Re: [c-nsp] Full BGP Feed Convergence Time on ASR 1006 RP2 Setup
Not exactly your scenario, but an ASR1006 w/RP2 can get stable in ~40 secs with two route-reflectors carrying full routes: Almost...notice the InQ NeighborV AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd x.x.x.x 4X 98486 5 406609 1540 00:00:35 354637 x.x.x.y 4X 92612 5 406609 1240 00:00:35 332391 InQ empty: NeighborV AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd x.x.x.x 4X 100592 5 41733900 00:00:36 361088 x.x.x.y 4X 100594 5 41733900 00:00:37 361088 --chip On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Brent Roberts brent...@wirezsound.com wrote: Can anyone provide real world BGP Table convergence times on 3 full Peers on an ASR 1006 RP2 for IPV4. Strictly in the IP V4 world scheme. Timing reference being sought is for the equivalent of CLEAR IP BGP ALL Command. Service engine would be a ASR1000-ESP10. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 08:03:59 AM McDonald Richards wrote: There have been issues inter-oping MPLS L2VPN with the Cisco gear (in our deployment) so I'd stick to a single vendor for your PE device and try to avoid using LDP at all on the CES/CER platform as it does not scale as well and performs poorly compared with RSVP. When we were testing the CER/CES2000 units back in '09, we discovered some LDP issues between the device and our Juniper M10i's. We had to shift configurations around, and eventually got it to work. When it comes to price vs performance, the CES has been pretty hard to beat and we looked at a LOT of other vendors. Do they have v6 now? I know that was one of the issues we had when testing then. We went with the ME3600X, so haven't played with the Brocade's again since. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco 3750 startup-config file open failed (Device or resource busy)
All I have a problem with my 3750 which i have inserted here: *write* *startup-config file open failed (Device or resource busy)* * * I have looked up and see you clear a particular line where the idea is another user has locked up the nvram. i don't have another user logged into my router: sh users Line User Host(s) Idle Location * 3 vty 2 xxx idle this is Me in the router... i don't see any other references on this in the forums. Any suggestions would be helpful Chris -- //CL ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MTU - issue while doing VPLS over VPLS!
Dipesh, As nobody has replied, maybe you should seek the services of a consultant or your local Cisco reseller. Peter -- Peter Hicks peter.hi...@poggs.co.uk ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP router upgrade
Thank you all for the feedback on the subject. It is much appreciated. Looking at the facts that the sup720 engine will hold full bgp table and do 30 mpps (400 mpps with dfc), it beats the 3945 (982 kpps), npe-g2 (2 mpps) it looks like a good investment compared to raw performance and needs. Among with the terms installed and forgotten and ghetto fabulous I assume the sup720-3bxl will suit my needs and budget. The ASR1k might be an alternative, I will ask for a quote. To complement the setup, I would like to connect to two different transit providers and do local peering with maybe 30 peers using three or four gigabit interfaces (different IXes). Some new questions are raising after feedbacks, - Load times of the full BGP table will be higher than the NPE-G1/2 - do anyone know the respective load times? Do you expect to see 1 minute or 10 minutes? - Do we benefit to use DFC at the linecards when traffic rate is low (guessing 5 to 10 mpps)? Will DFC still be recommended for my setup? - Will the 7600/RSP720 be a better choice, still using 67xx linecards? Thanks. Lars Eidsheim This email has been scanned and secured by Intellit This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any dissemination, use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] remote location voice qos with switches
Hello, I have a remote location, where I have a 3560 which connects to our main location via a wireless bridge and goes into a 3560G. The wireless bridge has approximately 70mbps throughput. This remote location has about 12 7962 phones, and for the most part everything works fine, except when some of our I.T. staff are doing large backups or copying images across the link. What would be the most simple qos config to solve the data transfers from hogging the link? Or maybe not qos, maybe just policing? Thanks, Dan. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] remote location voice qos with switches
On 8/16/2011 8:47 PM, Dan Letkeman wrote: Hello, I have a remote location, where I have a 3560 which connects to our main location via a wireless bridge and goes into a 3560G. The wireless bridge has approximately 70mbps throughput. This remote location has about 12 7962 phones, and for the most part everything works fine, except when some of our I.T. staff are doing large backups or copying images across the link. What would be the most simple qos config to solve the data transfers from hogging the link? Or maybe not qos, maybe just policing? Thanks, Dan. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ You'll need to implement QoS on the radios for that to work out for you. tv ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] secondary addresses on 3524
I've got a cisco 3524 running IOS 12.0 which accepts 'ip x.x.x.x y.y.y.y secondary' on its vlan interface but the command appears to be ignored. Anyone know if secondary addresses are supported on this switch? Online docs seem to suggest so but maybe 12.0 is too old? -- Antonio Querubin e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 6500 SNMP interface CRC oid
I m looking for SNMP 6500 interface CRC input error OID. Which MIB should i use? Thanks for your feedback ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
