Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-05-01 Thread Jeff Wright
Thank you Tom.

Just knowing that I will always have you to prove me correct beyond any
shadow of doubt is enough for me.

Maybe I'm just making it too easy for you.

> -Original Message-
> As you see from the snippet below, you just can't engage Jeff in any
> serious discussion. "Evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy"
> indeed. And so very sad. He is a smart guy, but isn't willing to work
> with it.
> 
> >No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.
> >Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest
> ethics
> >and above reproach.
> >The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and
> always
> >up to something no good.



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-30 Thread Tom Piwowar
>(by the way Tom, you're posting in the future again.)

So you had better believe -- I have seen the future!



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-30 Thread Jordman
Put another way: If we can't define and rely on an accurate perception 
of the real, fact based world, how can we hope to accurately perceive 
the future.

If we can't see where we are now, how can we see where we're going.

(by the way Tom, you're posting in the future again.)

Tom Piwowar wrote:
A few nights ago PBS ran a great program on Watergate 30 Years After. 
They interviewed many of the primary players looking at events from the 
perspective that 30 years provides. 

One of the interesting points was that those involved in the Nixon crimes 
were people of high personal virtue -- they didn't smoke, didn't drink, 
didn't chase the opposite sex, etc. 

But they had no morals when it came to the public sphere. There seemed to 
be no limits to what they would do to win a political battle. One 
reporter noted how those in the administration would just lie and lie and 
lie with absolutely no compunction. If caught in a lie they would just 
lie some more. They bribed, they bullied, they falesly prosecuted, they 
blackmailed, they burgled, they ruined people's lives.


Watching the show I sadly noted that those were the good old days. It is 
worse today.


As you see from the snippet below, you just can't engage Jeff in any 
serious discussion. "Evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy" 
indeed. And so very sad. He is a smart guy, but isn't willing to work 
with it.


  

No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.
Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
and above reproach.
The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
up to something no good.



This discussion is not really "off topic." This is an attempt to examine 
a decisionmaking process that is central to any discussion of how we use 
technology. It is key to thinking about DMCA, net neutrality, defective 
software security, false market statistics, etc. If we can't honestly 
examine the data, we can't honestly come to valid conclusions, and we 
can't effectively plot a future course.




* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived


  




* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-30 Thread Tom Piwowar
A few nights ago PBS ran a great program on Watergate 30 Years After. 
They interviewed many of the primary players looking at events from the 
perspective that 30 years provides. 

One of the interesting points was that those involved in the Nixon crimes 
were people of high personal virtue -- they didn't smoke, didn't drink, 
didn't chase the opposite sex, etc. 

But they had no morals when it came to the public sphere. There seemed to 
be no limits to what they would do to win a political battle. One 
reporter noted how those in the administration would just lie and lie and 
lie with absolutely no compunction. If caught in a lie they would just 
lie some more. They bribed, they bullied, they falesly prosecuted, they 
blackmailed, they burgled, they ruined people's lives.

Watching the show I sadly noted that those were the good old days. It is 
worse today.

As you see from the snippet below, you just can't engage Jeff in any 
serious discussion. "Evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy" 
indeed. And so very sad. He is a smart guy, but isn't willing to work 
with it.

>No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.
>Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
>and above reproach.
>The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
>up to something no good.

This discussion is not really "off topic." This is an attempt to examine 
a decisionmaking process that is central to any discussion of how we use 
technology. It is key to thinking about DMCA, net neutrality, defective 
software security, false market statistics, etc. If we can't honestly 
examine the data, we can't honestly come to valid conclusions, and we 
can't effectively plot a future course.



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-29 Thread Randy
Unfortunately,  I think the "common ground" you speak of is, at root, the 
absence of critical thinking, related to - an at best - ambivalence about the 
value of truth.  The real "inconvenient truth" is that truth itself is very 
often inconvenient.  We worship many other considerations above the truth or 
trying to understand things through reason, yet we are generally not even 
honest about this.  When we do not value apprehending reality (as best as 
possible, better than our current or given understanding) as a bedrock, 
fundamental governing value or principle (of individuals, societies, nations) 
then we are too easily satisfied with the "given" - with the way things are, 
what we hear or see or are told, with explanations, with things at face value.  
When we are satisfied, for whatever reason, we aren't skeptical and we don't 
ask questions.  When we don't ask questions, we are not thinking critically.  
When we don't think critically, we are not using reason and we also are easily 
manipulated and fooled by language.  When others deliberately use language to 
obfuscate reality or for some other purpose than elucidating reality, this is 
rhetoric.  We also readily deceive ourselves with language, including the 
"language" of mathematics, such as with statistics.  

All of us fall prey to this to some extent, some of the time.  Even the most 
brilliant scientists, who may engage in critical thinking as a high art in the 
narrow questions they pursue do not necessarily think critically in general, 
across all domains, issues, important societal problems, discourse, etc.   My 
best guess is that the vast majority of people, certainly in this country, only 
engage in regular critical thinking in limited, sporadic ways, such as in their 
job or certain areas of interest or when critiquing some "other" (group, party, 
person, position, etc.) or in certain circumstances or with certain people.  
When it comes to public discourse on public policy and important social or 
political issues, real critical thinking, on both or all sides, is rare, though 
few would probably agree that this is true for "their side."  That failure to 
engage in self-critical examination is itself a failure of critical thinking.  

