Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:54, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: if you wish to not violate a patent.. you simply have to give up on implementing the algorithm - or fight his patent in court first. Very straight and plain... what would you do in my place? -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:57, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: i'd invent a new input method that doesn't violate the patent. take the principal and change it so its different enough not to violate. then implement that. They've just released version 1.1 for free (1.0 was 1.50 price). Could this mean something? :) -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual paper, then you have something beginning to be believable. What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof. Perlin Quickwriting page: http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/ We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor where to find it :-( -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:14, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: you need documents from him - papers he's submitted, lectures given, anything else that proves he had the idea AND when it actually happened (before the filing of the patent). the patent filing proves that 8pen's invention happened at least when they filed it - you have to prove that their invention came AFTEr another and is the same ie - prior art. you have to provide 1. it is actually prior, and 2. that it is the same thing. for that you will need all the documentation and proof you can get. an that means getting perlin's help. if he isn't interested in helping.. you're pretty much SOL as you need to convince the patent office, not your fellow hackers. :) I sent 2 e-mails to Perlin, still no reply from him. This is unfortunate... :S i'll try to get all the documents I can get by my own, but i guess that without Perlin's help i won't get much far... -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:52, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: it's his idea. it's his job to defend it. he is the one who can. unless.. he's involved in 8pen as a founder/investor... then you're pushing poo uphill :) Contacting him by phone is not something I can do, i don't speak english very well... Anyway about the licensing e-mail address in the site, I already tried that, it's not active... :S -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Tuesday 23 November 2010, Daniele Ricci wrote: Hello Carsten, thanks for your reply. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:02, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: themselves. they are forgeable. if you have an overwhelming set of such data from multiple sources and witness statements with signatures on actual paper, then you have something beginning to be believable. What kind of proof do I exactly need? I mean, all I have is prof. Perlin Quickwriting page: http://www.mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/ We also have some implementations of that, such as the Pocket PC one and the Linux one (QWO), but i don't know what else I may need nor where to find it :-( Ideally you want something in print with a verifiable publication date. A printed copy of UIST '98 - Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology [1] might be available through university libraries if you can't get it direct from ACM. I don't know whether the 'Wired' article [2] made it into the print edition, but that's another one to check. [1] http://www.acm.org/uist/archive/html/proceedings/1998.html [2] http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1999/04/19411 ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan Petty etie...@gmail.com wrote: This is not true. A patent (6031525) was already filed for Quickwriting in 1999/2000: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html So if this is actually a duplicate patent, all Ken Perlin has to do is point out his patent to the patent office to get the 8pen one invalidated. I guess he won't. Can we do something about this? The patent office will realize it on its own, right? -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
--- On Tue, 11/23/10, Daniele Ricci daniele.ath...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan Petty etie...@gmail.com wrote: A patent (6031525) was already filed for Quickwriting in 1999/2000: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html The patent office will realize it on its own, right? There's sarcasm in that question, isn't there? Usually the patent office doesn't know or (bother to?) find out. The applicant for a duplicate patent also does not want to know or find out, because in that case they can be hold for triple damages in case of a complaint from the original patent holder. For similar reasons there is little incentive for the original inventor to raise a flag before the other becomes successful: it takes trouble with probably little returns. It is worth much more in damages to complain after the (so called) copycat became successful. Good luck with this quest! Boudewijn ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 23:53, Bryan Petty etie...@gmail.com wrote: If your concern if that you have licensed Ken Perlin's patent, you're safe from any lawsuits from 8pen. Actually my concern is about the implementation of the input method. I've already pushed to my git repository a working GLP'd implementation, but without data files (thus just a blank window). I'm waiting for this issue to be solved to be able to push the rest as soon as possible. For now I am the only one in the world to use it outside Android. Or i could simply push those files and forget about patents. I mean, it's just an open source implementation, who cares? :) -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it wrote: Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact them? DaveMDS I contacted the 8pen company: just one reply and that's it. They're not responding any more. Probably they think they're in a bad position. I also sent a mail to prof. Perlin, the quickwriting creator, no reply. What about FSF? -- Daniele ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: [e-users] Someone is trying to patent Quickwriting
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:24 +0100, Daniele Ricci wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 15:41, Dave Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it wrote: Yeah , ABSOLUTELY!! What can we do to stop this patent? 8pen is EXACTLY the same as quikwriting. what can we do? are you involved in the quikwriting project? did you contact them? DaveMDS I contacted the 8pen company: just one reply and that's it. They're not responding any more. Probably they think they're in a bad position. I also sent a mail to prof. Perlin, the quickwriting creator, no reply. What about FSF? What about SFLC? Denis. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
