[cfaussie] Facebook integration using ColdFusion
I have to implement the solution within our system which will communicate with Facebook via HTTP POST (remotely). Our clients are recruitment consultants they wanted to advertise their jobs on Facebook in their account. For example..this is the goal. - Our clients will create the job ad details like job title, location, job category, job description etc...within our system. - Our system will post job details into client's Facebook account via HTTP POST. - Later, our system should be also able to modify / archive the same job via HTTP POST. How is this possible? I looked into Facebook API documentation but NOT sure what to follow in order to implement this solution? Can somebody guide me? Looking forward to seeing your reply. Kind regards. - Hitesh. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion
Look at the facebook API on riaforge -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hitesh Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 8:44 PM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Facebook integration using ColdFusion I have to implement the solution within our system which will communicate with Facebook via HTTP POST (remotely). Our clients are recruitment consultants they wanted to advertise their jobs on Facebook in their account. For example..this is the goal. - Our clients will create the job ad details like job title, location, job category, job description etc...within our system. - Our system will post job details into client's Facebook account via HTTP POST. - Later, our system should be also able to modify / archive the same job via HTTP POST. How is this possible? I looked into Facebook API documentation but NOT sure what to follow in order to implement this solution? Can somebody guide me? Looking forward to seeing your reply. Kind regards. - Hitesh. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion
It should also be noted that they can't do it to their account. Their best option would be to create an application on Facebook, and then use the API as Dale suggested. Then people can join the application or page and leave at their own free will. Spamming to an account with jobs is not what a facebook account is mean to be about. -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dale Fraser Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 9:03 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion Look at the facebook API on riaforge --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion
Can you please tell me little bit more why there is a need to create Their best option would be to create an application on Facebook,??? Thanks. On Jul 16, 9:39 pm, CyberAngel andre...@gmail.com wrote: It should also be noted that they can't do it to their account. Their best option would be to create an application on Facebook, and then use the API as Dale suggested. Then people can join the application or page and leave at their own free will. Spamming to an account with jobs is not what a facebook account is mean to be about. -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dale Fraser Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 9:03 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion Look at the facebook API on riaforge --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion
Because facebook is about friends connecting... Applications and pages is about companies and organisations promoting and advertising. I suggest you log into facebook join the developers page and read the information available to you. Seek did exactly what your clients / customers want to do, the best option is a page / application where you get the same functionality as an account. The only difference is that the page / application is allowed to do things that the TOS doesn't cover for normal accounts. If you haven't read the developers blog, application pages or forums then you're doing yourself a disfavour by not doing so. Application is the best way to go, the reason being is that when you create an Application you then can set that to retrieve from your own servers. This allows you to connect, produce, direct and if you so desire spam (wouldn't recommend it) to anyone you wish that connects to your application from your own servers and database. Not to mention connect that application to any databse you so desire, including your clients and/or customers. Again your best bet first is to read the TOS, then read the developers section, then browse the forums. And as Dale suggested d/load the API that will allow you to do this. Been there and written many facebook applications, but at the end of the day the information you need is already on facebook. -Original Message- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hitesh Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 9:47 PM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Facebook integration using ColdFusion Can you please tell me little bit more why there is a need to create Their best option would be to create an application on Facebook,??? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] OT : Friday discussion To browse or not to browse
Today I thought I would log into my twitter account after 7 months mind you and have a look around again thinking maybe I can put it to some use (jury is still out on that one), but while I was in there I noticed in the right hand column under Trending topics I noticed a topic names IE6 Must die. Being human and curious by nature I thought I would check it out and noticed some interesting comments like IE6 must die for the web to move on and I spent days trying to get sites looking vaguely similar in IE6 to Firefox. IE IS EVIL! . I guess my question is, should IE6 die? Is IE really evil? I hear a lot of talk about how Microsoft browsers don't adhere to W3C standards and developing for IE is such a pain and FireFox is a much better browser. How much time do you really spend checking cross browser compatibility? Is it really worth it? In my experience, I would say not a great deal. If you stick to the standards I have found that you end up just tweaking the CSS a little and most of if is because of positioning issues. That said, this sort of issue is not only related to the IE browsers or IE6 specifically. MAC in general are a pain because of the way they render fonts and have there own style of classic fonts like Arial and so on. Issues like that cause problems with padding and spacing, especially if you are looking for a pixel perfect layout. At least with IE browsers you can use the IF/ELSE technique to include specific CSS files to target specific versions of the browser. There are CSS hacks for everything now, and honestly I don't think you need them as long as you stick to simple standards code. A lot can be achieved if you do this without having to sacrifice functionality or compatibility for the plethora of browsers available. In the end, every browser, new and old has their quirks and to point the finger and at one browser is unfair if not unjust. Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: OT : Friday discussion To browse or not to browse
Interesting discussion. Personally, the main issue I have with IE6 these days is I have a lot of users on my site who want to print everything out and I'm often getting people complaining about the right margin getting cut off. You can always guarantee these are IE6 users. I create a separate print stylesheet that only has percentage based widths in it, rather than pixel based it fixes the issues in IE6. But IMHO it's a nuisance having to do that when the problem has already been addressed in more modern browsers. Not sure that I agree with your comment that it's unfair to target this browser though. The fact is that it's old technology - there have been two newer IE releases with address a lot of its issues, and there are many other alternatives. The real problem as far as I am concerned is that people using IE6 are often using operating systems which Microsoft will no longer support, but still expect web sites to support them. The good news is that it is slowly dying of old age as far as I can tell...we're down to about 23% of our users on it. Hopefully just like $1 and $2 notes and copper coins they'll all be out of circulation soon. :-))) Andrew. 2009/7/17 Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au Today I thought I would log into my twitter account after 7 months mind you and have a look around again thinking maybe I can put it to some use (jury is still out on that one), but while I was in there I noticed in the right hand column under Trending topics I noticed a topic names *IE6 Must die*. Being human and curious by nature I thought I would check it out and noticed some interesting comments like IE6 must die for the web to move on and I spent days trying to get sites looking vaguely similar in IE6 to Firefox. IE IS EVIL! . I guess my question is, should IE6 die? Is IE really evil? I hear a lot of talk about how Microsoft browsers don't adhere to W3C standards and developing for IE is such a pain and FireFox is a much better browser. How much time do you really spend checking cross browser compatibility? Is it really worth it? In my experience, I would say not a great deal. If you stick to the standards I have found that you end up just tweaking the CSS a little and most of if is because of positioning issues. That said, this sort of issue is not only related to the IE browsers or IE6 specifically. MAC in general are a pain because of the way they render fonts and have there own style of classic fonts like Arial and so on. Issues like that cause problems with padding and spacing, especially if you are looking for a pixel perfect layout. At least with IE browsers you can use the IF/ELSE technique to include specific CSS files to target specific versions of the browser. There are CSS hacks for everything now, and honestly I don't think you need them as long as you stick to simple standards code. A lot can be achieved if you do this without having to sacrifice functionality or compatibility for the plethora of browsers available. In the end, every browser, new and old has their quirks and to point the finger and at one browser is unfair if not unjust. Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: OT : Friday discussion To browse or not to browse
