[COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Alexander . Schiffer
Dear Paul,

There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and SIGF when 
using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR column seems to be 
used instead of F but there is no reference what has been used in the logfile 
(sample attached). Unfortunately the only indication something went wrong is 
the high R-Factor, which in this case could also be due to the fact that the MR 
solution is incorrect.

Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,

Alexander

 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement

Dr. Alexander Schiffer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
Industriepark Hoechst
Bldg. G877, Room 029
D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
t: +49 69 305 24896
f: +49 69 305 80169
w:www.sanofi-aventis.de

*
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main · 
Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin 
Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias Braun, 
Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus Menken, Dr. Heinz Riederer
*



refmac-from-coot-0.log
Description: refmac-from-coot-0.log


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Kevin Cowtan

Hi!

Coot has to be told what columns to use for different programs. We've 
coded fore refmac, phenix.refine and my density modification programs, 
but not for phaser because no-one has asked.


Can you send me a dump of the mtz header with a list of the columns?
Which columns would you like used by default on auto open?
Should there be a difference map as well?

Thanks,
Kevin

alexander.schif...@sanofi-aventis.com wrote:

Dear Paul,

There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and SIGF when 
using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR column seems to be 
used instead of F but there is no reference what has been used in the logfile 
(sample attached). Unfortunately the only indication something went wrong is 
the high R-Factor, which in this case could also be due to the fact that the MR 
solution is incorrect.

Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,

Alexander

 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement


Dr. Alexander Schiffer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
Industriepark Hoechst
Bldg. G877, Room 029
D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
t: +49 69 305 24896
f: +49 69 305 80169
w:www.sanofi-aventis.de

*
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main · 
Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias Braun, 
Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus Menken, Dr. Heinz Riederer

*



Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Clemens Vonrhein
Dear Alexander,

FCTR looks like it is coming from a BUSTER refinement:

  http://www.globalphasing.com/buster/manual/buster/manual/chapter5.html#mlphas

This column is obviously only intended for looking at maps (however:
usually one looks at the 2FOFCWT/PH2FOFCWT and FOFCWT/PHFOFCWT maps).

So there mus thave been some additional step like

  autoPROC - Phaser - BUSTER - Coot

or

  autoPROC - BUSTER - Phaser - Coot

involved?

Those problems often occur when one keeps 'chaining' the use of MTZ
files: the MTZ file for looking at maps (all kind of additional
columns, scaling might have been taken place etc) should ideally be
different from the one used in refinement (this should always be the
same 'master' file after data processing and adding test set flag). I
guess by combining map viewing in Coot with driving refinement from
the gui as well this can become tricky.

Cheers

Clemens


On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:23:26AM +0100, alexander.schif...@sanofi-aventis.com 
wrote:
 Dear Paul,
 
 There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and SIGF when 
 using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR column seems to be 
 used instead of F but there is no reference what has been used in the logfile 
 (sample attached). Unfortunately the only indication something went wrong is 
 the high R-Factor, which in this case could also be due to the fact that the 
 MR solution is incorrect.
 
 Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,
 
 Alexander
 
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement
 
 Dr. Alexander Schiffer
 
 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
 RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
 Industriepark Hoechst
 Bldg. G877, Room 029
 D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
 t: +49 69 305 24896
 f: +49 69 305 80169
 w:www.sanofi-aventis.de
 
 *
 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main · 
 Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin 
 Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias Braun, 
 Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus Menken, Dr. Heinz 
 Riederer
 *
 

Content-Description: refmac-from-coot-0.log
 sh: octet-filter: command not found


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Alexander . Schiffer
Hi Kevin,

As Clemens pointed out it was not a phaser but a user problem. I accidently 
used a buster mtz file for phaser. For autoproc - phaser everything works as 
expected.
I have attached the mtzdump of a buster mtz-file. If you could support 
auto-open for that it would be great.
Do you see a way to include in the refmac-from-coot logfile which mtz columns 
were used? 

Alexander

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Cowtan [mailto:cow...@ysbl.york.ac.uk] 
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 11:02 AM
To: Schiffer, Alexander RD/DE
Cc: COOT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

Hi!

Coot has to be told what columns to use for different programs. We've coded 
fore refmac, phenix.refine and my density modification programs, but not for 
phaser because no-one has asked.

Can you send me a dump of the mtz header with a list of the columns?
Which columns would you like used by default on auto open?
Should there be a difference map as well?