Anyway, better stop, as computer keeps freezing and better get outside while 
the sun is still out on this beautiful day.  Or before I get tarred and 
feathered here!

Randall

- Original Message - 
From: "Stewart A. Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political


> That is usually how it is viewed.
> 
> My church body has had a right left battle going for about 50 years or more.
> 
> Having seen some stuff from the right and from the left, I can assure 
> you they are mirror images.
> 
> If they would spend some time listening to each other (which they 
> usually don't) and trying to walk a mile in their shoes they might 
> come down from their holy mountains and find some common ground.
> 
> Usually that is not to be and the common ground is left standing vacant.
> 
> Those of us who stand in the middle are very numerous, just very 
> quiet. (at least quieter than the extremes.)
> 
> Stewart
> 
> 
> At 12:29 AM 4/29/2007, you wrote:
>>No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.
>>
>>Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
>>and above reproach.
>>
>>The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
>>up to something no good.
>>
>>And, above all, you are never a partisan, just the other guy.
>>
>>Most importantly though, if you don't believe in the same thing, you're the
>>other guy from the other side.
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > It goes both ways both left and right.
>> >
>> > The Radical Right is just as bad as the radical left.  They are
>> > really mirror images of each other.
>> >
>> > Stewart
> 
> Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
> Ozark, AL  SL 82
> 
> 
> 
> * ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
> * ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
> * Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
> * Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
> * Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
> * New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
> * Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **

Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-29 Thread Paul Meyer
Jeff, I actually liked this post. 

Jeff Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.

Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
and above reproach.

The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
up to something no good.

And, above all, you are never a partisan, just the other guy.

Most importantly though, if you don't believe in the same thing, you're the
other guy from the other side.

> -Original Message-
> It goes both ways both left and right.
> 
> The Radical Right is just as bad as the radical left.  They are
> really mirror images of each other.
> 
> Stewart



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived





* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



[CGUYS] Off topic-Political

2007-04-29 Thread Jordman
I gave some insights based on sociological studies, researched and 
confirmed facts, and scientific polls, and you offer platitudes, talking 
points, and untruths.
In the passed 12 years, the political middle has been pushed further and 
further to the right. I live in a part of PA considered to be the 
Alabama of PA. I know what these people think, they are happy to talk 
about it, and what they use to shape their reality. Rush Limbaugh is 
involved. And they don't just think he's funny. They believe what he 
says, though some won't admit it.


In order to maintain a degree of relative metal health, we all seek to 
find a reality we can live in.
Others are belligerently ignorant, in an effort to hide fear. There has 
been considerable study of this behavior. If you are curious, check out 
this book, which can be read online:

http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/

I'm just touching on some of what can be learned about what is happening 
to our society and why. This is scary stuff, but it's important.




I suspect that a lot of people don't have the time or inclination to 
find out if what they hear is true. It is to your credit that you do try.
Many people who watch Fox do not know that they are right leaning, 
sometimes radically so. These people are not stupid. They just don't 
know any better, for a host of different reasons. Knowing what our 
country has become, such ignorance is almost unforgivable. At this point 
polls are showing that most people who choose to watch Fox are right 
wing ideologues.


In the last few years, even NPR has been penetrated by the right.

Several of the media I mentioned previously are not out to make money. 
They are subsidized by radical right wing millionaires. They are part of 
the Republican noise machine.


If you are curious, check out 
http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2004/09/09_400.html




* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-29 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 12:40 AM -0500 4/29/07, Stewart A. Marshall wrote:


...
Usually that is not to be and the common ground is left standing vacant.

Those of us who stand in the middle are very numerous, just very 
quiet. (at least quieter than the extremes.)


Amen!
--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-28 Thread Stewart A. Marshall

That is usually how it is viewed.

My church body has had a right left battle going for about 50 years or more.

Having seen some stuff from the right and from the left, I can assure 
you they are mirror images.


If they would spend some time listening to each other (which they 
usually don't) and trying to walk a mile in their shoes they might 
come down from their holy mountains and find some common ground.


Usually that is not to be and the common ground is left standing vacant.

Those of us who stand in the middle are very numerous, just very 
quiet. (at least quieter than the extremes.)


Stewart


At 12:29 AM 4/29/2007, you wrote:

No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.

Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
and above reproach.

The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
up to something no good.

And, above all, you are never a partisan, just the other guy.

Most importantly though, if you don't believe in the same thing, you're the
other guy from the other side.

> -Original Message-
> It goes both ways both left and right.
>
> The Radical Right is just as bad as the radical left.  They are
> really mirror images of each other.
>
> Stewart


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Off topic-political

2007-04-28 Thread Jeff Wright
No, no Rev, you've got it all wrong.

Your side is brilliant, honest, forthright, righteous, of the highest ethics
and above reproach.

The other side is evil, stupid and/or ignorant, dishonest, sleazy and always
up to something no good.

And, above all, you are never a partisan, just the other guy.

Most importantly though, if you don't believe in the same thing, you're the
other guy from the other side.

> -Original Message-
> It goes both ways both left and right.
> 
> The Radical Right is just as bad as the radical left.  They are
> really mirror images of each other.
> 
> Stewart



* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived