[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi all! The vote to release Commons Transaction 1.2 final has passed with the following votes: Oliver Zeigermann +1 Jörg Heinicke +1 (non-binding) Daniel Florey +1 Tim O'Brien +1 Oliver Heger +1 Jörg Schaible +1 I will roll out the release ASAP. Oliver 2007/3/4, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
(rising from the ether) +1, looks good to me. Tim On 3/7/07, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Go for it! +1 Daniel -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04.03.2007 17:19 Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver -- -- Tim O'Brien Phone: (847) 863-7045 Fax: (866) 314-3323 SkypeIn: (347) 410-9085 Skype: tmobrien AIM: TimNinja
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Looks good to me: +1 Oliver Oliver Zeigermann wrote: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi Oliver, +1 build from source with Ant on Linux with Sun JDK 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, with IBM JDK 1.4, Blackdown JDK 1.4 and JRockit 1.4. however, there were some problems with the build. Maven does not work, since it does not find its deps: = % === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src $ maven clean test __ __ | \/ |__ _Apache__ ___ | |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ intelligent projects ~ |_| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_| v. 1.0.2 Attempting to download geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download commons-codec-1.2.jar. 29K downloaded Attempting to download commons-logging-1.1.jar. 51K downloaded The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies: geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar Total time: 10 seconds Finished at: Fri Mar 09 04:33:03 CET 2007 = % === The IBM JDK 1.5.0.3 and JRockit 1.5.0.6 compiler tries to open the .pom file as archive that it finds on the classpath and fail with an error: = % === build: [javac] Compiling 37 source files to /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/build/classes [javac] error: error reading /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom; Error opening zip file /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom = % === build: [javac] Compiling 37 source files to /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/build/classes [javac] error: error reading /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom; Could not find End Of Central Directory = % === You should use a pattern in the file set. Nothing that prevents the vote to be cancelled though. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi Jörg! Thanks for checking :) Concerning the maven build and the geronimo jars you are right. I had to change to repository to a local one to build it. This is supposed to be changed as soon as the geronimo jars are available over the standard repos. Cheers Oliver 2007/3/9, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Oliver, +1 build from source with Ant on Linux with Sun JDK 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, with IBM JDK 1.4, Blackdown JDK 1.4 and JRockit 1.4. however, there were some problems with the build. Maven does not work, since it does not find its deps: = % === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src $ maven clean test __ __ | \/ |__ _Apache__ ___ | |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ intelligent projects ~ |_| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_| v. 1.0.2 Attempting to download geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar. WARNING: Failed to download geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar. Attempting to download commons-codec-1.2.jar. 29K downloaded Attempting to download commons-logging-1.1.jar. 51K downloaded The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies: geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.jar geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1.jar geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1.jar Total time: 10 seconds Finished at: Fri Mar 09 04:33:03 CET 2007 = % === The IBM JDK 1.5.0.3 and JRockit 1.5.0.6 compiler tries to open the .pom file as archive that it finds on the classpath and fail with an error: = % === build: [javac] Compiling 37 source files to /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/build/classes [javac] error: error reading /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom; Error opening zip file /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom = % === build: [javac] Compiling 37 source files to /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/build/classes [javac] error: error reading /home/joehni/java/commons-transaction-1.2-src/lib/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1.pom; Could not find End Of Central Directory = % === You should use a pattern in the file set. Nothing that prevents the vote to be cancelled though. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Go for it! +1 Daniel -- Forwarded message -- From: Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04.03.2007 17:19 Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Niall Pemberton niall.pemberton at gmail.com writes: That can be changed with the next release (1.3 or 1.2.1) when the jars can be retrieved over the standard Maven repository. +1 I'd like to see the release without any further delays. I'll address the Jar issue as fast as possible, but waiting with the release for it will cause another delay of probably a few weeks. Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
My understanding was that David Blevins had kindly created JDK 1.3 compatible versions of the geronimo dependencies that transaction needs - see http://tinyurl.com/yw2j4e From what I can see from the geronimo vote threads they seemed to have passed - but the final release steps not yet completed. I'm sure a ping to David would resolve this. David resolving the JDK 1.3 issue with the Geronimo jars removes the necessity of having jars in the subversion repo for transaction - which was an objection from a number of people over the last transaction 1.2 RC. From what I can see looks like the same objections still stand for this RC? Niall On 3/4/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi Niall! Thanks for checking that. The jars are the new ones from David, yes. But AFAIK you can not get them over the standard Maven repositories. It least I could not. That's why they are in the distro. That can be changed with the next release (1.3 or 1.2.1) when the jars can be retrieved over the standard Maven repository. So, this is no objection to me, unless you vote with a -1 ;) Cheers Oliver 2007/3/4, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My understanding was that David Blevins had kindly created JDK 1.3 compatible versions of the geronimo dependencies that transaction needs - see http://tinyurl.com/yw2j4e From what I can see from the geronimo vote threads they seemed to have passed - but the final release steps not yet completed. I'm sure a ping to David would resolve this. David resolving the JDK 1.3 issue with the Geronimo jars removes the necessity of having jars in the subversion repo for transaction - which was an objection from a number of people over the last transaction 1.2 RC. From what I can see looks like the same objections still stand for this RC? Niall On 3/4/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
On 3/4/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Niall! Thanks for checking that. The jars are the new ones from David, yes. But AFAIK you can not get them over the standard Maven repositories. It least I could not. That's why they are in the distro. That can be changed with the next release (1.3 or 1.2.1) when the jars can be retrieved over the standard Maven repository. So, this is no objection to me, unless you vote with a -1 ;) Its not something that would cause me to vote against the release - but it does seem a shame, given the number of comments from others in previous threads, to not at least ping David first and try to keep everyone happy. Niall Cheers Oliver 2007/3/4, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: My understanding was that David Blevins had kindly created JDK 1.3 compatible versions of the geronimo dependencies that transaction needs - see http://tinyurl.com/yw2j4e From what I can see from the geronimo vote threads they seemed to have passed - but the final release steps not yet completed. I'm sure a ping to David would resolve this. David resolving the JDK 1.3 issue with the Geronimo jars removes the necessity of having jars in the subversion repo for transaction - which was an objection from a number of people over the last transaction 1.2 RC. From what I can see looks like the same objections still stand for this RC? Niall On 3/4/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks! Every now and then I make a new approach to finally release commons transaction 1.2. I have created a branch for the 1.2 version now TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH and a release tag TRANSACTION_1_2_RELEASE And have put up the rc4 to http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc4/ for inspection. This includes the distributions and a preview of the site updated for 1.2. To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
2007/3/4, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 3/4/07, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Niall! Thanks for checking that. The jars are the new ones from David, yes. But AFAIK you can not get them over the standard Maven repositories. It least I could not. That's why they are in the distro. That can be changed with the next release (1.3 or 1.2.1) when the jars can be retrieved over the standard Maven repository. So, this is no objection to me, unless you vote with a -1 ;) Its not something that would cause me to vote against the release - but it does seem a shame, given the number of comments from others in previous threads, to not at least ping David first and try to keep everyone happy. 1.2 is not going to be the final version in history. AFAIK the policy is release early, release often. The main question to me is: Is this 1.2 release going to be better than the existing final 1.1? Or put the other way round: Is it a good idea to replace 1.1 as the official version with 1.2? And my answer: It is by all means! That's why - INHO - removing the jars can wait until 1.3 or 1.2.1. Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Niall Pemberton niall.pemberton at gmail.com writes: The ant build only seems to work for JDK 1.3 when the geronimo jars are overriden with the sun ones and doesn't work for me for JDK 1.4 Yes, it stands and fails with the correct jee jars as I wrote recently [1]. (tests fail because it can't find junit). This might have been done with an especially prepared Ant. You either have to drop both ant-junit.jar (Ant task) and junit.jar (JUnit itself) into Ant classpaths or separate both jars from it [2]. (This seems to have changed with Ant 1.7.) I guess the dist was always done with junit.jar dropped into Ant's classpath as there is no taskdef in build.xml. So it seems a waste of time having them in the repo. I can update the ant build to download the other jars (or allow them to be specified in a build.properties) if its important to have a working ant build for 1.3. In general I don't like the need for internet access on build time. But with Ant it's at least better than with Maven as the build environment itself does not get changed. Is it really the only solution? Can Geronimo offer those jars compiled with JDK 1.3 (whoever has to do this work)? Hmm, wait, Cocoon 2.1 uses them as well and also claims 1.3 compatibility. I'll have a look. Even if not I do not see it as a blocker if the build does not work with 1.3. The same was true for older releases, so there is no deterioration. It only must be runnable with 1.3 and this should be true when you have 1.3 compiled jee jars. I'm wondering how the RC was created since neither the ant or maven builds seem to currently produce what RC3 contained. No idea. But if JUnit is the only remaining problem when building with 1.4 I wrote a probable subtile difference in the environment above. If it helps I can tag and produce another RC (using the maven build). That would be fine as I don't have any experience with releasing on Apache. (I only have written a company internal build system based on Ant 1.6 2 years ago, where I just need to do dist projectname and everything happens from clean check out to tagging and finally putting it into a local repository.) Regards Jörg [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11672360475r=1w=4 [2] http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/junit.