Re: [COSE] Call for Consensus: Begin Recharter of COSE WG

2020-04-17 Thread Matthew A. Miller
With no hat ...

Being a little less specific on the profile details in the charter seems
worthwhile to me.  I don't want it to be an open invitation to come up
with a third profile, though.


- m

Matthew A. Miller
On 20/04/17 01:30, Joel Höglund wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I support the charter, with the addition/comment below made by John
> Mattsson about also keeping the RFC 7925 profile, as it is relevant for
> the IoT scenarios we are working on.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Joel Höglund
> 
>>> I just learned that IETF 6TiSCH is relying on IEEE 802.11AR profiled
> X.509 
>>> certificates instead of RFC 7925 profiled X.509 certificates. It
> might be that the
>>> CBOR compression should support both. This could be done with small 
>>> additions as the profiles are quite similar. I think the charter
> should leave the 
>>> scope a bit more open on this point.
> 
> ___
> COSE mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
> 

___
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose


[COSE] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-03

2020-04-17 Thread Ivaylo Petrov via Datatracker
Ivaylo Petrov has requested publication of draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs-03 as 
Informational on behalf of the COSE working group.

Please verify the document's state at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-hash-algs/


___
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose


[COSE] Call for Consensus: Begin Recharter of COSE WG

2020-04-17 Thread Joel Höglund
Hi all,

I support the charter, with the addition/comment below made by John
Mattsson about also keeping the RFC 7925 profile, as it is relevant for the
IoT scenarios we are working on.

Best Regards

Joel Höglund

>> I just learned that IETF 6TiSCH is relying on IEEE 802.11AR profiled
X.509
>> certificates instead of RFC 7925 profiled X.509 certificates. It might
be that the
>> CBOR compression should support both. This could be done with small
>> additions as the profiles are quite similar. I think the charter should
leave the
>> scope a bit more open on this point.
___
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose