Re: [CODE4LIB] TemaTres 1.2, web tool to manage controlled vocabularies, has been released
Hi dear Eric, ... today we have released TemaTres keywords Distiller in google code. You can download it from: http://code.google.com/p/tematres-keywords-distiller/ TemaTres Keywords Distiller is a php tool to extract terms from a text and use it to obtain keywords from a specific controlled vocabulary. You can do automatic categorization of texts based on controlled vocabularies managed by TemaTres. For some documentation about Web Services-based API, there are a explanation in http://www.r020.com.ar/tematres/wiki/doku.php?id=en:tematres:web_services_terminologicos Or, you can invoke any TemaTres web services without arguments, eg: http://www.r020.com.ar/tematres/services.php Please ... let me know about any problem or doubt :-) My apologies about my english best regards --- diego ferreyra http://www.vocabularyserver.com/ http://www.r020.com.ar/ 2011/1/10 Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu: On Jan 8, 2011, at 10:31 AM, diego ferreyra wrote: We have the glad to announce the release of Tematres 1.2. TemaTres is a web tool to manage, publish and exploit controlled vocabularies and other formals representation of knowledge ( thesauri, taxonomies, glossaries, etc)... - TemaTres Keywords extractor http://www.vocabularyserver.com/distiller/index.php Diego, after a few minutes of wandering around, what I saw was pretty impressive. I liked the keywords extractor interface the best. 'Have not gone so far as to try to install it. Sorry. Consider publishing some of your work in Code4Lib Journal? Can you point us more specifically to the Web Services-based API documentation? -- Eric Lease Morgan University of Notre Dame Great Books Survey -- http://bit.ly/auPD9Q
[CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that... salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
[CODE4LIB] Yay, Code4Lib! Sponsorship goal accomplished!
Hi Code4Lib, You all are faster than I am. In the process of typing up that last email, someone contributed enough to put us at the 100% mark. Yay, Code4Lib! So, if we want to continue collecting (say set the goal at $1500), someone else pitch in and we'll keep the fun going... :-) Kevin
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
On 1/13/11 9:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Actually thanks for the reminder. I was wondering why I had this string on my finger all this while. ;-) ./fxk -- Chisolm's First Corollary to Murphy's Second Law: When things just can't possibly get any worse, they will.
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
I think this is a good point to make (about the host saying they aren't lacking at this point)... for me (just one person speaking), this isn't about this year's conference being strapped for funds. Personally, I think this is in part a gauge to see whether this might work as a future method for (partially) funding the conference (...though, admittedly, one year's success may not be an indicator of an ongoing success). It's also worth noting that money not used this year gets passed to next year's host, so even if this year's host doesn't use this money the conference is still benefiting and perhaps it reduces the amount of other types of sponsorship we need for next year (or alternatively gives us a buffer for a low sponsorship year). And, I think, like many other things in Code4Lib, it's an experiment... Lastly, it's just a nice way to express one's appreciation for the conference... it's not going to waste even if it's not used this year. Those are all just my personal opinions... others contributing might have different reasons or motivations... Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
Oh, and we've had three more people contribute since my emails, so I'll take that as a vote to push it up to $1500 (which I won't get to until later today). As with anything in Code4Lib, it's an optional involvement... no obligation to participate. Different people may also participate for their own reasons... Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
+1 Just what I was going to say (except I didn't know about the rollover to next year option.) Thanks, Kevin! Ralph -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin S. Clarke Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:30 AM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship I think this is a good point to make (about the host saying they aren't lacking at this point)... for me (just one person speaking), this isn't about this year's conference being strapped for funds. Personally, I think this is in part a gauge to see whether this might work as a future method for (partially) funding the conference (...though, admittedly, one year's success may not be an indicator of an ongoing success). It's also worth noting that money not used this year gets passed to next year's host, so even if this year's host doesn't use this money the conference is still benefiting and perhaps it reduces the amount of other types of sponsorship we need for next year (or alternatively gives us a buffer for a low sponsorship year). And, I think, like many other things in Code4Lib, it's an experiment... Lastly, it's just a nice way to express one's appreciation for the conference... it's not going to waste even if it's not used this year. Those are all just my personal opinions... others contributing might have different reasons or motivations... Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Presenters - a shared presentation machine? really????
