Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko

2007-04-20 Thread Simon Norberg

Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including 
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:


I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.

I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure 
now. And i really hope we can replace the non-free GPS software as soon 
as possible or atleast before the public release.


Regards
Simon Norberg




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko

2007-04-20 Thread Raphaël Jacquot

[and this was obviously meant to be sent to the list]

Simon Norberg wrote:

Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including 
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:


I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.

I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure 
now. And i really hope we can replace the non-free GPS software as soon 
as possible or atleast before the public release.


I'm still wondering *why* we need to use an AGPS device that's so dumb
that it needs the *host* to do most of the calculations, when we could
have used a SIRF-STAR III sensor, that does everything inside, just like
the GSM/GPRS module.

this sounds like this thing is the winmodem / winprinter of the GPS world


Regards
Simon Norberg



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko

2007-04-20 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller


Am 20.04.2007 um 08:48 schrieb Raphaël Jacquot:


I'm still wondering *why* we need to use an AGPS device that's so dumb
that it needs the *host* to do most of the calculations, when we could
have used a SIRF-STAR III sensor, that does everything inside, just  
like

the GSM/GPRS module.


I would suspect: size, matching interfaces, availability, cost of  
additional components?


If you look at the pictured of the PCB there isn't much room...

There is a technology trend called Software Defined Radio http:// 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_radio
which tries to get rid of as many components as possible and do  
everything by software inside a 45nm chip...


-- hns
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Release (WAS: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko)

2007-04-20 Thread Hans van der Merwe

On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:26 +0200, Simon Norberg wrote:
 Hello,
 I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including 
 what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:
 
 I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
 software for the GPS.
 
 I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure 
 now. And i really hope we can replace the non-free GPS software as soon 
 as possible or atleast before the public release.

On that note - Im an electronic engineer and is eagerly awaiting the
public release - or any release for that matter - I have a lot of DIY
plans for the device (maybe some work related).
So - any vague idea of a release date?




E-Mail disclaimer:
http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


SoftGPS, was: Re: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko

2007-04-20 Thread Attila Csipa
On Friday 20 April 2007 09:16, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
 I would suspect: size, matching interfaces, availability, cost of
 additional components?

When I worked on similar things, cost and updates were the two main reasons. 
Sizewise often there wasn't such a big difference, cost was very important. 
You can save much more by spreading cost of SW development over a large 
number of units, HW savings by large order discounts are much smaller. The 
other reason was you can update the firmware often, if you expect 
interoperability issues, standard changes, or simply improvements. Having 
separate flash chips or update methods is really a pain, a central software 
repository is much cleaner. In the case of GPS the improvement factor is 
actually a very plausible reason (or at least would be if we had info on the 
raw data) - you can always think up ways to increase precision with neat 
tricks if you have access to the raw data. Imagine something like 
the .RAW/.CRW files in digicams. They contain proprietary data, but have more 
information than your distilled jpeg file, so if you think up a way which 
extracts this information better, you will end up with a higher quality 
image. 

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread Florent THIERY

I'd like to be able to do most things without menus or buttons, just

learned interaction.

Sorry to remind this, but we have been thinking of such controls, with
simple mockups:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/UI_Improvements#Using_simple.2C_localized_warp_as_modifier_key

These controls are intended to be implemented for all finger-apps, and
may be suitable for image navigation.

Please feel free to add yours :)

Cheers

Florent

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko

2007-04-20 Thread Red Dragon

I have raised the question about this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] long
time ago. Similar issue to Wifi driver, but different decision.

However, I think we have to understand that building everything from
free/open source in the expected timeline is not that easy.

cheers,

--rd

On 4/20/07, Simon Norberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello,
I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:

I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
software for the GPS.

I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure
now. And i really hope we can replace the non-free GPS software as soon
as possible or atleast before the public release.

Regards
Simon Norberg




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Release (WAS: Richard Stallmans standpoint about openmoko)

2007-04-20 Thread Hans Cats

2007/4/20, Hans van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:26 +0200, Simon Norberg wrote:
 Hello,
 I mailed Richard Stallman a while ago regarding a few things including
 what he thought about openmoko and his answer was:

 I could endorse it if they get rid of the plan to use non-free
 software for the GPS.

 I don't think the answer surprise anyone, but atleast we know for sure
 now. And i really hope we can replace the non-free GPS software as soon
 as possible or atleast before the public release.

On that note - Im an electronic engineer and is eagerly awaiting the
public release - or any release for that matter - I have a lot of DIY
plans for the device (maybe some work related).
So - any vague idea of a release date?




E-Mail disclaimer:
http://www.sunspace.co.za/emaildisclaimer.htm

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



Liane write something like end of april, beginning of may somewhere at the
wiki, but I can't find it again.

I'm beginning to wonder if the phase1 and phase1+ (hardware refresh) is
being merged? IMHO I don't see the point of using $350 on a phase1 phone in
may and then $??? on a phase1+ phone in june if there is a significant
update. More information about the hardwarerevisions would be great.

Hans
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Fwd: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread Ryan Prior

-- Forwarded message --
From: Ryan Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 20, 2007 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: picture viewer
To: Florent THIERY [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If we're going to have a mokofingerwheel on the map interface, why not allow
finger wheel up to zoom out and finger wheel down to zoom in? This would be
a lot easier to implement than double-touch a la iphone, and I believe it
would be easier to use. Two fingers can be tough to manipulate, and it's
hard to get precision when you're focusing on moving two fingers at once. A
double-tap on the map to zoom in on that location would not be a bad feature
in addition to the zoom wheel interface, and since the wheel can be
toggled, it doesn't really take use of the wheel away from other
possibilities either.


--
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick
society.
 - Krishnamurti
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread Ortwin Regel

The problem I have with double tap zooming is that I'd like to have
smooth zooming. I also don't like drawing a box for zooming but rather
the picture reacting instantly to my motion. Not sure how well the
first gen hardware will handle this, though.

Ortwin

On 4/19/07, Steven Milburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sound pretty good, but I change a couple things from what you describe.  For
zooming and panning, don't do just the center tap thing.  (For one thing,
panning doesn't make sense until you're zoomed in).  I'd like to be able to
do most things without menus or buttons, just learned interaction.

To Zoom, double-tap an area, that should cause the picture to zoom and
center to where you tapped.  Once zoomed in, just drag your finger to pan
around.  Zoom mode would probably have a few levels, so double-tap again
zooms more.  In zoom more, there could be either an escape button somewhere,
or there could be a miniature display of the full pic, with a box to show
the viewable area, and tapping on that display restores the full view.

The reason I'm suggesting double tapping is so that you can still have
single taps for going to the next and previous picture on the left/top and
right/bottom, as well as pulling up a context menu for center taps.  That
context menu may still include zoom levels, but would have other options
also, like sending the pic to someone else, copying, deleting, etc.

--Steve


On 4/19/07, Ortwin Regel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dragging motions to the left/right could display the next/last
 picture. Maybe even better: Only require a single touch at the left or
 right side of the screen. Makes the screen last longer and is faster.
 Left and right would be two sides each because the phone could be held
 upwards and sideways, possibly depending on the individual picture.
 I like the idea that a single touch (in the middle of the screen, if
 the rim is used for picture switching) makes on screen controls
 appear. However, we should think a little more about placement and
 uses. I think they shouldn't necessarily be at the side of the screen.
 In fact there should be two prominent ones in the middle of the
 picture: One for starting a zooming motion, one for dragging the
 visible area around. You have to start at the buttom but can use the
 whole screen after that. The button symbols would have to be
 recognizable equally from both directions. Since they are in the
 middle of the screen they should probably be transparent to not appear
 as obtrusive. For rotating the standard corner wheel can be used,
 though it should be transparent, too. The lower right hand corner
 (this refers to holding the phone vertically) could then have the
 button for switching off the controls, the upper left hand corner the
 escape from slideshow button, both diagonally orientated as to be
 readable equally from both views.
 The message of the controls should be: This is a handheld device! It
 doesn't have to rotate pictures for you. Instead you can rotate the
 device and enjoy the benefit of using more screen space.
 The diagonal orientation might make sense for other applications and
 I'd love to see it used.

 If you need a mock up to understand this, tell me and I can make one.
 It will look crappy, though.

 Ortwin


 On 4/19/07, Frank Coenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hay,
 
  Browsing the wiki, I found that the picture viewer was to be a stylus
  application.
  Viewing photos is something you do together, making it very unpractical
to
  do with a stylus.
 
  I think it should be a combination of both stylus and finger.
  Managing and looking for a specific dir should be done with a stylus.
  Here the approach should be like with the RSS-reader. At the top a list
of
  photos in your current directory, at the bottom a preview.
 
  Then you should be able to switch to either slide show or full
screen-mode.
  Both are the same, with the exception of course that the slide show
switches
  the photo's automatically (and will rotate them so that the most amount
of
  screen space is used)
  In full screen or slide show mode, if you then press the screen, 5
controls
  will appear:
  - scroll-wheel - Either for zooming or switching between the photos
  - button to switch to either zoom or next-prev-picture mode
  - button to rotate the picture 90 dec clockwise
  - button to remove the on screen controls again. (so that you will only
see
  the picture, until you press the screen again)
  - a button to go back to stylus mode
 
  here are two mock ups, note that the left most button will change from
zoom
  - switch mode.
 
http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w29/baldr_OM/photo_viewer_zoom_mode.png
 
http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w29/baldr_OM/photo_viewer_slideshow_mode.png
 
  Kind regards,
 
  Frank
 
  ___
  OpenMoko community mailing list
  community@lists.openmoko.org
  http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
 
 

 

Re: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread kenneth marken

Ortwin Regel wrote:

The problem I have with double tap zooming is that I'd like to have
smooth zooming. I also don't like drawing a box for zooming but rather
the picture reacting instantly to my motion. Not sure how well the
first gen hardware will handle this, though.



true, that iphone zoom works because its a feedback loop. as in, the 
longer one moves the fingers apart, the more one zooms. you do not have 
to do much in the way of translation between what you want to do and 
what actions to take...


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread Steven Milburn

If  you want smooth scrolling, how about this mod to what I said earlier:

On the double-tap to center-and-zoom, hold the the second tap.  The pic
slowly (human speed) zooms and centers to where you're touching.  When
you've zoomed in enough, lift the finger.  This would be similar to the way
CTRL-wheel on Adobe pdf's zooms and centers.

--Steve
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: picture viewer

2007-04-20 Thread Ortwin Regel

Interesting... However, what about zooming out again? Also this would
take too much time while possibly being too fast for my grandparents.
Holding the second tap is a bad idea but dragging it around might be a
good one. All in all, how about this:

drag finger -- drag viewable area
tap, then tap again, hold and drag -- zoom in and out
tap sides -- change to next/last picture (can be changed to requiring
double tap in config)

What is missing? The gesture that brings up the on slideshow menu
where you can escape from the slideshow, rotate the picture, jump to
first/last with simple buttons. The only reasonable thing I can think
of is a double tap in the center of the screen. What to use the wheel
for in that menu? Scrolling through pictures quickly, of course!

Ortwin

On 4/20/07, Steven Milburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

If  you want smooth scrolling, how about this mod to what I said earlier:

On the double-tap to center-and-zoom, hold the the second tap.  The pic
slowly (human speed) zooms and centers to where you're touching.  When
you've zoomed in enough, lift the finger.  This would be similar to the way
CTRL-wheel on Adobe pdf's zooms and centers.

--Steve


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community