Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?
That is the reason for my question Anyone know for sure? Scott PS> version 11.5. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Anthony Holloway < avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you talking about DNS TTL? Defects or poor programming might reveal > that it's only resolved at service start (like NTP references on IOS), or > possible never cached and DNS is hit for every connection (like SIP trunks > with DNS names in CUCM). > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM Scott Vollwrote: > >> How often does CM query smtp DNS name? we are changing our Cname for >> SMTP and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to >> change. >> >> Thanks >> >> Scott >> >> ___ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?
Are you talking about DNS TTL? Defects or poor programming might reveal that it's only resolved at service start (like NTP references on IOS), or possible never cached and DNS is hit for every connection (like SIP trunks with DNS names in CUCM). On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM Scott Vollwrote: > How often does CM query smtp DNS name? we are changing our Cname for SMTP > and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to change. > > Thanks > > Scott > > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?
How often does CM query smtp DNS name? we are changing our Cname for SMTP and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to change. Thanks Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] 8861 Default Password issue
Seeing this issue too. It looks like you can set it at "Local Phone Unlock Password" on the common phone profile but no idea what the default is and not seeing anything online. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Erick Bergquistwrote: > CUCM. Other phones work fine on the same switch port and cable, so > that has been checked. Normal switchport config. > > Unable to check settings or network info on phone itself as it is > prompting for this password even after factory reset. > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Anthony Holloway > wrote: > > Kind of funny that I have to ask this on Cisco-VoIP now but are you > > registering to CUCME, BE4K, Spark or CUCM? If CUCM, via MRA? > > > > Also, I've deployed many 8800 and have never seen a password issue like > > this. Albeit, most of my deployments were with CUCM. > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:08 PM Erick Bergquist > wrote: > >> > >> Havng issue getting new 8861 registered. > >> > >> On the phone it prompts for admin password, but stops at the 4th > >> character. > >> Default password is Cisco but we can only enter 4 characters. Doesn't > >> take anything past 4. > >> > >> Anyone seen this before? > >> > >> Have done factory reset to with same. > >> > >> Erick > >> ___ > >> cisco-voip mailing list > >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error
So is it only the Tomcat Cert I need to reissue? if I reissue, does it affect any other systems, (such as CM)? Just need to schedule maintenance. TIA Scott On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) < akram...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > > > The certificate should contain subjectAltName(SAN), and you should not > have any issues. If you were using CN, ensure it is now in the SAN. The > same is documented here: https://productforums.google. > com/forum/#!msg/chrome/5f1Kp_ntUwU/CfER8_JKDwAJ > > > > The team looked at this today and for CA signed certificates with the > above config, there are no issues on the latest Chrome/FF. If you are still > facing issues, can you send me the screenshot and details? > > > > Regards, > > Abhiram Kramadhati > > Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU > > CCIE Collaboration # 40065 > > > > > > *From: *cisco-voipon behalf of > Nathan Reeves > *Date: *Friday, 28 April 2017 at 4:04 AM > *To: *Scott Voll > *Cc: *"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" > *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error > > > > Chrome stopped supporting Common Name matching in the latest release 58 > which dropped in the last week or so. This would cause the error you > referenced below. Looks like it now only supports names in the > subjectAlternativeName field of the cert. > > > > Hope this assists > > > > Nathan > > On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Scott Voll wrote: > > OK, as of yesterday I started having reports of users in Chrome and > Firefox getting an error connecting to the Finesse webpage. > > > > Looking at the cert It's sha2 but I get Not secure in FF and not private > in Chrome. > > > > Chome complains of NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID > > > > cert is internal CA and the sigature algorithim is Sha512RSA hash is SHa512 > > > > The only thing that looks a little questionable is in the subject, I also > have the serial number and the hostname is CAPs not lower case > > > > UCCx 11.5.1.1-61 > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > TIA > > > > Scott > > > > ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] best CUIC report
hi all, i have a uccx 11.x environment. one of our user/receptionist want a report in which she can check the number of calls hit to IVR during out of office hours (i.e from 5:00pm to next day 8:00 am, and when no agent is logged in). Could you guys guide me which will give me this information. Regards Naray ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] use of "IP Phone Service" while connected via MRA
Not sure about support (it changes so much w/ each cucm and expressway ver's) but EM does work via mra Jeffrey McHugh | Sr. Collaboration Consulting Engineer Fidelus Technologies Named Best UC Provider in the USA +1-212-616-7801 office | www.fidelus.com Disclaimer - April 28, 2017 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for Michael Hamann,voip puck. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of Fidelus Technologies, LLC. Warning: Although Fidelus Technologies, LLC has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 28, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Michael Hamannwrote: > > Hello Folks, > > we just start to switch our home office phones from the old anyconnect / > phone VPN way to mra... > > The MRA part works very well, but we are asking us if it is possible to use > IP Phone Service (XML Services) ? I just read that extension mobility is not > supported yet so I fear that IP phone services will not work via MRA... > > Can anyone confirm this ? > > Michael > ___ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error
Hi guys, The certificate should contain subjectAltName(SAN), and you should not have any issues. If you were using CN, ensure it is now in the SAN. The same is documented here: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/chrome/5f1Kp_ntUwU/CfER8_JKDwAJ The team looked at this today and for CA signed certificates with the above config, there are no issues on the latest Chrome/FF. If you are still facing issues, can you send me the screenshot and details? Regards, Abhiram Kramadhati Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU CCIE Collaboration # 40065 From: cisco-voipon behalf of Nathan Reeves Date: Friday, 28 April 2017 at 4:04 AM To: Scott Voll Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error Chrome stopped supporting Common Name matching in the latest release 58 which dropped in the last week or so. This would cause the error you referenced below. Looks like it now only supports names in the subjectAlternativeName field of the cert. Hope this assists Nathan On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Scott Voll > wrote: OK, as of yesterday I started having reports of users in Chrome and Firefox getting an error connecting to the Finesse webpage. Looking at the cert It's sha2 but I get Not secure in FF and not private in Chrome. Chome complains of NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID cert is internal CA and the sigature algorithim is Sha512RSA hash is SHa512 The only thing that looks a little questionable is in the subject, I also have the serial number and the hostname is CAPs not lower case UCCx 11.5.1.1-61 Any thoughts? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[cisco-voip] use of "IP Phone Service" while connected via MRA
Hello Folks, we just start to switch our home office phones from the old anyconnect / phone VPN way to mra... The MRA part works very well, but we are asking us if it is possible to use IP Phone Service (XML Services) ? I just read that extension mobility is not supported yet so I fear that IP phone services will not work via MRA... Can anyone confirm this ? Michael___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip