[c-nsp] DOM on 6724-SFP (was: Will UDLD work with converters ?)
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:12:47PM -0700, Kevin Graham wrote: Also, bear in mind that not all c65k ports support reading DDM info from SFPs. SUP720 cards will, as will later hardware revisions of the 6724sfp blades. Earlier hardware revisions won't. Yeah. I really wish this had gone under a new part number (WS-X6724A-SFP?). It hasn't happened yet, but I dread having to RMA one of our HW rev = 3.0 cards. Well, DOM on 6724-SFP is one of the policy-banned features I'm afraid. For many years, multiple customers tried several times to get it working. This topic was also mentioned on various meetings with Cisco, for example in 2007 I gave the following presentation on European NREN workshop: http://md.bts.sk/wien2007-dom.pdf In 2008, the broken I2C bus was fixed on 6724-SFP linecards (HW rev 3.0) and everyone hoped the problem is over. But instead of announcing DOM support on these cards, new IOS enhancements were put into SXI train, which aim to disable this functionality in software: #sh inte g 3/1 tra Module 3 doesn't support DOM #sh inte tra supported-modules Mod DOM support -- 3 Not Applicable I really fail to undestand, why someone at Cisco tries to make our work harder and disables highly useful features for no reason. I suppose it's just a belief that customers will buy ES20 modules instead, but given that wirespeed 1RU switches with 10G uplinks and 24 SFP downlinks are available from multiple vendors at reasonable prices, this assumption fails miserably. With kind regards, -- Marian Ďurkovič network manager Slovak Technical University Tel: +421 2 571 041 81 Computer Centre, Nám. Slobody 17 Fax: +421 2 524 94 351 812 43 Bratislava, Slovak RepublicE-mail/sip: m...@bts.sk -- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco SCE simultaneous users
Dear All, can anyone advice, does the SCE QM (Quota Manager) supports that a Username is running on Multiple SCE at the same time ? we have users in our network that can access the Network from two different places using the same username So what we got is that we have this username is running on multiple SCE on the same time my question is there is any problem in quota calculation when the same Subscriber is running on the same time on multiple SCEs ? Thanks Jason ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Crypto tunnel issue or undocumented feature?
Hi Jonas Jonas Jonsson wrote: It was a bit puzzling until after looking at the remote config we allowed icmp and the tunnel now stays up. Hence is this an undocumented feature or a bug? Can you post the ACLs at either end, and provide software versions for both ends? Peter ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF
Hi . Though I read past reference, I'm still confused about support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF. Thanks. Liviu Cohen Director of Network Engineering RD Media Gateways Veraz Networks Ltd. www.veraznetworks.com Mail liviu.co...@veraznetworks.com Phone +972-3 -970-9047 Cell +972-54-970-9047 Fax +972-3-970-9442 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco SCE simultaneous users
Jason, It's not supported, The Cisco Quota Manager implementation assumes a subscriber can exist on one SCE at any given time. However, customers may implement their own QM on top of the SCE Subscribers API and have it support such topology. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Alex Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 09:53 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco SCE simultaneous users Dear All, can anyone advice, does the SCE QM (Quota Manager) supports that a Username is running on Multiple SCE at the same time ? we have users in our network that can access the Network from two different places using the same username So what we got is that we have this username is running on multiple SCE on the same time my question is there is any problem in quota calculation when the same Subscriber is running on the same time on multiple SCEs ? Thanks Jason ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF
Liviu, Can you explain a bit what you want to achieve? Thanks Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liviu Cohen Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:14 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF Hi . Though I read past reference, I'm still confused about support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF. Thanks. Liviu Cohen Director of Network Engineering RD Media Gateways Veraz Networks Ltd. www.veraznetworks.com Mail liviu.co...@veraznetworks.com Phone +972-3 -970-9047 Cell +972-54-970-9047 Fax +972-3-970-9442 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF
This is possible using the set vrf next-hop command: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute/command/reference/irp_pi2.html#wp1035512 Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liviu Cohen Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:14 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF Hi . Though I read past reference, I'm still confused about support of PBR action: set ip next-hop under VRF. Thanks. Liviu Cohen Director of Network Engineering RD Media Gateways Veraz Networks Ltd. www.veraznetworks.com Mail liviu.co...@veraznetworks.com Phone +972-3 -970-9047 Cell +972-54-970-9047 Fax +972-3-970-9442 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
All, Just noticed IOS 15.0 is out... but why the sudden jump in image naming?! Poggs ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
