Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:12 AM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
I know it's not a thing that liberals want to believe, but it costs  
real

money to deploy that technology.  Go ahead and vote for it, I know
how to do it.  But it is going to cost real money to implement on a
wide scale.


Last time I checked Google was not the government. Are you suggesting  
that those famous black helicopters are going to fan out from  
Washington to deliver gigabit to the people? Or are you just preparing  
an excuse in case Google delivers on its promise?


If it is liberal to notice that corporate managers are holding the  
nation hostage while paying themselves huge salaries and bonuses then  
I'm happy to be a liberal. This corporate attitude is not unlike that  
of the Greek Communist labor unions who are currently striking to warn  
their government that they expect to be paid top dollar even as the  
Greek nation collapses under the financial burden. Should I call you a  
Communist apparatchik?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread John DeCarlo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net wrote:

 You want private telecom to deliver universal broadband in the US,
 you are going to have to pay for it.


My main complaint in this area is that there seems to be little money spent
to refresh technology.

The  hardest part about Gigabit to the home is really getting fiber to the
home.

For Verizon to complain about how hard it will be to update their
infrastructure to handle the increased traffic is a big load of cr*p.  There
is no reason for telecoms not to have kept up with technology at fairly low
costs over time.

We saw how the telecoms were complaining how much it costs to provide
consumers with *the advertised bandwidth*  (we thought they would only use
1% of it, so we could clearly pretend to offer a lot, sniff!).

As so many have mentioned, if they put some of the profit to keep the
infrastructure upgraded as technology improved, they would have higher
profit today.  But the executives who depend on stock price would have seen
a tiny decrease in their compensation, maybe, so it didn't get done.

Sad commentary.

So now it is Boo hoo, we don't have multi-terabit optical switches
anywhere, and it would cost us money to upgrade all at once just for
consumers to get more bandwidth.  Boo hoo, give us more money.

-- 
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 11:29 AM, John DeCarlo wrote:

So now it is Boo hoo, we don't have multi-terabit optical switches
anywhere, and it would cost us money to upgrade all at once just for
consumers to get more bandwidth.  Boo hoo, give us more money.


Interesting commentary at 
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/technologylive/post/2010/02/googles-fiber-network-experiment-could-be-disruptive-/1
Some of the big telecoms may feel threatened by Google's attempts to  
control key parts of the Internet, says Day. Others may feel Google  
could help validate the hundreds of billions of dollars poured into  
installing fiber trunk lines. If there is a new generation of  
compelling applications that come out of this, he says, it  could  
stimulate business for everyone.


Several commentators have also noted that there is still a huge amount  
of dark fiber left over from the bursting of the Internet bubble a  
decade ago. Google could pick this up for a song and bypass  
recalcitrant incumbent carriers.


Currently the telecoms are trying to hold the rest of the economy  
hostage.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
Gee, you can't plan ahead *four hours*

BTW, what is the resolution and time duration of this four-hour download?  
760p?  two hours?

Who is your ISP?

On Cox Cable in Annandale, VA I get 20 mbs if the server can provide it, i.e., 
on occasional downloads.

Fred Holmes

At 11:40 PM 2/10/2010, t.piwowar wrote:
Today, suffering from cabin fever, I ordered up a video on demand from  
Amazon. It took close to 4 hours to trickle down the wires. At such a  
data rate I'm not likely to give the service much business. Google  
claims their network would have delivered this video in 5 minutes.  
That would make VOD quite appealing.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
If you took all of the corporate bonuses and threw them in a pot, it would be 
minuscule in comparison with the deficits governments are running.

While I have a problem when corporate managers get bonuses from failing 
companies, I have no problem with bonuses from successful companies.  We do a 
better job of running industry in this country than anywhere else.  At scale.  
A big factor is corporate management reward systems.

The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.

Fred Holmes

At 10:47 AM 2/11/2010, tjpa wrote:
If it is liberal to notice that corporate managers are holding the  
nation hostage while paying themselves huge salaries and bonuses then  
I'm happy to be a liberal. This corporate attitude is not unlike that  
of the Greek Communist labor unions who are currently striking to warn  
their government that they expect to be paid top dollar even as the  
Greek nation collapses under the financial burden. Should I call you a  
Communist apparatchik?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Fred Holmes f...@his.com wrote:

 The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.

 Or, perhaps just more equally situated and hopefully happy, referred
to as Communism in some circles.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
And the NeoCons spread BS and fear-mongering to keep us all ignorant and
afraid of the liberals.

Thank you, 
Mark Snyder 
-Original Message-
If you took all of the corporate bonuses and threw them in a pot, it
would be minuscule in comparison with the deficits governments are
running.

While I have a problem when corporate managers get bonuses from failing
companies, I have no problem with bonuses from successful companies.  We
do a better job of running industry in this country than anywhere else.
At scale.  A big factor is corporate management reward systems.

The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:

Gee, you can't plan ahead *four hours*


NO!

When you click on a web link are you oaky with the page appearing 4  
hours later?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
If you took all of the corporate bonuses and threw them in a pot, it  
would be minuscule in comparison with the deficits governments are  
running.


Magicians call this technique misdirection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misdirection_(magic)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.


Like this...
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/02/11/france.quality.life/?hpt=T2


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:42 PM, tjpa t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 Like this...
 http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/02/11/france.quality.life/?hpt=T2

  It often surprises me that the Internet does not really seem to have
done all that much to broaden how well a lot of people in the United
States understand and view the rest of the world and how our nation
fits into the mix.  So much information is available, yet so many of
the same and tired old myths and misperceptions abound.

  We are not the top dog in many areas that are commonly used to
determine quality of life, yet so many in the United States continue
to maintain that we are.  Yet, these same people, a lot of them in
influential positions and claiming to be experts, are quite computer
literate and routinely ply the ether of the Internet.  They must have
very powerful filtering algorithms at work in their computers that
prevent them from discovering what so many others can easily find and
plainly see.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 3:38 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:

We are not the top dog in many areas that are commonly used to
determine quality of life, yet so many in the United States continue
to maintain that we are.


Well the robber barons don't care. They are sitting in their mansions  
counting the loot they stole from widows and orphans.


Their supporters, who vote against their own interests, are so deeply  
brainwashed that they are oblivious to facts. If you try to clue them  
in they attack you with blind range. There is really nothing to do  
about it. They will never wise up.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
I don't give much credence to picks by judges. The judges generally give 
different weighting factors to the quality of life attributes.  What's the 
relative emigration / immigration between the U.S. and France?

Fred Holmes

At 02:42 PM 2/11/2010, tjpa wrote:
The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.

Like this...
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/02/11/france.quality.life/?hpt=T2


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread b_s-wilk

It is not unprecedented. It exists in Japan, Korea, and other places  I'm not 
going to look up.


I'm not going to cite numbers on how small physically Japan and Korea
are.  Compared to the US. 


Finland is also building a national network. It has lots of empty spaces 
and more weather challenges for installers than in the US--including 
this week's eastern US blizzards.


It could cost about the same or less per household in the US as in 
Finland if there are incentives to create a viable network. Google 
competition could help a lot with that. Maybe there could be an 
affordable gigabit network in the US, but not likely for a long time. 
The telecoms have been collecting fees for new networks.


Perhaps the new networks should be owned by the public, as it is where 
it works, instead of waiting and waiting and waiting for private 
companies to expand the networks, often with assistance through public 
grants and tax breaks. Once the networks are created with public money, 
they could be maintained by private companies for the benefit of the 
public--as utilities.


Private networks are welcomed to compete, however need to be prohibited 
from suing municipalities that plan to build their own networks for 
restraint of trade where the private companies refused to serve, as 
happened in Lafayette, Louisiana, in Ohio, Minnesota, North Carolina, 
and across the country; ex., http://is.gd/8bxiY.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
I don't know how to evaluate it, but it's often been said that the quality of 
life statistics are apples and oranges among different countries.  The classic 
example is that most countries simply let preemies die, they don't try to save 
them.  Since they die at birth, the are _not_ recorded as an infant mortality 
statistic.  The U.S.'s infant mortality statistics are high because we do try 
to save preemies, but don't always succeed.  Dunno if this is true, but I'll 
bet there are a lot of things like this.  And, I'll bet most government cook 
these kinds of statistics. 

Fred Holmes

At 03:38 PM 2/11/2010, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:

  It often surprises me that the Internet does not really seem to have
done all that much to broaden how well a lot of people in the United
States understand and view the rest of the world and how our nation
fits into the mix.  So much information is available, yet so many of
the same and tired old myths and misperceptions abound.

  We are not the top dog in many areas that are commonly used to
determine quality of life, yet so many in the United States continue
to maintain that we are.  Yet, these same people, a lot of them in
influential positions and claiming to be experts, are quite computer
literate and routinely ply the ether of the Internet.  They must have
very powerful filtering algorithms at work in their computers that
prevent them from discovering what so many others can easily find and
plainly see.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:51 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:

 Perhaps the new networks should be owned by the public, as it is where it
 works, instead of waiting and waiting and waiting for private companies to
 expand the networks, often with assistance through public grants and tax
 breaks. Once the networks are created with public money, they could be
 maintained by private companies for the benefit of the public--as utilities.

  We all know about how far a suggestion such as this will go given
the current political climate in the United States.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread mike
I'm happy to have the republicans own their deficits, how long till both
sides realize there is a third invisible party from both sides driving this
up and up and now its just Obama at the helm now.

On Feb 11, 2010 3:26 PM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:

  The liberals just want to make everyone equally miserable.  

   Or, perhaps just more equally situated and hopefully happy, referred 
 to as Communism in some ci...


The communist label would be wrong, however. Socialism, as in Scandinavia,
is a better description for liberal societies where people are happy with
their gummints. The Republican deficits he complains about will go away when
we can get the corporations out of our government. Fast networks for people
will make businesses more profitable too.

* **
 List info, subscrip...


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread tjpa

On Feb 11, 2010, at 4:51 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
Finland is also building a national network. It has lots of empty  
spaces and more weather challenges for installers than in the US-- 
including this week's eastern US blizzards.


It should be considered a strategic resource, much like the National  
Defense Highway System. Considering the likelihood of cyberattack it  
probably needs more protection than our roadways.


Tell me how is the internet substantially different from the highway  
net?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
At 05:22 PM 2/11/2010, tjpa wrote:
viz. previous comment on brainwashing. Why did you not bring up death  
panels? That's the surest way to keep costs down.

The death panel is a Democratic Party concept.  Only the name came from the 
Republicans.  The Democrats had the concept buried in the Health Care bill in 
very obscure language, but they didn't succeed in hiding it from the public.

The best way to keep costs down is to have the lifestyle police prevent 
everyone from doing anything at all risky, including eating too much and eating 
the wrong foods.  Prohibit all red meat, all starches, . . .

Fred Holmes 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Vicky Staubly

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Fred Holmes wrote:
The death panel is a Democratic Party concept.  Only the name came from 
the Republicans.  The Democrats had the concept buried in the Health 
Care bill in very obscure language, but they didn't succeed in hiding it 
from the public.


Wow! Does _everyone_ wear those tinfoil hats on your planet?

--
Vicky Staubly   http://www.steeds.com/vicky/vi...@steeds.com


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread John DeCarlo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Fred Holmes f...@his.com wrote:

 At 05:22 PM 2/11/2010, tjpa wrote:
 viz. previous comment on brainwashing. Why did you not bring up death
 panels? That's the surest way to keep costs down.

 The death panel is a Democratic Party concept.  Only the name came from the
 Republicans.  The Democrats had the concept buried in the Health Care bill
 in very obscure language, but they didn't succeed in hiding it from the
 public.


Man, I almost snorted my drink through my nose.

Either you have your tongue planted firmly in cheek, or you have had some
sort of brain hemorrhage.

You used to occasionally try to keep close to reality.

-- 
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread b_s-wilk

Perhaps the new networks should be owned by the public, as it is where it
works, instead of waiting and waiting and waiting for private companies to
expand the networks, often with assistance through public grants and tax
breaks. Once the networks are created with public money, they could be
maintained by private companies for the benefit of the public--as utilities.


  We all know about how far a suggestion such as this will go given
the current political climate in the United States.

  Steve


Too bad the evil US DoD invented ARPANET with OUR valuable tax dollars, 
and spent OUR money for so many years on a silly Defense project, then 
allowed that Brit Tim Berners-Lee at CERN [that evil place where they're 
looking for the God particle] to GIVE AWAY his WWW code for FREE--and 
have the nerve to start the W3C to make us follow their standards, not 
ours.


Should have been corporate. Then we'd have nothing...or maybe the Swiss 
would own the Internet. That could be interesting [having worked for a 
Swiss company]. That might work better that it does now. I love/hate the 
Swiss, but they're never boring.


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread Fred Holmes
At 06:48 PM 2/11/2010, John DeCarlo wrote:
You used to occasionally try to keep close to reality.

I'm getting to old to worry about that any more.

Fred Holmes 


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-11 Thread b_s-wilk

Steve -

You can't taste the food on the Internet. You can't appreciate the 
special French love of beauty and nature on the Internet. You can't feel 
the excitement of colors and scents at the weekly outdoor markets on the 
Internet. Most of all you can't appreciate the wonderful French sense of 
humor on the Internet. Doesn't matter if you don't speak French or 
whatever language is spoken in the country you're visiting, as long as 
you learn the basics--hello, goodbye, please, thank you, and a few more 
phrases--and use them politely, you'll be welcome almost anywhere in the 
world. Lots of people will gladly practice speaking English with you. 
And if not, you can have an amazing conversation by pointing to pictures 
on you cell phone or notebook, and haggle effectively with a calculator.


But you have to go, as a traveler instead a tourist, not on a tour, 
without a group, and meet lots of people [even the charming gendarmes 
who were taking classes at our hotel near Perpignan]. After all, that's 
the best reason to travel--people [and shopping]. And you can keep in 
touch with friends and family using their very fast Internet and 
ubiquitous cellular networks while you're away from home. Most 
important, never let a lack of money keep you from traveling. Go! Now! 
I hear the weather in the Canary Islands is delightful this time of 
year--or maybe Brazil, Uruguay or Chile.


Did I mention the food? All that delicious unprocessed non-GMO food?

Betty



 Like this...
 http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/02/11/france.quality.life/?hpt=T2


  It often surprises me that the Internet does not really seem to have
done all that much to broaden how well a lot of people in the United
States understand and view the rest of the world and how our nation
fits into the mix.  So much information is available, yet so many of
the same and tired old myths and misperceptions abound.

  We are not the top dog in many areas that are commonly used to
determine quality of life, yet so many in the United States continue
to maintain that we are.  Yet, these same people, a lot of them in
influential positions and claiming to be experts, are quite computer
literate and routinely ply the ether of the Internet.  They must have
very powerful filtering algorithms at work in their computers that
prevent them from discovering what so many others can easily find and
plainly see.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread t.piwowar
I guess the hope is that this will get incumbent providers off their  
rears.


http://www.pcworld.com/article/189066/googles_ultrafast_broadband_questions_and_answers.html

Google, you see, has just announced plans to build a series of  
uberfast broadband networks in cities across America. The Google  
broadband service would bring speeds up to a hundred times faster than  
what we currently use, the crew from Mountain View says, and it'd all  
be delivered directly to our homes.





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

We have a new provider coming to town who promises speeds of 13mps.

Stewart


At 05:38 PM 2/10/2010, you wrote:

I guess the hope is that this will get incumbent providers off their
rears.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/189066/googles_ultrafast_broadband_questions_and_answers.html

Google, you see, has just announced plans to build a series of
uberfast broadband networks in cities across America. The Google
broadband service would bring speeds up to a hundred times faster than
what we currently use, the crew from Mountain View says, and it'd all
be delivered directly to our homes.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric S. Sande
I guess the hope is that this will get incumbent providers off their  
rears.


If you pay for it I will build it.  I can all ready do what they are
describing, and do.  For the paying customers.

