[cia-drugs] [truthabout911] Re: John Judge

2007-09-17 Thread mark urban
Kris,

Do you think Fetzer is disinfo?


I find it hard to believe the pentahit was accomplished with a 
commercial jet; however, Judge says he knows people who saw luggage 
and remains.

 --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 John Judge is not disinfo,
 
 Eastman is.
 
 Eastman's disinfo is a brush of truth and lies.
 
 Be aware.
 
 Peace,
 K
 
 On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Andy McCracken wrote:
 
  Good luck with the march.
  It does make a difference - they get worried when there are 
angry  
  crowds in
  the streets.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: seveneasypeaces [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 4:37 PM
  Subject: [truthabout911] Re: John Judge
 
 
  That is what my question was about looking around.  John never 
said
  a word about 911 details last night.   He is quite a historian on
  Washington insider stuff.  He did talk about the need to include 
911
  truth in all debates.  He agrees we've been had.  And he has 
gotten
  permission to start a museum in DC on hidden news.  He has a 
massive
  collection.
 
  DE was talking about JFK and from what I heard last night from 
both
  John Judge and Joan Mellen, the cia killed JFK (the cia doing the
  dirty work of the elites).  This has been my research too for the
  past 7 years.  I was wondering about DE's JFK comment.
 
  We now know the plane at the pentagon was a decoy, flying over 
at the
  exact time the bomb or missile or drone hit. perfect timing.  
When
  John said those things it may have been before we understood 
that.
  People saw a plane (it was a decoy).  http://www.thepentacon.com
 
  I'm off to the march in DC.  4,000 people are supposed to lay 
down
  and die at the capitol.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], banoyes2 banoyes2@  
  wrote:
 
 
  http://www.blackopradio.com/forums/messages.cfm?
threadid=5EC10FBC-
  123F-ECE3-BC9FB9A95BD4DDEA
 
  You should look around a little more
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





[cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn

2007-09-17 Thread mark urban
It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 911.




--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that the pentagon 
plane turned into plasmic matter.  as i understand it, plasmic 
matter is the fourth phase of matter.  solid, liquid, gas, plasma.  
like in the sun.  the sun is plasmic matter.  he's saying that the 
plane vaporized into plasma and that's why the damage to the 
pentagon went so deep, because of the focused energy.
 the plane vaporized into plasma because that one wall had been 
armored.  
 he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human 
remains.
 of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the 
plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill, 
etc.  could a missile be vaporized into plasma?  according to 
loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this.  he was 
stating this as proof that the plasmic effect could be possible.  
heh.
 to me, its all just begging the question.  for instance, why did 
the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back 
around, and hit THAT side?  and what about the alleged explosions 
before the pentagon strike?
 now theyre talking about security cams.
 www.wtprn.com
 9:15 pm central time





[cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn

2007-09-17 Thread mark urban
It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 911.




--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that the pentagon 
plane turned into plasmic matter.  as i understand it, plasmic 
matter is the fourth phase of matter.  solid, liquid, gas, plasma.  
like in the sun.  the sun is plasmic matter.  he's saying that the 
plane vaporized into plasma and that's why the damage to the 
pentagon went so deep, because of the focused energy.
 the plane vaporized into plasma because that one wall had been 
armored.  
 he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human 
remains.
 of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the 
plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill, 
etc.  could a missile be vaporized into plasma?  according to 
loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this.  he was 
stating this as proof that the plasmic effect could be possible.  
heh.
 to me, its all just begging the question.  for instance, why did 
the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back 
around, and hit THAT side?  and what about the alleged explosions 
before the pentagon strike?
 now theyre talking about security cams.
 www.wtprn.com
 9:15 pm central time





Re: [cia-drugs] [truthabout911] Re: John Judge

2007-09-17 Thread RoadsEnd
Whether Fetzer is or no, I do not know. But what he says, yes.

Heavy psyops going on. Definite False memes are 1. No Plane at  
Pentagon, 2. No Planes in NY, 3. Jews/Israel did it all.

I am sure there were radio controls, you don't leave such to chance,  
faith or orders.

Why  create a fake with turns into the just reinforced wall?

Arguing details is a big reason.

While the perps continue on with their shadow play.

Peace,
K

On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:59 PM, mark urban wrote:

 Kris,

 Do you think Fetzer is disinfo?


 I find it hard to believe the pentahit was accomplished with a
 commercial jet; however, Judge says he knows people who saw luggage
 and remains.

  --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 John Judge is not disinfo,

 Eastman is.

 Eastman's disinfo is a brush of truth and lies.

 Be aware.

 Peace,
 K

 On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Andy McCracken wrote:

 Good luck with the march.
 It does make a difference - they get worried when there are
 angry
 crowds in
 the streets.