so what you guys are saying is that you're hopeful that Microsoft is successful in promoting IE8 ... yes? The real problem as far as I am concerned is that people using IE6 are often using operating systems which Microsoft will no longer support, but still expect web sites to support them. you are NOT going to have any joy converting those people from Internet Explorer to Chrome or Firefox. Give up now before the heartache. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Myersam2...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting discussion. Personally, the main issue I have with IE6 these days is I have a lot of users on my site who want to print everything out and I'm often getting people complaining about the right margin getting cut off. You can always guarantee these are IE6 users. I create a separate print stylesheet that only has percentage based widths in it, rather than pixel based it fixes the issues in IE6. But IMHO it's a nuisance having to do that when the problem has already been addressed in more modern browsers. Not sure that I agree with your comment that it's unfair to target this browser though. The fact is that it's old technology - there have been two newer IE releases with address a lot of its issues, and there are many other alternatives. The real problem as far as I am concerned is that people using IE6 are often using operating systems which Microsoft will no longer support, but still expect web sites to support them. The good news is that it is slowly dying of old age as far as I can tell...we're down to about 23% of our users on it. Hopefully just like $1 and $2 notes and copper coins they'll all be out of circulation soon. :-))) Andrew. 2009/7/17 Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au Today I thought I would log into my twitter account after 7 months mind you and have a look around again thinking maybe I can put it to some use (jury is still out on that one), but while I was in there I noticed in the right hand column under Trending topics I noticed a topic names IE6 Must die. Being human and curious by nature I thought I would check it out and noticed some interesting comments like IE6 must die for the web to move on and I spent days trying to get sites looking vaguely similar in IE6 to Firefox. IE IS EVIL! . I guess my question is, should IE6 die? Is IE really evil? I hear a lot of talk about how Microsoft browsers don't adhere to W3C standards and developing for IE is such a pain and FireFox is a much better browser. How much time do you really spend checking cross browser compatibility? Is it really worth it? In my experience, I would say not a great deal. If you stick to the standards I have found that you end up just tweaking the CSS a little and most of if is because of positioning issues. That said, this sort of issue is not only related to the IE browsers or IE6 specifically. MAC in general are a pain because of the way they render fonts and have there own style of classic fonts like Arial and so on. Issues like that cause problems with padding and spacing, especially if you are looking for a pixel perfect layout. At least with IE browsers you can use the IF/ELSE technique to include specific CSS files to target specific versions of the browser. There are CSS hacks for everything now, and honestly I don't think you need them as long as you stick to simple standards code. A lot can be achieved if you do this without having to sacrifice functionality or compatibility for the plethora of browsers available. In the end, every browser, new and old has their quirks and to point the finger and at one browser is unfair if not unjust. Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: OT : Friday discussion To browse or not to browse
I should also point out that the SOE of the enterprise environment uses IE6 (thousands of machines) there is a pilot and review (run by the department next door to me) of evaluating for deployment ... wait for it ... IE7 ... On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Barry Beattiebarry.beat...@gmail.com wrote: so what you guys are saying is that you're hopeful that Microsoft is successful in promoting IE8 ... yes? The real problem as far as I am concerned is that people using IE6 are often using operating systems which Microsoft will no longer support, but still expect web sites to support them. you are NOT going to have any joy converting those people from Internet Explorer to Chrome or Firefox. Give up now before the heartache. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Myersam2...@gmail.com wrote: Interesting discussion. Personally, the main issue I have with IE6 these days is I have a lot of users on my site who want to print everything out and I'm often getting people complaining about the right margin getting cut off. You can always guarantee these are IE6 users. I create a separate print stylesheet that only has percentage based widths in it, rather than pixel based it fixes the issues in IE6. But IMHO it's a nuisance having to do that when the problem has already been addressed in more modern browsers. Not sure that I agree with your comment that it's unfair to target this browser though. The fact is that it's old technology - there have been two newer IE releases with address a lot of its issues, and there are many other alternatives. The real problem as far as I am concerned is that people using IE6 are often using operating systems which Microsoft will no longer support, but still expect web sites to support them. The good news is that it is slowly dying of old age as far as I can tell...we're down to about 23% of our users on it. Hopefully just like $1 and $2 notes and copper coins they'll all be out of circulation soon. :-))) Andrew. 2009/7/17 Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au Today I thought I would log into my twitter account after 7 months mind you and have a look around again thinking maybe I can put it to some use (jury is still out on that one), but while I was in there I noticed in the right hand column under Trending topics I noticed a topic names IE6 Must die. Being human and curious by nature I thought I would check it out and noticed some interesting comments like IE6 must die for the web to move on and I spent days trying to get sites looking vaguely similar in IE6 to Firefox. IE IS EVIL! . I guess my question is, should IE6 die? Is IE really evil? I hear a lot of talk about how Microsoft browsers don't adhere to W3C standards and developing for IE is such a pain and FireFox is a much better browser. How much time do you really spend checking cross browser compatibility? Is it really worth it? In my experience, I would say not a great deal. If you stick to the standards I have found that you end up just tweaking the CSS a little and most of if is because of positioning issues. That said, this sort of issue is not only related to the IE browsers or IE6 specifically. MAC in general are a pain because of the way they render fonts and have there own style of classic fonts like Arial and so on. Issues like that cause problems with padding and spacing, especially if you are looking for a pixel perfect layout. At least with IE browsers you can use the IF/ELSE technique to include specific CSS files to target specific versions of the browser. There are CSS hacks for everything now, and honestly I don't think you need them as long as you stick to simple standards code. A lot can be achieved if you do this without having to sacrifice functionality or compatibility for the plethora of browsers available. In the end, every browser, new and old has their quirks and to point the finger and at one browser is unfair if not unjust. Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] OT : Another Friday discussion : FLEX Vs HTML5
Just watched an interesting, and my first video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AusOPz8Ww80) on what's happening with HTML5. From what I have seen in the past, HTML5 has been in the works for a long time and from what I can see now it will still be a while before it is officially released even though a few browsers are starting to implement some of the functionality now. It was interesting to see they are doing a lot of work around asynchronous sending and receiving of data, 2D/3D rendering, offline data storage, native video embedding with the video tag and and some other cool stuff that will certainly make developing websites a lot more interesting. I couldn't help but think though while I was watching it was that you can do all this stuff in FLEX and FLASH and using Blaze or LifeCycle so I put to youwhich would you rather? Develop with FLEX or utilise HTML5 ? Considering the uptake of the average internet user actually upgrading their browsers I can't really see a great opportunity to be able to utilise the additional features and functionality that will come with HTML5 where as the uptake of the FLASH plug-in already has the penetration and the flexibility and customisation of FLEX and FLASH is heaps better than what I could see the HTML5 components being. The way I see it, HTML5 is like a new road, but you are saying to people they have to buy a new car to drive on it (yes I know the browsers are free), and to a lot of users, computers are like cars, as long as it goes and they put fuel in it they don't care and I see the same thing with browsers. I wouldn't think the average user would consciously upgrade their browsers which is why we still have XP users running IE6it works and that's all they are worried about. - What are your thoughts? - How sellable is HTML5 to clients? - Can you justify saying to your client Hey we can do this really cool stuff but ANYONE who wants to use it will have to upgrade their browser. - Is HTML5 just going to create a new generation of hacks and work arounds to utilise new features and still retain backwards compatibility? - Do you think that the time being spent on HTML5 would be better spent getting everyone to implement the HTML4 standards more consistently? Food for thought Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: OT : Another Friday discussion : FLEX Vs HTML5
- How sellable is HTML5 to clients? see my comments on how the Enterprise I work in is still using IE6 across the board and is only now evaluating IE7... (whereas Flex, or at least FlashPlayer10 is here already). Meh, my 1.5cents barry.b On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Steve Onnisst...@cfcentral.com.au wrote: Just watched an interesting, and my first video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AusOPz8Ww80) on what's happening with HTML5. From what I have seen in the past, HTML5 has been in the works for a long time and from what I can see now it will still be a while before it is officially released even though a few browsers are starting to implement some of the functionality now. It was interesting to see they are doing a lot of work around asynchronous sending and receiving of data, 2D/3D rendering, offline data storage, native video embedding with the video tag and and some other cool stuff that will certainly make developing websites a lot more interesting. I couldn't help but think though while I was watching it was that you can do all this stuff in FLEX and FLASH and using Blaze or LifeCycle so I put to youwhich would you rather? Develop with FLEX or utilise HTML5 ? Considering the uptake of the average internet user actually upgrading their browsers I can't