with anything. Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 December 2010 00:43 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization Yea I'm remembering why I chose to use cfwddx when I build this specific app, but I'm wishing I had used something else like that. Have you used that much with international or special character sets, writing to database, etc? Before I change serialization techniques I want to find the right one this time. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: Could you use CFJSON instead http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 To: cf-talk Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339874 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization
If it's valid XHTML with no high ASCII it works. Sent from my mobile device On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pretty sure I've stored HTML fragments inside WDDX packets just fine, and never had an issue. Mind you, I haven't use WDDX in probably ~8 years ;o) Mark On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: I haven't used it in that way no, but as JSON is so widely used (JQUERY for example) I would imagine it can cope with anything. Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 December 2010 00:43 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization Yea I'm remembering why I chose to use cfwddx when I build this specific app, but I'm wishing I had used something else like that. Have you used that much with international or special character sets, writing to database, etc? Before I change serialization techniques I want to find the right one this time. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote: Could you use CFJSON instead http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ Russ -Original Message- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:dan.baugh...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 To: cf-talk Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature tons more useful. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339875 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
