I actually didn't mean to start this conversation. Is there still time
to run away and hide? :)
On a (slightly) more serious note, I agree with your assessment and I
thought at first that there was some work being done on that.
:DG
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
-chromium-reviews, +chromium-dev
Not really sure. It seems to me that we need to send patches upstream to
make InspectorController not depend directly on JSC. It doesn't seem like it
should need to interact so directly with JSC. It's a non-trivial amount of
work. Is there another way we could tackle this?
Ojan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
LGTM.
BTW, what's our plan on getting this file unforked? :)
http://codereview.chromium.org/27007
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
