[Clamav-users] Feature Request
Has anyone considered or requested that the URL for upgrading Clamav might be put in the notice the admin receives when the following message is sent: WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately! I may just poke through the source code, but my time can be better spent elsewhere... This is NOT meant to be taken as a high priority. Keeping my servers clean from viruses is significantly more important than worrying about whether I have to type clamav.net in the URL field. Thanks for not flaming me. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] send_sms passed parameters
2. I am using my 0.71 versions of clamav.conf and freschclam.conf. What am I going to lose by doing this? In the mean time, I'll go read the 0.75.1 conf files and see what I can pick out. No differences in freshclam.conf, but clamav.conf had one change. Added it and up and running. Still, however %f does NOT tell me the file as 0.6n did. I now get something, however. It passes 0.0 to me. I don't know why, it just does. Do any of you know why? I'd really like to know what file is infected. It's pretty useless as it is. I kicked off a clamdscan on / and it chewed up system resources so badly I had to kill it... Also, along that line, is there an option that will tell me where in an email source file of, say 1.5MB, the virus is found? I've even resorted to doing a cat f|wc then using head -|tail - but can't get clandscan to work in that mode. Karl --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] send_sms passed parameters
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon after. The current version 0.75.1 . 0.71 will NOT catch all current viruses so you should upgrade first. Okay, upgrade complete. It took all of 25 minutes, including copying my old config files from /etc. Clamav-milter still looks for the config file in /etc instead of where 0.75.1 is looking for it (/usr/local/etc). 2 questions: 1. I did a soft link from /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf to /etc/clamav.conf for clamav-milter. Is that going to be a problem? Will it affect freshclam? 2. I am using my 0.71 versions of clamav.conf and freschclam.conf. What am I going to lose by doing this? In the mean time, I'll go read the 0.75.1 conf files and see what I can pick out. TIA, Karl --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
[Clamav-users] send_sms passed parameters
I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon after. I'm curious what happened to %f for send_sms to pass the location of the file that is infected. Only the %v parameter is passed now. I would rather know where a virus is than the name of the virus, if I have to choose. Would upgrading to 0.75 return %f to me? Karl --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047alloc_id=10808op=click ___ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
