Re: [computer-go] Time controls for KGS tournament

2009-06-18 Thread Nick Wedd
In message 49ea696b-bc3e-4cb5-bb20-1b38d09cb...@lclark.edu, Peter 
Drake dr...@lclark.edu writes

The Canadian overtime is new to me.

1) Can a program that simply never runs out of basic time safely ignore 
this?


I believe so.

2) Is there something special that has to go in the config file? I 
currently have this line:


rules.time=18:00


My impression is that the rules.time statement in your config file has 
no effect; its purpose is to specify the default time settings for 
custom games, and it isn't going to be playing any while it is set to

mode=tournament.

I might be wrong about this. To be on the safe side, you could set
rules.time=18:00+25/00:20

Nick
--
Nick Weddn...@maproom.co.uk
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


[computer-go] Paper: Beta Distribution

2009-06-18 Thread Peter Drake

An improvement on the UCB/UCT formula:

Stogin, J., Chen, Y.-P., Drake, P., and Pellegrino, S. (2009) “The  
Beta Distribution in the UCB Algorithm Applied to Monte-Carlo Go”. In  
Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial  
Intelligence, CSREA Press.


http://webdisk.lclark.edu/drake/publications/BetaDistribution.pdf

Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/



___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Paper: Beta Distribution

2009-06-18 Thread Michael Williams
Section 3.2 describes a pair of tests that took about 4.2 minutes each (if my calculations are correct).  Why not play more games and have each game contain 
more simulations?  Writing the code and the paper is the hard part, waiting for a computer to run your code is easy.


Peter Drake wrote:

An improvement on the UCB/UCT formula:

Stogin, J., Chen, Y.-P., Drake, P., and Pellegrino, S. (2009) “The Beta 
Distribution in the UCB Algorithm Applied to Monte-Carlo Go”. In 
Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial 
Intelligence, CSREA Press.


http://webdisk.lclark.edu/drake/publications/BetaDistribution.pdf

Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/



___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/



___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] Paper: Beta Distribution

2009-06-18 Thread Álvaro Begué
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Michael
Williamsmichaelwilliam...@gmail.com wrote:
 Section 3.2 describes a pair of tests that took about 4.2 minutes each (if
 my calculations are correct).  Why not play more games and have each game
 contain more simulations?  Writing the code and the paper is the hard part,
 waiting for a computer to run your code is easy.

I guess there is a mistake in that paragraph, since you can't run a
full game in .25 seconds. That's probably the time per move, so the
whole test might have taken 10 or 20 hours.


 Peter Drake wrote:

 An improvement on the UCB/UCT formula:

 Stogin, J., Chen, Y.-P., Drake, P., and Pellegrino, S. (2009) “The Beta
 Distribution in the UCB Algorithm Applied to Monte-Carlo Go”. In Proceedings
 of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, CSREA
 Press.

 http://webdisk.lclark.edu/drake/publications/BetaDistribution.pdf

 Peter Drake
 http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/



 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/