[Clamav-users] Glibc requirements
We are still using RedHat 7, and were running glibc-2.2.4-18.7.0.9. Clamav complained about something that was in glibc, so I had to upgrade. I have installed clamav 0.8 using glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8 glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8 glibc-profile-2.3.2-4.80.8 Finally I tried glibc-devel-2.3.2-4.80.8 This required me to update binutils, so: binutils-2.13.90.0.2-2 which required a new version of gcc gcc-2.96-98 which required a new version of cpp cpp-2.96-98 I am now finally running clamav fine, problem is I would have to do this on a whole ton of production boxes. What I want to know is what pakckages do you guys recommend for RH7 or are the above packages ok. Shot -- Shaun Bügler Hetzner Africa Tel: +27 21 970 2000 Fax: +27 21 970 2001 Email Disclaimer: http://www.hetzner.co.za/index.php?id=245 [ * Awarded Top 50 ICT Companies status in SA - 2003/4] [ * Awarded Top 300 National Companies status - 2004/5/6 ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Glibc requirements
Shaun Bugler wrote: I am now finally running clamav fine, problem is I would have to do this on a whole ton of production boxes. What I want to know is what pakckages do you guys recommend for RH7 or are the above packages ok. If you have tons of RH7 boxes, you better compile your own RPMS. use the SRPMS or .spec that you have (I hear Dag's and Crash Hat's work great), and start from there. You could also use static binary, such as one on http://clamav.or.id Regards, Fajar ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Glibc requirements
Shaun Bugler wrote: I am now finally running clamav fine, problem is I would have to do this on a whole ton of production boxes. What I want to know is what pakckages do you guys recommend for RH7 or are the above packages ok. If you have tons of RH7 boxes, you better compile your own RPMS. use the SRPMS or .spec that you have (I hear Dag's and Crash Hat's work great), and start from there. I tried the following: 'rpm -i clamav-0.80-4.src.rpm' I then tried to rebuild: 'rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/clamav.spec' 'rpm -ba clamav.spec' (using crash hats) It said it had dependancies, I got them, installed them: autoconf253-2.53-3.noarch.rpm automake15-1.5-2.noarch.rpm libidn-0.5.2-0.fdr.0.rh73.i386.rpm libidn-devel-0.5.2-0.fdr.0.rh73.i386.rpm pkgconfig-0.7.0-3.i386.rpm sendmail-devel-8.12.8-9.1.rh73.dag.i386.rpm Once again, alot. But still it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-source]# rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/clamav.spec error: failed build dependencies: autoconf is needed by clamav-0.80-4 automake is needed by clamav-0.80-4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-source]# ll /usr/bin | grep auto lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 22 Jan 11 14:23 autoconf - /usr/bin/ autoconf-2.53 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6196 Mar 27 2002 autoconf-2.53 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 Jan 11 14:22 automake - automake-1.5 its there any suggestions for a struggling noob? -- Shaun Bügler Hetzner Africa Tel: +27 21 970 2000 Fax: +27 21 970 2001 Email Disclaimer: http://www.hetzner.co.za/index.php?id=245 [ * Awarded Top 50 ICT Companies status in SA - 2003/4] [ * Awarded Top 300 National Companies status - 2004/5/6 ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] upgrade problem
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 08:25 +0200, Meni Shapiro wrote: Hi, just upgraded to clam-0.8 on a slackware 9.1 machine running sendmail+mimedefang. after installation when i try to start the daemon i get this error message: relocation error: /usr/sbin/clamd: undefined symbol: cli_strtok clamav any ideas? there are likely some libraries from your previous install somewhere - probably in /usr/local/lib as opposed to /usr/lib Or the other way around - the new binary is later in the search path that the old... -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX Austin Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning of mailboxes
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:51:38 -, Clive McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a requirement to scan messages in mailbox files on a mailhost. The host is a sparc platform (Solaris 8) and has a mixture of standard unix and mbx format mailbox files. I have been advised that ClamAV may be able to scan mailbox files and presumably handle the de-miming that is required. Before I start experimenting in earnest is it true that ClamAV can do this? To some degree, though (as other recent threads have pointed out) it's not designed to be used that way. It's designed to be used as, for example, with your MTA to detect the viruses before they are delivered. I don't know how good it's MIME capabilities are. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Glibc requirements
Shaun Bugler wrote: Shaun Bugler wrote: I am now finally running clamav fine, problem is I would have to do this on a whole ton of production boxes. What I want to know is what pakckages do you guys recommend for RH7 or are the above packages ok. If you have tons of RH7 boxes, you better compile your own RPMS. use the SRPMS or .spec that you have (I hear Dag's and Crash Hat's work great), and start from there. I tried the following: 'rpm -i clamav-0.80-4.src.rpm' I then tried to rebuild: 'rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPEC/clamav.spec' 'rpm -ba clamav.spec' (using crash hats) It said it had dependancies, I got them, installed them: autoconf253-2.53-3.noarch.rpm automake15-1.5-2.noarch.rpm libidn-0.5.2-0.fdr.0.rh73.i386.rpm libidn-devel-0.5.2-0.fdr.0.rh73.i386.rpm pkgconfig-0.7.0-3.i386.rpm sendmail-devel-8.12.8-9.1.rh73.dag.i386.rpm Once again, alot. But still it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-source]# rpm -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/clamav.spec error: failed build dependencies: autoconf is needed by clamav-0.80-4 automake is needed by clamav-0.80-4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav-source]# ll /usr/bin | grep auto lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 22 Jan 11 14:23 autoconf - /usr/bin/ autoconf-2.53 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 6196 Mar 27 2002 autoconf-2.53 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 Jan 11 14:22 automake - automake-1.5 its there any suggestions for a struggling noob? Please try also dag rpm: http://dag.wieers.com/packages/clamav/ The packages you need are: clamav, clamav-db, clamd; maybe clamav-devel and clamav-milter. And they are rh7 ready. G ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning of mailboxes
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 at 12:52:14 +, Rob MacGregor wrote: On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:51:38 -, Clive McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a requirement to scan messages in mailbox files on a mailhost. The host is a sparc platform (Solaris 8) and has a mixture of standard unix and mbx format mailbox files. I have been advised that ClamAV may be able to scan mailbox files and presumably handle the de-miming that is required. Before I start experimenting in earnest is it true that ClamAV can do this? To some degree, though (as other recent threads have pointed out) it's not designed to be used that way. Things aren't so bad :-). It's designed to be used as, for example, with your MTA to detect the viruses before they are delivered. I don't know how good it's MIME capabilities are. Quite good, actually. They are improved all the time, so you may want to use CVS version for this (or wait for releasing 0.81). Though I'm not sure about something you call mbx format mailbox files as you contrast them with standard unix mailbox files. -- Tomasz Papszun SysAdm @ TP S.A. Lodz, Poland | And it's only [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lodz.tpsa.pl/iso/ | ones and zeros. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ClamAV.net/ A GPL virus scanner ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
RE: [Clamav-users] Scanning of mailboxes
To some degree, though (as other recent threads have pointed out) it's not designed to be used that way. Things aren't so bad :-). It's designed to be used as, for example, with your MTA to detect the viruses before they are delivered. We already use sophie/sophos to scan mail passing through our mailhubs. However, messages can find their way into mailboxes via IMAP/POP if users copy messages from other systems. Those won't be picked up by the MTAs. I don't know how good it's MIME capabilities are. Quite good, actually. They are improved all the time, so you may want to use CVS version for this (or wait for releasing 0.81). Though I'm not sure about something you call mbx format mailbox files as you contrast them with standard unix mailbox files. MBX format is an indexed text format that includes the indexing information at the top of the file. Apart from additional headers to indicate message boundaries I think it's pretty much the same as standard unix format. I would think that any software that could handle the latter wrt demiming could also handle mbx. Thanks for the replies, Clive McDowell Information Services The Queen's University of Belfast ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning of mailboxes
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:36:20 -, Clive McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We already use sophie/sophos to scan mail passing through our mailhubs. However, messages can find their way into mailboxes via IMAP/POP if users copy messages from other systems. Those won't be picked up by the MTAs. In that case, I'd probably suggest using ClamAV on the mailhubs (possibly along with Sophie) and use Sophos to sweep the files. That way you're using each in a way it's designed for :) -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] Scanning of mailboxes
On Tuesday 11 Jan 2005 11:51, Clive McDowell wrote: Folks, I have a requirement to scan messages in mailbox files on a mailhost. The host is a sparc platform (Solaris 8) and has a mixture of standard unix and mbx format mailbox files. I have been advised that ClamAV may be able to scan mailbox files and presumably handle the de-miming that is required. Before I start experimenting in earnest is it true that ClamAV can do this? Yes Clive McDowell -Nigel ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
RE: [Clamav-users] upgrade problem
I got a similar message after upgrading on FreeBSD; /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/sbin/clamd: Undefined symbol cl_build And freshclam gave me this error; /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/bin/freshclam: Undefined symbol cli_gentemp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meni Shapiro Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:26 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: [Clamav-users] upgrade problem Hi, just upgraded to clam-0.8 on a slackware 9.1 machine running sendmail+mimedefang. after installation when i try to start the daemon i get this error message: relocation error: /usr/sbin/clamd: undefined symbol: cli_strtok clamav any ideas? -- Sincerely, Meni Shapiro ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] upgrade problem
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:05:17 -0800, Penny Rand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got a similar message after upgrading on FreeBSD; /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/sbin/clamd: Undefined symbol cl_build And freshclam gave me this error; /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/bin/freshclam: Undefined symbol cli_gentemp Well, my standard response for FreeBSD is - remove your manual install and install from the ports. However, removing the old install (fully) before installing the new one should solve your problem. It's likely you've got an old library lying around. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] initial configure
Hi! 10--2005 16:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt) wrote to ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net: M UUCP then? uupc. M BTW, with regards to the ftp site you mentioned earlier, bog M standard anonymous login gets you into that one. __O\_/_\_/O__ Connecting to database.clamav.net 220 swordfish.island.net.au FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. --- USER anonymous 530 User anonymous unknown. Failed to login --- QUIT 221 Goodbye. _ O/~\ /~\O ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Re: [Clamav-users] initial configure
Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! 10-___-2005 16:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt) wrote to ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net: M UUCP then? uupc. It is uucp protocol, just renamed. M BTW, with regards to the ftp site you mentioned earlier, bog M standard anonymous login gets you into that one. __O\_/_\_/O__ Connecting to database.clamav.net 220 swordfish.island.net.au FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. --- USER anonymous 530 User anonymous unknown. Failed to login --- QUIT 221 Goodbye. _ O/~\ /~\O I failed to remember it was a geographically inclined selection :) The server returned from my location is: mirrors.webpartner.dk Matt ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
