Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
On Monday 28 June 2010 05:50:54 undrwater wrote: This is big and good news! I expect there to be some problems moving to this version of the kernel, but it's good to see that it has finally arrived! In fact this is first SHR version that works good for me. Maybe i was just unlucky having crashes here and there after 5 minutes playing. But this version looks fast and stable. I haven't hit any problem yet. Nice work Regards Radek ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
On 28/06/2010 09:38, Radek Polak wrote: On Monday 28 June 2010 05:50:54 undrwater wrote: This is big and good news! I expect there to be some problems moving to this version of the kernel, but it's good to see that it has finally arrived! In fact this is first SHR version that works good for me. Maybe i was just unlucky having crashes here and there after 5 minutes playing. But this version looks fast and stable. I haven't hit any problem yet. Nice work Regards Radek __ after upgrade reboot, Bad CRC for me -Reflashing for me .(snif snif :-/) AstHrO ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:11:55AM +0200, Thomas HOCEDEZ wrote: On 28/06/2010 09:38, Radek Polak wrote: On Monday 28 June 2010 05:50:54 undrwater wrote: This is big and good news! I expect there to be some problems moving to this version of the kernel, but it's good to see that it has finally arrived! In fact this is first SHR version that works good for me. Maybe i was just unlucky having crashes here and there after 5 minutes playing. But this version looks fast and stable. I haven't hit any problem yet. Nice work Regards Radek __ after upgrade reboot, Bad CRC for me -Reflashing for me .(snif snif :-/) did you read this part? * The kernel is bigger than 2MB so if you're using u-boot, update your environment according to wiki entry [2]. [2]: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Kernel#.22Verifying_Checksum_..._Bad_Data_CRC.22_with_U-boot (snif snif :-/) -- Jansa 'JaMa' Martin jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
[cut] AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/glamo_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/glamo_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context) That one is from /var/log/Xorg.0.log fsousaged : Can't read-open /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0/0-0073/neo1973-resume.0/resume_reason: No such file or directory And that one is from fsousaged. Hi Vladimir, please report bugs to http://www.shr-project.org/trac/report -- Patryk LeadMan Benderz Linux Registered User #377521 () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Email secured by Check Point ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
On 28/06/2010 10:22, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:11:55AM +0200, Thomas HOCEDEZ wrote: On 28/06/2010 09:38, Radek Polak wrote: On Monday 28 June 2010 05:50:54 undrwater wrote: This is big and good news! I expect there to be some problems moving to this version of the kernel, but it's good to see that it has finally arrived! In fact this is first SHR version that works good for me. Maybe i was just unlucky having crashes here and there after 5 minutes playing. But this version looks fast and stable. I haven't hit any problem yet. Nice work Regards Radek __ after upgrade reboot, Bad CRC for me - Reflashing for me .(snif snif :-/) did you read this part? * The kernel is bigger than 2MB so if you're using u-boot, update your environment according to wiki entry [2]. [2]: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Kernel#.22Verifying_Checksum_..._Bad_Data_CRC.22_with_U-boot (snif snif :-/) Nop, I Didn't read, beacause I did a simple opkg upgrade... When I saw Kernel firmware 2.6.32 on the screen I said woops, might be strong upgrade ! Thanks, I'll do it. Also I saw mesa DRI installed ?! Isn't it strange ? Rgds ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Missing feature
Am 24.06.2010 21:39, schrieb Fox Mulder: Good news. I contacted Marc Trevisan and he was willing to update his script to the new dbus methods, even that he doesn't use shr anymore. i'm thankfull for his effort and his newest version is available at [1]. So i think i can try the script again at the weekend. :) Ciao, Rainer [1] http://dev.3v1n0.net/gitweb/shr-notifier.git I tested the script and it now works partly again. :) It reminds me of missed calls/sms when the phone is awake every x seconds. Only the automatic wakeup function doesn't work for me. But i think it is only a minor problem because the script uses atd for wakeup and ffalarms also uses atd and it works there. Ciao, Rainer ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: New SHR-unstable images with 2.6.32 kernel
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:58:18AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: After hopefully lucky incident we have finally switched to new kernel. It's based on 2.6.32.13 and has DRM/KMS enabled. * Distribution revision was changed in OE, this means that every package installed from shr-unstable feeds will be upgraded during next opkg upgrade (so be sure that you have enough time and space in /var partition). Consider flashing new image, it can be faster and safer in the end. If you only opkg upgraded and now update-alternatives always links /boot/uImage to old uImage-2.6.29-rc3 Configuring kernel. update-alternatives: Linking //boot/uImage to uImage-2.6.29-rc3 please run: cd /boot; update-alternatives --remove uImage uImage-2.6.29-rc3 opkg install -force-reinstall kernel -- Jansa 'JaMa' Martin jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: opkg.org virus?