Thanks,
Kevin

alexander.schif...@sanofi-aventis.com wrote:
 Dear Paul,
 
 There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and SIGF when 
 using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR column seems to be 
 used instead of F but there is no reference what has been used in the logfile 
 (sample attached). Unfortunately the only indication something went wrong is 
 the high R-Factor, which in this case could also be due to the fact that the 
 MR solution is incorrect.
 
 Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,
 
 Alexander
 
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement
 
 Dr. Alexander Schiffer
 
 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
 RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
 Industriepark Hoechst
 Bldg. G877, Room 029
 D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
 t: +49 69 305 24896
 f: +49 69 305 80169
 w:www.sanofi-aventis.de
 
 **
 **
 * Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der 
 Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main · Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, 
 Abt. B Nr. 40661 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - 
 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. 
 Matthias Braun, Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus 
 Menken, Dr. Heinz Riederer
 **
 **
 *
 



refine.mtzlog
Description: refine.mtzlog


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Bernhard Lohkamp

Hi,

the automatic selection of structure factors for refinement happens in 
Refmac and not in Coot. This is one for Garib. I dont know exactly how 
Refmac chooses which structure factors to use, but it certainly should 
write the selected ones in the log file (maybe newer versions of refmac 
already do so?!). If you want to make sure Refmac uses the structure 
factors you want, then select the corresponding option and do not trust 
Refmac to do the job for you. Furthermore you probably should work with 
the original mtz file when doing refinement. In that case there wont be 
too many different options to pick the 'wrong' structure factors for 
refinement as well.


Hope this helps,

B

P.S. Kevin, I guess you misunderstood the problem. It's about SF used in 
refmac (via Coot) rather than (auto)open mtz files.



Dear Paul,

There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and SIGF when 
using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR column seems to be 
used instead of F but there is no reference what has been used in the logfile 
(sample attached). Unfortunately the only indication something went wrong is 
the high R-Factor, which in this case could also be due to the fact that the MR 
solution is incorrect.

Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,

Alexander

 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement


Dr. Alexander Schiffer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
Industriepark Hoechst
Bldg. G877, Room 029
D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
t: +49 69 305 24896
f: +49 69 305 80169
w:www.sanofi-aventis.de

*
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main · 
Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias Braun, 
Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus Menken, Dr. Heinz Riederer

*
  



--

***

Dr. Bernhard Lohkamp
Assistant Professor
Div. Molecular Structural Biology
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics (MBB)
Karolinska Institutet
S-17177 Stockholm
Sweden

phone: (+46) 08-52487673
fax:   (+46) 08-327626
email: bernhard.lohk...@ki.se


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Kevin Cowtan

OK, so the map coefficients are:

1. FCTR PHICTR
2. 2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT
3. FOFCWT PHFOFCWT
4. FOFRGSLV PHFOFRGSLV
5. FC PHIC
6. FOSC SIGFOSC

I think that auto-open (assuming you are using a 0.6pre from the last 6 
months) should automatically pick up (2) and (3) for a normal and 
difference map - is that what you see?


Which other columns would you like maps from? Just (1)?

Do you see a way to include in the refmac-from-coot logfile which mtz columns were used? 


Sorry, didn't understand this bit.

K


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Kevin Cowtan

Bernhard is right, sorry. Ignore me!

Kevin

Bernhard Lohkamp wrote:

Hi,

the automatic selection of structure factors for refinement happens in 
Refmac and not in Coot. This is one for Garib. I dont know exactly how 
Refmac chooses which structure factors to use, but it certainly should 
write the selected ones in the log file (maybe newer versions of refmac 
already do so?!). If you want to make sure Refmac uses the structure 
factors you want, then select the corresponding option and do not trust 
Refmac to do the job for you. Furthermore you probably should work with 
the original mtz file when doing refinement. In that case there wont be 
too many different options to pick the 'wrong' structure factors for 
refinement as well.


Hope this helps,

B

P.S. Kevin, I guess you misunderstood the problem. It's about SF used in 
refmac (via Coot) rather than (auto)open mtz files.



Dear Paul,

There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and 
SIGF when using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The FCTR 
column seems to be used instead of F but there is no reference what 
has been used in the logfile (sample attached). Unfortunately the only 
indication something went wrong is the high R-Factor, which in this 
case could also be due to the fact that the MR solution is incorrect.


Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,

Alexander

 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement


Dr. Alexander Schiffer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
Industriepark Hoechst
Bldg. G877, Room 029
D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
t: +49 69 305 24896
f: +49 69 305 80169
w:www.sanofi-aventis.de

* 

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am 
Main · Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer: Dr. 
Martin Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias Braun, 
Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus Menken, Dr. 
Heinz Riederer
* 

  





Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Garib Murshudov
At the moment refmac does extremely simple selection. First structure  
factor label and the first sigma that has similar name to the first  
structure factor, if not then the first sigma.
It works for a class of cases but it cannot be universal. While we are  
on this matter I think it would be good to not mix input mtz and  
output mtz from refinement. They may have completely different  
meaning. I.e. for refinement always original mtz after scala/truncate  
with correct space group assigned should be used.
Structure factors in the output mtz may have been modified by the  
programs and these modifications are based on some assumptions that  
may or may not be correct at the time of that program processing that  
dataset. As information changes (e.g. better model) modification may  
also change.


i hope I did not add more confusion.
Garib



On 30 Nov 2009, at 10:43, Bernhard Lohkamp wrote:



Hi,

the automatic selection of structure factors for refinement happens  
in Refmac and not in Coot. This is one for Garib. I dont know  
exactly how Refmac chooses which structure factors to use, but it  
certainly should write the selected ones in the log file (maybe  
newer versions of refmac already do so?!). If you want to make sure  
Refmac uses the structure factors you want, then select the  
corresponding option and do not trust Refmac to do the job for you.  
Furthermore you probably should work with the original mtz file when  
doing refinement. In that case there wont be too many different  
options to pick the 'wrong' structure factors for refinement as well.


Hope this helps,

B

P.S. Kevin, I guess you misunderstood the problem. It's about SF  
used in refmac (via Coot) rather than (auto)open mtz files.



Dear Paul,

There seems to be a problem with the automatic asignment for F and  
SIGF when using a file from phaser (processed by autoproc). The  
FCTR column seems to be used instead of F but there is no reference  
what has been used in the logfile (sample attached). Unfortunately  
the only indication something went wrong is the high R-Factor,  
which in this case could also be due to the fact that the MR  
solution is incorrect.


Best rega refmac-from-coot-0.log rds,

Alexander

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards / Cordialement

Dr. Alexander Schiffer

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
RD CAS Structural Biology FFM
Industriepark Hoechst
Bldg. G877, Room 029
D-65926 Frankfurt am Main
t: +49 69 305 24896
f: +49 69 305 80169
w:www.sanofi-aventis.de

*
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH ·  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt  
am Main · Handelsregister: Frankfurt am Main, Abt. B Nr. 40661
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Hanspeter Spek - Geschäftsführer:  
Dr. Martin Siewert (Vorsitzender), Ulf Bialojahn, Dr. Matthias  
Braun, Peter Guenter, Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Kramer, Dr. Klaus  
Menken, Dr. Heinz Riederer

*




--

***

Dr. Bernhard Lohkamp
Assistant Professor
Div. Molecular Structural Biology
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics (MBB)
Karolinska Institutet
S-17177 Stockholm
Sweden

phone: (+46) 08-52487673
fax:   (+46) 08-327626
email: bernhard.lohk...@ki.se




Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Bernhard Lohkamp

Alexander,

Do you see a way to include in the refmac-from-coot logfile which mtz columns were used? 
  
No, since, as mentioned earlier, this is a refmac decision. However I 
agree that the refmac log file should tell you which column was used 
when automatically picking SF (maybe it does already, Garib?).


B

--

***

Dr. Bernhard Lohkamp
Assistant Professor
Div. Molecular Structural Biology
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics (MBB)
Karolinska Institutet
S-17177 Stockholm
Sweden

phone: (+46) 08-52487673
fax:   (+46) 08-327626
email: bernhard.lohk...@ki.se


Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Garib Murshudov
Yes. It should and I will add it now. I do not think refmac writes  
this info into the output file but it will do in one or two days time.


GArib

On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:32, Bernhard Lohkamp wrote:



Alexander,

Do you see a way to include in the refmac-from-coot logfile which  
mtz columns were used?
No, since, as mentioned earlier, this is a refmac decision. However  
I agree that the refmac log file should tell you which column was  
used when automatically picking SF (maybe it does already, Garib?).


B

--

***

Dr. Bernhard Lohkamp
Assistant Professor
Div. Molecular Structural Biology
Dept. of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics (MBB)
Karolinska Institutet
S-17177 Stockholm
Sweden

phone: (+46) 08-52487673
fax:   (+46) 08-327626
email: bernhard.lohk...@ki.se




Re: [COOT] Automatic column asignment for refmac

2009-11-30 Thread Clemens Vonrhein
Hi Kevin,

just for the record (even if the original question/thread was about
something slightly different):

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:13:14AM +, Kevin Cowtan wrote:
 OK, so the map coefficients are:

 1. FCTR PHICTR
 2. 2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT
 3. FOFCWT PHFOFCWT
 4. FOFRGSLV PHFOFRGSLV
 5. FC PHIC
 6. FOSC SIGFOSC

Those are not map coefficients (these are scaled Fobs/SIGFobs).

 I think that auto-open (assuming you are using a 0.6pre from the last 6  
 months) should automatically pick up (2) and (3) for a normal and  
 difference map - is that what you see?

This has always worked as expected, yes. Running

  % coot --pdb refine.pdb --auto refine.mtz

after BUSTER works perfectly for me every time ;-)

Cheers

Clemens

-- 

***
* Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com
*
*  Global Phasing Ltd.
*  Sheraton House, Castle Park 
*  Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK
*--
* BUSTER Development Group  (http://www.globalphasing.com)
***


[COOT] How to make a map file readable

2009-11-30 Thread pebblepeddle
Hi all

I am trying to find out if coot can export a map file that in text format.

I have created a difference map from two cns maps and want to export
it also in cns format (can be read in text eidtor). But till now, I
can only save it in xx.map format that in ASCII format.

How to do that?


Re: [COOT] How to make a map file readable

2009-11-30 Thread Eleanor Dodson

pebbleped...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all

I am trying to find out if coot can export a map file that in text format.

I have created a difference map from two cns maps and want to export
it also in cns format (can be read in text eidtor). But till now, I
can only save it in xx.map format that in ASCII format.

How to do that?

Why not export it as a CCP4 map and use xdlman to convert it to CNS format?

Eleanor


Re: [COOT] How to make a map file readable

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Emsley

pebbleped...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all

I am trying to find out if coot can export a map file that in text format.

I have created a difference map from two cns maps and want to export
it also in cns format (can be read in text eidtor). But till now, I
can only save it in xx.map format that in ASCII format.
  


Can't be done. 

However, you can export a CCP4 map and convert that to text using CCP4's 
maptona4.  How useful that would be, I don't know.



Paul.


Re: [COOT] Electron density map for ligand

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Emsley

pebbleped...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi all

I want to know possible method to get  electron density map for ligand only.

The material are  2mFo-DFc map downloaded from EDS server and also
coordinates from PDB.

The electron density map contains protein, water and ligand. I want to
build a electron density map only for ligand.

How can I do that with help of some usual softwares like coot, ccp4
  


Section 6.16 of the User Manual.

You can use any arbitrary atom selection.


Paul.


Re: [COOT] Electron density map for ligand

2009-11-30 Thread pebblepeddle
Hi

There are some problems still existing.

The pdb file contain two domain A and B. As I do not know how to
select protein segid A and B and also waters at the same time, I do
mask as following:

First, I read .pdb file and then .ccp4 file. Then I use
ExtensionMapsMask map by atom selection. I use //A/1-124 for Atom
selection input, then export this map to a1.map

Then read it back and ExtensionMapsMask map by atom selection with
//B/1-124 for Atom selection input, then export this map to a2.map

and then do same thing to mask water molecules in A and B
(//A/129-200) (//B/129-200) and finally got a4.map.

Then I use mapman to transfer a4.map to a4.cns that can be read by text editor.

However, I find there are some differences between a4.cns and that
from initial  .cns file.

They have different grid points.


What I think before is when I open a4.cns, I can find at which point
the density was set to be zero like this:

a4.cns
1.222E-1 0.000E0  1.222E-1 1.222E-1 1.222E-1

.cns
1.222E-1 1.222E-1 1.222E-1 1.222E-1 1.222E-1

That is I can find relationships between a4.cns and that .cns.


But now I can not find it as they have totally different grid points.

Is there any thing wrong in my procedure?

How does coot to mask electron density maps?



2009/11/30 Paul Emsley paul.ems...@bioch.ox.ac.uk:
 pebbleped...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all

 I want to know possible method to get  electron density map for ligand
 only.

 The material are  2mFo-DFc map downloaded from EDS server and also
 coordinates from PDB.

 The electron density map contains protein, water and ligand. I want to
 build a electron density map only for ligand.

 How can I do that with help of some usual softwares like coot, ccp4


 Section 6.16 of the User Manual.

 You can use any arbitrary atom selection.


 Paul.