 - Original Message -
 From: seveneasypeaces [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 4:37 PM
 Subject: [truthabout911] Re: John Judge


 That is what my question was about looking around.  John never
 said
 a word about 911 details last night.   He is quite a historian on
 Washington insider stuff.  He did talk about the need to include
 911
 truth in all debates.  He agrees we've been had.  And he has
 gotten
 permission to start a museum in DC on hidden news.  He has a
 massive
 collection.

 DE was talking about JFK and from what I heard last night from
 both
 John Judge and Joan Mellen, the cia killed JFK (the cia doing the
 dirty work of the elites).  This has been my research too for the
 past 7 years.  I was wondering about DE's JFK comment.

 We now know the plane at the pentagon was a decoy, flying over
 at the
 exact time the bomb or missile or drone hit. perfect timing.
 When
 John said those things it may have been before we understood
 that.
 People saw a plane (it was a decoy).  http://www.thepentacon.com

 I'm off to the march in DC.  4,000 people are supposed to lay
 down
 and die at the capitol.







 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], banoyes2 banoyes2@
 wrote:


 http://www.blackopradio.com/forums/messages.cfm?
 threadid=5EC10FBC-
 123F-ECE3-BC9FB9A95BD4DDEA

 You should look around a little more






 Yahoo! Groups Links







 Yahoo! Groups Links








 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

 Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

 OM

 Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn

2007-09-17 Thread RoadsEnd
Basically, my understanding of what Loftus is talking about is what  
happens when a large object moving at a high rate of speed hits an  
immovable object creating high temperatures  and thusly  
disintegration. What form this disintegration took and if this  
activity created any special effect I do not know.

Peace,
K

On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:09 PM, mark urban wrote:

 It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 911.




 --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that the pentagon
 plane turned into plasmic matter.  as i understand it, plasmic
 matter is the fourth phase of matter.  solid, liquid, gas, plasma.
 like in the sun.  the sun is plasmic matter.  he's saying that the
 plane vaporized into plasma and that's why the damage to the
 pentagon went so deep, because of the focused energy.
 the plane vaporized into plasma because that one wall had been
 armored.
 he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human
 remains.
 of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the
 plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill,
 etc.  could a missile be vaporized into plasma?  according to
 loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this.  he was
 stating this as proof that the plasmic effect could be possible.
 heh.
 to me, its all just begging the question.  for instance, why did
 the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back
 around, and hit THAT side?  and what about the alleged explosions
 before the pentagon strike?
 now theyre talking about security cams.
 www.wtprn.com
 9:15 pm central time





 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

 Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

 OM

 Yahoo! Groups Links






[cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn

2007-09-17 Thread mark urban
The concept of a shaped charge is what is being proffered. An 
inverted cone of metal jacketed high explosive that hits armor 
creates a molten stream of metal that burns through the armor plate.
If Loftus wants to say a commercial jet hitting a building behaves 
like an RPG7 hitting a humvee, then I would think that we are now 
seeing the next phase in the 911 cover up. I lump this right in there 
with Mike Ruppert telling us to forget about 911. geez!


 --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Basically, my understanding of what Loftus is talking about is 
what  
 happens when a large object moving at a high rate of speed hits an  
 immovable object creating high temperatures  and thusly  
 disintegration. What form this disintegration took and if this  
 activity created any special effect I do not know.
 
 Peace,
 K
 
 On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:09 PM, mark urban wrote:
 
  It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 
911.
 
 
 
 
  --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis
  thehatefulnerd@ wrote:
 
  john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that the pentagon
  plane turned into plasmic matter.  as i understand it, plasmic
  matter is the fourth phase of matter.  solid, liquid, gas, plasma.
  like in the sun.  the sun is plasmic matter.  he's saying that 
the
  plane vaporized into plasma and that's why the damage to the
  pentagon went so deep, because of the focused energy.
  the plane vaporized into plasma because that one wall had been
  armored.
  he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human
  remains.
  of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the
  plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill,
  etc.  could a missile be vaporized into plasma?  according to
  loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this.  he was
  stating this as proof that the plasmic effect could be possible.
  heh.
  to me, its all just begging the question.  for instance, why did
  the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back
  around, and hit THAT side?  and what about the alleged explosions
  before the pentagon strike?
  now theyre talking about security cams.
  www.wtprn.com
  9:15 pm central time
 
 
 
 
 
  Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
 
  Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
 
  OM
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





[cia-drugs] [truthabout911] Re: John Judge

2007-09-17 Thread mark urban
The problem as I see it is that Fetzer and Morgan Reynolds are 
heading down the trail that leads to Webfairy land. Fetzer asserts 
that something much more powerful than jets, jet fuel and even 
thermite has to be the cause of the towers collapsing at greater than 
freefall speeds. 

