Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
I am in for the both! Tell me how much to ship to 21666 Joe Coquina C 35 MK I From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of schiller via CnC-List Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 10:02 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: schiller Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C BTW, my rig failure was a clean bending failure right at the cross bolt for the spreaders and lower shroud tang. The only reason that the upper part of the mast stayed above the deck was the wire main and jib halyards. This is an area with a pretty high stress riser. I cant imagine how much more difficult it would have been to deal with if the mast had sunk. I'm sure we would have had to cut the shrouds and sails and let them sink. Anyone need a 2010 North Main Sail or an older UK 150 Jib? You cover shipping and they are yours. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (C 35, Mark I) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, Hull #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/18/2017 8:12 AM, Bruce Whitmore via CnC-List wrote: I have to agree with Neil. The rigging is responsible for your primary mode of propulsion, and the forces are signficant. At least down here in Florida (Tampa area), riggers are pretty inexpensive, and the investment is well worth it for peace of mind. Just my $.02 worth, Bruce Whitmore 1994 C 37/40+ "Astralis" (847) 404-5092 (mobile) bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net<mailto:bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net> From: schiller via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com><mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: schiller <schil...@bloomingdalecom.net><mailto:schil...@bloomingdalecom.net> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:07 PM Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question >From a Former C From somebody who has lost a rig. Of all of the things we spend our money on, the rig is one where spending the money on a rigger makes sense. It is no fun to be bobbing a mile off shore trying to collect rigging and sails in three foot waves, afraid to engage the motor for fear of tangling in lines or sails. Find a rigger and have him give you advice. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (dismasted) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/17/2017 8:54 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Thank you for the replies. After some research it looks like I should use double jaw toggles to connect the eyes of the new shrouds to the eyes in the existing shroud plates. http://hayn.com/marine/rigging/tj.html#djt On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to the mast. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-bounces@cnc- list.com<mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] On Behalf Of Neil Gallagher via CnC-List Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: Neil Gallagher Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers,
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
BTW, my rig failure was a clean bending failure right at the cross bolt for the spreaders and lower shroud tang. The only reason that the upper part of the mast stayed above the deck was the wire main and jib halyards. This is an area with a pretty high stress riser. I cant imagine how much more difficult it would have been to deal with if the mast had sunk. I'm sure we would have had to cut the shrouds and sails and let them sink. Anyone need a 2010 North Main Sail or an older UK 150 Jib? You cover shipping and they are yours. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (C 35, Mark I) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, Hull #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/18/2017 8:12 AM, Bruce Whitmore via CnC-List wrote: I have to agree with Neil. The rigging is responsible for your primary mode of propulsion, and the forces are signficant. At least down here in Florida (Tampa area), riggers are pretty inexpensive, and the investment is well worth it for peace of mind. Just my $.02 worth, Bruce Whitmore 1994 C 37/40+ "Astralis" (847) 404-5092 (mobile) bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net *From:* schiller via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com *Cc:* schiller <schil...@bloomingdalecom.net> *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 9:07 PM *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question >From a Former C From somebody who has lost a rig. Of all of the things we spend our money on, the rig is one where spending the money on a rigger makes sense. It is no fun to be bobbing a mile off shore trying to collect rigging and sails in three foot waves, afraid to engage the motor for fear of tangling in lines or sails. Find a rigger and have him give you advice. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (dismasted) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/17/2017 8:54 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Thank you for the replies. After some research it looks like I should use double jaw toggles to connect the eyes of the new shrouds to the eyes in the existing shroud plates. http://hayn.com/marine/rigging/tj.html#djt On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to the mast. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina *From:*CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-bounces@cnc- list.com <mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] *On Behalf Of *Neil Gallagher via CnC-List *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> *Cc:* Neil Gallagher *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-)
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
I have to agree with Neil. The rigging is responsible for your primary mode of propulsion, and the forces are signficant. At least down here in Florida (Tampa area), riggers are pretty inexpensive, and the investment is well worth it for peace of mind. Just my $.02 worth, Bruce Whitmore 1994 C 37/40+"Astralis" (847) 404-5092 (mobile) bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net From: schiller via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: schiller <schil...@bloomingdalecom.net> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 9:07 PM Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C From somebody who has lost a rig. Of all of the things we spend our money on, the rig is one where spending the money on a rigger makes sense. It is no fun to be bobbing a mile off shore trying to collect rigging and sails in three foot waves, afraid to engage the motor for fear of tangling in lines or sails. Find a rigger and have him give you advice. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (dismasted) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/17/2017 8:54 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Thank you for the replies. After some research it looks like I should use double jaw toggles to connect the eyes of the new shrouds to the eyes in the existing shroud plates. http://hayn.com/marine/rigging/tj.html#djt On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to the mast. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-bounces@cnc- list.com] On Behalf Of Neil Gallagher via CnC-List Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Neil Gallagher Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: ---Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M __ _ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/ stumurray __ _ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/ stumurray __ _ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/ stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you wa
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
From somebody who has lost a rig. Of all of the things we spend our money on, the rig is one where spending the money on a rigger makes sense. It is no fun to be bobbing a mile off shore trying to collect rigging and sails in three foot waves, afraid to engage the motor for fear of tangling in lines or sails. Find a rigger and have him give you advice. Neil Schiller Old: 1970 Redwing 35, Hull #7 (dismasted) New: 1983 C 35, Mark III, #028 "Grace" White Lake, Michigan On 11/17/2017 8:54 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Thank you for the replies. After some research it looks like I should use double jaw toggles to connect the eyes of the new shrouds to the eyes in the existing shroud plates. http://hayn.com/marine/rigging/tj.html#djt On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to the mast. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote: You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina *From:*CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] *On Behalf Of *Neil Gallagher via CnC-List *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> *Cc:* Neil Gallagher *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution --https://www.paypal.me/stumurray <https://www.paypal.me/stumurray> ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray <https://www.paypal.me/stumurray> ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray <https://www.paypal.me/stumurray> ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
