Re: Has anyone dealing with PCI-Compliance seem this?

2013-04-01 Thread Maureen

I have vague memories of that being an issue with HP buffer overflow, but
it has been years.  Google of HP dced says problems on port 135, but
again this is really old.

http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/369697


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.comwrote:


 I've been trying to deal with security scans and getting my serverup to
 PCI-Compliance standards. One ding that has been an issue from the start
 has involvedwhat the scan refers to as dced. The first support tech at
 the scanning company didn't know whatit was. I can't find out very much
 from searching, either. (I've foundthe acronym has a lot to do with certain
 state agencies, however!) Here's the text from the security scan: Title:
 possible vulnerability in HP dced
  Impact: A remote attacker could execute arbitrary commands with root
 privileges. Resolution: Apply
 patch PHSS_29963 for HP-UX 11.00, PHSS_29964 for HP-UX 11.11, or PHSS_29966
 for HP-UX 11.23. HP-UX patches are available from the [http://itrc.hp.com]
 HP Resource Center. Patch information for Tru64 users is available from [
 http://support.entegrity.com/private/patches/dce/ssrt4741.asp] Entegrity.
 Patch information for OpenVMS is available from [
 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/368882] SSRT 4741.  This may have
 something to do with virtualization from what I've gathered.I'm on a
 Virtual Private Server, at this point. So, that would make some
 sense.There's no program or port referenced by the scanning results,
 either. Clues and advice anyone? Thanks! Rick



~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:355217
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Has anyone dealing with PCI-Compliance seem this?

2013-04-01 Thread Dave Watts

 I've been trying to deal with security scans and getting my serverup to 
 PCI-Compliance standards. One ding that has been an
 issue from the start has involvedwhat the scan refers to as dced. The first 
 support tech at the scanning company didn't know
 what it was. I can't find out very much from searching, either. (I've 
 foundthe acronym has a lot to do with certain state agencies,
 however!) Here's the text from the security scan: Title: possible 
 vulnerability in HP dced
 Impact: A remote attacker could execute arbitrary commands with root 
 privileges.
 Resolution: Apply patch PHSS_29963 for HP-UX 11.00, PHSS_29964 for HP-UX 
 11.11, or PHSS_29966 for HP-UX 11.23.
 HP-UX patches are available from the [http://itrc.hp.com] HP Resource Center. 
 Patch information for Tru64 users is available
 from [http://support.entegrity.com/private/patches/dce/ssrt4741.asp] 
 Entegrity. Patch information for OpenVMS is available
 from [http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/368882] SSRT 4741.  This may 
 have something to do with virtualization from
 what I've gathered.I'm on a Virtual Private Server, at this point. So, that 
 would make some sense.There's no program or port
 referenced by the scanning results, either. Clues and advice anyone? Thanks! 
 Rick

This (dced) is a program found on HP-UX. Are you running on HP-UX,
Tru64 or OpenVMS? (My guess is no.) If you're not, you should go back
to the scanning vendor and tell them that you're not running an OS
with that vulnerability.

I'm not that familiar with scanning specifically for PCI compliance,
but aren't they scanning the interface from a public network? If so,
you should have a very small number of listening ports. Maybe just
two: TCP/80 and TCP/443. There is no reason why you'd expose TCP/135
to a public network (especially if you're running Windows).

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/

Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB) on
GSA Schedule, and provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers, online, or onsite.

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:355218
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm


Re: Has anyone dealing with PCI-Compliance seem this?

2013-04-01 Thread Justin Scott

 but aren't they scanning the interface from a public network? If so,
 you should have a very small number of listening ports. Maybe just
 two: TCP/80 and TCP/443. There is no reason why you'd expose
 TCP/135 to a public network (especially if you're running Windows).

Good advice; in my experience the scan vendors require you to open
your firewall to their scanner IPs so they can get a more complete
picture of vulnerabilities that may be lurking behind it.  One of my
clients ran into problems with this a while back because while 80/443
were the only things open to the public, they had an older version of
Veritas Backup Exec running on the network which had known
vulnerabilities that the QSA complained about.  PCI is a pain in the
arse.  I generally refer people to use Stripe or Braintree Payments
for processing for just these reasons.  The extra per-transaction
costs are usually less than the costs of dealing with all the
network/server security and maintenance required to satisfy the
compliance requirements.


-Justin

~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:355219
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm