Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-08-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, July 01, 2013 09:21:46 AM Adam Vitkovsky wrote:

 Hi Amit,
 Unfortunately there's no option to configure two BGP
 processes in XE yet. If you only need to act as a
 different AS# for a particular eBGP or even iBGP peer,
 you might use the local-as feature. Or if you would
 like to achieve more separation you might be looking at
 the route-server-context feature and prepend desired
 AS# manually via route-map.

Cisco did announce Multi-Instance BGP support on the IOS XR 
platform a while back. But you're right, this doesn't 
support IOS XE.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-08-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 06:30:59 PM David Kotlerewsky 
wrote:

 Cisco is moving away from SDR, just like Juniper is
 slowly moving away from Logical Systems. This type of
 feature is not widely used, and requires code validation
 to make sure that whatever features are available in the
 default system, are also available to the non-default
 logical systems. I've ran into a number of issues in the
 field where some features are not available in such a
 set up. Probably not what you want to hear, but that's
 the case. ​

For the amount of pain, never did quite understand the 
logica of SDR's or logical systems.

I always find it cheaper to buy another chassis.

I posit virtualization can only be taken so far.

Mark.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-07-01 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi Amit,
Unfortunately there's no option to configure two BGP processes in XE yet. 
If you only need to act as a different AS# for a particular eBGP or even
iBGP peer, you might use the local-as feature. 
Or if you would like to achieve more separation you might be looking at the
route-server-context feature and prepend desired AS# manually via
route-map. 


adam

-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Dhamija Amit
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:10 PM
To: Andrew Miehs
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

VRF Lite is only to separate the Global  VPN Routing table . My requirement
is to have two routing domains i.e 2 AS Numbers in a single router , One to
be used for EBGP  Second for IBGP.
 


On Fri, 6/28/13, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:

 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
 To: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:40 AM
 
 VRF Lite ?
 
 Sent from a mobile device
 
 On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 
   Hi
 
  Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the  concept of Logical
Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any  seprate mechanism to isolate the
routings between two  domains on ASR 1K .
 
  Thanks
  Amit Dhamija
 
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net  
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-30 Thread Aaron
Have you tried multiple bgp speakers? You might have to use a DRP to do it.

Aaron


On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:00 AM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote:

 if i recall -- the asr9k only supports a single sdr (default sdr) anyway.
 asr1k only supports ios-xe -- so only the typical routing isolation is
 supported (vrf, etc). the only device that will provide 'sdr-like'
 emulation is a vdc on n7k -- though this is not a direct comparison.

 q.

 -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =-

 On Jun 29, 2013, at 13:45, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
Hi
 
  Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
  concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
  seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
  domains on ASR 1K .
 
  Thanks
  Amit Dhamija
 
  ___

 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-29 Thread David Kotlerewsky
Cisco is moving away from SDR, just like Juniper is slowly moving away from 
Logical Systems. This type of feature is not widely used, and requires code 
validation to make sure that whatever features are available in the default 
system, are also available to the non-default logical systems. I've ran into a 
number of issues in the field where some features are not available in such a 
set up. Probably not what you want to hear, but that's the case.
​
- David 

—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Edward Salonia e...@edgeoc.net wrote:

 SDR is only available on IOS-XR devices 12K, ASR 9K, CRS.
 - Ed
 On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com wrote:
 VRF Lite is only to separate the Global  VPN Routing table . My requirement 
 is to have two routing domains i.e 2 AS Numbers in a single router , One to 
 be used for EBGP  Second for IBGP.
  
 
 
 On Fri, 6/28/13, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
 To: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:40 AM
 
 VRF Lite ?
 
 Sent from a mobile device
 
 On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 
   Hi 
 
 Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
 concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
 seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
 domains on ASR 1K .
 
 Thanks
 Amit Dhamija
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-29 Thread Tony
Can you not use the commands in BGP to support having only one AS, but 
appearing as a different AS to other neighbours ? eg. local-as, remote-as  
replace-as ?






 From: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
To: Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de 
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2013 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
 

VRF Lite is only to separate the Global  VPN Routing table . My requirement 
is to have two routing domains i.e 2 AS Numbers in a single router , One to be 
used for EBGP  Second for IBGP.
 


On Fri, 6/28/13, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:

Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
To: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:40 AM

VRF Lite ?

Sent from a mobile device

On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
wrote:

 
  Hi 
 
 Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
domains on ASR 1K .
 
 Thanks
 Amit Dhamija
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-29 Thread quinn snyder
if i recall -- the asr9k only supports a single sdr (default sdr) anyway. 
asr1k only supports ios-xe -- so only the typical routing isolation is 
supported (vrf, etc). the only device that will provide 'sdr-like' emulation is 
a vdc on n7k -- though this is not a direct comparison. 

q. 

-= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =-

On Jun 29, 2013, at 13:45, Tony td_mi...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
   Hi 
 
 Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
 concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
 seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
 domains on ASR 1K .
 
 Thanks
 Amit Dhamija
 
 ___

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-28 Thread Dhamija Amit

 Hi 

Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the concept of Logical 
Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any seprate mechanism to isolate the 
routings between two domains on ASR 1K .

Thanks
Amit Dhamija

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-28 Thread Andrew Miehs
VRF Lite ?

Sent from a mobile device

On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
  Hi 
 
 Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the concept of Logical 
 Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any seprate mechanism to isolate the 
 routings between two domains on ASR 1K .
 
 Thanks
 Amit Dhamija
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-28 Thread Dhamija Amit
VRF Lite is only to separate the Global  VPN Routing table . My requirement is 
to have two routing domains i.e 2 AS Numbers in a single router , One to be 
used for EBGP  Second for IBGP.
 


On Fri, 6/28/13, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:

 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
 To: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:40 AM
 
 VRF Lite ?
 
 Sent from a mobile device
 
 On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  
   Hi 
  
  Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
 concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
 seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
 domains on ASR 1K .
  
  Thanks
  Amit Dhamija
  
  ___
  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers

2013-06-28 Thread Edward Salonia
SDR is only available on IOS-XR devices 12K, ASR 9K, CRS.

- Ed


On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com wrote:

 VRF Lite is only to separate the Global  VPN Routing table . My requirement 
 is to have two routing domains i.e 2 AS Numbers in a single router , One to 
 be used for EBGP  Second for IBGP.
  
 
 
 On Fri, 6/28/13, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SDR//Logical Routers
 To: Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 Date: Friday, June 28, 2013, 10:40 AM
 
 VRF Lite ?
 
 Sent from a mobile device
 
 On 28/06/2013, at 20:04, Dhamija Amit amiitdham...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
 
   Hi 
 
 Could you please let me know if ASR - 1K Supports the
 concept of Logical Routers or SDR ?? Or else is there any
 seprate mechanism to isolate the routings between two
 domains on ASR 1K .
 
 Thanks
 Amit Dhamija
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] SDR

2010-07-07 Thread My Name
Is anyone using SDR? any problems , lessons learned, or best practices
you can share?

thanx in advance,

Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR

2010-07-07 Thread Guillaume FORTAINE

http://www.wirelessinnovation.org

On 07/07/2010 04:39 PM, My Name wrote:

Is anyone using SDR? any problems , lessons learned, or best practices
you can share?

thanx in advance,

Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


   


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR

2010-07-07 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 7/7/10 1:35 PM, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
 http://www.wirelessinnovation.org
 
 On 07/07/2010 04:39 PM, My Name wrote:
 Is anyone using SDR? any problems , lessons learned, or best practices
 you can share?

There's an app for that!

http://digitalconfections.com/

--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR

2010-07-07 Thread My Name
Sorry guys, I meant Cisco Secure Domain Routers for the CRS platform

thanx for replying though.

Joe

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:

 On 7/7/10 1:35 PM, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
  http://www.wirelessinnovation.org
 
  On 07/07/2010 04:39 PM, My Name wrote:
  Is anyone using SDR? any problems , lessons learned, or best practices
  you can share?

 There's an app for that!

 http://digitalconfections.com/

 --
 Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
 Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
 Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR

2010-07-07 Thread Jared Mauch
Ahh. I thought you were talking about multicast 'ip sdr' (aka SAP) commands.

Was going to comment about the control-plane issues you will see enabling that 
on the routers.

- Jared

On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:06 PM, My Name wrote:

 Sorry guys, I meant Cisco Secure Domain Routers for the CRS platform
 
 thanx for replying though.
 
 Joe
 
 On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
 
 On 7/7/10 1:35 PM, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
 http://www.wirelessinnovation.org
 
 On 07/07/2010 04:39 PM, My Name wrote:
 Is anyone using SDR? any problems , lessons learned, or best practices
 you can share?
 
 There's an app for that!
 
 http://digitalconfections.com/
 
 --
 Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
 Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
 Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] SDR

2010-01-26 Thread My Name
Is any one running SDR on the CRS platform? Are there any issues?
One area that I am unclear on is the linecard requirements, documenation
states that an additional  DRP or DRP pair must be utilized, so does that
mean
you require at least one DRP for overall chassis management and
additional DRP for each SDR?

So for example, assuming you are not deploying redundant DRPs and you want
to
configure 2 SDRs, then you would need 3 total DRPs?


thanx,

mike
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] SDR

2010-01-26 Thread Aaron
You need 1. The second DRP would be standby if so desired.
In your example you should be able to get away with 2.

Your RPs still handle overall system management.

Aaron

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:06, My Name denac...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is any one running SDR on the CRS platform? Are there any issues?
 One area that I am unclear on is the linecard requirements, documenation
 states that an additional  DRP or DRP pair must be utilized, so does that
 mean
 you require at least one DRP for overall chassis management and
 additional DRP for each SDR?

 So for example, assuming you are not deploying redundant DRPs and you want
 to
 configure 2 SDRs, then you would need 3 total DRPs?


 thanx,

 mike
 ___
 cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
 archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/