[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?
On 17 Gen, 19:45, "Ben Goodger (Google)" wrote: > +1 > > FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months > (MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be > written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to > be Cocoa on OS X. > > -Ben > So, different native toolkits for each platform. But while Windows has mfc and Osx uses cocoa/carbon, i wonder what is "THE" native toolkit for linux (?) Or, if you prefer, why did you choose gtk over qt (at least) on linux? It's very strange, since google earth uses qt... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?
On 17 Gen, 19:45, "Ben Goodger (Google)" wrote: > +1 > > FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months > (MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be > written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to > be Cocoa on OS X. > > -Ben So, different native toolkits for each platform. But while Windows has mfc and Osx uses cocoa/carbon, i wonder what is the 'native toolkit' for linux (?) Or, if you prefer, why did you choose gtk over qt (at least) on linux? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