The no plane theory booster without equal is Nico Haupt, who, if you 
have ever had the pleasure to meet him, is very high strung and 
quickly assumes that anybody who does not agree with him is a CIA 
plant. You can imagine my chagrin when Fetzer starts talking about 
the no plane theory, particle weapons, Satellite based beam weapons 
and mininukes.

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Whether Fetzer is or no, I do not know. But what he says, yes.
 
 Heavy psyops going on. Definite False memes are 1. No Plane at  
 Pentagon, 2. No Planes in NY, 3. Jews/Israel did it all.
 
 I am sure there were radio controls, you don't leave such to 
chance,  
 faith or orders.
 
 Why  create a fake with turns into the just reinforced wall?
 
 Arguing details is a big reason.
 
 While the perps continue on with their shadow play.
 
 Peace,
 K
 
 On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:59 PM, mark urban wrote:
 
  Kris,
 
  Do you think Fetzer is disinfo?
 
 
  I find it hard to believe the pentahit was accomplished with a
  commercial jet; however, Judge says he knows people who saw 
luggage
  and remains.
 
   --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd roadsend@ wrote:
 
  John Judge is not disinfo,
 
  Eastman is.
 
  Eastman's disinfo is a brush of truth and lies.
 
  Be aware.
 
  Peace,
  K
 
  On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Andy McCracken wrote:
 
  Good luck with the march.
  It does make a difference - they get worried when there are
  angry
  crowds in
  the streets.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: seveneasypeaces seveneasypeaces@
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 4:37 PM
  Subject: [truthabout911] Re: John Judge
 
 
  That is what my question was about looking around.  John 
never
  said
  a word about 911 details last night.   He is quite a historian 
on
  Washington insider stuff.  He did talk about the need to 
include
  911
  truth in all debates.  He agrees we've been had.  And he has
  gotten
  permission to start a museum in DC on hidden news.  He has a
  massive
  collection.
 
  DE was talking about JFK and from what I heard last night from
  both
  John Judge and Joan Mellen, the cia killed JFK (the cia doing 
the
  dirty work of the elites).  This has been my research too for 
the
  past 7 years.  I was wondering about DE's JFK comment.
 
  We now know the plane at the pentagon was a decoy, flying over
  at the
  exact time the bomb or missile or drone hit. perfect timing.
  When
  John said those things it may have been before we understood
  that.
  People saw a plane (it was a decoy).  
http://www.thepentacon.com
 
  I'm off to the march in DC.  4,000 people are supposed to lay
  down
  and die at the capitol.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], banoyes2 banoyes2@
  wrote:
 
 
  http://www.blackopradio.com/forums/messages.cfm?
  threadid=5EC10FBC-
  123F-ECE3-BC9FB9A95BD4DDEA
 
  You should look around a little more
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
 
  Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
 
  OM
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 





Re: [cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn

2007-09-17 Thread Vigilius Haufniensis
thats one f'n special effect.
i think what loftus was doing was going along with the commission report. 
at one point he stated that the WTC was built as an exosekeleton.  never 
mind the 47 steel gurders on the inside.  to be fair to loftus, he did say 
that all the questions were legitimate and should be discussed.  i dont know 
whethere he buys into any or all of it or what.  i was just taken aback.



- Original Message - 
From: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
Cc: RoadsEnd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [cia-drugs] Re: loftus on wtprn


 Basically, my understanding of what Loftus is talking about is what
 happens when a large object moving at a high rate of speed hits an
 immovable object creating high temperatures  and thusly
 disintegration. What form this disintegration took and if this
 activity created any special effect I do not know.

 Peace,
 K

 On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:09 PM, mark urban wrote:

 It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 911.




 --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, Vigilius Haufniensis
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that the pentagon
 plane turned into plasmic matter.  as i understand it, plasmic
 matter is the fourth phase of matter.  solid, liquid, gas, plasma.
 like in the sun.  the sun is plasmic matter.  he's saying that the
 plane vaporized into plasma and that's why the damage to the
 pentagon went so deep, because of the focused energy.
 the plane vaporized into plasma because that one wall had been
 armored.
 he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human
 remains.
 of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the
 plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill,
 etc.  could a missile be vaporized into plasma?  according to
 loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this.  he was
 stating this as proof that the plasmic effect could be possible.
 heh.
 to me, its all just begging the question.  for instance, why did
 the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back
 around, and hit THAT side?  and what about the alleged explosions
 before the pentagon strike?
 now theyre talking about security cams.
 www.wtprn.com
 9:15 pm central time





 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

 Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

 OM

 Yahoo! Groups Links






 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

 Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

 OM

 Yahoo! Groups Links





 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.21/1012 - Release Date: 
 9/16/2007 6:32 PM