Re: [Community-Discuss] Message of Condolences to the family and friends of Mr. Serge Kabwika Ilunga

[Abibu Ntahigiye]

Innallilaah wa innallilaah rajiun.

Serge umetangulia, nasi tutafuata.
Pumzika kwa amani.

Amin.

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, 20:24 Mary Uduma via Community-Discuss, <
community-discuss@afrinic.net> wrote:

> My sincere condolences to the Afrinic family and his immediate family. RIP
> Serge.
> Mary Uduma
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> 
>
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 20:09, Mark Elkins
>  wrote:
> ___
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
> ___
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
___
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

[Community-Discuss] Board update on Governance Committee report

[Abibu Ntahigiye]

Dear Afrinic Community,


The Board in March 2018, as per resolution 201803.391, tasked the
Governance Committee (GC) to convene an investigation on allegations made
by a staff member. The GC was requested to define the Terms of Reference
(TORs) for an independent investigation, and to appoint an investigation
committee.  The Board requested the findings to be reported by 30 April
2018.

The GC notified the community that they would deliver the report by 4 May
2018, and has submitted the report to the Board on 2 May 2018. The Board
acknowledged receipt of the report. The Board is going to thoroughly
consider the report and recommendations thereof, and will share with the
community applicable actions and steps that will be taken in due course.

The Board has also been advised that in considering the report they need to
be cognizant of issues of confidentiality and data protection.

With regards to allegations made against certain Board members, the Board
can announce the following outcomes as derived from  the report:



   -

   That there was a violation of the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) and
section 153 of the Companies Act 2001, by Mr Sunday Folayan.



   -

   That there is no evidence whatsoever against Haitham El Nakhal of having
   breached the terms of the NDA and/or section 153 of the Companies Act 2001.



   -

   That the Investigation Committee (IC) is satisfied that there was no
   evidence of harassment, bullying or intimidation by Board members.


The Board will re-evaluate the interim Chair and Vice Chair appointments
that were made in resolution 201803.398.

With regards to allegations made against certain members of staff, the
Board observed from the IC report  that there may have been inappropriate
behaviour on the part of certain staff members.


The findings and recommendations related to staff matters will be addressed
through necessary processes.

We appeal to the community to allow the Board time to consider the report
carefully, and provide feedback to the community no later than 31 July 2018
on the next steps and how the recommendations will be implemented.


Kind regards



Abibu R. Ntahigiye

Chair, Afrinic Board.
___
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

[Abibu Ntahigiye]

+1 to Frank.
The PRIMARY value to Associate members should be reflected in the association 
with Afrinic  and not Voting.
The PRIMARY value to resource members are the resources from Afrinic.

rgds
-
Eng. Abibu R. Ntahigiye.

On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Frank Habicht wrote:

> Hi Douglas,
> 
> valid points.
> One small "value addition" is of course the "priceless" association with
> AfriNIC. I trust that for "some, but only a few" entities this could be
> enough value.
> 
> But beyond that I think the question is: "how much more value does
> AfriNIC want to give and how many more associate members do we wish to get?"
> 
> We probably have diverse answers to this. I personally prefer if we can
> find enough seats at the members' meeting ;-)
> 
> About dropping the category altogether: I don't object. But maybe there
> are a number of entities that would want to become associate members,
> just because they like that, and without voting rights...???
> (I don't know)
> 
> Regards,
> Frank
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/19/2016 11:05 AM, Douglas Onyango wrote:
>> Hi Frank, et al,
>> On 19 September 2016 at 06:49, Frank Habicht  wrote:
>>> I agree, with all of the above. Well said.
>>> Considering that someone could control many legal entities, and these
>>> could all become associate members, that could change voting outcomes
>>> very much into that someone's favour.
>> 
>> My original intent, which I thought I had expressed clearly in
>> previous discussions, is a more fundamental issue with the Associate
>> Membership category: lack of value addition. This issue is a parent
>> issue to the proposed clarifying text. It must be addressed first to
>> pave way for, and inform any clarifying text on Associate Membership
>> in the bylaws.
>> 
>> Now just to be clear, I am not advocating for voting rights per se.
>> What I am advocating for is value addition for every membership
>> category. The idea of a membership category that collects fees but
>> offers no value in return just doesn't sit well with me.
>> 
>> My proposal is that we find substantial value for this category. If we
>> can't, I believe the membership category makes no sense and should
>> effectively be dropped all together.
>> 
>> I hope this provides more clarity on my views.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> ___
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>> 
> 
> ___
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

___
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss