Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

2017-04-13 Thread Ryan Huff 
Not knowing how or where you acquired your original demo licenses (or if you 
were just running on the initial 60 day grace period); you could visit 
https://cisco.com/go/license and select "Demo and evaluation" from the "Get 
Other Licenses" selector for "Unified Communications Products".

It should be able to sign your PLM request for a 180 day temp license for 
CUCM/CUC; 20 CUWL Pro and 5 TP Room licenses, which would satisfy your lab 
needs, at least for 6 months.

Thanks,

Ryan

On Apr 13, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Heim, Dennis 
> wrote:

If you work for a Cisco partner.. look at the UC NFR Kit.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Samadi boukil
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:29 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

Hello,

I'm running CUCM 11.x since a week, and when I installed IM Presence, it tell 
me that i can't add new users and phones and that  my demo licence has expired.
I can't buy a licence I just need it for Lab environment.

Thanks.
--
SAMADI Boukil
Élève Ingénieur
Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZS01PWV91S01WWXM=0B_xjs74PFblZYkhMeVRWYkdhZ2tIN3lHaG5NK3RMZWIrRlRNPQ]Profile
 LinkdeIn
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZWU9hNzB0cDQwblE=0B_xjs74PFblZZ1M3b2JBTFp0MjVJL2orUE1OcmZHRStwUE1VPQ]+212696184254
[https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aYm91a2lsc2FtYWRpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D=zerocontent=30c88e72-6672-41b5-a8a3-ce682e6b3150]ᐧ
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

2017-04-13 Thread Heim, Dennis 
If you work for a Cisco partner.. look at the UC NFR Kit.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Samadi boukil
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:29 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

Hello,

I'm running CUCM 11.x since a week, and when I installed IM Presence, it tell 
me that i can't add new users and phones and that  my demo licence has expired.
I can't buy a licence I just need it for Lab environment.

Thanks.
--
SAMADI Boukil
Élève Ingénieur
Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZS01PWV91S01WWXM=0B_xjs74PFblZYkhMeVRWYkdhZ2tIN3lHaG5NK3RMZWIrRlRNPQ]Profile
 LinkdeIn
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZWU9hNzB0cDQwblE=0B_xjs74PFblZZ1M3b2JBTFp0MjVJL2orUE1OcmZHRStwUE1VPQ]+212696184254
[https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aYm91a2lsc2FtYWRpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D=zerocontent=30c88e72-6672-41b5-a8a3-ce682e6b3150]ᐧ
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

2017-04-13 Thread Samadi boukil 
Hello,

I'm running CUCM 11.x since a week, and when I installed IM Presence, it
tell me that i can't add new users and phones and that  my demo licence has
expired.
I can't buy a licence I just need it for Lab environment.

Thanks.
-- 

*SAMADI Boukil*

*Élève Ingénieur *

*Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux**Profile LinkdeIn
*
*+212696184254*

ᐧ
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UDS Searches not sanitizing the Plus Symbol

2017-04-13 Thread Justin Steinberg 
i meant to say it will also find numbers with hypens (the documentation
mentions they are ignored)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Justin Steinberg 
wrote:

> While Anthony's encoding is right, I actually think the documentation does
> intend to actually mean you can act as though the + was not in the phone
> number value as stored in AD.
>
> I have used the query below
>
> https://{host}:8443/cucm-uds/users?numberlast=3175551234
> <(317)%20555-1234>
>
> To search for phone numbers in AD.  This finds any number with right
> justified digits above.  This should find results for +13175551234
> <(317)%20555-1234>, 13175551234 <(317)%20555-1234>, and 3175551234
> <(317)%20555-1234>.   If there are hypens in the numbers in AD (e.g.
> 317-555-1234 <(317)%20555-1234>).
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No worries.  Transitioning to app dev will be a bumpy road for a lot of
>> UC Engineers, we might as well help each other progress forward.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM Nathan Reeves 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> lol, cheers for that, should have picked that up earlier.  Quick test
>>> shows that works perfectly.
>>>
>>> When the docs mention that it ignores the plus symbol, I was working on
>>> the assumption that it therefore would ignore the plus symbol in the actual
>>> number.  Wrong assumption.
>>>
>>> Thanks again
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>>> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Plus signs (+) in URL query parameters (the part after the question
 mark [?]) are treated as spaces.  E.g., ?name=anthony+holloway == "anthony
 holloway"  So, you're effectively asking UDS for " 6140011" (note the
 leading space, and omission of the plus sign [+]).

 The work around is to use some sort of URL encoding library, which will
 build your URL with the plus sign (+) encoded with it's percent sign (%)
 equivelent, which happens to be %2B.

 So, your submitted UDS request would actually look like:

 https://172.20.2.21:8443/cucm-uds/users?number=%2B6140011

 Finally, this is not a function of UDS at all, and something you'll
 need to know, now that you are explorely RESTful APIs which rely on URL
 structures to work with data.

 On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM Nathan Reeves <
 nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Taking a look around at what options we have to drive additional
> directories for our IP phones and decided to take a quick look at using 
> UDS
> as the data source, accessing it via the published API.
>
> One thing I'm finding (which I can't see any bug report on), is that
> number searches, where the number in UDS contains a plus, does not return
> search results based on the query submitted.
>
> I have a user configured with a mobile number in PlusE164
> (+6140011 <+61%20400%20111%20111> for example) which is pulled
> into the CUCM directory via LDAP sync.
>
> The API docs note that brackets, plus symbols etc are all ignored in
> the search.  When I access the UDS API and construct a query string in a
> URL along the lines of 'https://172.20.2.21:8443/cucm
> -uds/users?number=61400', the returned response is 0 results.  If I
> update the Mobile number to remove just the plus (and resync LDAP), the
> same search now returns my user with the mobile number correctly searched.
>
> Running 11.5(1)SU1 (haven't yet checked this against SU2), attempted
> to use native UDS but also tried searching while UDS Proxy is enabled.
> Same results either way.
>
> Anyone seen this issue or am I missing something?  I can only assume
> that the sanitized query doesn't correctly ignore the plus symbol.
>
> Cheers
>
> Nathan
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

>>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UDS Searches not sanitizing the Plus Symbol

2017-04-13 Thread Justin Steinberg 
While Anthony's encoding is right, I actually think the documentation does
intend to actually mean you can act as though the + was not in the phone
number value as stored in AD.

I have used the query below

https://{host}:8443/cucm-uds/users?numberlast=3175551234

To search for phone numbers in AD.  This finds any number with right
justified digits above.  This should find results for +13175551234,
13175551234, and 3175551234.   If there are hypens in the numbers in AD
(e.g. 317-555-1234).

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No worries.  Transitioning to app dev will be a bumpy road for a lot of UC
> Engineers, we might as well help each other progress forward.
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM Nathan Reeves 
> wrote:
>
>> lol, cheers for that, should have picked that up earlier.  Quick test
>> shows that works perfectly.
>>
>> When the docs mention that it ignores the plus symbol, I was working on
>> the assumption that it therefore would ignore the plus symbol in the actual
>> number.  Wrong assumption.
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>> avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Plus signs (+) in URL query parameters (the part after the question mark
>>> [?]) are treated as spaces.  E.g., ?name=anthony+holloway == "anthony
>>> holloway"  So, you're effectively asking UDS for " 6140011" (note the
>>> leading space, and omission of the plus sign [+]).
>>>
>>> The work around is to use some sort of URL encoding library, which will
>>> build your URL with the plus sign (+) encoded with it's percent sign (%)
>>> equivelent, which happens to be %2B.
>>>
>>> So, your submitted UDS request would actually look like:
>>>
>>> https://172.20.2.21:8443/cucm-uds/users?number=%2B6140011
>>>
>>> Finally, this is not a function of UDS at all, and something you'll need
>>> to know, now that you are explorely RESTful APIs which rely on URL
>>> structures to work with data.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 AM Nathan Reeves <
>>> nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Taking a look around at what options we have to drive additional
 directories for our IP phones and decided to take a quick look at using UDS
 as the data source, accessing it via the published API.

 One thing I'm finding (which I can't see any bug report on), is that
 number searches, where the number in UDS contains a plus, does not return
 search results based on the query submitted.

 I have a user configured with a mobile number in PlusE164 (+6140011
 <+61%20400%20111%20111> for example) which is pulled into the CUCM
 directory via LDAP sync.

 The API docs note that brackets, plus symbols etc are all ignored in
 the search.  When I access the UDS API and construct a query string in a
 URL along the lines of 'https://172.20.2.21:8443/
 cucm-uds/users?number=61400', the returned response is 0 results.  If
 I update the Mobile number to remove just the plus (and resync LDAP), the
 same search now returns my user with the mobile number correctly searched.

 Running 11.5(1)SU1 (haven't yet checked this against SU2), attempted to
 use native UDS but also tried searching while UDS Proxy is enabled.  Same
 results either way.

 Anyone seen this issue or am I missing something?  I can only assume
 that the sanitized query doesn't correctly ignore the plus symbol.

 Cheers

 Nathan
 ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

>>>
>>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] BAT Phone Insert Issue

2017-04-13 Thread Ryan Huff 
Yeah, the column headers for the CSVs change often between versions; required 
fields added, fields removed or renamed ... etc.

My suggestion is to generate a "sample" export of the data set you're trying to 
import, using the 10.5.2 BAT. Then, copy/paste the relevant columns from your 
CSV that you want to import, into the "sample" sheet you exported (removing the 
sample data set rows of course).

If you're trying a "Specific Details" insert type, you'll generally want to 
create a customized template for that data type to insert against first, then 
select it during the import.

Thanks,

Ryan

On Apr 12, 2017, at 9:36 PM, Ruben Trujillo via cisco-voip 
> wrote:

Hello,

I'm attempting to do a BAT phone insert (CUCM 10.5.2)but I'm running into an 
issue where I get an error "(blank) is not a supported field".  Since the log 
isn't telling me what the issue is I'm having a hard time finding what it's 
complaining about.  Has anyone else run into this?  I've tried this with an 
"all details" as well as "specific details" when attempting to insert phones 
via BAT.  My feeling is that something changed between this version and the 
previous version of CM but I'm not having any luck finding what it is.  Also, I 
have done this successfully before but it’s been a few years and I believe we 
were on CUCM 9.x at the time.

Thanks,
Ruben Trujillo
IT Telecom

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip