Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-12 Thread Damien Lecan
Hello,

   for 
 http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
 we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko

 We use the standalone version installed in a vm.

Standalone version is as slow as embedded version in Tomcat :-(

My server is not powerful, but other applications running on it are
very fast compared to Continuum (Jira, Spring MVC/Struts home-made
Java applications, Proximity, ...)

Are 7,5s to load a single page an acceptable value for a such product ?

Damien


Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-12 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

I'd like you test something about performance.

As explain in this page 
(http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Performance+Tuning), you can create a 
freemarker.properties file under WEB-INF/classes that contains 
'template_update_delay=6'
then you extract the template directory from webwork jar to WEB-INF/classes

Let us know if it's better with that.
Thanks

Emmanuel

Damien Lecan a écrit :

Hello,


  for 
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko

We use the standalone version installed in a vm.


Standalone version is as slow as embedded version in Tomcat :-(

My server is not powerful, but other applications running on it are
very fast compared to Continuum (Jira, Spring MVC/Struts home-made
Java applications, Proximity, ...)

Are 7,5s to load a single page an acceptable value for a such product ?

Damien






Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-11 Thread Damien Lecan
  I could activate some special debug log or anything else which could help ?

 you can set the log level of JPOX* and SQL to DEBUG in 
 apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/plexus/application.xml

I did that. I load page Project Group Summary of a 17 module project.


For a request that begins at 00:00:00 and ends at 00:00:18, I get that :

00:00:01,692 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG General - Implementation
creator not configured. Due to that, the persistence of interfaces was
disabled!

... lot of logs

00:00:02,870 [http-8081-Processor9] DEBUG JDO - Persistence Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] closed

2 sec to retrieve data.

But what happens between 00:00:02,870 and 00:00:18 ?

More logs to enable ?

Thanks

Damien


Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-11 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

 for 
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=9
we have 30 modules printed in 7,5s and the page size is 101ko

We use the standalone version installed in a vm.

Emmanuel

Damien Lecan a écrit :

2007/9/11, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I don't understand why it is so slow to render the project list because the 
rendering start with this line:

00:00:03,452 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult- 
Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/projectSummaryComponent.jsp

and end with this line:

00:00:21,213 [http-8081-Processor11] DEBUG ServletDispatcherResult- 
Forwarding to location /WEB-INF/jsp/components/companyLogo.jsp

so it's 18 seconds to print the html, very long because we don't have data to 
process there. We don't have the hand on this part because the rendering is 
webwork and extremecomponents work.

Can you try with the Continuum standalone version to see if the result is 
different?
What is your jdk?


Resulting page is about 71kb.

I'm using Java 1.5.0_11 under Linux fedora

I'll try asap Continuum as a standalone instance (without Tomcat).

Thanks

Damien






Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-04 Thread Emmanuel Venisse



Damien Lecan a écrit :

Hello,

I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
1.0.3 instance.
I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat 5.5.17

Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(

I followed http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
for installation.

Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
displaying project group information. Each module name  appears one
after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).


25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better performance 
(http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears at the same time
Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?



MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
with expected performances.

What can be the problem ?

Thanks

Damien Lecan







Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-04 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.

-Justin

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
 
 
 Damien Lecan a écrit :
 Hello,

 I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
 1.0.3 instance.
 I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
 5.5.17

 Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(

 I followed
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
 and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
 for installation.

 Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
 on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
 displaying project group information. Each module name  appears one
 after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
 
 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
 performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
 at the same time
 Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
 

 MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
 with expected performances.

 What can be the problem ?

 Thanks

 Damien Lecan



 
 
 !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
 


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org


RE: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

2007-09-04 Thread Mrinal Mukherjee
Same problem with me. Slow UI. I had this problem as soon as I upgraded to
the newer version of continuum. I thought it was a problem in my system, but
now I know its something to do with the new version of continuum. 

Mrinal

-Original Message-
From: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:49 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 UI performance

I am using derby out of the box and noticed the same slowdown. I don't
have any metrics to back it up but its definitely noticeably slower.

-Justin

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
 
 
 Damien Lecan a écrit :
 Hello,

 I've just installed Continuum 1.1.0-beta-2 to replace my old Continuum
 1.0.3 instance.
 I'm working with MySql instead of embbeded sql server and with Tomcat
 5.5.17

 Nice new features, but UI is very, very, very slow :(

 I followed
 http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+MySQL
 and http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUMUSER/Continuum+on+Tomcat
 for installation.

 Everything works fine, but very, very slowly. For example, each item
 on the left menu appears one after the other. Same thing when
 displaying project group information. Each module name  appears one
 after the other (25s for a 17 modules project).
 
 25s for 17 modules??? With embedded derby database we have better
 performance (http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/) and all appears
 at the same time
 Are you sure you use the right jdbc driver?
 

 MySql database is shared with other Java applications. They work fine,
 with expected performances.

 What can be the problem ?

 Thanks

 Damien Lecan



 
 
 !DSPAM:4007,46dd7d79203981439371379!
 


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.12/979 - Release Date: 8/29/2007
8:21 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.12/979 - Release Date: 8/29/2007
8:21 PM