Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Ryan Huff]

IMO, FreeFTPd is one of those things that sounds great ... until you try it. My 
advice, take 20 minutes and spin up a Linux distribution with OpenSSH.

Thanks,

Ryan

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 29, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Scott Voll  wrote:
> 
> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?
> 
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to 
> restart it and run my backups again.
> 
> What have others had good success using?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Scott
> 
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Scott Voll]

What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
FTP?

I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to
restart it and run my backups again.

What have others had good success using?

Thanks

Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Cisco Google]

Hi 

Im using CoreFTP Mini SFTP-server to backup our UCM. It works but docent scale 
well if you want to back up more than one application.
Im also using the FreeFTP, I was having issues with it at first but it seemed 
to be a permissions issue on the actual server. Still think its bit flakey.

Cisco Recommend Titan and OpenSSH but I’ve never been able to get it to work.

Jon
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 14:45, Scott Voll  wrote:
> 
> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?
> 
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to 
> restart it and run my backups again.
> 
> What have others had good success using?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Scott
> 
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask

[Scott Voll]

could you just use a translation pattern.  9130XXX translates to
130xxx.

Scott

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick <
nick.barn...@countryfinancial.com> wrote:

> Here’s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our
> field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to
> the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting
> speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This
> causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount
> of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing
> 9 to reach HQ for decades.
>
>
>
> I’m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with
> non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I’ll get there, I just
> can’t do it right now.
>
>
>
> My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use
> 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXX. This gives a
> derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission
> accomplished… I think.
>
>
>
> Does this method cause any call processing issues? I’m slightly worried
> that it could raise processor usage… but I’m mostly just worried about it
> because it is “new” to me.
>
>
>
> Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask

[Barnett, Nick]

I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after 
everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of 
translations going on.

From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM
To: Barnett, Nick
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate 
enterprise number mask

could you just use a translation pattern.  9130XXX translates to 130xxx.

Scott

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick 
> 
wrote:
Here’s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field 
offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field 
offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to 
call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to 
trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or 
bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for 
decades.

I’m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did 
numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I’ll get there, I just can’t do it 
right now.

My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 
digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXX. This gives a derived 
DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished… I 
think.

Does this method cause any call processing issues? I’m slightly worried that it 
could raise processor usage… but I’m mostly just worried about it because it is 
“new” to me.

Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?

Thanks,
Nick

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate enterprise number mask

[Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)]

I think this is a great use for the alternate enterprise number and it won’t 
cause any overhead with call processing.

-Ryan

On Oct 29, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Barnett, Nick 
> 
wrote:

I sure could, but we are going to have over 1000 NPA-NXX combinations after 
everything is deployed. I was looking for a way to not have a ton of 
translations going on.

From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:09 PM
To: Barnett, Nick
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] I need some feedback on the use of alternate 
enterprise number mask

could you just use a translation pattern.  9130XXX translates to 130xxx.

Scott

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick 
> 
wrote:
Here’s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our field 
offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to the field 
offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting speed dials to 
call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This causes the call to 
trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount of training or 
bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing 9 to reach HQ for 
decades.

I’m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with non-did 
numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I’ll get there, I just can’t do it 
right now.

My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use 11 
digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXX. This gives a derived 
DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission accomplished… I 
think.

Does this method cause any call processing issues? I’m slightly worried that it 
could raise processor usage… but I’m mostly just worried about it because it is 
“new” to me.

Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around?

Thanks,
Nick

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CME 9.1 shared line

[Jeremy Rogers (AM)]

I have a CME with several 9971 phones that have a shared line.  Internally they 
use a 3 digit extension.  Externally the calls hit an inbound translation to go 
from a 10 digit DID to the 3 digit extension.  The issue is as follows:

If I call from a cell phone to the DID, the call only rings on the SIP phone 
that has that DN as line 1.
If I call internally to the 3 digit DN, it rings on all three phones.

Is this normal behavior?  I've tried searching but can't find any answers.

Jeremy Rogers CCNA
Advanced Technical consultant
Advanced Solutions, Professional Services
Dimension Data
Office:  +1.732.452.5238
Mobile:  +1.908.229.3474
e-fax:  +1.732.352.7891
www.dimensiondata.com



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Scott Voll]

So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?

Do you like them?

Pro's and Con's?

We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
their's free and not continuing support for new Models.

We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series.  I have a Demo of Uplinx.  It
seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
little xp'ish).

Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.

TIA

Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Walenta, Philip]

I’ve been using Unified FX for quite some time now.  The ability to see/manage 
groups of phones makes it a dream for me (I manage several labs, so I have a 
different use case).

It makes certain tasks very easy (like putting wallpapers on phones).  You can 
also use it to monitor audio and send audio (Play:AreYouThere.raw) etc.

The interface is a little sparse, but very functional.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott 
Voll
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 4:51 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?

Do you like them?

Pro's and Con's?

We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's 
free and not continuing support for new Models.

We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series.  I have a Demo of Uplinx.  It seems 
very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little 
xp'ish).

Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.

TIA

Scott

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Stephen Welsh]

Okay, I can’t resit this one ;)

I’m sure opinions will vary based on personal taste etc., but one key point, 
only PhoneView (http://www.unifiedfx.com) is Cisco Compatible (tested with 
10.5, IVT testing for 11.0 will be complete shortly too) and used by Cisco 
themselves including the following:

Cisco ACE team (internal Cisco IT that supports alpha clusters etc.)
CCIE Collaboration Proctors to help remotely mark your pod configuration
Cisco Devnet sandbox
Cisco TAC globally

I’m not claiming our software is flawless, but it is being used to manage 
Millions of IP Phones, so we do have a few happy customers ;)

Kind Regards

Stephen Welsh
CTO
UnifiedFX

On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:51, Scott Voll 
> wrote:

So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?

Do you like them?

Pro's and Con's?

We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made their's 
free and not continuing support for new Models.

We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series.  I have a Demo of Uplinx.  It seems 
very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a little 
xp'ish).

Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.

TIA

Scott

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Charles Goldsmith]

Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll  wrote:

> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>
> Do you like them?
>
> Pro's and Con's?
>
> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>
> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series.  I have a Demo of Uplinx.  It
> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
> little xp'ish).
>
> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Mike King]

Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll  wrote:

> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> FTP?
>
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> to restart it and run my backups again.
>
> What have others had good success using?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Jason Aarons (AM)]

Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server….

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike 
King
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
To: Scott Voll 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?


Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll 
> wrote:
What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?

I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to 
restart it and run my backups again.

What have others had good success using?

Thanks

Scott


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control -- Opinions

[Nick Britt]

+1 plus for unified fx saved my bacon numerous times ;-)

On Friday, 30 October 2015, Charles Goldsmith  wrote:

> Variphy (variphy.com), and it comes with a lot of other very handy tools.
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Scott Voll  > wrote:
>
>> So what vendor do you use for Remote phone control?
>>
>> Do you like them?
>>
>> Pro's and Con's?
>>
>> We have used SingleWire for the last 5 or 6 years, but they have made
>> their's free and not continuing support for new Models.
>>
>> We are moving from 7961's to 88xx series.  I have a Demo of Uplinx.  It
>> seems very feature rich, but the GUI could use a little updating (seems a
>> little xp'ish).
>>
>> Before I go and spend any money, I want to go with the best.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>

-- 
- Nick
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 7821 phones issue

[Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman]

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the suggestion, kindly have a look on the attached sh run, it may 
has some clues.

BTW, I sound the following configs under the sip-ua but it’s a default as I 
didn’t configure it myself:
sip-ua
 presence enable



Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer - KSA

From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:21 AM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7821 phones issue

You could try a sip-profile under voice service voip to strip it out.

voice class sip-profiles 100
 request Invite sip-header Authorization remove

voice service voip
 sip
  sip-profiles 100

I've never tried this for CME messaging though.  It's normally a CUBE feature.  
It may still work though.

You should be able to remove the username/password under the SIP ephone 
configuration for the calling phone if it's on the same subnet as CME which may 
also help but doesn't help if you have those 78XX phones registering over the 
WAN.


On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
> wrote:
Nothing configured under the sip-ua.

How can I strip out the authorization header please?





Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer - BMB KSA

On Oct 28, 2015, at 7:29 PM, Brian Meade 
>>
 wrote:

I'm guessing there's a device with SIP inspection in the middle that doesn't 
like the Authorization header and is dropping the packets.  You could either go 
through the full path and fix that issue or somehow strip out that 
Authorization header.

What do you have configured under sip-ua?

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>>
 wrote:
Hi Brian,

If this is the case, so how this can be fixed ?

Also if this is what makes the call fail, how these calls are working between 
the 7821 phones on the same LAN (both HQ and Branch)? Also it’s working from 
branch 7821 to HQ 7821, it just not working from HQ 7821 to branch 7821.



Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer - KSA


From: 
bmead...@gmail.com>
 
[mailto:bmead...@gmail.com>]
 On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 6:43 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>>
Cc: 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7821 phones issue

In the non-working Invite, CME is sending an Authorization header that doesn't 
exist in the working case:
Authorization: Digest 
username="204",realm="all",uri="sip:201@10.10.3.2>;user=phone",response="13d0e80e52a41bc8642290d5744ca66d",nonce="9D2BD5F30012BAFA",cnonce="570b883d",qop=auth,nc=0003,algorithm=MD5

This is forwarded from the incoming Invite from the 7821.  I'm guessing you 
have some sort of header-passthrough configured here resulting in the problem 
occurring.




On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
>>
 wrote:
I know that there is a lack of a response to the SIP invite message which is 
being sent from HQ 7821 phone to the branch 7821 phone during the call setup 
which may point to a network connectivity (or blocking) in the middle, but can 
anyone give me a reasonable answer for why the same messages are flowing 
normally when the 8831 HQ phone initiate the call to the 7821 branch phone ?? 
if something blocked it will be blocked for all.



Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer - KSA

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>]
 On Behalf Of Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:02 PM
To: 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7821 phones issue

Hi Gents,


I have a setup of CME 10.5 on 2911 ISR in the HQ, then I have a DMVPN to the 
branch site.

I have the following phone types:

- 7945 skinny based phone.

- 8831 SIP conference station.

-7821 SIP phones.

- 7861 SIP phone.

the setup is working fine in the HQ (on the same LAN) but 

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Charles Goldsmith]

same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
know about

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:

> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server….
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Mike King
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
> *To:* Scott Voll 
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
>
>
>
>
>
> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll  wrote:
>
> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
> FTP?
>
>
>
> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
> to restart it and run my backups again.
>
>
>
> What have others had good success using?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> itevomcid
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Mike King]

http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith 
wrote:

> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
> know about
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
> jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>
>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server….
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *Mike King
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
>> *To:* Scott Voll 
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll 
>> wrote:
>>
>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and
>> FTP?
>>
>>
>>
>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
>> to restart it and run my backups again.
>>
>>
>>
>> What have others had good success using?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> itevomcid
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Charles Goldsmith]

I don't think this is technically SFTP as we know it in the Cisco world.
This is FTP-SSL/TLS.  I have not tested it, but I don't think we can use it
to backup our UC apps.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Mike King  wrote:

>
> http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith 
> wrote:
>
>> same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i
>> know about
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
>> jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server….
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Mike King
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
>>> *To:* Scott Voll 
>>> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP
>>> and FTP?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have
>>> to restart it and run my backups again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What have others had good success using?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> itevomcid
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

[Ryan Huff]

It is worth noting that SFTP and FTPS are completely different protocols.

FTPS is FTP with a control channel and opens new connections for the data 
transfer. As it uses SSL, it requires a certificate.

SFTP is an extension of SSH, so it usually uses only the SSH port for both data 
and control.

SSH server installations generally have SFTP support but FTPS typically needs a 
supported FTP server.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 29, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Mike King 
> wrote:

http://secure.nerdster.com.au/knowledgebase/10075/How-to-enable-SFTP-with-Filezilla-Server.html

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Charles Goldsmith 
> wrote:
same, i know it's an ftp server, but only the client can do sftp that i know 
about

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) 
> wrote:
Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Mike King
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:36 PM
To: Scott Voll >
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?


Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile.

Mike

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll 
> wrote:
What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and FTP?

I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but it keeps crashing and then I have to 
restart it and run my backups again.

What have others had good success using?

Thanks

Scott


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip