[c-nsp] npe-g2 + shaping
Hello, I met an interesting issue: there is a Cisco 7200 NPE-G2 with 12.4(24)T7, this router terminates some broadband users, we applied shaping on the virtual-template and we surprised: shaping was not working. We upgraded (downgraded?) to 12.2(33)SRE6 and the shaping was working properly, so I think it is not a config issue. This router has a SA-VAM2+, but SRE does not support this module. First question: is it normal, that shaping is not working on virtual-template at 12.4(24)T7? Second question: is any release which supports shaping on virtual-template and sa-vam2+? BR, Attila ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] npe-g2 + shaping
On 29/10/2012 7:11 PM, BALLA Attila wrote: Hello, I met an interesting issue: there is a Cisco 7200 NPE-G2 with 12.4(24)T7, this router terminates some broadband users, we applied shaping on the virtual-template and we surprised: shaping was not working. We upgraded (downgraded?) to 12.2(33)SRE6 and the shaping was working properly, so I think it is not a config issue. This router has a SA-VAM2+, but SRE does not support this module. First question: is it normal, that shaping is not working on virtual-template at 12.4(24)T7? Second question: is any release which supports shaping on virtual-template and sa-vam2+? I ran into the same problem with 12.4 releases on the 7200 and ISR G1/G2s some time ago when applying a QoS policy via RADIUS, (can't remember if it was in 12.4T but certainly was a problem in 12.4 mainline). This may be what you're running into. The bug IDs for this were CSCte95297 and CSCti80776 . Fixes for it were integrated in earlier 15.0M builds which in turn means 15.1M and 15.2M also have the fixes. The syntax for checking the QoS also changed - you need to use 'show subscriber session' commands from then on to see if the policy has applied and what, if any, drops are occurring. It was a source of frustration that the old style 'show policy-map interface' commands didn't work anymore after that but restoring the old CLI output was considered an 'enhancement request' and I had no such luck getting that bit fixed :-( Reuben ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509
Hi, I am facing a problem in multicast.. The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1 switch(cisco 6509). These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using catOS. The multicast data is flowing in SAME vlan, means eventhough L3 is there in between, the data is flowing at layer-2 only. Please help me... Thanks, Ambi ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509
On 10/29/2012 10:18 AM, Ambedkar wrote: Hi, I am facing a problem in multicast.. The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1 switch(cisco 6509). These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using catOS. The multicast data is flowing in SAME vlan, means eventhough L3 is there in between, the data is flowing at layer-2 only. How many bits/packets per second? What linecards are you using? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Netflow issue
We used to collect full unsampled Netflow from two 7613 routers. Both ran 12.2(18)SXF11 and all was well. We continue to get flow data as follows from the 12.2(18)SXF router: Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache Exporting flows to xxx.139.197.76 (9800) xx.229.0.7 () Exporting using source interface Loopback0 Version 5 flow records, origin-as 35057147 flows exported in 1168572 udp datagrams We upgraded the other 7613 to 12.2(33)SRE6 - and most of the flow data no longer appears in our collector. Yet: gp1#sho ip flow export Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache Export source and destination details : VRF ID : Default Source(1) xxx.139.220.90 (Loopback0) Destination(1) xxx.139.197.76 (9800) Version 5 flow records, origin-as 28312144 flows exported in 943738 udp datagrams It appears like we should be getting flow data but we are not. We have a very simple Netflow setup. On most GigE and 10GigE interfaces we have defined: ip flow ingress and globally we have defined: ip flow-cache entries 12 mls flow ip interface-full This used to work pre-12.2(33)SRE. Something must have changed that we are not aware of that needs to be defined. Any ideas? Thanks, Hank ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Aggregate bandwidth of a MLPPP bundle
Hi, I would like to have your feedback on the question that is often raised about the combined throughput of a MLPPP bundle with asymetric DSL links. I have come across quite a few documents claiming that the bundle will have the combined bandwidth of all the links, but that mostly refers to symmetric links in a bundle. e.g. on a cisco 1941 router with 4 xDSL wics, 3 synching at 9Mbps and 1 syncing at 1 Mbps, what will be the total throughput of this bundle? will it be 28 Mbps or 4 Mbps? Thanks Raz ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509
Couple of things: 1) What is the TTL set on the packets? If it is set to 1, it won't cross a L3 boundry. 2) On the Layer 3 switches, what are the multicast settings on the L3 interfaces (pim sparse, pim dense, etc...) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 6:46 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509 On 10/29/2012 10:18 AM, Ambedkar wrote: Hi, I am facing a problem in multicast.. The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1 switch(cisco 6509). These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using catOS. The multicast data is flowing in SAME vlan, means eventhough L3 is there in between, the data is flowing at layer-2 only. How many bits/packets per second? What linecards are you using? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
VLANs are not properly set up between the VMs and the hardware switch ports. Regards, Ifti -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: 29 October 2012 15:40 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com DISCLAIMER:This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) (the intended recipient(s)) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible. The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Maxima Holdings plc.Maxima Holdings plc. Cotswold Court, Lansdown Road, Cheltenham, Glos, GL50 2JA. Registered in England. 5043538. VAT Number - 728778184 This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
ASA version? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:40 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IOS-XR CFM to E-LMI interworking
Hi folks, Is there a special foo that needs to be enabled for these two to start exchanging states please? I'm struggling with a basic setup CE--PE--p2p-mpls-PW--PE--CE (PEs are ASR9k, CEs are 2811) When I shut down the interface on one end I'd like to see it down on the other end as well I also tried adding Ethernet OAM to the mix -on the CE-PE interfaces with no results I'd apreaciate any pointers Thanks adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
Care to expand? Scott On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Iftikhar Mehar iftikhar.me...@maxima.co.uk wrote: VLANs are not properly set up between the VMs and the hardware switch ports. Regards, Ifti -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: 29 October 2012 15:40 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com DISCLAIMER:This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) (the intended recipient(s)) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible. The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Maxima Holdings plc.Maxima Holdings plc. Cotswold Court, Lansdown Road, Cheltenham, Glos, GL50 2JA. Registered in England. 5043538. VAT Number - 728778184 This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
8.4.4.5 On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote: ASA version? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:40 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
Yes make sure the VLANs are correctly expanded from the virtual NIC all the way through to the physical switch port. Regards, Ifti From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 October 2012 16:34 To: Iftikhar Mehar Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. Care to expand? Scott On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Iftikhar Mehar iftikhar.me...@maxima.co.uk wrote: VLANs are not properly set up between the VMs and the hardware switch ports. Regards, Ifti -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: 29 October 2012 15:40 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com DISCLAIMER:This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) (the intended recipient(s)) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible. The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Maxima Holdings plc.Maxima Holdings plc. Cotswold Court, Lansdown Road, Cheltenham, Glos, GL50 2JA. Registered in England. 5043538. VAT Number - 728778184 This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
Scott, Can you post a sanitized output of show nat. I know you said you have proxy-arp turned off, but it does sound like a nat (inside,any) statement that's causing the issue. -ryan From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:34 PM To: Ryan West Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. 8.4.4.5 On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.commailto:rw...@zyedge.com wrote: ASA version? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:40 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's. We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp. Is there something else that may be causing these issues? TIA Scott ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
On 10/29/12 8:40 AM, Scott Voll wrote: We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). Does the duplicate IP error show the MAC address of the conflicting device? If so, what have you done to track it down on the network? -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Multicast packets dropping at 6509
I'm familiar with a bug CSCsk07136 that was found about 4 years ago that causes the multicast table to dump on a hybrid 6500 (catos) every time a port in the same VLAN went down/up. Basically, all members of a group would lose access to the group every time a port in the same VLAN, on the same 6500, dropped. I believe the problem was fixed in a later release, however we upgraded to native and no longer experienced the issue. The only workaround was to statically assign hosts to the required groups. On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Ambedkar p.ambed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am facing a problem in multicast.. The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1 switch(cisco 6509). These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using catOS. The multicast data is flowing in SAME vlan, means eventhough L3 is there in between, the data is flowing at layer-2 only. Please help me... Thanks, Ambi ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR CFM to E-LMI interworking
Hi, On 30 October 2012 05:14, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote: Hi folks, Is there a special foo that needs to be enabled for these two to start exchanging states please? I'm struggling with a basic setup CE--PE--p2p-mpls-PW--PE--CE (PEs are ASR9k, CEs are 2811) When I shut down the interface on one end I'd like to see it down on the other end as well I also tried adding Ethernet OAM to the mix -on the CE-PE interfaces with no results I'd apreaciate any pointers This sort of setup (P2P PWE3) should pass state of the PE-CE interface by default. One of our setups: l2vpn xconnect group layer2_504 p2p layer2_504 interface GigabitEthernet0/1/0/3.504 neighbor 10.123.130.1 pw-id 504 #sh l2vpn xconnect group layer2_504 Tue Oct 30 07:50:59.164 NZDT Legend: ST = State, UP = Up, DN = Down, AD = Admin Down, UR = Unresolved, SB = Standby, SR = Standby Ready, (PP) = Partially Programmed XConnect Segment 1 Segment 2 Group Name ST DescriptionST Description ST - - layer2_504 layer2_504 UP Gi0/1/0/3.504 UP 10.123.130.1504UP if I take down the interface the PWE2 part goes down as well, signalling the other end to take the physical port down as well. #sh l2vpn xconnect group layer2_504 Tue Oct 30 07:52:36.153 NZDT Legend: ST = State, UP = Up, DN = Down, AD = Admin Down, UR = Unresolved, SB = Standby, SR = Standby Ready, (PP) = Partially Programmed XConnect Segment 1 Segment 2 Group Name ST DescriptionST Description ST - - layer2_504 layer2_504 DN Gi0/1/0/3.504 AD 10.123.130.1504DN kind regards Pshem ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
No, it does not show a mac for the dup ip. I could only wish. On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: On 10/29/12 8:40 AM, Scott Voll wrote: We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP). Does the duplicate IP error show the MAC address of the conflicting device? If so, what have you done to track it down on the network? -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] LACP hello rate negotiation
Anyone,
Been googling for an hour, can't find anything definitive.
Trying to go LACP between an ASR (using 2 built-in gig ports) and a switch
stack (3750 or 2960S). Would like to use the fast mode of LACP PDUs ('lacp
rate fast' on the ASR). This command doesn't seem to exist on the small
switches from what I can tell. If one side is configured with 'fast' and
the other isn't, will they negotiate to the faster speed, the slower speed,
or not at all? Or will they work, but with one side reacting in 3 seconds,
and the other in 90? Unfortunately I don't have a small switch at my
disposal to try it myself. The output of show lacp neigh leads me to
believe the other device requests your sending speed:
sh lacp 1 nei det
Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs
F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs
Anyone know for sure?
Thanks,
Chuck
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Netflow issue
On 29/10/2012 11:52, Hank Nussbacher wrote: This used to work pre-12.2(33)SRE. Something must have changed that we are not aware of that needs to be defined. Any ideas? It's been a couple of years since I've run sxf, but I had an idea in the back of my mind that I ran into something similar when upgrading, but that it was easy enough to fix. Can you post the output of show run | i flow? Also, are either of your flow destinations multicast addresses? Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] LACP hello rate negotiation
The local config determines the remote transmit interval but not all devices
support fast PDUs. They can be mismatched. This is from the spec not Ciscos
implementation persay.
Phil
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Chuck Church chuckchu...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone,
Been googling for an hour, can't find anything definitive.
Trying to go LACP between an ASR (using 2 built-in gig ports) and a switch
stack (3750 or 2960S). Would like to use the fast mode of LACP PDUs ('lacp
rate fast' on the ASR). This command doesn't seem to exist on the small
switches from what I can tell. If one side is configured with 'fast' and
the other isn't, will they negotiate to the faster speed, the slower speed,
or not at all? Or will they work, but with one side reacting in 3 seconds,
and the other in 90? Unfortunately I don't have a small switch at my
disposal to try it myself. The output of show lacp neigh leads me to
believe the other device requests your sending speed:
sh lacp 1 nei det
Flags: S - Device is requesting Slow LACPDUs
F - Device is requesting Fast LACPDUs
Anyone know for sure?
Thanks,
Chuck
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