really see a great opportunity to be able to utilise the additional features and functionality that will come with HTML5 where as the uptake of the FLASH plug-in already has the penetration and the flexibility and customisation of FLEX and FLASH is heaps better than what I could see the HTML5 components being. The way I see it, HTML5 is like a new road, but you are saying to people they have to buy a new car to drive on it (yes I know the browsers are free), and to a lot of users, computers are like cars, as long as it goes and they put fuel in it they don't care and I see the same thing with browsers. I wouldn't think the average user would consciously upgrade their browsers which is why we still have XP users running IE6it works and that's all they are worried about. - What are your thoughts? - How sellable is HTML5 to clients? - Can you justify saying to your client Hey we can do this really cool stuff but ANYONE who wants to use it will have to upgrade their browser. - Is HTML5 just going to create a new generation of hacks and work arounds to utilise new features and still retain backwards compatibility? - Do you think that the time being spent on HTML5 would be better spent getting everyone to implement the HTML4 standards more consistently? Food for thought Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] Re: OT : Friday discussion To browse or not to browse
I cringe when I hear the word just. As a production manager, I hear a lot of just related to IE6 specific tweaks (it will 'just' take me an hour or two), which cumulate to thousands of dollars per year and significant schedule pain. Yes, in a perfect world IE6 would be managed through perfect CSS and if/then statements. But our world of plug ins, widgets, third-party ad-ons and integration with legacy systems is far from perfect. I require an element of predictability and profitability that IE6 in particular threatens. It takes a significant amount of time to perform a full user test on each browser, and accommodating the likes of Safari, IE6, IE7, IE8, FF2, FF3, and Opera can be a 2-day exercise, not too mention if there are issues that require changes and re-testing. It would be nice to eliminate just one of the options we as a society feel are necessary. If I have an option to kill something, IE6 is top of my list. Chad who still lurks on Cold Fusion forums like the bad smell from the lunch your 6th grade kid forgot in their bag over school holidays On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.auwrote: Today I thought I would log into my twitter account after 7 months mind you and have a look around again thinking maybe I can put it to some use (jury is still out on that one), but while I was in there I noticed in the right hand column under Trending topics I noticed a topic names *IE6 Must die*. Being human and curious by nature I thought I would check it out and noticed some interesting comments like IE6 must die for the web to move on and I spent days trying to get sites looking vaguely similar in IE6 to Firefox. IE IS EVIL! . I guess my question is, should IE6 die? Is IE really evil? I hear a lot of talk about how Microsoft browsers don't adhere to W3C standards and developing for IE is such a pain and FireFox is a much better browser. How much time do you really spend checking cross browser compatibility? Is it really worth it? In my experience, I would say not a great deal. If you stick to the standards I have found that you end up just tweaking the CSS a little and most of if is because of positioning issues. That said, this sort of issue is not only related to the IE browsers or IE6 specifically. MAC in general are a pain because of the way they render fonts and have there own style of classic fonts like Arial and so on. Issues like that cause problems with padding and spacing, especially if you are looking for a pixel perfect layout. At least with IE browsers you can use the IF/ELSE technique to include specific CSS files to target specific versions of the browser. There are CSS hacks for everything now, and honestly I don't think you need them as long as you stick to simple standards code. A lot can be achieved if you do this without having to sacrifice functionality or compatibility for the plethora of browsers available. In the end, every browser, new and old has their quirks and to point the finger and at one browser is unfair if not unjust. Steve --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[cfaussie] [ANN-SYD] Next Monday: Going It Alone
Monday 20th July, 6pm for 6:30 start A panel discussion on the pros and cons of becoming an independent contractor/sole trader/business owner. The panel consists of people who have successfully gone out on their own. Please RSVP to help with the catering numbers. You need to sign in and join the group to RSVP. Note: In order to be eligible for the major software prize, you must have attended at least 3 meeting since the June major software prize draw. Previous major software winners within the last 2 years are ineligible. Chris -- Chris Velevitch Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney m: 0415 469 095 www.apugs.org.au Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney July meeting: Going It Alone Date: Mon 20th July 6pm for 6:30 start Details and RSVP on http://groups.adobe.com/posts/1f34697b9b --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups cfaussie group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