Thank you for the replies. After some research it looks like I should use double jaw toggles to connect the eyes of the new shrouds to the eyes in the existing shroud plates. http://hayn.com/marine/rigging/tj.html#djt On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Josh Muckley via CnC-List < cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings > should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to > the mast. > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List < > cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > >> You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs >> line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an >> angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. >> >> Joe >> >> Coquina >> >> >> >> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Neil >> Gallagher via CnC-List >> *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM >> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com >> *Cc:* Neil Gallagher >> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C >> >> >> >> It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, >> is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain >> bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to >> bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast >> through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression >> tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate >> for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to >> just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. >> >> Neil Gallagher >> Weatherly, 35-1 >> Glen Cove, NY >> >> On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: >> >> Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. >> >> In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. >> >> I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my >> new boat. >> >> Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group >> site: >> >> --- >> >> Greetings, >> >> My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of >> shrouds. >> >> The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. >> >> The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular >> plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. >> >> I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the >> bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) >> >> Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. >> >> Cheers, >> >> --Bob M >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> >> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and >> every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use >> PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each >> and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - >> use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray >> >> > ___ > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each > and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - > use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > > > ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
Yeah I kinda misinterpreted the description. The swadged end fittings should be properly attached to a tang which could then be through bolted to the mast. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017, 8:10 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List < cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > You can’t run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs > line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an > angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. > > Joe > > Coquina > > > > *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Neil > Gallagher via CnC-List > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM > *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com > *Cc:* Neil Gallagher > *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C > > > > It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is > it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain > bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to > bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast > through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression > tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate > for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to > just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. > > Neil Gallagher > Weatherly, 35-1 > Glen Cove, NY > > On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: > > Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. > > In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. > > I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my > new boat. > > Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group > site: > > --- > > Greetings, > > My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of > shrouds. > > The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. > > The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates > (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. > > I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the > bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) > > Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. > > Cheers, > > --Bob M > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and > every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use > PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > > > > > ___ > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each > and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - > use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > > ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
Or it would flatten the eye to the mast and the shroud would be coming out of the eye fitting at an angle. Either way will fail. From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 8:09 AM To: 'cnc-list@cnc-list.com' Cc: Della Barba, Joe Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C You can't run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Neil Gallagher via CnC-List Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: Neil Gallagher Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
You can't run a bolt through the eye on the end of a shroud. The tangs line up the direction of pull, a bolt would be getting pulled on at an angle trying to yank the head/nut off from one side. Joe Coquina From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Neil Gallagher via CnC-List Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 2:23 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Neil Gallagher Subject: Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
It's common to have the lowers attach directly to the spreader bracket, is it possible that the plate is part of the bracket? . Further, a plain bolt through the mast, when tightened, could cause the walls of the mast to bend or collapse. There should be a compression tube inside the mast through which the bolt goes to prevent that. On my mast the compression tube and bolt are directly in line with the spreaders, and the tang plate for the lowers is part of the spreader bracket. Attaching the lowers to just a plain bolt through the mast doesn't seem advisable. Neil Gallagher Weatherly, 35-1 Glen Cove, NY On 11/16/2017 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
I can't exactly see how it wouldn't be right. Its relatively easy to find the sheer strength of what ever sized bolt it is but I would expect (since it is supporting 2 shrouds on each side) that the bolt is at least one size larger than the pins used on the deck fittings. My MacGregor 26C used a single 3/8ths bolt to through bolt the tangs on the lower shrouds and the brackets which hold the spreaders. As I recall I was tensioning the shrouds to 1000 lbs. Josh Muckley S/V Sea Hawk 1989 C 37+ Solomons, MD On Nov 16, 2017 9:25 PM, "bobmor99 . via CnC-List"wrote: Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Re: Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
Can’t imagine that to be the case. The bolt would be several bolts in the first good breeze. it would shear right off. I suspect the po planned to install a different mast fitting but that is only my guess. John Sent from my iPad > On Nov 16, 2017, at 9:24 PM, bobmor99 . via CnC-List> wrote: > > Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. > In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. > I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new > boat. > Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: > --- > Greetings, > My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. > The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. > The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates > (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. > I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt > directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) > Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. > Cheers, > --Bob M > > > ___ > > Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and > every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use > PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray > ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Stus-List Standing Rigging Question From a Former C
Hurricane Irma claimed Ox, my beloved 33-1. In its place I now have a 1979 Cal-31. I am hoping for some sympathy-advice regarding the standing rigging on my new boat. Below is the as yet unanswered question I posted on the Cal user group site: --- Greetings, My new-to-me 31 came with an oversized, uninstalled, brand new set of shrouds. The mast ends have beefy eye fittings. The existing lowers terminate with jaws that connect to rectangular plates (port and stbd) that are bolted together through the mast. I am wondering if the intent was to do away with the plates and run the bolt directly through the four eyes (two eyes on each side, of course). :-) Any thoughts or ideas are most welcomed. Cheers, --Bob M ___ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray