Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Jake Brodersen via CnC-List
Joel,

 

Fortunately we didn’t do any anchoring in the Annapolis-Bermuda race this year!

 

Me:  5’ of chain and 100’ of 3/8” of three strand anchor line.  We racers keep 
it light.  8-)

 

Jake

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Joel Aronson 
via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:13
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Joel Aronson 
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

 

My 35/3 had a fairly light Danforth and 10 feet of chain.  I used it only as a 
lunch hook, and it was pretty easy to haul up by hand.

 

My 44 has a 35 pound anchor (considered light for the boat by many) and 25 feet 
of 3/8 stainless chain.  When I tripped the breaker on the windlass and did not 
know how to reset it, I needed help hauling up the anchor and chain.  

 

Can't live with em, can't live without em!

 

Joel

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List
Without significant chain or a kellet, the reversing tide at Chestertown does a 
superb job of wrapping your anchor line around the keel and/or rudder.

Joe Della Barba
Coquina


From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Joel Aronson 
via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 13:44
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Joel Aronson
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

I've not used a kellet, but another C&C owner, chef2sail, uses one and swears 
by it.  FWIW.

Joel
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Joel Aronson via CnC-List
I've not used a kellet, but another C&C owner, chef2sail, uses one and
swears by it.  FWIW.

Joel
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List
Mark,

I read the article attached but came to a slightly different conclusion
regarding anchor and rode construction and deployment.  (I also wonder what
Mr. Smith's association is with Rocna anchors).   I'll concur, any anchor
rode or mooring rope can be stretched to its limits with enough force, be it
from wind, waves, or current.  While catenary of chain rode doesn't come
close to equaling the tensile strength of the chain itself, it will lessen
the effects of wave movements and other forces.  Not everything about anchor
rode is about keeping the anchor from dislodging from the sea bed.  A boat
that rides well at anchor generally doesn't have a jerking and lurching
motion, which can be offset by. You  guessed it. catenary in the anchor
rode.  I'll also put in a plug for using a snubber in areas where you'll
likely get strong wind and waves that may put an anchor and rode to the
test.  But for all the reasons suggested by other posters, I'll continue to
keep a length of chain between my stretchy 8 plait rope and CQR anchor.  Not
100% chain, not 100% rope, a combination.

Chuck Gilchrest

S/V Half Magic

1983 Landfall 35

Padanaram, MA 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Dr. Mark
Bodnar via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:01 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Dr. Mark Bodnar 
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

 

 

I can't offer up anywhere near the experience of others on this list - so I
depend on learning from more experienced sailors.  This group is part of
that, plus I pay for a membership with Attainable Cruising Adventure -
https://www.morganscloud.com/ - lots of great info that has been tried and
tested in challenging climates (including an extensive discussion on
jacklines and tethers)

On the topic of catenary effects of chain - they argue that the effects are
pretty minimal.  This article is offered as evidence of the calculations.
Chain still offers some benefits, just not so much in catenary effect.

http://www.petersmith.net.nz/boat-anchors/catenary.php

 

Mark

 
 
There is no cure for birth and death save to enjoy the interval.
  - George Santana

On 2016-08-17 11:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List wrote:

Chuck,

Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you're giving up one of the most
important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By
allowing some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort
that it takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut,
serves as a shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on
an anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a
crowded anchorage without worrying that your anchor will break free.

Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little
catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire
shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line,
I would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise,
to manage those loads.

On Half Magic, we use 25' of 5/16" Galv BBB chain spliced to 200' of 5/8"
NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a
bit light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more
than 20' of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide
to cruise up in Maine or Nova Scotia.

 

Chuck Gilchrest

S/V Half Magic

1983 Landfall 35

Padanaram, MA

 

 

 


___

 

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions
are greatly appreciated!

 






___
 
This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions
are greatly appreciated!

 

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Robert Boyer via CnC-List
I completely agree with Mark's comments about chain--the big advantage is chafe 
protection in areas where there is coral and not the shock absorbing of the 
catenary effect.  Actually, you need a snubber made from nylon rope to get any 
significant shock absorbing benefit. 

I have one rode with all chain and I made a snubber for this rode.  My 
secondary anchor has 40 feet of chain and the remainder is rope.  Both anchors 
are 44-lb.  This anchor system is setup for the Bahamas.

