Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609
Nam, as Tony already said, deny clauses are not supported in QoS classification ACLs on this linecard. So you need to change your qos semantic. Assuming deny was supported, your current qos policy semantic looks like if( destination is not in (1.52.x.x, etc.) ) then police to 1 mbps else police to 2 mbps if that is the case, you can change the config to access-list foo permit ip any 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list foo permit ip any 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list foo permit ip any 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list foo permit ip any 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 ! class-map FOO match access-group foo ! policy-map BAR class FOO police cir 200 bc 10 be 10 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop class class-default police cir 100 bc 10 be 10 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop If the policy is more complex, it could get trickier.. oli On 03/10/2013 05:13, Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all ! At the end of ACL 161, I have defined permit ip any any: access-list 161 deny ip any 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 permit ip any any I think it's ok but I couldn't see the counter. Please help me Thanks Nam On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ! at the end of acl i have defined permit ip any any: - i need to block some traffic and permit the rest Nam Nguyen On 26-09-2013, at 19:02, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, The error message seems to be fairly clear, you can't have DENY statements in ACL. As to why you are not seeing anything in your counters, you only have DENY statements and the end of every ACL is an implicit deny ip any any this means that your ACL's will not match anything at all, so nothing will go into your class. What are you trying to achieve ? regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2013 8:21 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 Hi all ! I have some problem when configure QoS on Cisco ES20 card: - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (egress), I see error message: %G_QOS_CLASSIFY-DFC2-3-QOS_CONFIG: error detected: Can not support deny ace in ACL (161) - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (ingress), It's okay but I cann't see the counter. Below is example: class-map match-all UP match access-group 161 class-map match-all DOWN match access-group 160 class-map match-any MATCH_ALL match access-group 100 policy-map 3M (This policy-map: I can see counter when issue show policy-map interface) class MATCH_ALL police cir 300 bc 30 be 30 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop policy-map ABC (This policy-map apply to ingress ok but I cannot see counter when issue show policy-map interface ) class UP police cir 100 bc 10 be 10 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop class MATCH_ALL police cir 2000 bc 200 be 200 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop Extended IP access list 100 (class MATCH_ALL) 10 permit ip any any Extended IP access list 160 (class DOWN) 10 deny ip 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 20 deny ip 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 30 deny ip 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 40 deny ip 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 any ... Extended IP access list 161 (class UP) 10 deny ip any 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 20 deny ip any 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 30 deny ip any 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 40 deny ip any 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 50 deny ip any 101.53.0.0 0.0.63.255 ... Result show policy-map interface 7609#sh policy-map int Po1.XYZ Port-channel1.2304332 Service-policy input: ABC Class-map: UP (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate bps, drop rate bps Match: access-group 161 police: cir 1000 bps, bc 100 bytes, be 100 bytes conformed 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: transmit exceeded 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: drop violated 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: drop conformed bps, exceed bps, violate bps Class-map: MATCH_ALL (match-any) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate bps, drop rate bps Match: access-group 100 police: cir 1 bps, bc 1000 bytes, be 1000 bytes conformed 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: transmit
Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?
Hi Waris, So on ME3800 I read the l2pt tunnel is not supported on EFPs with PW/xconnect configured on them, though IOS will let you enter the command with no complains. So to work around this I should be using l2pt forward instead right? Is there actually a difference in function of these two commands please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:29 PM To: Chris Russell; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour (mosmanso) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Mostafa, Can you help with ASR1K L2PT behavior? What is supported on ASR1K? Hi Chris, I am copying Mostafa (ASR 1K expert) to confirm the L2PT behavior on ASR1K. Just a side note from ME perspective, I would recommend using L2PT forward command rather than L2PT tunnel. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Chris Russell ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.com Organization: ntech Date: Saturday, August 31, 2013 6:18 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? On 21/08/2013 10:00, Chris Russell wrote: On 21/08/2013 09:54, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. Is it possible to issue cmd: l2protocol peer or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow. As a final thread closing to this one, with thanks to various people, especially Adam, who responded - L2 tunnelling of control packets (BPDUs) is NOT supported on the ASR1K. Thanks Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?
Hi Adam, With 'forward' the ethernet packets are forwarded 'as-is' through the MPLS topology. With 'tunnel' the destination MAC address gets rewritten to a 'special' multicast MAC addresses, the remote end of the 'tunnel' restores the original MAC address. Forward can be used if both customer devices are connected directly to PEs, if one side connects to a L2 only devices you have to use tunnel. kind regards Pshem On 3 October 2013 21:23, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote: Hi Waris, So on ME3800 I read the l2pt tunnel is not supported on EFPs with PW/xconnect configured on them, though IOS will let you enter the command with no complains. So to work around this I should be using l2pt forward instead right? Is there actually a difference in function of these two commands please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:29 PM To: Chris Russell; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour (mosmanso) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Mostafa, Can you help with ASR1K L2PT behavior? What is supported on ASR1K? Hi Chris, I am copying Mostafa (ASR 1K expert) to confirm the L2PT behavior on ASR1K. Just a side note from ME perspective, I would recommend using L2PT forward command rather than L2PT tunnel. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Chris Russell ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.com Organization: ntech Date: Saturday, August 31, 2013 6:18 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? On 21/08/2013 10:00, Chris Russell wrote: On 21/08/2013 09:54, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. Is it possible to issue cmd: l2protocol peer or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow. As a final thread closing to this one, with thanks to various people, especially Adam, who responded - L2 tunnelling of control packets (BPDUs) is NOT supported on the ASR1K. Thanks Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?
Hi Pshem, I see so the tunnel feature/keyword basically applies everywhere where the BPDUs have to traverse (or be tunneled through) a native L2 switched network in order to get to the desired device/l2pt endpoint. adam -Original Message- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:48 AM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Adam, With 'forward' the ethernet packets are forwarded 'as-is' through the MPLS topology. With 'tunnel' the destination MAC address gets rewritten to a 'special' multicast MAC addresses, the remote end of the 'tunnel' restores the original MAC address. Forward can be used if both customer devices are connected directly to PEs, if one side connects to a L2 only devices you have to use tunnel. kind regards Pshem On 3 October 2013 21:23, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote: Hi Waris, So on ME3800 I read the l2pt tunnel is not supported on EFPs with PW/xconnect configured on them, though IOS will let you enter the command with no complains. So to work around this I should be using l2pt forward instead right? Is there actually a difference in function of these two commands please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:29 PM To: Chris Russell; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour (mosmanso) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Mostafa, Can you help with ASR1K L2PT behavior? What is supported on ASR1K? Hi Chris, I am copying Mostafa (ASR 1K expert) to confirm the L2PT behavior on ASR1K. Just a side note from ME perspective, I would recommend using L2PT forward command rather than L2PT tunnel. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.j pg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Chris Russell ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.com Organization: ntech Date: Saturday, August 31, 2013 6:18 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? On 21/08/2013 10:00, Chris Russell wrote: On 21/08/2013 09:54, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. Is it possible to issue cmd: l2protocol peer or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow. As a final thread closing to this one, with thanks to various people, especially Adam, who responded - L2 tunnelling of control packets (BPDUs) is NOT supported on the ASR1K. Thanks Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 131, Issue 6
Hi ! Thank you so much for your support Oliver Boehmer Tony. I have tried to convert using ACL permit (not deny) and it's okay. Thanks and Best Regards. Nam On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:54 PM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote: Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at cisco-nsp-ow...@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 (Nam Nguyen) 2. Re: Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 (Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)) 3. Re: VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? (Adam Vitkovsky) 4. Re: VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? (Pshem Kowalczyk) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:13:04 +0700 From: Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com To: Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 Message-ID: CAAs= dclnmxsfq1cudxaabv09zwqh11zkqh1a4bgmov-42bk...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Dear all ! At the end of ACL 161, I have defined permit ip any any: access-list 161 deny ip any 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 deny ip any 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 161 permit ip any any I think it's ok but I couldn't see the counter. Please help me Thanks Nam On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ! at the end of acl i have defined permit ip any any: - i need to block some traffic and permit the rest Nam Nguyen On 26-09-2013, at 19:02, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, The error message seems to be fairly clear, you can't have DENY statements in ACL. As to why you are not seeing anything in your counters, you only have DENY statements and the end of every ACL is an implicit deny ip any any this means that your ACL's will not match anything at all, so nothing will go into your class. What are you trying to achieve ? regards, Tony. - Original Message - From: Nam Nguyen nhna...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2013 8:21 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Question configure QoS on ES20 Card, Cisco 7609 Hi all ! I have some problem when configure QoS on Cisco ES20 card: - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (egress), I see error message: %G_QOS_CLASSIFY-DFC2-3-QOS_CONFIG: error detected: Can not support deny ace in ACL (161) - When I applied policy-map on sub-interface (ingress), It's okay but I cann't see the counter. Below is example: class-map match-all UP match access-group 161 class-map match-all DOWN match access-group 160 class-map match-any MATCH_ALL match access-group 100 policy-map 3M (This policy-map: I can see counter when issue show policy-map interface) class MATCH_ALL police cir 300 bc 30 be 30 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop policy-map ABC (This policy-map apply to ingress ok but I cannot see counter when issue show policy-map interface ) class UP police cir 100 bc 10 be 10 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop class MATCH_ALL police cir 2000 bc 200 be 200 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop Extended IP access list 100 (class MATCH_ALL) 10 permit ip any any Extended IP access list 160 (class DOWN) 10 deny ip 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 20 deny ip 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 30 deny ip 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 any 40 deny ip 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 any ... Extended IP access list 161 (class UP) 10 deny ip any 1.53.0.0 0.0.255.255 20 deny ip any 1.52.0.0 0.0.255.255 30 deny ip any 1.54.0.0 0.0.255.255 40 deny ip any 1.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 50 deny ip any 101.53.0.0 0.0.63.255 ... Result show policy-map interface 7609#sh policy-map int Po1.XYZ Port-channel1.2304332 Service-policy input: ABC Class-map: UP (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate bps, drop rate bps Match: access-group 161 police: cir 1000 bps, bc
[c-nsp] c-nsp] VACL limitation in 6509
Dears , After a long case discussed with Cisco TAC , this is the final configuration that make a VACL capture work successfully: vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 1356,1357,1351, vlan filter ASTELIA vlan-list 3737, interface GigabitEthernet9/23 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk switchport capture as you can see there is no correlation between the filter and the config on the interface that mean that you cannot configure another filter for another VACL for a different interface. Does anyone successfully created several VACL on same 6509 switch ? Br. BEN HAMMADI Kayssar NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS Lead Engineer -BroadBand Connectivity JNCIE-M (#471), JNCIE-SP (#1147), CCIP Mobile : +216 29 349 952 / +216 98 349 952 FIX : +216 71 108 173 Skype : kayssar ben hammadi kayssar.ben_hamm...@nsn.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Nguyen luan20...@gmail.com wrote: Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
VIRL sounds awesome. I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). XRv same as VIRL ? Aaron -Original Message- From: Lane Wigley (lwigley) [mailto:lwig...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:18 AM To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram and proc). large scale networks will require large pools of resources. the software may be free -- but running it may not be if you're short on servers. q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:08, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Nguyen luan20...@gmail.com wrote: Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
Oh yeah ! it will be very sweet Aaron From: Oliver Garraux [mailto:oli...@g.garraux.net] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:55 AM To: Lane Wigley (lwigley) Cc: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.com wrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:12, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). XRv same as VIRL ? xrvr == xr within virl. doesn't ncs run virtualized xr (xrv)? q. -= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
Hi Adam, I will get back to the team with the resolution update. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk Date: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:32 AM To: Waris Sagheer wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com, 'Darren O'Connor' darre...@outlook.commailto:darre...@outlook.com, 'Nick Ryce' n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS Hi Waris, This issue was discovered on 15.3(1)S2. The “multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” issue is persistent in 15.3(2)S2 as well. adam From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:59 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Darren O'Connor'; 'Nick Ryce'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS Hi Adam and Darren, Which software release you are using? EFP Link Bundling QOS is on the roadmap. I'll get back to you on the exact release. Best Regards, [Image removed by sender.] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 [Image removed by sender. Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk Date: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 6:29 AM To: 'Darren O'Connor' darre...@outlook.commailto:darre...@outlook.com, 'Nick Ryce' n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS Interesting we've had some 100% CPU until reload ourselves. It was related to Port-channel and mcast. adam From: Darren O'Connor [mailto:darre...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:16 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Nick Ryce'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS On that same vein of port channels. This morning my LACP ports bounced between my me3600x test box and a Brocade XMR and for some odd reason it caused my LSP tunnel interfaces to push the CPU up to 99% for a few hours. Makes me weary about using a PO at all on this box From: adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk To: n...@fluency.net.ukmailto:n...@fluency.net.uk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:52:17 +0200 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS Can be applied to the member ports of the channel. Also you can't apply service policies to EFP's on a port channel either. Thus my conclusion that port-channel interfaces on ME3600 are useless so far No incoming multicast No BFD with ASR9k No QOS Though I'm not sure whether some of this has been fixed in the most recent codes for X and CX adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
Did someone get a chance to download whatever under XRv? it's page not available currently. If i remember correctly, my SE said you have to pay for it. Beta is going right now and the list is long i was told. You have a better chance of getting it from being leaked out then get on the beta. Was thinking with titanium out, csr1000v, nexus1000v all available, now XRv is out? all you need to do is piece them together yourself to get a poor man VIRL. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Oh yeah ! it will be very sweet Aaron From: Oliver Garraux [mailto:oli...@g.garraux.net] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:55 AM To: Lane Wigley (lwigley) Cc: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.com wrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?
Hi Adam, L2PT Tunneling as well as L2PT Forward are supported on ME platforms but recommended is L2PT Forward. L2PT tunneling changes the destination mac address to well known Cisco mac address and can only work with remote devices supporting L2PT tunneling. It does not interoperate with non Cisco devices and even has limited support on Cisco devices. L2PT Forward does not change the destination mac address and can interoperate with any Cisco or non Cisco devices. It also supports CE2.0 listed control BPDUs. Due to these reasons, recommendation would be to use L2PT Forward. Below are the documents which has details. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=sitessrcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxtd2FyaXN8Z3g6NTk5NzNmNGUwOTYzZmFh https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=sitessrcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxtd2FyaXN8Z3g6NzI1MTc2YzdjNGI2YmQ1NA Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk Date: Thursday, October 3, 2013 1:23 AM To: Waris Sagheer wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com, 'Chris Russell' ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour (mosmanso) mosma...@cisco.commailto:mosma...@cisco.com Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Waris, So on ME3800 I read the l2pt tunnel is not supported on EFPs with PW/xconnect configured on them, though IOS will let you enter the command with no complains. So to work around this I should be using l2pt forward instead right? Is there actually a difference in function of these two commands please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:29 PM To: Chris Russell; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour (mosmanso) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? Hi Mostafa, Can you help with ASR1K L2PT behavior? What is supported on ASR1K? Hi Chris, I am copying Mostafa (ASR 1K expert) to confirm the L2PT behavior on ASR1K. Just a side note from ME perspective, I would recommend using L2PT forward command rather than L2PT tunnel. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Chris Russell ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.commailto:ch...@nifry.com Organization: ntech Date: Saturday, August 31, 2013 6:18 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ? On 21/08/2013 10:00, Chris Russell wrote: On 21/08/2013 09:54, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. Is it possible to issue cmd: l2protocol peer or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow. As a final thread closing to this one, with thanks to various people, especially Adam, who responded - L2 tunnelling of control packets (BPDUs) is NOT supported on the ASR1K. Thanks Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
Free? are you sure? On 10/03/2013 07:02 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
On 03 Oct 2013, at 17:12, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: VIRL sounds awesome. I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). XRv same as VIRL ? VIRL is a platform for virtualized software packages. vIOS, XRv, CSR 1000v and so on are examples of such packages. -- There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about. John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
On 03 Oct 2013, at 17:18, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:12, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote: I saw in Cisco TAC Case Open Tool, under IOS XR... XRv (XR on a server). XRv same as VIRL ? xrvr == xr within virl. doesn't ncs run virtualized xr (xrv)? Yes it does. -- There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org about. John von Neumann |http://lukasz.bromirski.net ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
I dont remember any product from cisco for free :-) On 10/03/2013 07:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Nguyen luan20...@gmail.com wrote: Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver - Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
Nobody said free. Just speculated. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Rati Berikaant Jokhadze iinf...@gmail.comwrote: I dont remember any product from cisco for free :-) On 10/03/2013 07:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: It should be.. We pay enough for Software and licenses and SmartNet on this stuff. The least they can do is give us something to help us test our networks... On 2013-10-03, at 11:05 AM, Luan Nguyen luan20...@gmail.com wrote: Seriously doubt that it would be free. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: This should be free. On 2013-10-03, at 10:55 AM, Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net wrote: I will be really really interested to see what they do pricing wise on VIRL. Hope its nothing crazy, I would love to be able to mess around with XR and NX-OS in the lab. Oliver --**--- Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lane Wigley (lwigley) lwig...@cisco.comwrote: I think this is what you're looking for - VIRL http://www.cisco.com/web/**solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/** virl/index.htmlhttp://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/netsys/CiscoLive/virl/index.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=nsbzHmwUz6Ihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsbzHmwUz6I Targeted for Dec/Jan I think. - Lane -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@**puck.nether.netcisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server) What do y'all know about this ? I understand this is IOS XR on a nix server virtual machine or something like that. I'd like to get it on a few servers in my lab. Where do I get/download it ? Aaron __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __**_ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
On 03/10/2013 16:16, quinn snyder wrote: on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram and proc). It shouldn't need that much (although the csr1000v's insane compute requirements are a complete mystery to me) - anyway, ram and cpu are both cheap resources these days. large scale networks will require large pools of resources. This may or may not be true, depending on the scale of what you're trying to model. A hypervisor with 8 cores and 128 gigs of ram costs a small amount of money, and would be enough to run a relatively large model deployment. the software may be free -- but running it may not be if you're short on servers. The software costs money to develop but there is no cost associated with making another copy of it. The most important thing for Cisco to remember is that it's trivial to build virtualised test labs with Junos Olive. This approach allows people to learn enough about the operating system that they feel comfortable about switching to or buying more Juniper kit. I know a good many people who started out with Olive and who liked it so much they started buying Juniper kit in volume. Cisco really missed the boat on this - to their cost. I don't particularly expect Cisco to provide this sort of facility for free, but unless they refrain from their usual policy of premium pricing, I'll shrug my shoulders, then move on and spend my budgets on other vendors. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] XRv (xr on a server)
On 3-Oct-13, at 11:00 , Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 03/10/2013 16:16, quinn snyder wrote: on a side note -- it requires a lot of compute to run successfully (ram and proc). It shouldn't need that much (although the csr1000v's insane compute requirements are a complete mystery to me) - anyway, ram and cpu are both cheap resources these days. yes. in comparison to outright purchase and installation of kit, this is *much* cheaper. i'm just adding a point that it won't be able to run in a small footprint, which was the vibe that i received when it was released at live! this year. the front-end management tools are light and run happily on modest resources -- but the actual orchestration on the backend requires more resources, especially as the instances are building and running. large scale networks will require large pools of resources. This may or may not be true, depending on the scale of what you're trying to model. A hypervisor with 8 cores and 128 gigs of ram costs a small amount of money, and would be enough to run a relatively large model deployment. i think the higher ceiling to hit will be in regards to (virtual) processors -- not the ram (as ram has scaled much faster than cores per box). there are some pretty finicky requirements and while its possible to kind of load share around them -- if resource contention is felt -- the software doesn't exactly fail gracefully. the software may be free -- but running it may not be if you're short on servers. The software costs money to develop but there is no cost associated with making another copy of it. The most important thing for Cisco to remember is that it's trivial to build virtualised test labs with Junos Olive. This approach allows people to learn enough about the operating system that they feel comfortable about switching to or buying more Juniper kit. I know a good many people who started out with Olive and who liked it so much they started buying Juniper kit in volume. Cisco really missed the boat on this - to their cost. I don't particularly expect Cisco to provide this sort of facility for free, but unless they refrain from their usual policy of premium pricing, I'll shrug my shoulders, then move on and spend my budgets on other vendors. and i see this being a cisco-centric answer to an olive or even junosphere (though there are usage costs to junonsphere that i'm not well versed in). i'm not exactly sure how this will be marketed or where it will be positioned. i just know what my experience in using the software has been. i see a lot of potential use cases with the software -- even though it has a *long* way to go in terms of features and software support. i know that we're internally looking at ways that we can tie this in with different aspects of our labs and demos in an effort to help augment our physical demo's and proof-of-concepts. it has a ways to go -- but it has promise and we're providing feedback to the dev teams on what we're seeing. as you say -- for most customers -- it will come down to price vs. reward. everyone has their own sweet spot. it just all depends on if cisco hits that mark. q. -- quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.com wrote: ME3600X does send out traps. Correct. But receiving traps means monitoring that traps are received and processed, sending test traps, etc. This is why we don't use traps for anything. Polling means we _know_ the data is current. If there's no data when polling, a general alarm can be raised. To put it another way, polling is more expensive than catching traps, but more reliable. Thanks, Richard PS: Can you log a request to add the data for missing PSU as well. I.e. to make ME3600x act like C6500 in this regard. Or should I do that via TAC? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled
Hi Richard, Please open a case and send me the number so that I can work with engineering to understand the possibility of implementing it on our platform. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.commailto:richih.mailingl...@gmail.com Date: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:38 PM To: Waris Sagheer wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Cc: Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fimailto:s...@ytti.fi, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com wrote: ME3600X does send out traps. Correct. But receiving traps means monitoring that traps are received and processed, sending test traps, etc. This is why we don't use traps for anything. Polling means we _know_ the data is current. If there's no data when polling, a general alarm can be raised. To put it another way, polling is more expensive than catching traps, but more reliable. Thanks, Richard PS: Can you log a request to add the data for missing PSU as well. I.e. to make ME3600x act like C6500 in this regard. Or should I do that via TAC? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map
Hi Adam, ME does not support ACL match in the egress policy and there is no plan to support it. However you can use the workaround ACLs can be matched in ingress policies and set qos-group. The qos-group can be matched in egress policies. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: Waris Sagheer wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 8:54 AM To: adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map Hi Adam, Let me get back to you on this. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901 http://www.cisco.com/ [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From: adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.skmailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:37 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map Hi Waris, folks, Is the ACL match in an output policy-map a hardware limitation or is there a plan to add this feature in future releases please? Or how do you folks work around this limitation please? Thank you. adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