It seems that the virus problem got fixed. Or at least my scanner doesn't complain anymore when i visit opkg.org. :) Am 18.06.2010 08:35, schrieb Thomas HOCEDEZ: I asked him a couple of time to get access to the sources to restyle the site. (no fluid CSS, fixed tempalte ...). Bu I got no answer or for the best just a I'll see when I have time... But I think he never foud time ... I think I can found back the little work I did for the site (originally I wanted it to be readable on the moko install apps from it). AstHrO Le 18/06/2010 01:05, Martix a écrit : Did you tried to contact opkg.org site owner? http://www.opkg.org/contact.html I think somebody from FSO/SHR or OpenEmbedded/Angstrom team should ask original site owner for domain transfer, if he already abandoned opkg.org. This domain could serve to our community again.[1] [1] http://lists.shr-project.org/pipermail/shr-devel/2010-June/002742.html Regards, Martix 2010/6/17 Fox Mulderquakem...@gmx.net: Seems that the owner of the website (who is it?) is no more actively maintaining the site. This is sad because opkg.org was a good starting point to search for different applications. But for a longer time it seems that there is nothing new at all. :( Ciao, Rainer Am 17.06.2010 19:26, schrieb Jakob: there has also been another thread about it last month see http://lists.openmoko.org/nabble.html#nabble-f1954 though not much happend On 6/17/10, Ed Kapiteine...@kapitein.org wrote: well, our company virus scanner is also complaining, so it seems a real virus: The page you've been trying to access was blocked. Reason: Virus Detected! The page or file you requested is infected with the following virus: Troj/JSRedir-BD. Kind regards, Ed On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:32 +0200, Fox Mulder wrote: Hi, since quite some time my virus scanner (avast) complains about a virus infection (JS:Illredir-AX[Tr]) when i try to surf to www.opkg.org. Can someone confirm this or is my virus scanner a bit mad? And if there is a virus then why didn't the owner of this site remove it? :) Ciao, Rainer ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: MC Navi 0.2.10 released
On 09.06.2010 14:25, Mike Crash wrote: I have released new version of MC Navi. It should be (more) stable now (hope) and have some improvements: Nice.. Looking forward to it.. :) This version needs new map, download at: Do you think it would be possible to have a Germany map there, too? I tried creating/converting a map the other day, but that was no good.. :P :( Cheers, -- Thomas -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ The meta-Turing test counts a thing as intelligent if it seeks to apply Turing tests to objects of its own creation. -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: MC Navi 0.2.10 released
Hi Mike, sounds cool... installed Debian package from your repository, and downloaded belgium map just for a try: $ mcnavi belgium-map-12022010.mcm Cannot open map strace shows: open(/usr/share/mcnavi/maps/map.mcm, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) and quick grepping confirms that path is compiled in: $ dpkg -L mcnavi | xargs grep map.mcm Binary file /usr/bin/mcnavi matches On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Mike Crash wrote: Hi all, I have released new version of MC Navi. It should be (more) stable now (hope) and have some improvements: - added support for orchards - draw cycle and tourist ways (for cycle and foot) - added GPS menu with satellites - draw the street names More info here: http://www.gps-routes.info/index.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=1 This version needs new map, download at: http://www.gps-routes.info/index.php?name=Downloadsd_op=viewdownloadcid=3 If marked with (old/uncompatible - do not use), do not download it, it is old version. I will regenerate it in some days. -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
cpu reclocking to 500Mhz, overclocking to 533Mhz, performance tests and bootloader images
Hi, list. This time i decided to try to look at performace from other side: check clocking, sdram timing and other things, so here is my report. I already announced it on IRC. Foreword: WARNING!!! Do it at your own risk nobody will be responsible in any case of problems, Only thing i can say: all configurations were at least tried here. Some were also tested. I will use something of 533/88/clk2 or 465/116, or finally 500/83/clk2 in case of any troubles. I'm not hw engineer. Foreword 2: I hope some hardware expert review my findings. --- Theory: 1. CPU Facts: In BOM, it is stated our CPU is stated as '500mhz 1.7v'. Unfortunately I have only manual for 400Mhz version, so i can't tell for sure which voltage range can be applied to it. Voltage: according to schematic, voltage is used only to feed CPU. So.. conclusion: 500mhz and 1.7 voltage is native for our cpu so this never will hurt it, but board were not designed for 1.7V. may be some hw expert may review this. 2.Memory. Facts: We have 2 sdram modules - 1 inside cpu and 1 outside. both have same timings. both are clk3 at up to 133Mhz, and clk2 at up to 83mhz. Idea: So, conclusion: at 100Mhz, memory not show all it's potential, as we have to run it on clk3 and (according tests) 88mhz/clk2-2-2 is same speed to 100mhz/clk3-3-3. Also it SDRAM itself should run up to 133Mhz without troubles. Bus: Memory is on same bus as: part of glamo, nand (internal), wifi. sdram (internal), nor flash, and may be something else so it's generally bad idea to increase it's voltage. If we need to rise memory voltage it will not be really good idea, and i in fact didn't checked all harware for compatibility, but here is what i checked: sdram in cpu - up to 1.95 ok sdram - up to 1.95 ok cpu - up to 1.95 ok glamo - up to 1.9 ok nand voltage on any pin relative to Vss - -0.5-2.45 unsure, but sounds ok ok. 3. USB usb have separate clock, so forget it. 4. overall frequency CPU freq may be to almost any value, but it is limited to rate 1:3:6 or 1:4:8 or 1:6:12. no 1:5. (ratings CPU/MEMORY/PERIPHERIAL). --- Practice: i saved different uboots which sets differents speed: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500 many of them are not working, all were tried here. once i even thought my fr i dead, but at the end i found that it is just my AUX desoldered. so i fixed AUX and continue tests bravely :) if you not planning to dive deep in this topic i consider you be interested in slightly overclocked: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7_1.8_CLK2 you need nothing to test it. in case of troubles it will be useful to try non-overclocked, in-spec version: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/u-boot.udfu_500_83_1.7_1.8_CLK2 for whoose who like a bit more speed, risk to hardware and work, assume your fr is fried before trying this, but this works here and is fastest config: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/u-boot.udfu_465_116_1.65_1.9 and in case of trouble a bit slower: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/u-boot.udfu_450_112_1.65_1.9 default u-boot is 400_100_1.5_1.8_CLK3. so, CPUCLOCK_MEMCLOCK_CPUVOLTAGE_MEMVOLTAGE. if something not mentioned in file name - it is default. as you see last 2 configs use modified memory voltage. to use it you need patch to the kernel. by default kernel will reset voltage to 1.8. patched kernel allow 1.8-1.9 range, see patch and end of mail. I tested all working configs to Xorg, on .34 kernel. decoded some videos on both u-boot.udfu_465_116_1.7_1.9_sdmax and u-boot.udfu_533_88_1.7_1.8_CLK2 --- u-boot setup help for whoose who not familiar with u-boot setup i provided www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/u-boot_env.in flash it with: dfu-util -D u-boot_env.in -a u-boot_env use power - wait 0.3s -hold aux for nand uboot menu. --- Power consumption: sorry, no tests :( may be someone? --- Performance testing: i tested several working configurations with lmbench: www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/lmbench.txt as you can see, 462/116 version seem best from kernel subsystem point of view. of course, pure computation will be better with 533/500Mhz. 550Mhz is excluded as it requires 1.75V CPU, and CLK2 version also 1.9V mem and were not 100% stable. for whoose who not familiar with u-boot: you may flash setting partition, use file u-boot_env and flash it with -a u-boot_env. press power and and 0.5 sec aux for NAND uboot menu. --- Patches uboot clk2:http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/CLK2.patch uboot frequency setting sample:http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/500_83_1.7.patch kernel patch to allow 1.9v on memory/other peritherials bus:http://www.bsdmn.com/openmoko/uboot500/kernel_memvoltage.patch Hope you'll have fun with faster fr :) Gennady. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: MC Navi 0.2.10 released
I don't know, Germany is huge, so I have not even tried to convert it. But it would be possible to convert smaller area. As I finish some functionality I need, the next step will be optimizing map conversion. My goal is to convert the whole Europe in one map if possible. Thomas Franck wrote: On 09.06.2010 14:25, Mike Crash wrote: I have released new version of MC Navi. It should be (more) stable now (hope) and have some improvements: Nice.. Looking forward to it.. :) This version needs new map, download at: Do you think it would be possible to have a Germany map there, too? I tried creating/converting a map the other day, but that was no good.. :P :( Cheers, -- Thomas -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ The meta-Turing test counts a thing as intelligent if it seeks to apply Turing tests to objects of its own creation. -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community -- View this message in context: http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/MC-Navi-0-2-10-released-tp5158145p5233726.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: MC Navi 0.2.10 released
You forget -m switch, run it as mcnavi -m belgium-map-12022010.mcm Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Hi Mike, sounds cool... installed Debian package from your repository, and downloaded belgium map just for a try: $ mcnavi belgium-map-12022010.mcm Cannot open map -- View this message in context: http://openmoko-public-mailinglists.1958.n2.nabble.com/MC-Navi-0-2-10-released-tp5158145p5233731.html Sent from the Openmoko Community mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