I just added a windlass for my primary anchor with all chain rode.  If I 
thought I could get by with a 33-lb anchor I would not have added the windlass. 
 On the Chesapeake Bay I used a 33-lb anchor with 10 feet of chain for over 20 
years but the holding is generally very good.

Bob

Bob Boyer
S/V Rainy Days (1983 C&C Landfall 38 - Hull #230)
Blog: dainyrays.blogspot.com
Email: dainyr...@icloud.com
Annapolis, MD (presently in Baltimore)

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Dr. Mark Bodnar via CnC-List 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> I can't offer up anywhere near the experience of others on this list - so I 
> depend on learning from more experienced sailors.  This group is part of 
> that, plus I pay for a membership with Attainable Cruising Adventure - 
> https://www.morganscloud.com/ - lots of great info that has been tried and 
> tested in challenging climates (including an extensive discussion on 
> jacklines and tethers)
> On the topic of catenary effects of chain - they argue that the effects are 
> pretty minimal.  This article is offered as evidence of the calculations.  
> Chain still offers some benefits, just not so much in catenary effect.
> http://www.petersmith.net.nz/boat-anchors/catenary.php
> 
> Mark
> There is no cure for birth and death save to enjoy the interval.
>   - George Santana
>> On 2016-08-17 11:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List wrote:
>> Chuck,
>> Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most 
>> important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By 
>> allowing some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort 
>> that it takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, 
>> serves as a shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on 
>> an anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a 
>> crowded anchorage without worrying that your anchor will break free.
>> Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
>> catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
>> shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, 
>> I would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, 
>> to manage those loads.
>> On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
>> NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a 
>> bit light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more 
>> than 20’ of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide 
>> to cruise up in Maine or Nova Scotia.
>>  
>> Chuck Gilchrest
>> S/V Half Magic
>> 1983 Landfall 35
>> Padanaram, MA
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> ___
>>  
>> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
>> what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions 
>> are greatly appreciated!
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
>> what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions 
>> are greatly appreciated!
> 
> ___
> 
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
> what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions 
> are greatly appreciated!
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List
I used to use a kellet before I had my 30 feet of chain. They do work. If you 
use nylon anyplace there is coral prepare to see your boat float away with a 
cut anchor line.

Joe Della Barba
Coquina


From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of S Thomas via 
CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 13:20
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: S Thomas
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

I used to see a lot of writing about the use of kellets as a way to reduce 
scope requirements or otherwise improve the effectiveness of ground tackle. Is 
anyone using one now? Are they an effective option? The idea makes sense to me, 
especially if hand hauling, otherwise just use a heavier chain. I have been 
pretty much resigned to having to purchase and install a bow roller, all chain 
rode, and a windlass for my C&C36 project. I had been led to believe that all 
chain is the only good option for Caribbean cruising. Certainly it is popular, 
but some of the comments in this thread have me wondering if a boat length of 
chain and the rest nylon might still be a viable option.
A dragging anchor in a crowded anchorage would be problem enough without having 
physical problems retrieving the ground tackle.

Steve Thomas
C&C27 MKIII
Port Stanley, ON

C&C36
Merritt Island, FL

- Original Message -
From: Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
To: 'cnc-list@cnc-list.com'
Cc: Della Barba, Joe<mailto:joe.della.ba...@ssa.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:02
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

I use 30 feet of chain because I got tired of all the cruisers anchoring with 
all chain and me having to be way off to allow 7:1 scope swing room. Having 30 
feet of 5/16 and anchoring in usually 8-15 feet of water works well. I have no 
windlass now, but I wouldn’t mind one. IMHO much past 35 feet and lack of a 
windlass will be painful with the correct size chain and anchor.
Joe
Coquina
C&C 35 MK I

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Frederick G 
Street via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:52
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Cc: Frederick G Street
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

Also, anyone who cruises in tropical areas NEEDS chain, to avoid chafe on the 
occasional chuck of dead coral...

Fred Street -- Minneapolis
S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- Bayfield, WI

On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote:

Chuck,
Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most important 
aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By allowing 
some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort that it 
takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, serves as a 
shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on an anchor rode 
means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a crowded anchorage 
without worrying that your anchor will break free.
Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, I 
would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to 
manage those loads.
On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a bit 
light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more than 20’ 
of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide to cruise up 
in Maine or Nova Scotia.

Chuck Gilchrest
S/V Half Magic
1983 Landfall 35
Padanaram, MA

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread S Thomas via CnC-List
I used to see a lot of writing about the use of kellets as a way to reduce 
scope requirements or otherwise improve the effectiveness of ground tackle. Is 
anyone using one now? Are they an effective option? The idea makes sense to me, 
especially if hand hauling, otherwise just use a heavier chain. I have been 
pretty much resigned to having to purchase and install a bow roller, all chain 
rode, and a windlass for my C&C36 project. I had been led to believe that all 
chain is the only good option for Caribbean cruising. Certainly it is popular, 
but some of the comments in this thread have me wondering if a boat length of 
chain and the rest nylon might still be a viable option. 
A dragging anchor in a crowded anchorage would be problem enough without having 
physical problems retrieving the ground tackle.   

Steve Thomas
C&C27 MKIII
Port Stanley, ON

C&C36 
Merritt Island, FL

- Original Message - 
  From: Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List 
  To: 'cnc-list@cnc-list.com' 
  Cc: Della Barba, Joe 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:02
  Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff


  I use 30 feet of chain because I got tired of all the cruisers anchoring with 
all chain and me having to be way off to allow 7:1 scope swing room. Having 30 
feet of 5/16 and anchoring in usually 8-15 feet of water works well. I have no 
windlass now, but I wouldn’t mind one. IMHO much past 35 feet and lack of a 
windlass will be painful with the correct size chain and anchor.

  Joe

  Coquina

  C&C 35 MK I

   

  From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Frederick 
G Street via CnC-List
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:52
  To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
  Cc: Frederick G Street
  Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

   

  Also, anyone who cruises in tropical areas NEEDS chain, to avoid chafe on the 
occasional chuck of dead coral...


  Fred Street -- Minneapolis
  S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- Bayfield, WI

   

On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List 
 wrote:

 

Chuck,

Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most 
important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By 
allowing some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort 
that it takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, 
serves as a shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on an 
anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a crowded 
anchorage without worrying that your anchor will break free.

Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, I 
would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to 
manage those loads.

On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a bit 
light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more than 20’ 
of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide to cruise up 
in Maine or Nova Scotia.

 

Chuck Gilchrest

S/V Half Magic

1983 Landfall 35

Padanaram, MA

   

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Dr. Mark Bodnar via CnC-List

  
  


I can't offer up anywhere near the experience of others on this
  list - so I depend on learning from more experienced sailors. 
  This group is part of that, plus I pay for a membership with
  Attainable Cruising Adventure - https://www.morganscloud.com/ -
  lots of great info that has been tried and tested in challenging
  climates (including an extensive discussion on jacklines and
  tethers)

On the topic of catenary effects of chain - they argue that the
  effects are pretty minimal.  This article is offered as evidence
  of the calculations.  Chain still offers some benefits, just not
  so much in catenary effect.

http://www.petersmith.net.nz/boat-anchors/catenary.php



Mark



There is no cure for birth and death save to enjoy the interval.
  - George Santana
On 2016-08-17 11:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest
  via CnC-List wrote:


  
  
  
  
Chuck,
Avoiding
chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most
important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock
absorbsion.   By allowing some of the chain to lie on the
ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort that it takes to lift the
chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, serves as a
shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain
on an anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat
shorter scope in a crowded anchorage without worrying that
your anchor will break free.
Using
only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very
little catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope
is bearing the entire shock load of the boat all the time. 
If I had only rope on my anchor line, I would make sure I
had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to
manage those loads.
On
  Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to
  200’ of 5/8” NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb
  CQR anchor (which is probably a bit light for the size and
  weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more than 20’ of
  water where we sail although we might rethink that if we
  decide to cruise up in Maine or Nova Scotia.
 
Chuck
  Gilchrest
S/V
  Half Magic
1983
  Landfall 35
Padanaram,
  MA


  

   


   


   


___

   

This
list is supported by the generous donations of our
members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for
our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly
appreciated!
  
  
 
  

  
  
  
  
  ___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly appreciated!



  


___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Joel Aronson via CnC-List
My 35/3 had a fairly light Danforth and 10 feet of chain.  I used it only
as a lunch hook, and it was pretty easy to haul up by hand.

My 44 has a 35 pound anchor (considered light for the boat by many) and 25
feet of 3/8 stainless chain.  When I tripped the breaker on the windlass
and did not know how to reset it, I needed help hauling up the anchor and
chain.

Can't live with em, can't live without em!

Joel

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I use 30 feet of chain because I got tired of all the cruisers anchoring
> with all chain and me having to be way off to allow 7:1 scope swing room.
> Having 30 feet of 5/16 and anchoring in usually 8-15 feet of water works
> well. I have no windlass now, but I wouldn’t mind one. IMHO much past 35
> feet and lack of a windlass will be painful with the correct size chain and
> anchor.
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
>
> C&C 35 MK I
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of 
> *Frederick
> G Street via CnC-List
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:52
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* Frederick G Street
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff
>
>
>
> Also, anyone who cruises in tropical areas *NEEDS* chain, to avoid chafe
> on the occasional chuck of dead coral...
>
>
> Fred Street -- Minneapolis
> S/V *Oceanis* (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- Bayfield, WI
>
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Chuck,
>
> Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most
> important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.
> By allowing some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the
> effort that it takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes
> taut, serves as a shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using
> chain on an anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope
> in a crowded anchorage without worrying that your anchor will break free.
>
> Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little
> catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire
> shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line,
> I would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise,
> to manage those loads.
>
> On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8”
> NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a
> bit light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more
> than 20’ of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide
> to cruise up in Maine or Nova Scotia.
>
>
>
> Chuck Gilchrest
>
> S/V Half Magic
>
> 1983 Landfall 35
>
> Padanaram, MA
>
>
>
> ___
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All
> Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List
I use 30 feet of chain because I got tired of all the cruisers anchoring with 
all chain and me having to be way off to allow 7:1 scope swing room. Having 30 
feet of 5/16 and anchoring in usually 8-15 feet of water works well. I have no 
windlass now, but I wouldn’t mind one. IMHO much past 35 feet and lack of a 
windlass will be painful with the correct size chain and anchor.
Joe
Coquina
C&C 35 MK I

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Frederick G 
Street via CnC-List
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:52
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Frederick G Street
Subject: Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

Also, anyone who cruises in tropical areas NEEDS chain, to avoid chafe on the 
occasional chuck of dead coral...

Fred Street -- Minneapolis
S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- Bayfield, WI

On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List 
mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote:

Chuck,
Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most important 
aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By allowing 
some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort that it 
takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, serves as a 
shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on an anchor rode 
means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a crowded anchorage 
without worrying that your anchor will break free.
Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, I 
would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to 
manage those loads.
On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a bit 
light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more than 20’ 
of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide to cruise up 
in Maine or Nova Scotia.

Chuck Gilchrest
S/V Half Magic
1983 Landfall 35
Padanaram, MA

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Frederick G Street via CnC-List
Also, anyone who cruises in tropical areas NEEDS chain, to avoid chafe on the 
occasional chuck of dead coral...

Fred Street -- Minneapolis
S/V Oceanis (1979 C&C Landfall 38) -- Bayfield, WI

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List 
>  wrote:
> 
> Chuck,
> Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most 
> important aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By 
> allowing some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort 
> that it takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, 
> serves as a shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on 
> an anchor rode means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a 
> crowded anchorage without worrying that your anchor will break free.
> Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
> catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
> shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, I 
> would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to 
> manage those loads.
> On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
> NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a 
> bit light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more 
> than 20’ of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide 
> to cruise up in Maine or Nova Scotia. <>
>  
> Chuck Gilchrest
> S/V Half Magic
> 1983 Landfall 35
> Padanaram, MA

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Chuck Gilchrest via CnC-List
Chuck,

Avoiding chain on anchor rode means you’re giving up one of the most important 
aspects of the rode: the catenary effect of shock absorbsion.   By allowing 
some of the chain to lie on the ocean (or lake) bottom, the effort that it 
takes to lift the chain off the bottom before the line goes taut, serves as a 
shock absorber to wave, wind, or current.  Also, using chain on an anchor rode 
means you can get by with a somewhat shorter scope in a crowded anchorage 
without worrying that your anchor will break free.

Using only rope between your clean and the anchor allows for very little 
catenary and as such, your cleat and the anchor rope is bearing the entire 
shock load of the boat all the time.  If I had only rope on my anchor line, I 
would make sure I had a proper anchor rode snubber, rubber or otherwise, to 
manage those loads.

On Half Magic, we use 25’ of 5/16” Galv BBB chain spliced to 200’ of 5/8” 
NovEight Novabraid 8 plait rope with a 25lb CQR anchor (which is probably a bit 
light for the size and weight of the boat).  We rarely anchor in more than 20’ 
of water where we sail although we might rethink that if we decide to cruise up 
in Maine or Nova Scotia.

 

Chuck Gilchrest

S/V Half Magic

1983 Landfall 35

Padanaram, MA

 

 

 


___

 

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!

 

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!


Re: Stus-List Windlass rebuff

2016-08-17 Thread Chuck S via CnC-List
Wow ! What's the weight of all that chain and anchor on the bow? I appreciate 
your project and applaud you sharing the details. 

At the risk of drawing out the "flamers", I think windlasses are a little 
overrated. 

Avoid chain and you don't need the windlass. Avoid the windlass and you don't 
need a battery for the motor or the switches or wiring or problems when it all 
jambs under extreme load. I have heard so many windlass problems from neighbors 
at my marina, I'm glad I don't have one. 

I solo a lot so I rely on tried and true methods to break the anchor out. 
To pull the anchor, start the engine in neutral and then hand the anchor rode 
in till it is snug, tension it as tight as you can get it, cleat it and pull up 
in the middle of the line between the bow and the cleat. Usually I can work the 
line so the anchor breaks free and I pull it right up and onto the roller. 
Rarely do I need to use the engine to motor forward to break it loose. I'm 62 
and don't claim to be stronger than the average bear. This almost always works. 
The last trick is to tie a rolling hitch on the rode and winch the thing up. I 
have had my 36 footer for 12 years and never needed to do that. 


Chuck 
Resolute 
1990 C&C 34R 
Broad Creek, Magothy River, Md 

- Original Message -

From: "Dreuge via CnC-List"  
To: "CnClist"  
Cc: "Dreuge"  
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:01:34 PM 
Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 37+ Anchor Roller Mount & Windlass 

Hi Ron, 

I recently installed a new windlass and upgraded the ground tackle on my LF38. 
I installed the windlass on the deck such that the chain hole is over the 
anchor locker whereas the windlass shaft hole is over the v-berth. I just 
started to writeup the windlass installation on my blog, but as of now it has 
mostly photos. For equipment, I went with the Maxwell RC8-8 5/16” G4 windlass, 
150’ 5/16” G4 HT chain, 150’ 5/8” 8-plait nylon rope, Mantus SS swivel, and 
44lb Vulcan anchor. Also I read good thing about using a 4WD winch controllers 
on a marine windlass, so I picked up both a wired and wireless winch 
controllers from amazon. The wireless controller works great but does have a 
slight delay which the wired controller does not. I chose not to go with the 
usual foot windlass switches. 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00LS5R0PO/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s01?ie=UTF8&psc=1
 

Here’s what I have so far: 
http://svjohannarose.blogspot.com/search/label/Windlass 



- 
Paul E. 
1981 C&C 38 Landfall 
S/V Johanna Rose 
Carrabelle, FL 

http://svjohannarose.blogspot.com/ 




On Aug 16, 2016, at 12:58 PM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote: 

Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:59:00 -0400 
From: Ron Ricci < rvri...@gmail.com > 
To: < cnc-list@cnc-list.com > 
Subject: Stus-List C&C 37+ Anchor Roller Mount & Windlass 
Message-ID: < 024601d1f7df$7ca71f30$75f55d90$@gmail.com > 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 

Maybe I'm getting old but am considering adding an anchor roller mount and 
windlass to my boat. I have a 33' Bruce anchor which I may upsize since I'd 
no longer be the windlass. It seemed pretty tricky to get the anchor and 
chain in with the head stay, jib tacks and mooring line chocks. 



Any advice and photos (especially of the bow roller & mooring line chock 
areas) would be appreciated. Please use link to OneDrive 
< https://1drv.ms/f/s!AhpB-lul9d5YgmIRm7Ain34SSCFu > to copy/paste photos 
that you can share or send them to my email address below (without copying 
the list). 



Thanks, 

Ron 

Ron Ricci 

S/V Patriot 

C&C 37+ 

Bristol, RI 





___ 

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated! 

___

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!