Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?

2017-04-28 Thread Scott Voll
That is the reason for my question Anyone know for sure?

Scott
PS>  version 11.5.

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you talking about DNS TTL?  Defects or poor programming might reveal
> that it's only resolved at service start (like NTP references on IOS), or
> possible never cached and DNS is hit for every connection (like SIP trunks
> with DNS names in CUCM).
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM Scott Voll  wrote:
>
>> How often does CM query smtp DNS name?  we are changing our Cname for
>> SMTP and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to
>> change.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?

2017-04-28 Thread Anthony Holloway
Are you talking about DNS TTL?  Defects or poor programming might reveal
that it's only resolved at service start (like NTP references on IOS), or
possible never cached and DNS is hit for every connection (like SIP trunks
with DNS names in CUCM).

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:05 PM Scott Voll  wrote:

> How often does CM query smtp DNS name?  we are changing our Cname for SMTP
> and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to change.
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] SMTP on CM?

2017-04-28 Thread Scott Voll
How often does CM query smtp DNS name?  we are changing our Cname for SMTP
and would like to know how long I should expect for the emails to change.

Thanks

Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] 8861 Default Password issue

2017-04-28 Thread Brian Meade
Seeing this issue too.  It looks like you can set it at "Local Phone Unlock
Password" on the common phone profile but no idea what the default is and
not seeing anything online.

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Erick Bergquist  wrote:

> CUCM.  Other phones work fine on the same switch port and cable, so
> that has been checked. Normal switchport config.
>
> Unable to check settings or network info on phone itself as it is
> prompting for this password even after factory reset.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Anthony Holloway
>  wrote:
> > Kind of funny that I have to ask this on Cisco-VoIP now but are you
> > registering to CUCME, BE4K, Spark or CUCM? If CUCM, via MRA?
> >
> > Also, I've deployed many 8800 and have never seen a password issue like
> > this. Albeit, most of my deployments were with CUCM.
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:08 PM Erick Bergquist 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Havng issue getting new 8861 registered.
> >>
> >> On the phone it prompts for admin password, but stops at the 4th
> >> character.
> >> Default password is Cisco but we can only enter 4 characters. Doesn't
> >> take anything past 4.
> >>
> >> Anyone seen this before?
> >>
> >> Have done factory reset to with same.
> >>
> >> Erick
> >> ___
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error

2017-04-28 Thread Scott Voll
So is it only the Tomcat Cert I need to reissue?  if I reissue, does it
affect any other systems, (such as CM)?

Just need to schedule maintenance.

TIA

Scott


On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) <
akram...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> The certificate should contain subjectAltName(SAN), and you should not
> have any issues. If you were using CN, ensure it is now in the SAN. The
> same is documented here: https://productforums.google.
> com/forum/#!msg/chrome/5f1Kp_ntUwU/CfER8_JKDwAJ
>
>
>
> The team looked at this today and for CA signed certificates with the
> above config, there are no issues on the latest Chrome/FF. If you are still
> facing issues, can you send me the screenshot and details?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Abhiram Kramadhati
>
> Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU
>
> CCIE Collaboration # 40065
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *cisco-voip  on behalf of
> Nathan Reeves 
> *Date: *Friday, 28 April 2017 at 4:04 AM
> *To: *Scott Voll 
> *Cc: *"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" 
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error
>
>
>
> Chrome stopped supporting Common Name matching in the latest release 58
> which dropped in the last week or so.  This would cause the error you
> referenced below.  Looks like it now only supports names in the
> subjectAlternativeName field of the cert.
>
>
>
> Hope this assists
>
>
>
> Nathan
>
> On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Scott Voll  wrote:
>
> OK, as of yesterday I started having reports of users in Chrome and
> Firefox getting an error connecting to the Finesse webpage.
>
>
>
> Looking at the cert It's sha2 but I get Not secure in FF and not private
> in Chrome.
>
>
>
> Chome complains of NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
>
>
>
> cert is internal CA and the sigature algorithim is Sha512RSA hash is SHa512
>
>
>
> The only thing that looks a little questionable is in the subject, I also
> have the serial number and the hostname is CAPs not lower case
>
>
>
> UCCx 11.5.1.1-61
>
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> TIA
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] best CUIC report

2017-04-28 Thread naresh rathore
hi all,



i have a uccx 11.x environment. one of our user/receptionist want a report in 
which she can check the number of calls hit to IVR during out of office hours 
(i.e from 5:00pm to next day 8:00 am, and when no agent is logged in). Could 
you guys guide me which will give me this information.



Regards



Naray
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] use of "IP Phone Service" while connected via MRA

2017-04-28 Thread Jeffrey McHugh
Not sure about support (it changes so much w/ each cucm and expressway ver's) 
but EM does work via mra

Jeffrey McHugh | Sr. Collaboration Consulting Engineer
Fidelus Technologies
Named Best UC Provider in the USA
+1-212-616-7801 office | www.fidelus.com
Disclaimer - April 28, 2017
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for Michael Hamann,voip puck. If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or 
opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not 
represent those of Fidelus Technologies, LLC. Warning: Although Fidelus 
Technologies, LLC has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 28, 2017, at 3:01 AM, Michael Hamann  wrote:
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> we just start to switch our home office phones from the old anyconnect / 
> phone VPN way to mra...
>
> The MRA part works very well, but we are asking us if it is possible to use 
> IP Phone Service (XML Services) ? I just read that extension mobility is not 
> supported yet so I fear that IP phone services will not work via MRA...
>
> Can anyone confirm this ?
>
> Michael
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error

2017-04-28 Thread Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh)
Hi guys,

The certificate should contain subjectAltName(SAN), and you should not have any 
issues. If you were using CN, ensure it is now in the SAN. The same is 
documented here: 
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/chrome/5f1Kp_ntUwU/CfER8_JKDwAJ

The team looked at this today and for CA signed certificates with the above 
config, there are no issues on the latest Chrome/FF. If you are still facing 
issues, can you send me the screenshot and details?

Regards,
Abhiram Kramadhati
Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU
CCIE Collaboration # 40065


From: cisco-voip  on behalf of Nathan 
Reeves 
Date: Friday, 28 April 2017 at 4:04 AM
To: Scott Voll 
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Finesse cert error

Chrome stopped supporting Common Name matching in the latest release 58 which 
dropped in the last week or so.  This would cause the error you referenced 
below.  Looks like it now only supports names in the subjectAlternativeName 
field of the cert.

Hope this assists

Nathan

On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Scott Voll 
> wrote:
OK, as of yesterday I started having reports of users in Chrome and Firefox 
getting an error connecting to the Finesse webpage.

Looking at the cert It's sha2 but I get Not secure in FF and not private in 
Chrome.

Chome complains of NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID

cert is internal CA and the sigature algorithim is Sha512RSA hash is SHa512

The only thing that looks a little questionable is in the subject, I also have 
the serial number and the hostname is CAPs not lower case

UCCx 11.5.1.1-61


Any thoughts?

TIA

Scott

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


[cisco-voip] use of "IP Phone Service" while connected via MRA

2017-04-28 Thread Michael Hamann
Hello Folks,
 
we just start to switch our home office phones from the old anyconnect / phone
VPN way to mra...
 
The MRA part works very well, but we are asking us if it is possible to use IP
Phone Service (XML Services) ? I just read that extension mobility is not
supported yet so I fear that IP phone services will not work via MRA...
 
Can anyone confirm this ? 
 
Michael___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip