Re: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread BSCH
GiM,您好!

I think you not to understand my mean.
your said Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable. YOU COULD NOT PROOF 
IT.
The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match signature could 
use standar c or c++.

=== 2006-04-01 23:10:09 您在来信中写道:===

BSCH in message 'Re: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code' wrote:
 Brian A. Reiter!
 
   if engine design pure. the others could use the clamav engine to write
 anti-virus software. the software not to write by us. ALL could use the
 engine convenience.
 
  

I don't think you understand the differences between UNIX and Windows
platforms. Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable.

And what problems do you see for others writing anti-virus software
on ClamAV basis?

btw: 1) I'm not a native english speaker, but it's quite hard o understand
 what you're trying to say (this and previous posts)
 2) stop top-posting, this is really annoying.

 main(int a[puts(Michał 'GiM' Spadliński)]){}
-- 
144722 lcamtuf I've found bug in sendmail
144724 lcamtuf what a suprise

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


致
礼!
 
 
BSCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  2006-04-02

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html


RE: Re: RE: [Clamav-devel] why don't write portable code

2006-04-01 Thread Nigel Horne
 GiM,您好!
 
 your said Programming in these environments is totaly different, and
 creating one universal engine wouldn't be reasonable. YOU COULD 
 NOT PROOF IT.
 The engine is pure! It only match signature one a file! match 
 signature could use standar c or c++.

I strongly suggest that we all stop feeding the troll.
 
 BSCH
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   2006-04-02

-Nigel

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html