Destructuring Bind on Regex
I wrote this little macro today that lets you do it. However, I feel like it was implemented in a pattern match library or something... but I'm not sure. Someone let me know if I'm re-inventing the wheel. If I'm not, here's the code: (defn re-bind-fn [str re bnds act forms] `(let [~'__TEMP__ (re-find ~re ~str) ~bnds ~'__TEMP__] (if ~'__TEMP__ ~act ~(if (empty? forms) nil (apply re-bind-fn str forms) (defmacro re-bind [str re bnds act forms] (apply re-bind-fn str re bnds act forms)) You can do things like this: (defn msg-parse [s] (re-bind s #HELLO (\w+) [_ nme] (println Hello message for nme) #COORDS (\d+) (\d+) [_ x y] (println Coords: ( x , y )) #.* _ (println unimportant))) cons-irc.util (msg-parse COORDS 123 456) Coords: ( 123 , 456 ) nil cons-irc.util (msg-parse HELLO Kaylen) Hello message for Kaylen nil cons-irc.util (msg-parse fdsfsd) unimportant nil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Prismatic Plumbing and Graph Open-Source Release
Hi Jason,
That's roughly what I figured, thanks for the helpful reply.
Thanks for taking the time release this lib; its really great
Edmund
On Saturday, 9 February 2013 01:28:09 UTC, Jason Wolfe wrote:
On Friday, February 8, 2013 1:56:27 AM UTC-8, Edmund wrote:
Hey Jason,
Going slightly OT here to describe my motivations, but you did ask
for more details ! :)
I wrote a little blog post + lib last month using Stuart Sierra's Flow
(much like
Graph) to implement the steps in doing a very simple discrete inference
task. Its
demonstrating the same thing you talk about in your post about
declarative computation - here the point is that you can efficiently
update your
inference based new data on account of having the
graph structure to work over. Here's the post
http://boss-level.com/?p=160 and a
literate version of the code http://ejackson.github.com/inflow/
This is my original motivation.
I think I understand what you're trying to do from the example, thanks!
What I'm doing there is 'building-up' the computation over time,
so I start with a graph with just the input data, and end up with a
graph with the input and output. But the 'building up' is not the
principal hangup I
have: I'm happy to have an in- and out- map. The problem is, when
dealing with a very nested graph, getting a fine grained syntax for
describing where to put the outputs. Ie how do I tell Graph to put just
the output x into
{:a {:b 1 :c x}} of the graph, without replacing the entire map of the :a
key ?
Like I said earlier, it's a requirement of Graph that node names must be
unique, and distinct from top-level input keys.
Thus, there cannot be a way to 'put x into the map under :a at key :c' ,
because there is no way to in-place modify the inputs or other node values
of the graph. The output is just a map of all the node results, nothing
more and nothing less.
That said, you can use a hierarchical graph to specify different node
functions for the different sub-keys:
;; As a hierarchical graph
user ((eager-compile {:a2 {:b (fnk [[:a1 b]] b)
:c (fnk [[:a1 b]] (inc b))}})
{:a1 {:b 1}})
{:a2 {:b 1, :c 2}}
So for an example like the one you gave in the above link, you can
represent your nested stats directly as a nested graph without resorting to
key flattening. And if you want to compute just a subset of the graph for
updated downstream values and then merge this into your previous map, you
can do this in two steps:
1. Pick out the subset of leaf functions that may have changed, using the
same strategy you currently use with Flow, and construct a Graph with only
those sub-keys. For example:
user ((eager-compile {:a2 {:b (fnk [[:a1 b]] b)}})
{:a1 {:b 2}})
{:a2 {:b 2}}
, then
2. deep-merge these results with the original result map.
i..e, (deep-merge-with (fn [x y] y) original-results updated-results)
where deep-merge-with is
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_contrib/clojure.contrib.map-utils/deep-merge-with
This logic could be wrapped up into a single higher-order function that
takes a graph and knows how to incrementally update the results given
incremental changes in input. Does that make sense / seem like it will
satisfy your need?
Cheers,
Jason
That's obviously no good if I need to have lots of things changing
beneath :a in a single graph flow due to uniqueness.[
With Flow what I did is flatten the nested graph such that the keys are
vectors of the path to each node, run the flow on that graph, and then
re-nest the the graph afterwards (the flow- and -flow functions).
So the map {:a {:b 1 :c x}} becomes {[:a :b] 1, [:a :c] x}, and I can
refer to
nested nodes this way.
In Graph such a scheme would be possible too, but that Graph enforces
keywords as the keys for the graph. Having vectors for the keys still
allows you to
have uniqueness, topological ordering etc. So the example I gave in my
last email:
{:a {:b 1}} - {:a {:b 1, :c 2}}
could, hypothetically, be written for just the outputs as
((graph/eager-compile {[:a :c] (fnk [[:a b]] (inc b))})
{:a {:b 1}})
{:a {:c 2}}
So my question is: how do I refer to nested nodes in the output
selector using Graph? Conditionally, on that being impossible, would
there be any merit in the vector scheme that I have suggested ?
Sorry for the long post, I hope I haven't obscured my question. I also
get the feeling that I must be missing something very obvious in your
code for how to do this !
Edmund
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 19:27:13 UTC, Jason Wolfe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:54 AM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
https://github.com/Prismatic/plumbing/blob/master/test/plumbing/graph_examples_test.clj#L148
Why do they return in a map instead of maybe a set ? do we ever get
{:key
false} ?
Thanks.
The leaf value for output schemata is always 'true'.
Re: Building a REST API / efficient RPC interface in Clojure
Hi, On Saturday, February 9, 2013 4:47:26 AM UTC+1, Feng Shen wrote: Hi, I did something similar during work (we are using Clojure) 1. Use HTTP as the transport: browser ajax call, mobile API call, intertal use 2. JSON as encoding. Javascript support it natively, mobile can decode it easily, Clojure has very good support for it Clojure can decode and encode json*[1]* very efficiently. Nginx can be configured to zip the data to save bandwidth. I, for one, would love to use fressian [*], for reasons explained by Rich Hickey [**]. Would you consider including this possibility in your lein template (which I'd very much like to use, considering the quality of your http-kit !) As for REST, have you considered liberator [***] ? Cheers, Bernard [*] https://github.com/Datomic/fressian [**] http://skillsmatter.com/podcast/scala/the-language-of-the-system/mh-6213 [***] https://github.com/clojure-liberator/liberator -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Building a REST API / efficient RPC interface in Clojure
Define an API in terms of messages I'm not familiar with the concept - just out of curiosity, what does a mesagge-based API consist of? Is the drastically different from most REST/JSON web APIs out there? Thank you - Victor -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Prismatic Plumbing and Graph Open-Source Release
Thanks for amazing work! I want to know how typical CRUD application is implemented. Do you use single gigantic graph with lazy-compile or separated graph for each operation? How do you handle validation and error? Will almost all x-y function disappear? On Jan 30, 3:46 am, Aria Haghighi m...@aria42.com wrote: Hey all, Prismatic has open-sourced our Plumbing and Graph library on githubhttps://github.com/prismatic/plumbing. Jason Wolfe gave a talkhttp://blog.getprismatic.com/blog/2012/10/1/prismatics-graph-at-stran...about how we use graph for systems composition at Strange loop last year. Please give the library a whirl and let us know if you're using it and if you find any issues or feature requests. We use this library very heavily throughout our code and hope others find it useful as well. Best, Aria -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure - Python Style suggestion
I like the parentheses better. My only complaint is that I have to press the shift key to type them. You can always remap your keyboard / keyboard bindings. For example in emacs: (define-key clojure-mode-map 9 'paredit-open-round) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
+1 on this line of thought. We are definitely interested in decomplecting dev mode utility from production lean-and-meanness. One question along this path is What options exist in Java/maven land for doing multiple releases of the same artifact with e.g. different performance and debugging characteristics, and how could these be incorporated into the Clojure build in a transparent, easy-to-assess way? Answering the preceding question (or reframing it into a better question) is not blocked waiting on anybody. Have at it! Stu On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Brian Marick mar...@exampler.com wrote: On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Daniel Glauser danglau...@gmail.com wrote: This sounds like a great idea. I was working with some tests today and it would have been really useful to have some way to query the current function/execution context. Seems like passing that through all lets would go a long way, provided I'm reading this right. It would be very interesting to have a maximally informative mode and a generate really tense code mode. There is tradition behind such an idea. It would be especially interesting if the maximally informative mode had hooks tools could exploit. For example, Midje provides a hack where you can declare records in a way that the contained functions can be mocked: `defrecord-openly`. I expect almost no one uses it, even though it is no different than `defrecord` when in production mode: it's too weird looking. But people would use it if ordinary defrecord methods weren't inlined during development. There's no *semantic* reason why parts of Clojure should *always* be closed to introspection-type actions. It's purely a matter of time constraints on the core team, which I am certainly not in a position to judge. How much core time should be spent on saving anonymous programmers time vs. saving cycles for anonymous apps running on the Amazon cloud? It's a tough tradeoff. Looking for 1/2-time employment as a Clojure programmer Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/ https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Simple Network Messaging
There's any number of answers to this, but when I have to do IPC between different languages I send JSON messages over ZeroMQ sockets. http://www.zeromq.org/ Pretty simple to use, implementations exist in almost all currently popular languages. On Friday, February 8, 2013 8:44:06 AM UTC+11, JvJ wrote: I'm looking to do some simple messaging (json strings) between programs running on the same machine. One will be in C# and one will be in Clojure. Is there a library/set of libraries that could simplify this communication? I haven't done much networking in the past, and I'd like to keep this as painless as possible. Thanks. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
Going the build route, probably use maven to produce debug and production artifacts of differing versions: blah-1.0.0-DEBUG.jar and blah-1.0.0.jar. Rather than go that route and the ensuing naming convention madness, I wonder how much we could rely on the JIT to push the decision of debug vs production to runtime? On Saturday, February 9, 2013 6:31:10 AM UTC-8, stuart@gmail.com wrote: +1 on this line of thought. We are definitely interested in decomplecting dev mode utility from production lean-and-meanness. One question along this path is What options exist in Java/maven land for doing multiple releases of the same artifact with e.g. different performance and debugging characteristics, and how could these be incorporated into the Clojure build in a transparent, easy-to-assess way? Answering the preceding question (or reframing it into a better question) is not blocked waiting on anybody. Have at it! Stu On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Brian Marick mar...@exampler.comjavascript: wrote: On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Daniel Glauser dangl...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: This sounds like a great idea. I was working with some tests today and it would have been really useful to have some way to query the current function/execution context. Seems like passing that through all lets would go a long way, provided I'm reading this right. It would be very interesting to have a maximally informative mode and a generate really tense code mode. There is tradition behind such an idea. It would be especially interesting if the maximally informative mode had hooks tools could exploit. For example, Midje provides a hack where you can declare records in a way that the contained functions can be mocked: `defrecord-openly`. I expect almost no one uses it, even though it is no different than `defrecord` when in production mode: it's too weird looking. But people would use it if ordinary defrecord methods weren't inlined during development. There's no *semantic* reason why parts of Clojure should *always* be closed to introspection-type actions. It's purely a matter of time constraints on the core team, which I am certainly not in a position to judge. How much core time should be spent on saving anonymous programmers time vs. saving cycles for anonymous apps running on the Amazon cloud? It's a tough tradeoff. Looking for 1/2-time employment as a Clojure programmer Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/ https://leanpub.com/fp-oo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
do you mean that, when the string it outputted like: = (println k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil = (prn k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil the side effects of evaluating k being mixed into the output could affect you (other than just visually in the repl) ? if ie. you redirect *out* to some file with the purpose of saving and later restoring that? Well, I don't actually like this myself (ever since I've encountered the map println example I've given) but I ignored it because people didn't seem to find it a big deal and nothing I could do about it + it only affected me in viewing REPL output. But I'm not sure if it is clear to you what is happening (perhaps I misunderstand what you're saying), it's only when showing the value of the string (k in this case) that the text shown is mixed, but the value of k is accurate, as seen below: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= [0 1 2 3 4] k) true On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] ** (do (pr x) ** x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:22 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: do you mean that, when the string it outputted like: = (println k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil = (prn k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil the side effects of evaluating k being mixed into the output could affect you (other than just visually in the repl) ? if ie. you redirect *out* to some file with the purpose of saving and later restoring that? Well, I don't actually like this myself (ever since I've encountered the map println example I've given) but I ignored it because people didn't seem to find it a big deal and nothing I could do about it + it only affected me in viewing REPL output. But I'm not sure if it is clear to you what is happening (perhaps I misunderstand what you're saying), it's only when showing the value of the string (k in this case) that the text shown is mixed, but the value of k is accurate, as seen below: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= [0 1 2 3 4] k) true OOps, I pasted the wrong one here (from the vec form) But looks like I was wrong, and you were correct!! = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do ;(pr x) x #'user/k = k (0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) true = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) false On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] ** (do (pr x) ** x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:22 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: do you mean that, when the string it outputted like: = (println k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil = (prn k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil the side effects of evaluating k being mixed into the output could affect you (other than just visually in the repl) ? if ie. you redirect *out* to some file with the purpose of saving and later restoring that? Well, I don't actually like this myself (ever since I've encountered the map println example I've given) but I ignored it because people didn't seem to find it a big deal and nothing I could do about it + it only affected me in viewing REPL output. But I'm not sure if it is clear to you what is happening (perhaps I misunderstand what you're saying), it's only when showing the value of the string (k in this case) that the text shown is mixed, but the value of k is accurate, as seen below: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= [0 1 2 3 4] k) true OOps, I pasted the wrong one here (from the vec form) But looks like I was wrong, and you were correct!! = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do ;(pr x) x #'user/k = k (0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) true = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) false = (= (012340 1 2 3 4) k) true so it's not exactly like the example that I've given... I'll have to investigate more On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] ** (do (pr x) ** x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
So, I basically thought that this is what's happening in your case also (but it's not!): = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (= '(nil nil nil) (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 true ;so your case is different due to pr-str and pr = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= (012340 1 2 3 4) k) true Sorry for the noise, indeed it seems like pr-str is just redirecting *out* until done using with-out-str. This is certainly much more severe that I thought initially. = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) (println nothing) x #'user/k = k (0nothing\r\n1nothing\r\n2nothing\r\n3nothing\r\n4nothing\r\n0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0nothing\r\n1nothing\r\n2nothing\r\n3nothing\r\n4nothing\r\n0 1 2 3 4) k) true This is so bad :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:26 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:22 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: do you mean that, when the string it outputted like: = (println k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil = (prn k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil the side effects of evaluating k being mixed into the output could affect you (other than just visually in the repl) ? if ie. you redirect *out* to some file with the purpose of saving and later restoring that? Well, I don't actually like this myself (ever since I've encountered the map println example I've given) but I ignored it because people didn't seem to find it a big deal and nothing I could do about it + it only affected me in viewing REPL output. But I'm not sure if it is clear to you what is happening (perhaps I misunderstand what you're saying), it's only when showing the value of the string (k in this case) that the text shown is mixed, but the value of k is accurate, as seen below: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= [0 1 2 3 4] k) true OOps, I pasted the wrong one here (from the vec form) But looks like I was wrong, and you were correct!! = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do ;(pr x) x #'user/k = k (0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) true = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) false = (= (012340 1 2 3 4) k) true so it's not exactly like the example that I've given... I'll have to investigate more On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] ** (do (pr x) ** x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Global variables in closure ?
Hello,
I'm a total beginer in Clojure and I've ran into a problem that I'm not
even sure if can be done in Closure.
So the issue is the following. I've implemeted a function that computes the
prime numbers from an interval (up to a limit).
(defn gather_primes_in_range [range_start range_end target_number
prime_list]
(if (or (= 0 target_number) ( range_start range_end) (= FIND_MORE_PRIMES
false))
prime_list
(do
(if (is_prime? range_start)
(gather_primes_in_range (+ range_start 1) range_end (- target_number 1)
(conj, prime_list, range_start))
(gather_primes_in_range (+ range_start 1) range_end target_number
prime_list)
)
)
)
)
(defn find_nr_of_primes_in_range [range_start range_end target_number]
(if ( range_start 2)
(gather_primes_in_range 2 range_end target_number [])
(gather_primes_in_range range_start range_end target_number [])
)
)
This works just fine. But what I want now is to have a global variable that
should store on each method call the primes that are found in a variable to
lookup later. In other languages like Python, Ruby or Scala I would just do
this by having a Set to which I add entries before returing from the
function. But in Clojure I have no ideea how to go around this.
Basically what I tried is, have somewhere global declared:
(def PRIMES_FOUND_SO_FAR #{})
And then somehow on return add the entries to this variable. Is this
possible at all in Clojure and if so how? I've tried on other variables to
change their values using either swap! and atom, or set! but could not make
it to work here in any situation.
Best regards,
Bogdan
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Clojure 1.5 RC 14
Clojure 1.5 RC 14 (fourteen) will be available soon from Maven Central: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.clojure%22%20AND%20a%3A%22clojure%22%20AND%20v%3A1.5.0* Please test it! Thanks, Stu -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
Hi Stu. All I see is beta13http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.clojure%7Cclojure%7C1.5.0-beta13%7Cjaras being last (9 feb), and RC6 05-Feb-2013 On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Stuart Halloway stuart.hallo...@gmail.comwrote: Clojure 1.5 RC 14 (fourteen) will be available soon from Maven Central: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.clojure%22%20AND%20a%3A%22clojure%22%20AND%20v%3A1.5.0* Please test it! Thanks, Stu -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
Maybe the registry has caught up with the updates yet. Leiningen found RC 14. % lein deps Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.5.0-RC14/clojure-1.5.0-RC14.pom from sonatype-oss-public Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.5.0-RC14/clojure-1.5.0-RC14.jar from sonatype-oss-public On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:29 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stu. All I see is beta13 as being last (9 feb), and RC6 05-Feb-2013 -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
thanks, obviously after I posted that I re-read Stu's post and will be
available soon made me realize how superficially I read his post.
lein deps
Could not find artifact org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.5.0-RC14 in central (
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/)
Could not find artifact org.clojure:clojure:jar:1.5.0-RC14 in clojars (
https://clojars.org/repo/)
This could be due to a typo in :dependencies or network issues.
Could not resolve dependencies
I added:
:repositories {sonatype-oss-public
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/public/}
;and it works now
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Steve Miner stevemi...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe the registry has caught up with the updates yet. Leiningen found RC
14.
% lein deps
Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.5.0-RC14/clojure-1.5.0-RC14.pom from
sonatype-oss-public
Retrieving org/clojure/clojure/1.5.0-RC14/clojure-1.5.0-RC14.jar from
sonatype-oss-public
On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:29 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stu. All I see is
beta13http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.clojure%7Cclojure%7C1.5.0-beta13%7Cjar
as being last (9 feb), and RC6 05-Feb-2013
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete,
even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
delete-file implementation (?!)
Hi, does anyone see anything wrong with this?
= (source clojure.java.io/delete-file)
(defn delete-file
Delete file f. Raise an exception if it fails unless silently is true.
{:added 1.2}
[f [silently]]
(or (.delete (file f))
silently
(throw (java.io.IOException. (str Couldn't delete f)
nil
If you don't already, see below:
= (.delete (q/newClass java.io.File a.tx1))
false
= (.delete (q/newClass java.io.File c:\\a.tx1))
true
= (clojure.java.io/delete-file (new java.io.File c:\\a.tx1))
IOException Couldn't delete c:\a.tx1 clojure.java.io/delete-file(io.clj:425)
= (clojure.java.io/delete-file (new java.io.File c:\\a.tx1) true)
true
= (clojure.java.io/delete-file (new java.io.File c:\\a.tx1) 1)
1
Yep, I do need it to return the true/false status from .delete
fix?
= *clojure-version*
{:major 1, :minor 5, :incremental 0, :qualifier RC14}
--
Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete,
even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
OK, if I follow your posts correctly you now agree with me that this is unpleasant behavior :-) On Saturday, February 9, 2013 1:35:48 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: So, I basically thought that this is what's happening in your case also (but it's not!): = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (= '(nil nil nil) (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 true ;so your case is different due to pr-str and pr = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= (012340 1 2 3 4) k) true Sorry for the noise, indeed it seems like pr-str is just redirecting *out* until done using with-out-str. This is certainly much more severe that I thought initially. = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) (println nothing) x #'user/k = k (0nothing\r\n1nothing\r\n2nothing\r\n3nothing\r\n4nothing\r\n0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0nothing\r\n1nothing\r\n2nothing\r\n3nothing\r\n4nothing\r\n0 1 2 3 4) k) true This is so bad :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:26 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:25 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:22 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: do you mean that, when the string it outputted like: = (println k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil = (prn k) (012340 1 2 3 4) nil the side effects of evaluating k being mixed into the output could affect you (other than just visually in the repl) ? if ie. you redirect *out* to some file with the purpose of saving and later restoring that? Well, I don't actually like this myself (ever since I've encountered the map println example I've given) but I ignored it because people didn't seem to find it a big deal and nothing I could do about it + it only affected me in viewing REPL output. But I'm not sure if it is clear to you what is happening (perhaps I misunderstand what you're saying), it's only when showing the value of the string (k in this case) that the text shown is mixed, but the value of k is accurate, as seen below: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) = (= [0 1 2 3 4] k) true OOps, I pasted the wrong one here (from the vec form) But looks like I was wrong, and you were correct!! = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do ;(pr x) x #'user/k = k (0 1 2 3 4) = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) true = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = (= (0 1 2 3 4) k) false = (= (012340 1 2 3 4) k) true so it's not exactly like the example that I've given... I'll have to investigate more On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: I agree when you print to stdout you'd expect lazily evaluated output to be mangled in. However, it would seem more natural to me that if you print something to a string it is counter intuitive for incidental writes to stdout to be redirected to the string, as well- There is also nothing in the documentation that suggests this would happen. Also, it would be technically relatively easy to change this. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:46:08 PM UTC-6, AtKaaZ wrote: here's a simpler example: = (map println '(1 2 3)) (1 2 nil 3 nil nil) = (dorun (map println '(1 2 3))) 1 2 3 nil On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:44 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: actually replacing vec with dorun or doall, would've been a better example :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's an illusion from being lazy ? = (def k (pr-str (vec (for [x (range 5)] ** (do (pr x) ** x) 01234 #'datest1.ret/k = k [0 1 2 3 4] On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of pr-str your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because pr-str works by using with-out-str. This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: *read-eval* vulnerability
Hi all, It looks like Rich has selected an approach to addressing *read-eval*, #=, and related issues. The sands may still be shifting a bit, but far less than e.g. earlier this week. With that in mind, I thought it might be helpful to point to three authoritative messages from the clojure-dev ML that describe various relevant changes and additions coming in 1.5.0. The first one contains a summary of the general principles involved, but note that the default mode described therein didn't last, as described in the second message: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/msg/786c689b596bb6a3 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/msg/f299efc525f096e2 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev/msg/8b572b8ebaba2ff5 Most relevant to the tactical concern of this thread (the default value of *read-eval* and its implications) is the new ability to set that default via a Java system property. Hopefully the above satiates anyone yearning for news on this topic until the 1.5.0 changelog is updated to reflect the relevant changes. Finally, I just wanted to thank everyone, for your attention, energy, enthusiasm, and brilliance. It's an honor to be among you. Cheers, - Chas -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
I just pulled it down locally and got the dreaded PermGen…
[java] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
[java] at
clojure.test_clojure.edn$types_that_should_roundtrip.invoke(edn.clj:32)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:161)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyTo(AFn.java:151)
[java] at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:617)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_iter.invoke(runner.clj:108)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419$fn__423.invoke(runner.clj:135)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419.invoke(runner.clj:130)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418.invoke(runner.clj:127)
[java] at
clojure.core$binding_conveyor_fn$fn__4130.invoke(core.clj:1836)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.call(AFn.java:18)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
[java] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
[java] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
[java] clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Value cannot roundtrip, see ex-data
{:printed [#inst 2034-04-17T21:03:17.620-00:00 #inst
1979-04-19T20:14:07.477-00:00 #inst 1996-06-20T05:47:52.868-00:00 #inst
1995-08-15T20:51:41.920-00:00 #inst 2029-05-17T14:34:37.906-00:00 #inst
1987-06-05T21:05:23.305-00:00 #inst 1994-06-29T16:17:24.459-00:00 #inst
2035-12-03T09:39:44.754-00:00 #inst 2040-01-31T09:47:29.774-00:00 #inst
1973-06-09T04:53:42.029-00:00 #inst 1996-12-23T17:26:25.607-00:00 #inst
2022-07-01T16:33:57.846-00:00 #inst 1998-10-01T00:21:09.895-00:00 #inst
1973-01-11T17:43:58.457-00:00 #inst 1988-11-03T22:46:53.468-00:00 #inst
1982-01-31T11:34:19.796-00:00 #inst 2011-11-11T10:59:23.168-00:00 #inst
1973-06-07T12:37:22.285-00:00 #inst 1977-12-15T03:32:20.215-00:00 #inst
2047-10-15T13:51:28.327-00:00 #inst 2007-12-16T05:50:59.539-00:00 #inst
1980-05-01T01:58:13.802-00:00 #inst 1980-01-30T04:31:20.418-00:00 #inst
2044-09-16T14:38:34.919-00:00 #inst 1980-08-05T18:06:50.589-00:00 #inst
1978-12-31T11:40:11.800-00:00 #inst 2015-05-08T15:03:27.594-00:00 #inst
1975-06-28T17:24:08.855-00:00 #inst 1975-06-09T07:22:42.892-00:00 #inst
2026-03-20T07:01:01.296-00:00 #inst 2053-02-02T01:33:45.525-00:00 #inst
2002-04-11T18:43:38.347-00:00 #inst 1992-12-10T13:33:55.048-00:00 #inst
2015-04-16T20:53:45.670-00:00 #inst 2013-12-23T20:16:07.506-00:00 #inst
1978-09-02T09:42:03.175-00:00 #inst 1980-06-29T00:54:55.361-00:00 #inst
2061-11-04T22:40:32.484-00:00 #inst 2190-06-05T04:42:38.638-00:00 #inst
2038-03-19T09:05:50.002-00:00 #inst 2033-08-08T13:48:51.747-00:00 #inst
2077-11-18T06:09:19.557-00:00 #inst 1997-02-07T14:02:27.410-00:00 #inst
1988-08-20T07:11:32.623-00:00 #inst 1981-12-06T05:48:21.787-00:00 #inst
1980-08-15T09:40:38.877-00:00 #inst 2022-01-19T16:23:06.638-00:00 #inst
1994-09-09T17:35:55.052-00:00 #inst 1989-09-14T07:24:38.880-00:00 #inst
2050-03-30T21:22:42.054-00:00 #inst 2071-10-09T20:37:08.430-00:00 #inst
2083-04-19T10:25:43.108-00:00 #inst 1978-09-09T18:28:22.366-00:00 #inst
1979-11-03T08:18:42.779-00:00 #inst 1975-10-24T00:59:58.497-00:00 #inst
1974-10-10T14:40:29.360-00:00 #inst 1999-07-14T07:47:47.220-00:00 #inst
2215-11-23T00:36:40.748-00:00 #inst 2077-02-14T19:40:22.712-00:00 #inst
1985-03-14T12:30:49.064-00:00 #inst 2021-08-26T20:51:15.030-00:00 #inst
2013-04-22T10:48:12.278-00:00 #inst 2019-08-31T17:31:05.195-00:00 #inst
1975-04-21T22:13:33.370-00:00 #inst 1984-09-10T23:30:15.313-00:00 #inst
2053-11-10T05:36:02.093-00:00 #inst 1974-01-05T15:17:02.286-00:00 #inst
2058-09-18T08:11:45.895-00:00 #inst 1987-10-26T13:15:29.968-00:00 #inst
2001-10-01T08:12:45.877-00:00 #inst 2003-05-29T15:17:24.449-00:00 #inst
1981-02-07T01:20:10.665-00:00 #inst 1972-02-20T03:11:10.395-00:00 #inst
1971-05-15T02:20:31.099-00:00 #inst 1998-07-14T19:05:58.450-00:00 #inst
2003-11-20T14:15:43.535-00:00 #inst 2032-11-06T18:16:34.702-00:00 #inst
1974-09-12T12:12:41.530-00:00 #inst 1971-01-16T05:00:36.536-00:00 #inst
1997-04-22T20:01:48.046-00:00 #inst 1980-02-10T15:10:37.905-00:00 #inst
1978-05-09T10:52:42.400-00:00 #inst 1991-03-04T00:27:15.926-00:00 #inst
1993-12-10T20:33:14.714-00:00 #inst 2045-04-04T10:42:38.474-00:00 #inst
1972-05-30T18:17:49.692-00:00 #inst 1986-03-14T02:42:42.374-00:00 #inst
2096-01-05T11:11:23.974-00:00 #inst 1997-12-03T18:50:28.444-00:00 #inst
2009-05-12T23:48:54.862-00:00 #inst 2026-02-16T11:51:39.884-00:00 #inst
1978-07-24T14:57:30.134-00:00 #inst 2003-08-21T22:16:56.540-00:00 #inst
2000-04-06T12:22:12.441-00:00 #inst 2002-11-24T01:28:22.121-00:00 #inst
1994-03-25T13:59:33.563-00:00 #inst 2071-07-24T05:23:57.700-00:00 #inst
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
maybe jvm arg would help
-XX:MaxPermSize=256m
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Aaron Bedra aaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I just pulled it down locally and got the dreaded PermGen…
[java] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
[java] at
clojure.test_clojure.edn$types_that_should_roundtrip.invoke(edn.clj:32)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:161)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyTo(AFn.java:151)
[java] at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:617)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_iter.invoke(runner.clj:108)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419$fn__423.invoke(runner.clj:135)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419.invoke(runner.clj:130)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418.invoke(runner.clj:127)
[java] at
clojure.core$binding_conveyor_fn$fn__4130.invoke(core.clj:1836)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.call(AFn.java:18)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
[java] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
[java] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
[java] clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Value cannot roundtrip, see
ex-data {:printed [#inst 2034-04-17T21:03:17.620-00:00 #inst
1979-04-19T20:14:07.477-00:00 #inst 1996-06-20T05:47:52.868-00:00 #inst
1995-08-15T20:51:41.920-00:00 #inst 2029-05-17T14:34:37.906-00:00 #inst
1987-06-05T21:05:23.305-00:00 #inst 1994-06-29T16:17:24.459-00:00 #inst
2035-12-03T09:39:44.754-00:00 #inst 2040-01-31T09:47:29.774-00:00 #inst
1973-06-09T04:53:42.029-00:00 #inst 1996-12-23T17:26:25.607-00:00 #inst
2022-07-01T16:33:57.846-00:00 #inst 1998-10-01T00:21:09.895-00:00 #inst
1973-01-11T17:43:58.457-00:00 #inst 1988-11-03T22:46:53.468-00:00 #inst
1982-01-31T11:34:19.796-00:00 #inst 2011-11-11T10:59:23.168-00:00 #inst
1973-06-07T12:37:22.285-00:00 #inst 1977-12-15T03:32:20.215-00:00 #inst
2047-10-15T13:51:28.327-00:00 #inst 2007-12-16T05:50:59.539-00:00 #inst
1980-05-01T01:58:13.802-00:00 #inst 1980-01-30T04:31:20.418-00:00 #inst
2044-09-16T14:38:34.919-00:00 #inst 1980-08-05T18:06:50.589-00:00 #inst
1978-12-31T11:40:11.800-00:00 #inst 2015-05-08T15:03:27.594-00:00 #inst
1975-06-28T17:24:08.855-00:00 #inst 1975-06-09T07:22:42.892-00:00 #inst
2026-03-20T07:01:01.296-00:00 #inst 2053-02-02T01:33:45.525-00:00 #inst
2002-04-11T18:43:38.347-00:00 #inst 1992-12-10T13:33:55.048-00:00 #inst
2015-04-16T20:53:45.670-00:00 #inst 2013-12-23T20:16:07.506-00:00 #inst
1978-09-02T09:42:03.175-00:00 #inst 1980-06-29T00:54:55.361-00:00 #inst
2061-11-04T22:40:32.484-00:00 #inst 2190-06-05T04:42:38.638-00:00 #inst
2038-03-19T09:05:50.002-00:00 #inst 2033-08-08T13:48:51.747-00:00 #inst
2077-11-18T06:09:19.557-00:00 #inst 1997-02-07T14:02:27.410-00:00 #inst
1988-08-20T07:11:32.623-00:00 #inst 1981-12-06T05:48:21.787-00:00 #inst
1980-08-15T09:40:38.877-00:00 #inst 2022-01-19T16:23:06.638-00:00 #inst
1994-09-09T17:35:55.052-00:00 #inst 1989-09-14T07:24:38.880-00:00 #inst
2050-03-30T21:22:42.054-00:00 #inst 2071-10-09T20:37:08.430-00:00 #inst
2083-04-19T10:25:43.108-00:00 #inst 1978-09-09T18:28:22.366-00:00 #inst
1979-11-03T08:18:42.779-00:00 #inst 1975-10-24T00:59:58.497-00:00 #inst
1974-10-10T14:40:29.360-00:00 #inst 1999-07-14T07:47:47.220-00:00 #inst
2215-11-23T00:36:40.748-00:00 #inst 2077-02-14T19:40:22.712-00:00 #inst
1985-03-14T12:30:49.064-00:00 #inst 2021-08-26T20:51:15.030-00:00 #inst
2013-04-22T10:48:12.278-00:00 #inst 2019-08-31T17:31:05.195-00:00 #inst
1975-04-21T22:13:33.370-00:00 #inst 1984-09-10T23:30:15.313-00:00 #inst
2053-11-10T05:36:02.093-00:00 #inst 1974-01-05T15:17:02.286-00:00 #inst
2058-09-18T08:11:45.895-00:00 #inst 1987-10-26T13:15:29.968-00:00 #inst
2001-10-01T08:12:45.877-00:00 #inst 2003-05-29T15:17:24.449-00:00 #inst
1981-02-07T01:20:10.665-00:00 #inst 1972-02-20T03:11:10.395-00:00 #inst
1971-05-15T02:20:31.099-00:00 #inst 1998-07-14T19:05:58.450-00:00 #inst
2003-11-20T14:15:43.535-00:00 #inst 2032-11-06T18:16:34.702-00:00 #inst
1974-09-12T12:12:41.530-00:00 #inst 1971-01-16T05:00:36.536-00:00 #inst
1997-04-22T20:01:48.046-00:00 #inst 1980-02-10T15:10:37.905-00:00 #inst
1978-05-09T10:52:42.400-00:00 #inst 1991-03-04T00:27:15.926-00:00 #inst
1993-12-10T20:33:14.714-00:00 #inst 2045-04-04T10:42:38.474-00:00 #inst
1972-05-30T18:17:49.692-00:00 #inst 1986-03-14T02:42:42.374-00:00 #inst
2096-01-05T11:11:23.974-00:00 #inst 1997-12-03T18:50:28.444-00:00 #inst
2009-05-12T23:48:54.862-00:00 #inst 2026-02-16T11:51:39.884-00:00 #inst
1978-07-24T14:57:30.134-00:00 #inst 2003-08-21T22:16:56.540-00:00 #inst
2000-04-06T12:22:12.441-00:00 #inst 2002-11-24T01:28:22.121-00:00 #inst
Passing ordinary Clojure data into incanter.stats.linear-model
Hi, I'm having trouble finding any examples of how to use linear-model with simple clojure data. As per the documentation it says both x and y can be vectors of values so I would think the following would work: (linear-model [1 2 3 4] [5 4 3 4]) Since the second can also be a matrix, I would think I could also write: (linear-model [1 2 3 4] (matrix [[5 4 3 4] [1 2 1 1]])) However, both of these bits of code throw obscure errors- Nothing I do seem to work. I'm guessing that I am misunderstanding what is meant by a vector of values in Incanter and that it has to be in some special Incanter data type- But I can't figure out which one... Could someone toss an Incanter newbie a bone and tell me what I'm missing? Thanks! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
these examples to illustrate what you are saying: = (= (debug 1\r\n2 nil 3) (pr-str (lazy-seq (list 2 (println debug 1) 3 true = (= (1\r\n) (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1 true On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of pr-str your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because pr-str works by using with-out-str. This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
Going the build route, probably use maven to produce debug and production artifacts of differing versions: blah-1.0.0-DEBUG.jar and blah-1.0.0.jar. My thoughts too. And there's no need for convention madness - e.g. Leiningen could transparently create those versions to the user: the NO-DEBUG versions would simply set certain vars to false. For example, for the idea I'm proposing there would be *tagging-let*, which defaulted to true. Would this adress the Android story as well? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure - Python Style suggestion
I like the parentheses better. My only complaint is that I have to press the shift key to type them. You can always remap your keyboard / keyboard bindings. For example in emacs: (define-key clojure-mode-map 9 'paredit-open-round) Thank-you, I'll try that. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
Are you thinking that the client developer (the person using the library) would maintain the proper magic ear-muffs in lein profiles? On Saturday, February 9, 2013 3:17:51 PM UTC-8, vemv wrote: Going the build route, probably use maven to produce debug and production artifacts of differing versions: blah-1.0.0-DEBUG.jar and blah-1.0.0.jar. My thoughts too. And there's no need for convention madness - e.g. Leiningen could transparently create those versions to the user: the NO-DEBUG versions would simply set certain vars to false. For example, for the idea I'm proposing there would be *tagging-let*, which defaulted to true. Would this adress the Android story as well? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: AOT/gen-class docs
I was programming a Clojure applet when I had similar problems with java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError. But my experience with Java told me to delete the old class files generated by my project. And it worked. Always delete the old class files in every compilation and the problem disappears. On Tuesday, December 2, 2008 1:56:47 PM UTC-5, Rich Hickey wrote: On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Chouser chou...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote: Proxy generation was the last runtime code-gen/classloader requirement. So the path is clear for building Clojure apps without runtime codegen, for delivery in those environments that preclude it (e.g. Android, unsigned applets). Looking forward to feedback from people trying to reach those targets. You asked for it. :-) Here's a minimal applet .clj: (ns net.n01se.Tree (:gen-class :extends java.applet.Applet)) Since it's missing a main fn, I would expect an exception like the this: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: net.n01se.Tree/-main not defined (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) When and why? The mappings are dynamic, you'll get an error if you try to call it, and you could define that later somehow. Using svn 1136 I can compile and get the above exception from a normal Clojure REPL, but if I try to use it as an applet: $ appletviewer test.html java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at clojure.lang.Namespace.init(Namespace.java:31) at clojure.lang.Namespace.findOrCreate(Namespace.java:116) at clojure.lang.Var.internPrivate(Var.java:95) at net.n01se.Tree.clinit(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325) at sun.applet.AppletPanel.createApplet(AppletPanel.java:798) at sun.applet.AppletPanel.runLoader(AppletPanel.java:727) at sun.applet.AppletPanel.run(AppletPanel.java:380) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.lang.RuntimePermission createClassLoader) You can see it found my class okay, but it looks like there may be some dynamic classloader stuff still going on? Thanks, that's useful. Yes, the dynamic loader is still there, just won't be used, but it looks like the security check is on creation. Getting it completely out is another project... Rich -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
I had something like this in mind:
- There's a set of clojure.core vars that mean something (potentially)
expensive yet convenient, and default to true
- Neither library producers or consumers have ever to touch those
(unless they want fine-grained control for some specific var/context)
- When performing a release to clojars or central, Lein creates two
versions (DEBUG, NO-DEBUG), in which the vars are set to true and
false, respectively
- Then library consumers can specify either [com.example/awesomelib *
1.4.0*], [com.example *1.4.0-DEBUG*], or [com.example *
1.4.0-NO-DEBUG*] in their :dependencies vector, in the corresponding
project.clj.
- If no version directive is specified, DEBUG would be chosen unless
specified otherwise in profiles.clj: {:user {:debug-dependencies false}}
Does it sound good enough?
On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:18:54 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
Given that: a) fns can have names for debugging purposes, and b) data
structures can have metadata, wouldn't it be a good idea to let let auto
attach (where possible) the names of the bindings to their corresponding
values?
For example, the improved let I'm thinking of would translate this input:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
to:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn foo [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar ^{:origin :my.namespace/do-it$let$bar} {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
This could be used to increase the precision of the stack traces, or in
IDEs/editors for locating the exact source of an exception.
Do you see such a mechanism being incorporated to clojure.core/let -
should I open a ticket?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
There's nothing wrong with pr-str. Debug output should go to stderr. user= (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (.println *err* x) (.println *err* nothing) x 0 nothing 1 nothing 2 nothing 3 nothing 4 nothing #'user/k user= k (0 1 2 3 4) On Saturday, February 9, 2013 2:41:23 PM UTC-8, AtKaaZ wrote: these examples to illustrate what you are saying: = (= (debug 1\r\n2 nil 3) (pr-str (lazy-seq (list 2 (println debug 1) 3 true = (= (1\r\n) (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1 true On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com javascript:wrote: For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of pr-str your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because pr-str works by using with-out-str. This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.comjavascript: Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
It is likely that, once this Pandora's box is opened, there will be more
profiles that just debug yes/no.
It is almost certain that whatever we do must be maven friendly. (Maven is
a de facto standard for 1000x more people than leiningen, and some of them
want to use libs written in Clojure.)
If you are excited about doing this design work, please start a page in
Confluence, and capture your goals, options, tradeoffs, and recommendations.
Stu
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, vemv v...@vemv.net wrote:
I had something like this in mind:
- There's a set of clojure.core vars that mean something (potentially)
expensive yet convenient, and default to true
- Neither library producers or consumers have ever to touch those
(unless they want fine-grained control for some specific var/context)
- When performing a release to clojars or central, Lein creates two
versions (DEBUG, NO-DEBUG), in which the vars are set to true and
false, respectively
- Then library consumers can specify either [com.example/awesomelib *
1.4.0*], [com.example *1.4.0-DEBUG*], or [com.example *
1.4.0-NO-DEBUG*] in their :dependencies vector, in the corresponding
project.clj.
- If no version directive is specified, DEBUG would be chosen unless
specified otherwise in profiles.clj: {:user {:debug-dependencies false}}
Does it sound good enough?
On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:18:54 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
Given that: a) fns can have names for debugging purposes, and b) data
structures can have metadata, wouldn't it be a good idea to let let auto
attach (where possible) the names of the bindings to their corresponding
values?
For example, the improved let I'm thinking of would translate this input:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
to:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn foo [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar ^{:origin :my.namespace/do-it$let$bar} {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
This could be used to increase the precision of the stack traces, or in
IDEs/editors for locating the exact source of an exception.
Do you see such a mechanism being incorporated to clojure.core/let -
should I open a ticket?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
this makes it a little more obvious maybe? = (pr-str (seq (println 1))) 1 nil = (= nil (pr-str (seq (println 1 1 true = (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1))) (1\r\n) = (= (1\r\n) (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1 true On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Armando Blancas abm221...@gmail.comwrote: There's nothing wrong with pr-str. Debug output should go to stderr. user= (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (.println *err* x) (.println *err* nothing) x 0 nothing 1 nothing 2 nothing 3 nothing 4 nothing #'user/k user= k (0 1 2 3 4) On Saturday, February 9, 2013 2:41:23 PM UTC-8, AtKaaZ wrote: these examples to illustrate what you are saying: = (= (debug 1\r\n2 nil 3) (pr-str (lazy-seq (list 2 (println debug 1) 3 true = (= (1\r\n) (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1 true On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of pr-str your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because pr-str works by using with-out-str. This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: `let` to automatically add metadata / fn names?
Thanks for the advice Stu! I might give it a shot at Confluence at some
point. Just for the record, I like to defend my hypotethical approach:
Non-Clojure consumers most likely win nothing from extended metadata
facilities etc. So on second thoughts, the best default for mylib-*1.0.0*.jar
is to turn them off.
But on the Lein side, even if you specify [mylib *1.0.0*], **mylib-*
1.0.0-DEBUG*.jar** gets fetched instead unless one specifies otherwise,
which'd be the exception rather than the rule.
That way we'd get the best of both worlds - zero noise for Java consumers
or constrained Clojure envs, and full / a la carte facilities for the
majority of Clojure library producers and consumers.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Stuart Halloway
stuart.hallo...@gmail.comwrote:
It is likely that, once this Pandora's box is opened, there will be more
profiles that just debug yes/no.
It is almost certain that whatever we do must be maven friendly. (Maven
is a de facto standard for 1000x more people than leiningen, and some of
them want to use libs written in Clojure.)
If you are excited about doing this design work, please start a page in
Confluence, and capture your goals, options, tradeoffs, and recommendations.
Stu
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, vemv v...@vemv.net wrote:
I had something like this in mind:
- There's a set of clojure.core vars that mean something
(potentially) expensive yet convenient, and default to true
- Neither library producers or consumers have ever to touch those
(unless they want fine-grained control for some specific var/context)
- When performing a release to clojars or central, Lein creates two
versions (DEBUG, NO-DEBUG), in which the vars are set to true and
false, respectively
- Then library consumers can specify either [com.example/awesomelib *
1.4.0*], [com.example *1.4.0-DEBUG*], or [com.example *
1.4.0-NO-DEBUG*] in their :dependencies vector, in the
corresponding project.clj.
- If no version directive is specified, DEBUG would be chosen
unless specified otherwise in profiles.clj: {:user {:debug-dependencies
false}}
Does it sound good enough?
On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:18:54 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
Given that: a) fns can have names for debugging purposes, and b) data
structures can have metadata, wouldn't it be a good idea to let letauto
attach (where possible) the names of the bindings to their
corresponding values?
For example, the improved let I'm thinking of would translate this
input:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
to:
(ns my.namespace)
(defn do-it
(let [foo (fn foo [] (throw (Exception.)))
bar ^{:origin :my.namespace/do-it$let$bar} {:hello (/ 0 0)}]))
This could be used to increase the precision of the stack traces, or in
IDEs/editors for locating the exact source of an exception.
Do you see such a mechanism being incorporated to clojure.core/let -
should I open a ticket?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To
Re: pr-str captures stdout- Is this intentional or a bug?
OK, that viewpoint does sound reasonable- Thanks. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 6:55:32 PM UTC-6, Armando Blancas wrote: There's nothing wrong with pr-str. Debug output should go to stderr. user= (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (.println *err* x) (.println *err* nothing) x 0 nothing 1 nothing 2 nothing 3 nothing 4 nothing #'user/k user= k (0 1 2 3 4) On Saturday, February 9, 2013 2:41:23 PM UTC-8, AtKaaZ wrote: these examples to illustrate what you are saying: = (= (debug 1\r\n2 nil 3) (pr-str (lazy-seq (list 2 (println debug 1) 3 true = (= (1\r\n) (pr-str (lazy-seq (println 1 true On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Conrad drc...@gmail.com wrote: For those reading this, the issue is NOT that output in the REPL looks funny. The problem is that if, for instance, you put debug code into a chunk of code that makes use of pr-str your debug code is actually WRITTEN TO THE STRING. This is because pr-str works by using with-out-str. This seems clumsy and is undocumented IMHO and I am wondering if other people feel the same. On Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:30:20 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: I tested this in the latest 1.5.0-RC6: = (def k (pr-str (for [x (range 5)] (do (pr x) x #'user/k = k (012340 1 2 3 4) This seems wrong to me... I can see what would be needed to fix it in clojure/core.clj, but it would require creating several additional private functions. Does anyone know if this behavior is intentional? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Please correct me if I'm wrong or incomplete, even if you think I'll subconsciously hate it. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Passing ordinary Clojure data into incanter.stats.linear-model
I just saw there's a special Incanter group- I will move my question over there... On Saturday, February 9, 2013 4:34:56 PM UTC-6, Conrad wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble finding any examples of how to use linear-model with simple clojure data. As per the documentation it says both x and y can be vectors of values so I would think the following would work: (linear-model [1 2 3 4] [5 4 3 4]) Since the second can also be a matrix, I would think I could also write: (linear-model [1 2 3 4] (matrix [[5 4 3 4] [1 2 1 1]])) However, both of these bits of code throw obscure errors- Nothing I do seem to work. I'm guessing that I am misunderstanding what is meant by a vector of values in Incanter and that it has to be in some special Incanter data type- But I can't figure out which one... Could someone toss an Incanter newbie a bone and tell me what I'm missing? Thanks! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure 1.5 RC 14
Yeah, I know what would fix it, but I would like to make sure the right
defaults are in place for folks who pull it down.
-Aaron
On Feb 9, 2013, at 4:29 PM, AtKaaZ atk...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe jvm arg would help
-XX:MaxPermSize=256m
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Aaron Bedra aaron.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I just pulled it down locally and got the dreaded PermGen…
[java] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space
[java] at
clojure.test_clojure.edn$types_that_should_roundtrip.invoke(edn.clj:32)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:161)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.applyTo(AFn.java:151)
[java] at clojure.core$apply.invoke(core.clj:617)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_iter.invoke(runner.clj:108)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419$fn__423.invoke(runner.clj:135)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418$fn__419.invoke(runner.clj:130)
[java] at
clojure.test.generative.runner$run_for$fn__417$fn__418.invoke(runner.clj:127)
[java] at
clojure.core$binding_conveyor_fn$fn__4130.invoke(core.clj:1836)
[java] at clojure.lang.AFn.call(AFn.java:18)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
[java] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
[java] at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
[java] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
[java] clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: Value cannot roundtrip, see ex-data
{:printed [#inst 2034-04-17T21:03:17.620-00:00 #inst
1979-04-19T20:14:07.477-00:00 #inst 1996-06-20T05:47:52.868-00:00 #inst
1995-08-15T20:51:41.920-00:00 #inst 2029-05-17T14:34:37.906-00:00 #inst
1987-06-05T21:05:23.305-00:00 #inst 1994-06-29T16:17:24.459-00:00 #inst
2035-12-03T09:39:44.754-00:00 #inst 2040-01-31T09:47:29.774-00:00 #inst
1973-06-09T04:53:42.029-00:00 #inst 1996-12-23T17:26:25.607-00:00 #inst
2022-07-01T16:33:57.846-00:00 #inst 1998-10-01T00:21:09.895-00:00 #inst
1973-01-11T17:43:58.457-00:00 #inst 1988-11-03T22:46:53.468-00:00 #inst
1982-01-31T11:34:19.796-00:00 #inst 2011-11-11T10:59:23.168-00:00 #inst
1973-06-07T12:37:22.285-00:00 #inst 1977-12-15T03:32:20.215-00:00 #inst
2047-10-15T13:51:28.327-00:00 #inst 2007-12-16T05:50:59.539-00:00 #inst
1980-05-01T01:58:13.802-00:00 #inst 1980-01-30T04:31:20.418-00:00 #inst
2044-09-16T14:38:34.919-00:00 #inst 1980-08-05T18:06:50.589-00:00 #inst
1978-12-31T11:40:11.800-00:00 #inst 2015-05-08T15:03:27.594-00:00 #inst
1975-06-28T17:24:08.855-00:00 #inst 1975-06-09T07:22:42.892-00:00 #inst
2026-03-20T07:01:01.296-00:00 #inst 2053-02-02T01:33:45.525-00:00 #inst
2002-04-11T18:43:38.347-00:00 #inst 1992-12-10T13:33:55.048-00:00 #inst
2015-04-16T20:53:45.670-00:00 #inst 2013-12-23T20:16:07.506-00:00 #inst
1978-09-02T09:42:03.175-00:00 #inst 1980-06-29T00:54:55.361-00:00 #inst
2061-11-04T22:40:32.484-00:00 #inst 2190-06-05T04:42:38.638-00:00 #inst
2038-03-19T09:05:50.002-00:00 #inst 2033-08-08T13:48:51.747-00:00 #inst
2077-11-18T06:09:19.557-00:00 #inst 1997-02-07T14:02:27.410-00:00 #inst
1988-08-20T07:11:32.623-00:00 #inst 1981-12-06T05:48:21.787-00:00 #inst
1980-08-15T09:40:38.877-00:00 #inst 2022-01-19T16:23:06.638-00:00 #inst
1994-09-09T17:35:55.052-00:00 #inst 1989-09-14T07:24:38.880-00:00 #inst
2050-03-30T21:22:42.054-00:00 #inst 2071-10-09T20:37:08.430-00:00 #inst
2083-04-19T10:25:43.108-00:00 #inst 1978-09-09T18:28:22.366-00:00 #inst
1979-11-03T08:18:42.779-00:00 #inst 1975-10-24T00:59:58.497-00:00 #inst
1974-10-10T14:40:29.360-00:00 #inst 1999-07-14T07:47:47.220-00:00 #inst
2215-11-23T00:36:40.748-00:00 #inst 2077-02-14T19:40:22.712-00:00 #inst
1985-03-14T12:30:49.064-00:00 #inst 2021-08-26T20:51:15.030-00:00 #inst
2013-04-22T10:48:12.278-00:00 #inst 2019-08-31T17:31:05.195-00:00 #inst
1975-04-21T22:13:33.370-00:00 #inst 1984-09-10T23:30:15.313-00:00 #inst
2053-11-10T05:36:02.093-00:00 #inst 1974-01-05T15:17:02.286-00:00 #inst
2058-09-18T08:11:45.895-00:00 #inst 1987-10-26T13:15:29.968-00:00 #inst
2001-10-01T08:12:45.877-00:00 #inst 2003-05-29T15:17:24.449-00:00 #inst
1981-02-07T01:20:10.665-00:00 #inst 1972-02-20T03:11:10.395-00:00 #inst
1971-05-15T02:20:31.099-00:00 #inst 1998-07-14T19:05:58.450-00:00 #inst
2003-11-20T14:15:43.535-00:00 #inst 2032-11-06T18:16:34.702-00:00 #inst
1974-09-12T12:12:41.530-00:00 #inst 1971-01-16T05:00:36.536-00:00 #inst
1997-04-22T20:01:48.046-00:00 #inst 1980-02-10T15:10:37.905-00:00 #inst
1978-05-09T10:52:42.400-00:00 #inst 1991-03-04T00:27:15.926-00:00 #inst
1993-12-10T20:33:14.714-00:00 #inst 2045-04-04T10:42:38.474-00:00 #inst
1972-05-30T18:17:49.692-00:00 #inst 1986-03-14T02:42:42.374-00:00 #inst
Re: Clojure - Python Style suggestion
ITT: emacs users complaining about modifier keys. Sorry, but as a Vim guy, I couldn't help laughing. On Feb 9, 2013 6:46 PM, Gregory Graham gsg...@gmail.com wrote: I like the parentheses better. My only complaint is that I have to press the shift key to type them. You can always remap your keyboard / keyboard bindings. For example in emacs: (define-key clojure-mode-map 9 'paredit-open-round) Thank-you, I'll try that. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure - Python Style suggestion
hypermetasuper:)) Luc P. ITT: emacs users complaining about modifier keys. Sorry, but as a Vim guy, I couldn't help laughing. On Feb 9, 2013 6:46 PM, Gregory Graham gsg...@gmail.com wrote: I like the parentheses better. My only complaint is that I have to press the shift key to type them. You can always remap your keyboard / keyboard bindings. For example in emacs: (define-key clojure-mode-map 9 'paredit-open-round) Thank-you, I'll try that. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Clojure - Python Style suggestion
For those too young to have seen this: http://www.globalnerdy.com/2009/02/05/hacklabtos-lisp-machine-keyboard/ -- Softaddictslprefonta...@softaddicts.ca sent by ibisMail from my ipad! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [ClojureScript] Please test CLJS-418, fixing browser REPL
On Thursday, February 7, 2013 7:11:35 PM UTC+2, David Nolen wrote: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-418 Some of you may have encountered bizarre problems when trying to use browser REPL with the latest releases of ClojureScript. This ticket contains a patch that should resolve the issue but we need people to test. Thanks, David Hi I tested this with the following approach and got the repl to work without issues: * I modified cljsbuild[1] to use [org.clojure/google-closure-library 0.0-2029-2] instead of [org.clojure/google-closure-library-third-party 0.0-2029]. * AFAIK google-closure-library 0.0-2029-2 will be used by clojurescript in a new release so the above change (should) confirm that the transitive dependency on google-closure-library-third-party is indeed working as expected. I also tried to test the browser repl without cljsbuild but script/bootstrap pulls in different closure-library deps than are specified in the pom.xml. The browser repl works without cljsbuild out of the box. If more testing concerning this issue is required please tell me because I'd like to see a new clojurescript release soon. Jonas [1] https://github.com/emezeske/lein-cljsbuild/blob/master/support/project.clj -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