Might be worth finding some people from previous years; I think previous years managed recording of presentation projection (if not live screencast), despite presenters swapping out machines. They did it somehow. From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Naomi Dushay [ndus...@stanford.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:52 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Presenters - a shared presentation machine? really Hopefully, this doesn't sound snotty. Talk transitions can get bogged down ... but maybe there's a better way? Make sure the connections for all types are up there. - Naomi Begin forwarded message: From: Naomi Dushay ndus...@stanford.edu Date: January 13, 2011 3:32:15 PM PST To: Porter, Dot dopor...@indiana.edu Cc: McDonald, Robert H. rhmcd...@indiana.edu Subject: Re: Important information and questions for Code4Lib Presenters I'm sorry if this creates a wrinkle for you, but I do not intend to use an assigned, shared laptop for my presentation. My presentation is not fully written yet, but I will not be solely stepping through powerpoint slides - far from it. I intend to run code during my presentation: I need my laptop to do this - it has all the programming software I need for it to work: the correct versions of ruby and gems and so on. If I'm brave, I might even write some code as part of my presentation. I would fervently hope that other presenters will be doing the same - they certainly have in the past. Beyond this, I am happy to be recorded, for my presentation to be considered public property and to use whichever microphone picks up my voice best (and works for my height and my outfit). - Naomi On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Porter, Dot wrote: Greetings, You are scheduled to present a talk at Code4Lib, to be held in Bloomington IN February 8-10 (conference program:http://code4lib.org/conference/2011/schedule#conf) . All talks will be streamed, and following the conference the video will be deposited in the Internet Archive and IU ScholarWorks (IU’s research repository). We’ll need your permission both to stream and to deposit, and at some point you’ll be provided with a permission form. Please let me know now if you don’t intend to give permission to stream and/or to have your talk deposited. There are several logistical issues related to the video streaming. 1) In order to minimize technical problems mid-session, and to ensure smooth transitions between speakers, we’ll be loading presentation materials on the presentation laptops prior to each session. You should come to the session in which you are scheduled 20 minutes early, with your presentation materials loaded on a USB drive (or be prepared to download your materials from the web), so we’re sure to have time to download everyone’s stuff. If you prefer to run your presentation straight from your USB key we can do that as well, just let me know. There will be volunteers contacting each session’s group of speakers the week before the conference to remind you of this. Please contact me now if you think this requirement will be an issue for you. 2) In order to have a successful recording, you’ll need to be mic’d. Please let me know if you’d prefer to use the podium mic or a lapel mic. Generally, if you like to move around a lot when you speak, you’re better off using the lapel mic. 3) Related to the previous point – will your presentation include audio from the laptop? If so, please let me know. Thanks very much. We’re looking forward to having you here next month! Dot *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Dot Porter (MA, MSLS) Associate Director for Digital Library Content Services Digital Library Program Indiana University Bloomington Herman B Wells Library W501 Phone: 812-855-8758 http://www.dlib.indiana.edu Email: dopor...@indiana.edu *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Presenters - a shared presentation machine? really????
I had a similar response. If the shared computer is exactly like mine, I might consider it. I have used a gadget called a TwinPact that sits between the 'puter and the projector and sucks out the video. It also has primitive, but useful, switching between sources and audio integration. Cary On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Naomi Dushay ndus...@stanford.edu wrote: Hopefully, this doesn't sound snotty. Talk transitions can get bogged down ... but maybe there's a better way? Make sure the connections for all types are up there. - Naomi Begin forwarded message: From: Naomi Dushay ndus...@stanford.edu Date: January 13, 2011 3:32:15 PM PST To: Porter, Dot dopor...@indiana.edu Cc: McDonald, Robert H. rhmcd...@indiana.edu Subject: Re: Important information and questions for Code4Lib Presenters I'm sorry if this creates a wrinkle for you, but I do not intend to use an assigned, shared laptop for my presentation. My presentation is not fully written yet, but I will not be solely stepping through powerpoint slides - far from it. I intend to run code during my presentation: I need my laptop to do this - it has all the programming software I need for it to work: the correct versions of ruby and gems and so on. If I'm brave, I might even write some code as part of my presentation. I would fervently hope that other presenters will be doing the same - they certainly have in the past. Beyond this, I am happy to be recorded, for my presentation to be considered public property and to use whichever microphone picks up my voice best (and works for my height and my outfit). - Naomi On Jan 13, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Porter, Dot wrote: Greetings, You are scheduled to present a talk at Code4Lib, to be held in Bloomington IN February 8-10 (conference program:http://code4lib.org/conference/2011/schedule#conf). All talks will be streamed, and following the conference the video will be deposited in the Internet Archive and IU ScholarWorks (IU’s research repository). We’ll need your permission both to stream and to deposit, and at some point you’ll be provided with a permission form. Please let me know now if you don’t intend to give permission to stream and/or to have your talk deposited. There are several logistical issues related to the video streaming. 1) In order to minimize technical problems mid-session, and to ensure smooth transitions between speakers, we’ll be loading presentation materials on the presentation laptops prior to each session. You should come to the session in which you are scheduled 20 minutes early, with your presentation materials loaded on a USB drive (or be prepared to download your materials from the web), so we’re sure to have time to download everyone’s stuff. If you prefer to run your presentation straight from your USB key we can do that as well, just let me know. There will be volunteers contacting each session’s group of speakers the week before the conference to remind you of this. Please contact me now if you think this requirement will be an issue for you. 2) In order to have a successful recording, you’ll need to be mic’d. Please let me know if you’d prefer to use the podium mic or a lapel mic. Generally, if you like to move around a lot when you speak, you’re better off using the lapel mic. 3) Related to the previous point – will your presentation include audio from the laptop? If so, please let me know. Thanks very much. We’re looking forward to having you here next month! Dot *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Dot Porter (MA, MSLS) Associate Director for Digital Library Content Services Digital Library Program Indiana University Bloomington Herman B Wells Library W501 Phone: 812-855-8758 http://www.dlib.indiana.edu Email: dopor...@indiana.edu *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* -- Cary Gordon The Cherry Hill Company http://chillco.com
Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship
Good point, Jon. Indiana folks, if you have a desired deadline, let me know. Otherwise, I'll just wait until contributions trickle and then close it up. Update: we're up to $1215... woot! Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Jon Gorman jonathan.gor...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect we might be pushing it to get to$ 1,500. I'd suggest that you might want to put some sort of earlier deadline on it if you can to make the money transfer work smoother. The Indiana folks might be able to pipe in with a reasonable deadline as far as time goes. Jon Gorman On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Kevin S. Clarke kscla...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, and we've had three more people contribute since my emails, so I'll take that as a vote to push it up to $1500 (which I won't get to until later today). As with anything in Code4Lib, it's an optional involvement... no obligation to participate. Different people may also participate for their own reasons... Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether folks think we should up the goal or stay with $1000. I'm thinking we could take the answer from whether anyone pitches in after we've reached the $1000 point. If someone contributes something over $1000, we can take that as a vote to bump up the goal a bit ($500). Otherwise, given a little time for people to think about it, I'll just go ahead and send these funds into Indiana as The Code4Lib Community sponsorship. On a personal note, I think this level of participation is really cool. Thanks to Dan for the idea to have a community sponsorship! It's been fun to pitch in and see others do the same... Kevin
