Re: Commons-collections events

2006-06-07 Thread Henri Yandell

On 6/6/06, Bryce L Nordgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

PS: I'd like to update my maven dependency for commons-collections to 3.2,
but it's not on ibiblio yet (released May16th).  When might this arrival be
celebrated?


The rsync between the ASF (and other places) and iBiblio is down since
Codehaus had problems. No idea on the eta for it come back
unfortunately. I've a hundred javadoc jars sitting and waiting :)

Hen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Commons-collections events

2006-06-07 Thread Stephen Colebourne
--- Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
  I'm in the process of stealing (possibly forking)
 the dormant project commons-events.
 
  I'd really rather keep it separate and refer to it
 by a dependency.
  Would there be any interest in reviving this
 project
 
 Yes.
Yes. This is a basically good idea for a commons
project, although the name could be better.

  is there any reason not to absorb commons-events
 back
  into commons-collections?
 
 Arguments for?  Against?

Commons-collections is too big. It was deliberately
broken out to make both parts managable.


This project did have quite an active life at first.
Where it floundered was that there were IIRC three
competing code implementations (not just designs). I
believe that all are currently in SVN. To revive this,
we would have to select one without excessive ego.

I also believe that Michael Heuer may have released
something related on java.net?

Stephen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Commons-collections events

2006-06-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Bryce L Nordgren wrote:

 I'm in the process of stealing (possibly forking) the dormant project
 commons-events.

 I'd really rather keep it separate and refer to it by a dependency.
 Would there be any interest in reviving this project

Yes.

 I hope to sweet talk someone here into taking commons-events back
 when I'm done with it.

Perhaps you and a few of your closest friends would like to contribute on an
on-going basis?

 is there any reason not to absorb commons-events back
 into commons-collections?

Arguments for?  Against?

--- Noel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Commons-collections events

2006-06-06 Thread Torsten Curdt

 I'm in the process of stealing (possibly forking) the dormant project
 commons-events.

 I'd really rather keep it separate and refer to it by a dependency.


Why fork? ...why not re-surrecting it in commons?

...just currious.

cheers
--
Torsten

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]