Re: Lazy map implementation
Can memoize do the job for you? On May 28, 10:39 am, Robert Luo robort...@gmail.com wrote: I need a lazy map in my compojure based application to inject data into handlers. I searched the web for an implementation, I got one from Meikel which was written in 2008. Is there any recommendation? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Lazy map implementation
On 5月28日, 下午11时01分, Sean Devlin francoisdev...@gmail.com wrote: Can memoize do the job for you? No. What I need is something can act as a map to replace the request map in compojure/ring so that it can be used in any middleware/ handles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Lazy map implementation
On May 28, 4:39 pm, Robert Luo robort...@gmail.com wrote: I need a lazy map in my compojure based application to inject data into handlers. I searched the web for an implementation, I got one from Meikel which was written in 2008. Is there any recommendation? Thanks. I don't really see what you're trying to do with this, but as an alternative, you can assoc lazy-seqs to a standard map. That is, if your values are going to be seqs (IME, most of the things you want lazy evaluation for are). Joost. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Lazy map implementation
Hi, On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:39:55AM -0700, Robert Luo wrote: I need a lazy map in my compojure based application to inject data into handlers. I searched the web for an implementation, I got one from Meikel which was written in 2008. Is there any recommendation? Just FYI: It's still maintained and will soon move to deftype to be ready for 1.2. Then I will also put a release on Clojars. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Lazy map implementation
Just FYI: It's still maintained and will soon move to deftype to be ready for 1.2. Then I will also put a release on Clojars. Sincerely Meikel Thanks Meikel, I will try your implementation in my application. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Lazy map implementation
On 5月29日, 上午12时50分, Joost jo...@zeekat.nl wrote: I don't really see what you're trying to do with this, but as an alternative, you can assoc lazy-seqs to a standard map. That is, if your values are going to be seqs (IME, most of the things you want lazy evaluation for are). Joost. The reason is very simple: Existing code base (ring) choose map as the data structure, I want my new feature seamless merge into it, then I can use all the existing functions, and new codes become normal citizen in the design. The reason I ask is that I think this is so common a need, and its idea fits into clojure's philosophy. I do not want to reinvent wheels on a common need. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
