Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-08 Thread reborgml
Yep, I mentioned the Almanac to "senior stakeholders" while pitching the 
book :)

It was a less internet-based age, but I think there is still room for an 
offline reference.

Thanks
Renzo

On Thursday, 8 December 2016 07:05:07 UTC, Torsten Uhlmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Back in the day I had a "Java Developers Almanac" for Java 1.4 and it 
> helped getting around the lesser used API parts, or discovering 
> functionality I hadn't used before.
>
>
> Alex Miller > schrieb am Do., 8. Dez. 
> 2016 um 04:13 Uhr:
>
>> This is a good gotcha. From Clojure's perspective this is just 
>> referencing a Java field (which could be mutable and NOT a constant). Maybe 
>> it would be possible to reflectively determine that this field is actually 
>> a constant and make it work, not sure.
>>
>> The number one special case I see people ask about with case though is 
>> Java class constants (which are *not* constants and don't work). One 
>> workaround is to use the class name as a string.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 5:43:28 PM UTC-6, Ryan Fowler wrote:
>>>
>>> I love the idea.
>>>
>>> ​A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail 
>>> about `case` to consider mentioning is that Java Constants don't work as 
>>> tests.
>>>
>>> ryans-mbp:~% cat test.clj
>>> (let [incoming-character Character/LINE_SEPARATOR]
>>>   (println "case w/ constant"
>>>(case incoming-character
>>>  Character/LINE_SEPARATOR :line-separator
>>>  :unknown))
>>>   (println "case w/ int "
>>>(case incoming-character
>>>  13 :line-separator
>>>  :unknown)))
>>>
>>> ryans-mbp:~% java -jar $CLOJURE test.clj
>>> case w/ constant :unknown
>>> case w/ int  :line-separator
>>>
>>> ​I think I understand why this doesn't work but it feels like it should 
>>> work. And without prior knowledge, I don't think I would assume that 
>>> constants don't work.
>>>
>>> ​Ryan​
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller >> > wrote:
>>>
 This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.

 I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come 
 out) but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get 
 why a physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is 
 expensive right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? 
 I know you likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair 
 to 
 complain to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.

 While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a 
 description of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have 
 the same output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:

 (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr


 Example:

 (case 3
   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
   4 "4"
   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")

 ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"

 I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the 
 kind of thing you'd want in the book.

 Alex

 On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti 
 wrote:
>
> Hi all, 
>
> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure 
> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a 
> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the 
> box 
> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. 
> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, 
> blogs 
> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book 
> website 
> is: 
>
> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library 
>
> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 
> functions, starting with some of the most important available in the 
> standard library. Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book 
> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of 
> treatment they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. 
> Any 
> question please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on 
> the book forum. 
>
> Regards, 
> Renzo 
>
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Clojure" group.
 To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
 
 Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
 your first post.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 clojure+u...@googlegroups.com 
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "Clojure" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group an

Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-08 Thread reborgml
Thanks Ryan, added this (and Alex's) to the book issues tracker. Will land 
in the following releases.

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 23:43:28 UTC, Ryan Fowler wrote:
>
> I love the idea.
>
> ​A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail 
> about `case` to consider mentioning is that Java Constants don't work as 
> tests.
>
> ryans-mbp:~% cat test.clj
> (let [incoming-character Character/LINE_SEPARATOR]
>   (println "case w/ constant"
>(case incoming-character
>  Character/LINE_SEPARATOR :line-separator
>  :unknown))
>   (println "case w/ int "
>(case incoming-character
>  13 :line-separator
>  :unknown)))
>
> ryans-mbp:~% java -jar $CLOJURE test.clj
> case w/ constant :unknown
> case w/ int  :line-separator
>
> ​I think I understand why this doesn't work but it feels like it should 
> work. And without prior knowledge, I don't think I would assume that 
> constants don't work.
>
> ​Ryan​
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller  > wrote:
>
>> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>>
>> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come 
>> out) but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get 
>> why a physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is 
>> expensive right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? 
>> I know you likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to 
>> complain to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.
>>
>> While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a 
>> description of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have 
>> the same output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:
>>
>> (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr
>>
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> (case 3
>>   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
>>   4 "4"
>>   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")
>>
>> ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"
>>
>> I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the 
>> kind of thing you'd want in the book.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, 
>>>
>>> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure 
>>> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a 
>>> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box 
>>> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. 
>>> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs 
>>> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website 
>>> is: 
>>>
>>> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library 
>>>
>>> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 
>>> functions, starting with some of the most important available in the 
>>> standard library. Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book 
>>> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment 
>>> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question 
>>> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book 
>>> forum. 
>>>
>>> Regards, 
>>> Renzo 
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> 
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com 
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-08 Thread reborgml
Hey Alex, many good points and great feedback. More inline. 

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:57:07 UTC, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>
> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come out) 
> but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get why a 
> physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is expensive 
> right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? I know you 
> likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to complain 
> to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.
>

I'm also concerned about the price tag at this stage in the book. If this 
was a finished work of 1200 pages (which is a better estimate IMHO) maybe 
it would be appropriate. More in general I've changed my mind overtime 
around the book project. At the beginning was great to start with Manning 
(and still is a decent experience), but as an afterthought this would have 
been better placed as a lean-pub (or similar) and made it a community 
effort (BTW I'm searching collaborators and co-authors anyway). But this is 
where we are now. To make it easier for people to check out the book at the 
moment:

* there is a promotion lasting until today 50% 
off: https://twitter.com/ManningBooks/status/806541284722806785 I'll ask 
Manning to make more of those.
* I'll add 3 function examples to the free downloadable material
* I'm asking Manning to have a website for the book with the HTML version 
on it, with a suitable business model (like buy 10-50-100 functions offers 
browsable online).
* In general (not just you) please post concerns on the book forum so 
Manning can 
listen: https://forums.manning.com/forums/clojure-standard-library


While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a description 
of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have the same 
output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:

>
> (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr
>
>
> Example:
>
> (case 3
>   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
>   4 "4"
>   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")
>
> ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"
>
> I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the 
> kind of thing you'd want in the book.
>

Totally. And as this one I'm pretty sure expert readers will find lacking 
information or worse, inaccuracies. This is the kind of feedback I'd really 
like, because even if I'm dissecting sources and everything else, I'm 
pretty sure I'll always miss something.

Thanks
Renzo
 

>
> Alex
>
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>>
>> Hi all, 
>>
>> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure 
>> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a 
>> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box 
>> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. 
>> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs 
>> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website 
>> is: 
>>
>> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library 
>>
>> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 
>> functions, starting with some of the most important available in the 
>> standard library. Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book 
>> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment 
>> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question 
>> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book 
>> forum. 
>>
>> Regards, 
>> Renzo 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-07 Thread Torsten Uhlmann
Thanks for working on this!

Back in the day I had a "Java Developers Almanac" for Java 1.4 and it
helped getting around the lesser used API parts, or discovering
functionality I hadn't used before.


Alex Miller  schrieb am Do., 8. Dez. 2016 um 04:13 Uhr:

> This is a good gotcha. From Clojure's perspective this is just referencing
> a Java field (which could be mutable and NOT a constant). Maybe it would be
> possible to reflectively determine that this field is actually a constant
> and make it work, not sure.
>
> The number one special case I see people ask about with case though is
> Java class constants (which are *not* constants and don't work). One
> workaround is to use the class name as a string.
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 5:43:28 PM UTC-6, Ryan Fowler wrote:
>
> I love the idea.
>
> ​A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail
> about `case` to consider mentioning is that Java Constants don't work as
> tests.
>
> ryans-mbp:~% cat test.clj
> (let [incoming-character Character/LINE_SEPARATOR]
>   (println "case w/ constant"
>(case incoming-character
>  Character/LINE_SEPARATOR :line-separator
>  :unknown))
>   (println "case w/ int "
>(case incoming-character
>  13 :line-separator
>  :unknown)))
>
> ryans-mbp:~% java -jar $CLOJURE test.clj
> case w/ constant :unknown
> case w/ int  :line-separator
>
> ​I think I understand why this doesn't work but it feels like it should
> work. And without prior knowledge, I don't think I would assume that
> constants don't work.
>
> ​Ryan​
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller  wrote:
>
> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>
> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come out)
> but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get why a
> physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is expensive
> right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? I know you
> likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to complain
> to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.
>
> While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a
> description of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have
> the same output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:
>
> (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr
>
>
> Example:
>
> (case 3
>   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
>   4 "4"
>   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")
>
> ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"
>
> I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the
> kind of thing you'd want in the book.
>
> Alex
>
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure
> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a
> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box
> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list.
> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs
> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website
> is:
>
> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library
>
> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 functions,
> starting with some of the most important available in the standard library.
> Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book
> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment
> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question
> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book
> forum.
>
> Regards,
> Renzo
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-07 Thread Alex Miller
This is a good gotcha. From Clojure's perspective this is just referencing 
a Java field (which could be mutable and NOT a constant). Maybe it would be 
possible to reflectively determine that this field is actually a constant 
and make it work, not sure.

The number one special case I see people ask about with case though is Java 
class constants (which are *not* constants and don't work). One workaround 
is to use the class name as a string.


On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 5:43:28 PM UTC-6, Ryan Fowler wrote:
>
> I love the idea.
>
> ​A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail 
> about `case` to consider mentioning is that Java Constants don't work as 
> tests.
>
> ryans-mbp:~% cat test.clj
> (let [incoming-character Character/LINE_SEPARATOR]
>   (println "case w/ constant"
>(case incoming-character
>  Character/LINE_SEPARATOR :line-separator
>  :unknown))
>   (println "case w/ int "
>(case incoming-character
>  13 :line-separator
>  :unknown)))
>
> ryans-mbp:~% java -jar $CLOJURE test.clj
> case w/ constant :unknown
> case w/ int  :line-separator
>
> ​I think I understand why this doesn't work but it feels like it should 
> work. And without prior knowledge, I don't think I would assume that 
> constants don't work.
>
> ​Ryan​
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller  wrote:
>
>> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>>
>> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come 
>> out) but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get 
>> why a physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is 
>> expensive right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? 
>> I know you likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to 
>> complain to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.
>>
>> While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a 
>> description of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have 
>> the same output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:
>>
>> (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr
>>
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> (case 3
>>   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
>>   4 "4"
>>   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")
>>
>> ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"
>>
>> I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the 
>> kind of thing you'd want in the book.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all, 
>>>
>>> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure 
>>> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a 
>>> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box 
>>> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. 
>>> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs 
>>> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website 
>>> is: 
>>>
>>> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library 
>>>
>>> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 
>>> functions, starting with some of the most important available in the 
>>> standard library. Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book 
>>> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment 
>>> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question 
>>> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book 
>>> forum. 
>>>
>>> Regards, 
>>> Renzo 
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options

Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-07 Thread Ryan Fowler
I love the idea.

​A gotchas section of some sort could be useful. For instance, a detail
about `case` to consider mentioning is that Java Constants don't work as
tests.

ryans-mbp:~% cat test.clj
(let [incoming-character Character/LINE_SEPARATOR]
  (println "case w/ constant"
   (case incoming-character
 Character/LINE_SEPARATOR :line-separator
 :unknown))
  (println "case w/ int "
   (case incoming-character
 13 :line-separator
 :unknown)))

ryans-mbp:~% java -jar $CLOJURE test.clj
case w/ constant :unknown
case w/ int  :line-separator

​I think I understand why this doesn't work but it feels like it should
work. And without prior knowledge, I don't think I would assume that
constants don't work.

​Ryan​


On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alex Miller  wrote:

> This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.
>
> I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come out)
> but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get why a
> physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is expensive
> right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? I know you
> likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to complain
> to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.
>
> While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a
> description of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have
> the same output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:
>
> (test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr
>
>
> Example:
>
> (case 3
>   (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
>   4 "4"
>   (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")
>
> ;;=> "1, 2, or 3"
>
> I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the
> kind of thing you'd want in the book.
>
> Alex
>
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure
>> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a
>> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box
>> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list.
>> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs
>> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website
>> is:
>>
>> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library
>>
>> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30
>> functions, starting with some of the most important available in the
>> standard library. Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book
>> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment
>> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question
>> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book
>> forum.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Renzo
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-07 Thread Alex Miller
This is a cool idea so thanks for working on it.

I was going to buy this (as I buy most of the Clojure books that come out) 
but $48 for an unfinished ebook put me off so I didn't. I totally get why a 
physical book of this length would be that much (because paper is expensive 
right now), but I don't get it with the ebook (particularly EA)? I know you 
likely have little control over this, so it's not really fair to complain 
to you, but maybe you can feed it back to your editor.

While pretty thorough, that case description is still lacking a description 
of one important feature - grouping multiple tests that have the same 
output in a list. Basically this line from the doc string:

(test-constant1 ... test-constantN)  result-expr


Example:

(case 3
  (1 2 3) "1, 2, or 3"
  4 "4"
  (5 6 7) "5, 6, or 7")

;;=> "1, 2, or 3"

I think most people are unaware of this feature and seems like it's the 
kind of thing you'd want in the book.

Alex

On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 12:14:29 PM UTC-6, Renzo Borgatti wrote:
>
> Hi all, 
>
> I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure 
> Standard Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a 
> reference of the roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box 
> with the Clojure jar file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. 
> Think of all the Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs 
> all mashed together to create an essay for each function. The book website 
> is: 
>
> https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library 
>
> It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 functions, 
> starting with some of the most important available in the standard library. 
> Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book 
> http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u to give you an idea of the kind of treatment 
> they get. Needless to say any feedback is highly appreciated. Any question 
> please shout here, personally at reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book 
> forum. 
>
> Regards, 
> Renzo 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[ANN] Book "The Clojure Standard Library - Annotated Reference"

2016-12-07 Thread Renzo Borgatti
Hi all, 

I'm very happy to announce the early access of a new book: "Clojure Standard 
Library - Annotated Reference" by Manning. Although it's a reference of the 
roughly 700+ functions (and macros) coming out of the box with the Clojure jar 
file, it is not designed to read as a boring list. Think of all the 
Stackoverflow, mailing lists, ClojureDocs, articles, blogs all mashed together 
to create an essay for each function. The book website is:

https://www.manning.com/books/clojure-standard-library

It contains now a total of 4 chapters (around 200 pages) or ~30 functions, 
starting with some of the most important available in the standard library. 
Here's a sample of “case" how it appears on the book http://tinyurl.com/hekc55u 
to give you an idea of the kind of treatment they get. Needless to say any 
feedback is highly appreciated. Any question please shout here, personally at 
reborg*at*reborg.net or on the book forum.

Regards,
Renzo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.