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Joerg Heinicke joerg.heinicke at gmx.de writes: The ant build only seems to work for JDK 1.3 when the geronimo jars are overriden with the sun ones and doesn't work for me for JDK 1.4 Yes, it stands and fails with the correct jee jars as I wrote recently [1]. Works now with 1.3 compiled Geronimo jars. Created them by checking out the tagged 1.1 versions (i.e. delivered with Geronimo 1.1) and modifying the POMs. (tests fail because it can't find junit). This might have been done with an especially prepared Ant. You either have to drop both ant-junit.jar (Ant task) and junit.jar (JUnit itself) into Ant classpaths or separate both jars from it [2]. (This seems to have changed with Ant 1.7.) I guess the dist was always done with junit.jar dropped into Ant's classpath as there is no taskdef in build.xml. Using Ant 1.7 the build indeed works as is. Hmm, wait, Cocoon 2.1 uses them as well and also claims 1.3 compatibility. Cocoon had only jta in use, but missed jca. That's why I had to do all the things mentioned above. If it helps I can tag and produce another RC (using the maven build). It would be really fine if you (or Oliver when he is around) could create a new dist. This works for me with both JDK 1.3 and 1.4 when using Ant 1.7. For including all files and the XA/JTA/JCA stuff it must be distributed with JDK 1.4. The compiled stuff should be usable with JDK 1.3 though. What I tested was a dist with 1.4 and an immediate ant test with 1.3 afterwards which worked (it did not recompile the classes, only the tests). Regards, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Niall Pemberton niall.pemberton at gmail.com writes: Since RC3 was created (back in July 2006!) there is now the new Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy that needs to be complied with: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Henri fixed this in the trunk for transaction a few weeks ago - but warrants a new RC IMO. Ok, that's an issue. Also Rahul raised the issue about dependency jars held in the repository - and it looked to me like you were going to change the build to download these automatically, rather than including them in the distro: http://tinyurl.com/yby9hd We wanted to get out the release as fast as possible. This issue can be postponed and addressed later IMO. I also think given the long time between cutting the RC and voting this makes the case for tagging the repository - initially I wondered where this had been built from as it didn't match any current source - until I releaized it had been done so long ago. The long time itself is not an issue, nothing has changed on the source code since the latest RC except the headers. The commits I did recently don't fix the issue (not buildable with JDK 1.3 due to 1.4 compiled dependencies), but only show the issue at a different during a build. This itself does not warrant a new RC IMO, but as the headers do so, it will be included in that RC as well. Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
On 1/5/07, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Niall Pemberton niall.pemberton at gmail.com writes: Since RC3 was created (back in July 2006!) there is now the new Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy that needs to be complied with: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Henri fixed this in the trunk for transaction a few weeks ago - but warrants a new RC IMO. Ok, that's an issue. Also Rahul raised the issue about dependency jars held in the repository - and it looked to me like you were going to change the build to download these automatically, rather than including them in the distro: http://tinyurl.com/yby9hd We wanted to get out the release as fast as possible. This issue can be postponed and addressed later IMO. The ant build only seems to work for JDK 1.3 when the geronimo jars are overriden with the sun ones and doesn't work for me for JDK 1.4 (tests fail because it can't find junit). So it seems a waste of time having them in the repo. I can update the ant build to download the other jars (or allow them to be specified in a build.properties) if its important to have a working ant build for 1.3. I also think given the long time between cutting the RC and voting this makes the case for tagging the repository - initially I wondered where this had been built from as it didn't match any current source - until I releaized it had been done so long ago. The long time itself is not an issue, nothing has changed on the source code since the latest RC except the headers. The commits I did recently don't fix the issue (not buildable with JDK 1.3 due to 1.4 compiled dependencies), but only show the issue at a different during a build. This itself does not warrant a new RC IMO, but as the headers do so, it will be included in that RC as well. I'm wondering how the RC was created since neither the ant or maven builds seem to currently produce what RC3 contained. Maybe a combination of the two was used with some manual intervention? IMO its important for the release to be easily re-created and the maven1 build should be used since the ant build seems to have too many problems. If it helps I can tag and produce another RC (using the maven build). Niall Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi Oliver, Since RC3 was created (back in July 2006!) there is now the new Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy that needs to be complied with: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Henri fixed this in the trunk for transaction a few weeks ago - but warrants a new RC IMO. Also Rahul raised the issue about dependency jars held in the repository - and it looked to me like you were going to change the build to download these automatically, rather than including them in the distro: http://tinyurl.com/yby9hd I also think given the long time between cutting the RC and voting this makes the case for tagging the repository - initially I wondered where this had been built from as it didn't match any current source - until I releaized it had been done so long ago. Niall On 12/27/06, Oliver Zeigermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have worked our way through three release candidates now and the latest has been out there for quite some time without substantial shortcomings reported: http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Hi Oliver, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: We have worked our way through three release candidates now and the latest has been out there for quite some time without substantial shortcomings reported: http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ Do you also have a link for the 1.2 site ? - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
We have worked our way through three release candidates now and the latest has been out there for quite some time without substantial shortcomings reported: http://people.apache.org/~ozeigermann/tx-1.2rc3/ To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Cheers Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Transaction 1.2
Oliver Zeigermann oliver.zeigermann at gmail.com writes: To release 1.2 final based on that release candidate here is my +1 Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