I'm disinclined to bankrupt myself under any circumstances.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Only if you have the infrastructure.

The local phone provider has told me he cannot get my DSL over 4 mps 
due to the trunk line being the size it is.


Present local cable can get it to 10mps.  New cable provider is 
telling me they can do 13mps.


That means either the phone company has to rebuild their system 
(which I doubt) or they will be a bit player in town.


Stewart


At 06:34 PM 2/10/2010, you wrote:
If you pay for it I will build it.  I can all ready do what they are

describing, and do.  For the paying customers.

I'm disinclined to bankrupt myself under any circumstances.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric S. Sande

Only if you have the infrastructure.


Actually my model is to build it on demand, in the gigabit
arena.  In other words build to order.  I can't do it any other
way.  It's not inexpensive.

FiOs alone is a hugh investment.  But we feel it's worthwhile in
high density areas.

If you want gigabit speeds elsewhere, you'll pay the construction
costs.  Yes I can do it.  But I can't afford to do it on an affordable
basis to EVERYWHERE.

If Google can afford the investment then they'd be well advised to
partner with my engineering and construction people.  They are
the experts.

I agree that the infrastructure has to be built.  But what Google is
saying is like saying that interstate highways or railroads are 
desirable without actually consulting people whose business it is

to build them.

This kind of action costs money.  Big, serious money.

Maybe Google has it.  I don't know.  But right now I don't.

I AM rebuilding my system.  But the scale they propose is 
unprecedented.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Surprisingly there are FIOS cable running in some very rural areas.

When I lived in WI Williams (now just a Gas company) laid a FIOS 
cable for telephone service from one end of WI to the other (E-W) 
along a rural Highway as they got a good price on the right of way.


Imagine an Internet Provider who bought access, and taped into that 
line to offer service?


The new cable provider who has come into town has laid fiber from 
their cable heads to town to provide service.


They are putting a lot of money into the system in hopes of striking 
it big.  Of course they probably will.  I already told you about our 
phone service, but our main cable provider is Charter and they are 
not putting any money into the local cable system.  We have no DVR, 
VOIP, HD or any extras except for movie channels.


I expect the new provider to offer all this (They already offered it 
to my church, but we are under contract right now) at an attractive price.


Stewart



At 07:23 PM 2/10/2010, you wrote:

Only if you have the infrastructure.


Actually my model is to build it on demand, in the gigabit
arena.  In other words build to order.  I can't do it any other
way.  It's not inexpensive.

FiOs alone is a hugh investment.  But we feel it's worthwhile in
high density areas.

If you want gigabit speeds elsewhere, you'll pay the construction
costs.  Yes I can do it.  But I can't afford to do it on an affordable
basis to EVERYWHERE.

If Google can afford the investment then they'd be well advised to
partner with my engineering and construction people.  They are
the experts.

I agree that the infrastructure has to be built.  But what Google is
saying is like saying that interstate highways or railroads are 
desirable without actually consulting people whose business it is

to build them.

This kind of action costs money.  Big, serious money.

Maybe Google has it.  I don't know.  But right now I don't.

I AM rebuilding my system.  But the scale they propose is unprecedented.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric S. Sande
Imagine an Internet Provider who bought access, and taped into that line to 
offer service?


That opens up a can o' worms.  The FCC says I HAVE to open the
copper network, which I built BTW, to alternative providers.

Part of the motivation to build a separate data network not subject to
those regs.  What's the Google take on that?

I mean, if I build and maintain the network should I not own it?

Oh yes, if Google builds a network they should own it.  The cable
providers do, with theirs.

Whatever the final decision, the stakes remain:  Who owns the highway?

The Feds can say that the people own the highway, but that isn't an
actual fact with things that people built, like the railroads and the
cable network.  Those are privately owned.

The copper telephone network was legislated into public ownership.

Too bad, it was very effective and still is as a utility.  But I have no
motivation to maintain it in the absence of profit.  Only regulation keeps
it going.

If I build a new thing, a new highway if you will, what guarantees do I
have that IT isn't going to be regulated into another commodity?

None whatsoever.  Google wants bandwidth.  They'd like to do it as
expeditiously as possible.  And they'd like my engineers to build it for
them at cut rate prices under government sanction.

I'd tend to resist that business model.  Only because I have 
responsibilities

to MY stockholders.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Notice that I said bought access.

They are building highways now with private contractors.  Toll roads.

Stewart






That opens up a can o' worms.  The FCC says I HAVE to open the
copper network, which I built BTW, to alternative providers.

Part of the motivation to build a separate data network not subject to
those regs.  What's the Google take on that?

I mean, if I build and maintain the network should I not own it?

Oh yes, if Google builds a network they should own it.  The cable
providers do, with theirs.

Whatever the final decision, the stakes remain:  Who owns the highway?

The Feds can say that the people own the highway, but that isn't an
actual fact with things that people built, like the railroads and the
cable network.  Those are privately owned.

The copper telephone network was legislated into public ownership.

Too bad, it was very effective and still is as a utility.  But I have no
motivation to maintain it in the absence of profit.  Only regulation keeps
it going.

If I build a new thing, a new highway if you will, what guarantees do I
have that IT isn't going to be regulated into another commodity?

None whatsoever.  Google wants bandwidth.  They'd like to do it as
expeditiously as possible.  And they'd like my engineers to build it for
them at cut rate prices under government sanction.

I'd tend to resist that business model.  Only because I have responsibilities
to MY stockholders.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric S. Sande

They are building highways now with private contractors.  Toll roads.


Yes.  But if I charge my costs off to these contactors at full rate I still
won't recover my build expense. I mean I use contractors.  If I used line
personnel it would be prohibitive.  Yes I rely on the tolls to recover the
costs.  But I still can't realize a profit without a reasonable timeline.

If I sold only the access I'd be in a negative situation.  That's what 
Google

wants me to do. But I can't do that.  Like I do with the copper.  That's a
money drain.  I have to offer value added services in order to leverage
my network.

I never went to business school.  But I figure if I have more money going
out than I have coming in that's bad.

And I'm not exactly paying for cut-rate talent.  My core people are the
best professionals that money can buy.  That's an expense that's worth
the dollars.  It's why we're the best at what we do.

Oh, yeah, we're more expensive.  But we also have an amazingly high
reliability rate.  I mean we are Bell Telephone.  Or what used to be Bell
Telephone.  None of the standards have been relaxed.

I guess we're sort of nonplussed and taken aback when it is assumed
that we'll take on a mission that someone else (like Google) has arbitrarily
defined without funding or a plan.  It is easy to say that something
should be done but less easy to describe how it could be done.

But we are experts at how it can be done.  We didn't build the greatest
telecommunications network in the world without our professionals
and our research labs and our manufacturing capacity.

It can be done again.  All of the talent and resources are in place.

Maybe we should think about doing that again instead of rescuing
banks and car manufacturers.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread t.piwowar

On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
I AM rebuilding my system.  But the scale they propose is  
unprecedented.


It is not unprecedented. It exists in Japan, Korea, and other places  
I'm not going to look up.


Today, suffering from cabin fever, I ordered up a video on demand from  
Amazon. It took close to 4 hours to trickle down the wires. At such a  
data rate I'm not likely to give the service much business. Google  
claims their network would have delivered this video in 5 minutes.  
That would make VOD quite appealing.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Gigabit Broadband To Your House?

2010-02-10 Thread Eric S. Sande
It is not unprecedented. It exists in Japan, Korea, and other places  
I'm not going to look up.


I'm not going to cite numbers on how small physically Japan and Korea
are.  Compared to the US.

I won't say how much their governments pay towards supporting
telecom.

I'll say that it's apples and oranges.

You want private telecom to deliver universal broadband in the US,
you are going to have to pay for it.

One way or another.  That's your choice as a taxpayer and a voter.

If you fund me, I can deliver the technology.

I know it's not a thing that liberals want to believe, but it costs real
money to deploy that technology.  Go ahead and vote for it, I know
how to do it.  But it is going to cost real money to implement on a
wide scale.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*