On Sun Oct 04, 2009 at 11:10:07PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote: Just noticed IOS 15.0 is out... but why the sudden jump in image naming?! Looks like they've jumped from 12.4 to 15.0. Sounds a bit like the jump from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 7. Took a look at 15.0 for my 877... ADVANCED IP SERVICES c870-advipservicesk9-mz.150-1.M.bin Release Date: 01/Oct/2009 Size: 23554.10 KB (24119396 bytes) Minimum Memory: DRAM:192 MB Flash:36 MB My 877 is fairly new (couple of months old), and only has 128M of RAM and 24M of flash. Gah, bloat. Simon -- Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain Registration * Director|* Domain Web Hosting * Internet Consultancy * Bogons Ltd | * http://www.bogons.net/ * Email: i...@bogons.net * ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
Simon Lockhart wrote: Took a look at 15.0 for my 877... ADVANCED IP SERVICES c870-advipservicesk9-mz.150-1.M.bin Release Date: 01/Oct/2009 Size: 23554.10 KB (24119396 bytes) Minimum Memory: DRAM:192 MB Flash:36 MB My 877 is fairly new (couple of months old), and only has 128M of RAM and 24M of flash. Gah, bloat. IIRC, 128Mb DRAM and 24Mb flash was the most you could fit in an 877W, although I recall having one with 192Mb after an accidental oh, it works with a 128Mb DIMM. Poggs ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Simon Lockhart wrote: Looks like they've jumped from 12.4 to 15.0. Sounds a bit like the jump from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 7. Took a look at 15.0 for my 877... ADVANCED IP SERVICES c870-advipservicesk9-mz.150-1.M.bin Release Date: 01/Oct/2009 Size: 23554.10 KB (24119396 bytes) Minimum Memory: DRAM:192 MB Flash:36 MB My 877 is fairly new (couple of months old), and only has 128M of RAM and 24M of flash. Gah, bloat. And that's for a little DSL router? I don't know whether to be shocked or happy that the cisco 877 DSL router is upgradable to 256mb RAM and 52mb Flash. -- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net| _ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
13 I can see skipping for superstitious reasons. 14 I dunno... maybe 15 to round it out to a '5', like Firefox 3.0 - 3.5? Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
Peter, Someone on twitter said that Asian culture has a phobia of the number 14, similar to the western phobia of 13. I would have preferred Cisco just ignore this stuff, but if they were going to bump, I guess 15 is just as good as 14. At least they are not naming it Cisco IOS 2010 or some such. Also, I just saw some references to what appears to be show version output for next version of ISR routersdown near the bottom of: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtly_sgnd_sw.html, you can see what appears to be a Cisco 3945 booting. Matt - Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk wrote: All, Just noticed IOS 15.0 is out... but why the sudden jump in image naming?! Poggs ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- -- Matthew Marlowe - http://www.deploylinux.net/ CEO @ DeployLinux Consulting, Inc m...@deploylinux.net, 858-400-7430 http://www.twitter.com/deploylinux ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump?
New routers will be announced this week (Tuesday IIRC?). tv - Original Message - From: Matthew Marlowe m...@deploylinux.net To: Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 9:20 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS 15.0 - why the numbering jump? Peter, Someone on twitter said that Asian culture has a phobia of the number 14, similar to the western phobia of 13. I would have preferred Cisco just ignore this stuff, but if they were going to bump, I guess 15 is just as good as 14. At least they are not naming it Cisco IOS 2010 or some such. Also, I just saw some references to what appears to be show version output for next version of ISR routersdown near the bottom of: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/configuration/guide/cf_dgtly_sgnd_sw.html, you can see what appears to be a Cisco 3945 booting. Matt - Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk wrote: All, Just noticed IOS 15.0 is out... but why the sudden jump in image naming?! Poggs ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- -- Matthew Marlowe - http://www.deploylinux.net/ CEO @ DeployLinux Consulting, Inc m...@deploylinux.net, 858-400-7430 http://www.twitter.com/deploylinux ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Enclosed rack with filtered air
I've had good success with Hoffman cabinets: http://www.hoffmanonline.com/product_catalog/product_detail.aspx?cat_1=34cat_2=2410cat_3=81607catID=81607itemID=69583 You can get them with or without integrated AC units. I can put you in touch with a reputable manufacturer's rep if you need further information. -mtw From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of scott owens [scottowen...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 08:37 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Enclosed rack with filtered air Hello, I need to put two 6509s in a non-clean warehouse. I thought I could just put them in a standard rack with some AC filters attached to the bottom and let the air get pulled out of the top. However the rack is not airtight enough and I am getting a lot of drywall/dust in the rack and switches. Anyone here know where / how to find a semi-sealed enclosed rack with filtered forced air ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
