Re: help with failing build
On 01/29/2015 04:36 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: This is problem in mockchain: I'm taking it back. This is completly correct. curl http://www.patternfly.org/wp-content/uploads/rpmsrc/patternfly1-1.1.3-1.fc20.src.rpm will print you redirect to https variant: https://www.patternfly.org/wp-content/uploads/rpmsrc/patternfly1-1.1.3-1.fc20.src.rpm And the SSL certificate is issued only for '*.rhcloud.com', 'rhcloud.com' and therefore does not match www.patternfly.org and python library refuse to download it. Which is completely correct. Either please remove the http-https redirect or create SSL certificate which include www.patternfly.org (you have to have silver+ plan in OpenShift to do that) or just use different hosting (e.g. people.fedorahosted.org) Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
Re: Version shows Release and dist tag?
On 02/13/2015 05:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I added a comment to the BZ... The release doesn't really bother me but it takes the dist tag from the SRPM which I think is a bad idea, and since the repos are separate for each release, I don't think it provides any useful purpose. Technically dist tag *is* part of release number. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
Re: Logo for Copr
Dne 11.5.2015 v 19:13 Klára Šimíčková napsal(a): Thank you very much for your thoughts. I've changed the font and simplified the dill seed and I think it matches the Fedora types much better. So what do you think about this one? This one is much better! Can we use it? Which font is used? Hmm when I open the SVG version in inkscape the image is little bit demaged. See attachment with screenshot. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
Re: ppc64le builders down
Dne 4.7.2015 v 17:01 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): Anyone could see what happens with copr ? [1] which have some pending jobs since yesterday on ppc64le builders . [1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/status/waiting/ Fixed. M. ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
Re: [patch] Added marshmallow as dependency for python-copr
On 11/05/2015 09:54 PM, Sergio Oliveira wrote: > Patch attached Patch committed and pushed. Thank you. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
Re: 70k+ tasks sent to Copr
Dne 7.6.2016 v 11:26 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): Is this still truth even for the rubygem batch? Seems like the ruby builds have some higher priority (waiting about ~2 hours before some other build gets processed). Ops. One config value got lost during latest upgrade. Should be fixed now. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: Unable to login to COPR
Dne 13.6.2016 v 21:40 Zygmunt Krynicki napsal(a): Is there any issue with the infrastructure or is it possible that there is something wrong on my end? Yes, we are aware of this problem (since today's afternoon). It is problem in Copr code. We will fix it soon. In the mean time reload helps (when it happened to me I need to reload the page 3 times). Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
New release of Copr
Hi, I just upgraded Copr instance to new version. There is one big change. You can now lower priority of your build. It was introduced to easy rebuild of rubygems and pypi. But it can be used by CI systems later. Copr-cli from our git, has --background option already. It lowers the priority. But due compatibility reason we will not push the package into main Fedora and we will wait one or two weeks. If you want to give it try, then you can install it from our copr project. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: copr waiting task queue
Dne 26.6.2016 v 17:36 Clinton Work napsal(a): The following chromium job has been running for the past 2 days and it looks like it is backing up the rest of the build queues. There are now 168 build jobs waiting in the queue. Running Project Build Package NamePackage Version Chroot 2 days lantw44/chromium362159 chromium 51.0.2704.106-1.fc23fedora-23-x86_64 There was issue with DB. It is resolved now. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org is no more
Several of you reported expired certificate of copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org This url was only used at very earlier stage of this project and now is deprecated. It still exist albeit with expired certificate, but it will be removed soon. Please replace your bookmarks with either copr.fedoraproject.org or copr.fedorainfracloud.org The second one is preferred for now. Miroslav Suchy ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: [Patch] COPR Moved
Dne 22.1.2016 v 13:26 Patrick Uiterwijk napsal(a): > The old URL is a redirect at this moment, and I don't see any > reason to drop those in the foreseeable future. I am curious as well. What was wrong on copr.fedoraproject.org? What was the reason for the change? Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: running for 31 hours
Dne 15.3.2016 v 13:21 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > Hello, can someone fix this please , > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/vboxfor23/build/167974 > / > > builds are done , repo is working, but status says that still running There was running appstream builder. For unknown reason. I killed it and the build is now finished. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: Importing SRPM into Dist Git failed, No space left on device
Dne 19.4.2016 v 09:09 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/vboxfor23/build/178895/ > http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/per-task-logs/178895-epel7.lo Fixed. Our current code leaves some files behind. There is already fix in master which should prevent it. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
copr-dist-git moves to F23
FYI - in case you operate your own Copr instance. Currently our copr-dist-git is on EL7, but this means we are unable to process weak and rich deps. So I moved our devel instance to F23 and it work flawlessly. So after next deploy to production we will stop actively support EL7 as target plaftorm for copr-dist-git and we will focus on Fedora. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Re: Packaging upstream with released tarballs in Copr
Dne 17.4.2016 v 17:38 Martin Novák napsal(a): > Copr however offers only Tito and Mock SCM builds. From what I read, > it seems to me that both methods expect upstream and packaging files > to be in same repository. Is it true? If not, is there any example of > a Tito/MockSCM project linking external tarball which builds on Copr? To be honest - tito and mock-scm was just proof of concept for building directly from pypi, rubygems... Albeit still useful in some situation. You can always create SRPM on your own and submit it to Copr. Example of building using Tito: https://github.com/xsuchy/packaging/tree/master/glacier-cli https://github.com/xsuchy/packaging/blob/master/rel-eng/tito.props This is example where tar.gz is stored in the same reposority. However Tito support git-annex so you can utilize this. E.g. see this blog post: http://m0dlx.com/blog/Reproducible_builds_on_Copr_with_tito_and_git_annex.html Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
copr-dist-git webui is working again
Recently I've got reports that http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ was timeouting. I enabled cgit cache and disabled access for robots and it seems it helped. If you encounter some problems please report. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Some projects fails to signed rpm
Hi, today we had incident, where Copr failed to sign package. It started yesterday and it took us nearly one day to fix the issue. It was caused by upgrade of gnupg2 and it tried to migrate data to new format, which failed in middle of the process. Today we restored the data and manually migrated all 18,000 keys. But we discovered that ~30 projects still have problems. It seems that it is project either tried to build or created project during the incident. I will try to resolve it tomorrow. If your project is affected, then please either wait one day, or just delete your project and create it again. Sorry for the problems. Mirek ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
