[courier-users] pop-before-smtp
Hi! I want to use courier for pop/imap and mta, but I didn't find anything about pop-before-smtp if I only use courier, I found some infos how to use courier pop/imap with other mta's, but nothing about courier-pop with courier-imap. thx, for your help. -- Regards, Robert Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers
well maybe I should study the relevant RFCs before making suggestions :-) Sorry for that. Well, one thing I could think of is to build in some extra intelligence into courier. 1. Never accept outgoing mail with bad headers. 2. Accept local mail with bad headers, but add a notification to the e-mail that it is corrupted. Maybe there could be introduced a switch how to handel local corrupted mail: 1. attach as plaintext (the existing implementation), 2. attach a notification to the original mail but keep it a Mime formatted mail (This will lead into troubles, too, but is not as worse as turning off the checks completely). As I mentioned in an earlier mail I tried to build a new Mime message around the corrupted message. The result was an at-the-first-glance-correct Mime message saying corrupted message. The original mail could be read via pop3 but not via imap. Imap didn't show the message body. My suggestion of using message/rfc822 is indeed just moving the problem from the mta to the delivery agents and clients - but not solving it. Regards Manfred - Original Message - From: Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:21 AM Subject: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers MH - Entwicklung writes: No can do. A MIME content type of message/rfc822 must be a valid MIME message. And we already know it's not. Well of course I should have mentioned this. But as the corrupted message is encapsulated into a well formatted message, No it's not. It's a part of the original message. Encapsulated message/rfc822 content must also be parsed by IMAP servers, to access the individual sections of the encapsulated MIME message. Essentially, the encapsulated message/rfc822 content is attached into its parent MIME tree. Think of it as multipart content with only one section. the result is a valid mail message Nope. If message/rfc822 is corrupted, its parent message is corrupted as well. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] pop-before-smtp
Robert Penz wrote: Hi! I want to use courier for pop/imap and mta, but I didn't find anything about pop-before-smtp if I only use courier, I found some infos how to use courier pop/imap with other mta's, but nothing about courier-pop with courier-imap. thx, for your help. What exactly are you looking for? What is pop-before-smtp? POP and IMAP are both protocols to download/view mail, not send mail ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] pop-before-smtp
On Monday, 7. January 2002 10:19, you wrote: What exactly are you looking for? What is pop-before-smtp? POP and IMAP are both protocols to download/view mail, not send mail sure, but we need to use pop for authentification before allowing the user to send a mail over other smtp, as they are using dynamic ips (dail in), so I can't add specific ips to a list, which are allowed to send mails. I know about Authenticated SMTP, but not all clients to support that. ps: even didn't find a setting for it in kmail which is shiped with kde 2.2.2, but thats off topic. postfix does support that feature, we use currrently sendmail with a program called pop-watch for that and there is also a patch available for qmail. But didn't find anything about courier, if I use courier also as mta. for courier pop/imap with other mtas like qmail, I have found some small programs. -- Regards, Robert Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] NAMESPACE?
Hello I have install courier-imap. When I telnet to my imap port(143) and try "1 capability", it only show up "CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1". I try some other imap server will have "NAMESPACE" also. It is the reason that I cannot create folder at the same level with INBOX? If it true, how can I setup my courier-imap server with NAMESPACE support? Thanks you Ming.
[courier-users] Re: NAMESPACE?
Lee Ming writes: Hello I have install courier-imap. When I telnet to my imap port(143) and try 1 capability, it only show up CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1. You did not install Courier-IMAP properly. I try some other imap server will have NAMESPACE also. It is the reason that I cannot create folder at the same level with INBOX? If it true, how can I setup my courier-imap server with NAMESPACE support? Follow the instructions in INSTALL. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Re-using lf_accept in libfilter
Alessandro Vesely writes: Sam, I have troubles using lf_accept in my filter. That's because I to catch a HUP signal by getting out of select with errno set to EINTR (the so-called SysV signal semantics.) Since lf_accept returns -1 in that case and trusting errno is not very reliable, I should either test again descriptor 0 or call select on my own. Both alternatives involve duplicating code that is already there. I include a zip file containing libfilter.[ch].patch where Your patch does not make any sense. Instead of returning -1, you're returning 0, and changing it to -1 in a wrapper function. In other words, your patch does absolutely nothing. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] customize webmail
hi! is there a documentation of the posibilities to customize the webmail interface? mainly, i'm interested in a list of [#command#]... tnx, armin fuerst ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] secure esmtp transmissions
I think the answer to my problem lies in their server not supporting STARTTLS: Escape character is '^]'. 220 [195.10.127.37] ESMTP Sendmail 8.10.2/8.10.2; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:12:50 GMT EHLO balclutha.org 250-ns3.iomol.net Hello host213-122-222-77.btinternet.com [213.122.222.77], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ONEX 250-ETRN 250-XUSR 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 250 HELP Cheers, Alan _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] (no subject)
I have a problem after I've installed the curier-webmail - the configuration and make directives worked ok, but when I try to access the site I receive an page with incomplect links (EX: [#s#]empty=1) in all the pages. Can you give me some advice on this matter? Thank you in advance Tavi ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] (no subject)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Octavian Ciobanu wrote: I have a problem after I've installed the curier-webmail - the configuration and make directives worked ok, but when I try to access the site I receive an page with incomplect links (EX: [#s#]empty=1) in all the pages. Can you give me some advice on this matter? are you sure, you really installed it correctly? to me, it seems as if you would look directly into the html-documents (templates) and don't use the webmail script... armin ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Binding serveral interfaces but not all
Hello, I have to bind 2 of my interfaces: the localhost and the mail dedicated interface. I can figure out how to bind a single address -- with ADDRESS directive -- or how to bind all interfaces. But I haven't found how to limit binding to only some interfaces. Is it possible ? Best regards, -- __ O l i v i e rP o i t r e y ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Replacing maildir message storage with SQL
Simon Cocking wrote: Has anyone contemplated modifying Courier to support the storage of messages in SQL tables rather than Maildirs? Why? Give me a logical reason other than it sounds cool. Two words -- replication and redundancy. We already have systems in place which make use of replicated MySQL databases for load-balancing and redundancy. I'll have to admit, it does sound cool. But I can't get much beyond that point. You can replicate the mail for redundacy to another system or folder or whatever using a .courier file and maildrop or procmail. It seems to me the ultimate goal is to replicate not just the mail, but the state of the mail back and forth. So your message may flow into server A and then get replicated to server B. Then, the user deletes half of the messages in a session with server B and those messages get deleted from server A (hopefully before the user carries out another session with server A). Does MySQL do all that for you? If there's an easier way, I'm all ears :o) Impossible. Hmm.. I like a challenge :o) Well, to get it into the database, you could just setup a .courier file to pipe the mail into your sql-loading app. The hard part would be getting the IMAP and POP servers to look there. And any other application. The think I like about Maildir is that mutt and other things also know how to read it. -andy ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier smtpd
--Darrell Cunningham wrote on 06.01.2002 20:52 -0700: Hey guys, I am trying to figure our how to make the makehosteddomains command even work. Everytime i try to run the script it tells me that there is no such command. even when I'm in the sme directory as the makhosteddomains command. Please help #!/bin/sh PREFIX=/usr/lib/courier export PATH=$PREFIX/bin:$PREFIX/sbin:$PATH cd $PREFIX/sbin echo makeacceptmailfor; ./makeacceptmailfor || echo *** ERROR *** echo makealiases; ./makealiases || echo *** ERROR *** echo makehosteddomains; ./makehosteddomains || echo *** ERROR *** echo makesmtpaccess; ./makesmtpaccess || echo *** ERROR *** # ./makesmtpaccess-msa echo makeuserdb; ./makeuserdb || echo *** ERROR *** echo courier reload; ./courier reload # tail -4 -f /var/log/maillog ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Replacing maildir message storage with SQL
hi Simon, Has anyone contemplated modifying Courier to support the storage of messages in SQL tables rather than Maildirs? I have been mulling over this very thought for a year or so as a nice way to preserve mail and so SELECTS on whatever. Simply have not got round_2_it .. There are some issues however. Usually one would use AFAIK LDAP to scale. But the SQL .db would be a very good way IMHO to store the strings or if you like records. However there are securing issues as well that the jury still out on. So with each seemingly great idea there are issues. My plan was/is that if i get a 26 hour day this would be a fascinating project. Best Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- /* Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr */ # # Note: To begin Journey type man afterboot,man help,man hier[.] # // Who's Afraid of Schrodinger's Cat? /var/(.)?mail/me \? ;-] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] pop-before-smtp
hi hi, I want to use courier for pop/imap and mta, but I didn't find anything about pop-before-smtp if I only use courier, I found some infos how to use courier pop/imap with other mta's, but nothing about courier-pop with courier-imap. That is a good question. I know it works because I use it myself with postfix. However the concepts would be the same. pop-before-smtp is a PERL script that does all the hard work. It is very well documented so if you know the equivalent hash files you will be fine. Then simply change the program to meet your needs. Hope that helps. Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- /* Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr */ # # Note: To begin Journey type man afterboot,man help,man hier[.] # // Who's Afraid of Schrodinger's Cat? /var/(.)?mail/me \? ;-] ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Q: How to allow users login via IMAP only when allowed to, but all users via POP3
Hello, I'd like to know, how I can allow only privileged users to login using IMAP, but all users to login using POP3. I'm using LDAP to authenticate users. So, has anyone already achieved this? If not, where should the source code of the authldap part be extended to use an extra LDAP attribute with content IMAP or POP? Thank you very much in advance S. Wagler ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] imap login: root OK, other: FAIL
my friends it's time to ask, accessing the root Maildir with Outlook works. Also telnet ... 143 . login root XXX works. But: accessing imapd as another user tzenker does not work and telnet tells me that I cannot login and responds connection closed by foreign host (attached below). ./authtest -s imap with tzenker and root work both. courier imap is 1.4.1, authdaemon is running. I have appended the telnet ... 143 output for root and tzenker. Where/what should I check next? Hints are very much welcome. Cheers, Thorsten -- login as root: Trying 192.168.2.5... Connected to 192.168.2.5. Escape character is '^]'. * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2001 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information. . login root XXX . OK LOGIN Ok. . logout * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down . OK LOGOUT completed Connection closed by foreign host. -- login as another user: telnet 192.168.2.5 143 Trying 192.168.2.5... Connected to 192.168.2.5. Escape character is '^]'. * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2001 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYIN for distribution information. . login tzenker XXX Connection closed by foreign host. -- endorphin:/home/tzenker/webmail/courier-imap-1.4.1/authlib # ./authtest -s imap tzenker XXX Authenticated: module authdaemon Home directory: /home/tzenker UID/GID: 500/100 AUTHADDR=tzenker AUTHFULLNAME=Thorsten Zenker ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] authpgsql don't authenticate ... but authuserdbdo .. need help please ...
Are you using courier with postgres auth ? ... if yes, can you send me your table schema and your authpgsql ? If you like, you can send directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks ... On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 04:39, Peter C. Norton wrote: On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:20:33AM -0200, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote: Hummm ... I don't think so ... I'm running Debian/Linux unstable distro ;o) ... and postgres aways create this socket : /var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432 Ah, so the name is based on the IP port number. I'll have to check that out. -- The 5 year plan: In five years we'll make up another plan. Or just re-use this one. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: imap login: root OK, other: FAIL
Thorsten Zenker writes: my friends it's time to ask, accessing the root Maildir with Outlook works. Also telnet ... 143 . login root XXX works. But: accessing imapd as another user tzenker does not work and telnet tells me that I cannot login and responds connection closed by foreign host (attached below). ./authtest -s imap with tzenker and root work both. courier imap is 1.4.1, authdaemon is running. I have appended the telnet ... 143 output for root and tzenker. Where/what should I check next? Hints are very much welcome. Cheers, Thorsten -- login as root: Trying 192.168.2.5... Connected to 192.168.2.5. Escape character is '^]'. * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2001 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYING for distribution information. . login root XXX . OK LOGIN Ok. . logout * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down . OK LOGOUT completed Connection closed by foreign host. -- login as another user: telnet 192.168.2.5 143 Trying 192.168.2.5... Connected to 192.168.2.5. Escape character is '^]'. * OK Courier-IMAP ready. Copyright 1998-2001 Double Precision, Inc. See COPYIN for distribution information. . login tzenker XXX Connection closed by foreign host. -- endorphin:/home/tzenker/webmail/courier-imap-1.4.1/authlib # ./authtest -s imap tzenker XXX Authenticated: module authdaemon Home directory: /home/tzenker UID/GID: 500/100 AUTHADDR=tzenker AUTHFULLNAME=Thorsten Zenker What authentication modules does courier-IMAP think it is using? Check the configuration file in the /etc directory. Have yopu restarted the server since adding the new user, just to be certain? -- Bill Michell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Suggested patch: check mail before entering IDLE mode
Sam,
Attached to this message is a small patch for imapd.c in courier-0.36.1.
It could be categorised as a slight usability improvement patch. It
gives the user faster feedback if new mail has arrived at the point
where the client is commanding the server to enter IDLE mode, instead of
having to wait until the IDLE loop times out. I know, it's not as if
your life was at stake, but why not give the user the smallest of favors? :)
It's been running on my production systems for the last 8 months or so
without any problem. My systems is running Debian Potato i386, soon to
be upgraded to Woody (which already runs in my production test environment).
Regards, Tomas
NOTE
For some reason the major part of the code being replaced (marked @@
-1379,25 +1420,32 @@) was using space instead of tab and was slightly
misaligned with one space missing.
I'm afraid it originates from my original IDLE patch. There is a similar
space-instead-of-tab section at the imapidle() function body which
probably also was part of that same IDLE patch. Just wanted to give you
a hint if you haven't noticed it before. The code format in general
seems to be using tabs, correct me if I'm wrong...
/NOTE
--- ./imap/imapd.c- Wed Nov 14 05:14:51 2001
+++ ./imap/imapd.c Mon Jan 7 19:57:30 2002
@@ -1077,6 +1085,7 @@
const int idleTimeout = envp ? atoi(envp) : 60;
writes(+ entering idle mode\r\n);
+ noop();
writeflush();
while (!doidle(idleTimeout))
{
@@ -1379,25 +1420,32 @@
writes( OK NOOP completed\r\n);
return (0);
}
- if (strcmp(curtoken-tokenbuf, IDLE) == 0)
- {
- if (nexttoken()-tokentype != IT_EOL) return (-1);
- if (current_mailbox)
- {
- read_eol();
- imapidle();
- curtoken=nexttoken();
- if (strcmp(curtoken-tokenbuf, DONE) == 0)
- {
- if (current_mailbox)
- noop();
- writes(tag);
- writes( OK IDLE completed\r\n);
- return (0);
- }
- }
- return (-1);
- }
+ if (strcmp(curtoken-tokenbuf, IDLE) == 0)
+ {
+ if (nexttoken()-tokentype != IT_EOL) return (-1);
+ if (!current_mailbox)
+ {
+ char * p=decode_valid_mailbox(inbox,1);
+ if (imapscan_maildir(current_mailbox_info, p, 1, 1))
+ {
+ free(p);
+ return (-1);
+ }
+ current_mailbox=p;
+ }
+ read_eol();
+ imapidle();
+ curtoken=nexttoken();
+ if (strcmp(curtoken-tokenbuf, DONE) == 0)
+ {
+ if (current_mailbox)
+ noop();
+ writes(tag);
+ writes( OK IDLE completed\r\n);
+ return (0);
+ }
+ return (-1);
+ }
if (strcmp(curtoken-tokenbuf, LOGOUT) == 0)
{
if (nexttoken()-tokentype != IT_EOL) return (-1);
[courier-users] Re: (no subject)
Octavian Ciobanu writes: I have a problem after I've installed the curier-webmail - the configuration and make directives worked ok, but when I try to access the site I receive an page with incomplect links (EX: [#s#]empty=1) in all the pages. Can you give me some advice on this matter? Sounds like you're trying to view the HTML templates, instead of running the sqwebmail cgi binary. See INSTALL. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: secure esmtp transmissions
alan milligan writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: mail.offshore-iom.com [195.10.127.37]: SECURITY=STARTTLS REQUESTED FOR THIS MESSAGE 500 Unable to set minimum security level. Is this because this feature is only available when the remote server is a Courier/ESMTP server as well? Correct, this is a Courier-specific extension that requires a separate certificate authority, and some additional configuration. You can always use plain garden-variety STARTTLS, which will work with any relay that supports TLS. No additional configuration is necessary to implement STARTTLS. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Binding serveral interfaces but not all
Olivier Poitrey writes: Hello, I have to bind 2 of my interfaces: the localhost and the mail dedicated interface. I can figure out how to bind a single address -- with ADDRESS directive -- or how to bind all interfaces. But I haven't found how to limit binding to only some interfaces. Is it possible ? Yes. Use the PORT setting: PORT=127.0.0.1.25,192.68.0.1.25 -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: problem with QP decoding
Nerijus Baliunas writes:
Hello,
courier-imap gives subject
Re: Re: Mozilla, OpenOffice lietuvoje (Atviro kodo programø problemø sprendimas)
which was encoded as
Re:
=?windows-1257?Q?Re:_Mozilla,_OpenOffice_lietuvoje_=28Atviro_kodo_programø_problemø_sprendimas=29?=
as (excerpt from log):
00:33:23: Mail log: 0009 FETCH 1,2 (ENVELOPE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Path
Message-ID Newsgroups Followup-To References)] UID INTERNALDATE RFC822.SIZE FLAGS)
00:33:23: Mail log: * 1 FETCH (ENVELOPE (Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:32:58 +0100 Re:
=?x-unknown?Q?=?windows-1257?Q?Re:_Mozilla,_OpenOffice_lietuvoje_=28At?=
=?x-unknown?Q?viro_kodo_program=F8_problem=F8_sprendimas=29?=?= ((Mantas K NIL
monte mail.lt)) (([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL owner-komp_lt
news.konferencijos.lt)) (([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL monte mail.lt)) ((Gintautas
Grigas NIL grigas julius.ktl.mii.lt)([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL komp_lt konf.lt))
NIL NIL NIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]) BODY[HEADER.FIELDS
(Path Message-ID Newsgroups Followup-To References)] {64}
Why there are these x-unknown? Is the subject incorrectly encoded?
Yes. There are still several 8-bit characters, ø that have not been
encoded in the headers.
--
Sam
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Replacing maildir message storage with SQL
Simon Cocking writes: The beauty of using SQL as a message back-end would be that you could set up an array of SMTP/POP/IMAP servers in a DNS round-robin arrangement, and users could hit any one of them at any time and it would appear to them to be the same server. Need more horsepower? Just add a new server to the pool. Fancy that? That's exactly how at least half a dozen ISPs I know of have their iron set up. And they don't need an SQL server to do that. Need better availability? Distribute your servers over multiple physical sites with different bandwidth providers. Want Just add more servers. You don't need a bloated SQL monster to do that. centralised stats reporting? It's all *already* in the database. Or, /var/log/messages. Plus, user management is just an SQL query away. All without a central Or a mkdir/rmdir. point of failure. Right. Words to live by: the more you overthink the plumbing, the easier it becomes to back up the drain. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Replacing maildir message storage with SQL
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Simon Cocking wrote: My need is purely IMAP POP3. Command-line access to mail is not in the picture, although I agree that interfacing filesystem-based mail readers would be a challenge :o) Having said that, at least Pine / Elm support IMAP anyway. If you are addicted to the idea of SQL message store, you might look at http://www.dbmail.org/ -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Replacing maildir message storage with SQL
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:15:40AM +1100, Simon Cocking wrote: It seems to me the ultimate goal is to replicate not just the mail, but the state of the mail back and forth. *Exactly* :o) Then use a cluster filesystem or something like drdb. SQL databases are really really slow compared to a filesystem, when you can't control the usage profile. Using maildirs on top of gfs would get you better replication, better speed, and better and easier redundancy then using a database. -- The 5 year plan: In five years we'll make up another plan. Or just re-use this one. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
addendum to [courier-users] Inbound traffic jam
I've attached what bounced back from one of my attempts to send a message into my courier server from an outside account. To reiterate, sending throught courier is working wonderfully from any of my machines in my network, and receiving between machines in the network works, too. It's receiving from the Internet that it seems to be choking on. Hopefully this will help in debugging. David M. Stowell Ravenslake Consulting Chicago, IL From raven Mon Jan 7 15:24:03 2002 Return-Path: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:13:05 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; Boundary_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Status: RO Content-Length: 1914 Lines: 56 --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: text/plain This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason:Relaying denied. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Received-From-MTA: dns; chopin.ravenslake (66.73.252.54) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.0 Remote-MTA: dns; ravenslakeconsulting.com (66.73.252.54) Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 513 Relaying denied. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from chopin.ravenslake ([66.73.252.54]) by mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:17:39 -0600 From: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition-Notification-To: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.3 Content-Length: 34 Lines: 1 test from Ameritech to ravenslake --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985--
Re: addendum to [courier-users] Inbound traffic jam
David M . Stowell wrote: I've attached what bounced back from one of my attempts to send a message into my courier server from an outside account. To reiterate, sending throught courier is working wonderfully from any of my machines in my network, and receiving between machines in the network works, too. It's receiving from the Internet that it seems to be choking on. Hopefully this will help in debugging. David M. Stowell Ravenslake Consulting Chicago, IL From raven Mon Jan 7 15:24:03 2002 Return-Path: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:13:05 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; Boundary_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Status: RO Content-Length: 1914 Lines: 56 --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: text/plain This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason:Relaying denied. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Received-From-MTA: dns; chopin.ravenslake (66.73.252.54) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.0 Remote-MTA: dns; ravenslakeconsulting.com (66.73.252.54) Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 513 Relaying denied. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from chopin.ravenslake ([66.73.252.54]) by mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:17:39 -0600 From: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition-Notification-To: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.3 Content-Length: 34 Lines: 1 test from Ameritech to ravenslake --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985-- Do you have auth through SMTP enabled? Do the clients have Username/password for SMTP enabled? ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: addendum to [courier-users] Inbound traffic jam
Sysop wrote: David M . Stowell wrote: I've attached what bounced back from one of my attempts to send a message into my courier server from an outside account. To reiterate, sending throught courier is working wonderfully from any of my machines in my network, and receiving between machines in the network works, too. It's receiving from the Internet that it seems to be choking on. Hopefully this will help in debugging. David M. Stowell Ravenslake Consulting Chicago, IL From raven Mon Jan 7 15:24:03 2002 Return-Path: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Mail Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:13:05 -0600 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; Boundary_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Status: RO Content-Length: 1914 Lines: 56 --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: text/plain This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reason:Relaying denied. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net Arrival-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Received-From-MTA: dns; chopin.ravenslake (66.73.252.54) Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.2.0 Remote-MTA: dns; ravenslakeconsulting.com (66.73.252.54) Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 513 Relaying denied. --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from chopin.ravenslake ([66.73.252.54]) by mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:19:04 -0600 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 01:17:39 -0600 From: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disposition-Notification-To: David M . Stowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.3 Content-Length: 34 Lines: 1 test from Ameritech to ravenslake --===_ _= 7992248(24187)1010419985-- Do you have auth through SMTP enabled? Do the clients have Username/password for SMTP enabled? ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users Oh, I think I see where some of the problem lies... I thought somebody was trying to use you as an SMTP server, from outside your network. This is just general mail coming in from another smtp server for delivery where do you have your domains listed, for hosted or local? ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] another problem with headers
Hi, Actual header in a message is: To: Aida \(E-mail\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] If a message is viewed through IMAP, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida \\(E-mail\\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Log: 02:48:50: Mail log: * 3 FETCH (ENVELOPE (Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:22:43 +0100 ku rtu ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) (([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Aida \\(E-mail\\) NIL aida xxx.lt)) NIL NIL NIL If a message is in mbox file, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the header bad? It is created by MS Outlook. Regards, Nerijus ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] another problem with headers
Nerijus Baliunas wrote: Hi, Actual header in a message is: To: Aida \(E-mail\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] If a message is viewed through IMAP, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida \\(E-mail\\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Log: 02:48:50: Mail log: * 3 FETCH (ENVELOPE (Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:22:43 +0100 ku rtu ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) (([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Aida \\(E-mail\\) NIL aida xxx.lt)) NIL NIL NIL If a message is in mbox file, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the header bad? It is created by MS Outlook. Regards, Nerijus ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users Looks like somewhere along the line, the first \ gets read as an actual character, and then it tries to escape the space with another \... odd ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: addendum to [courier-users] Inbound traffic jam
On 2002.01.07 18:59 Sysop wrote: Sysop wrote: Oh, I think I see where some of the problem lies... I thought somebody was trying to use you as an SMTP server, from outside your network. This is just general mail coming in from another smtp server for delivery where do you have your domains listed, for hosted or local? I have them listed in locals. No domains are listed in any other configuration file. I've attached a copy of locals. Thanks, David M. Stowell locals Description: Binary data
[courier-users] Re: another problem with headers
Nerijus Baliunas writes: Hi, Actual header in a message is: To: Aida \(E-mail\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] If a message is viewed through IMAP, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida \\(E-mail\\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Log: 02:48:50: Mail log: * 3 FETCH (ENVELOPE (Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:22:43 +0100 ku rtu ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Modesta NIL modesta xxx.com)) (([EMAIL PROTECTED] NIL modesta xxx.com)) ((Aida \\(E-mail\\) NIL aida xxx.lt)) NIL NIL NIL If a message is in mbox file, my mail client displays it as: To: Aida (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the header bad? It is created by MS Outlook. No. This is simply a by-product of rather poor choices that went into the original design of a number of related standards - RFC 822, RFC 2060, and others - which makes the interaction between these protocols full of various pitfalls and gotchas which end up manifesting themselves in these kinds of things... Just avoid using unnecessary punctuation in mail addresses. Otherwise, the only thing you should expect to happen - or NOT to happen as the case may be - is the various applications not crashing on you. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: addendum to [courier-users] Inbound traffic jam
You need to have domains listed in files in esmtpaccpetmailfor.dir/ and then you need to run makeacceptmailfor. Check out the man page for it. -Peter On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:48:50PM -0600, David M . Stowell wrote: On 2002.01.07 18:59 Sysop wrote: Sysop wrote: Oh, I think I see where some of the problem lies... I thought somebody was trying to use you as an SMTP server, from outside your network. This is just general mail coming in from another smtp server for delivery where do you have your domains listed, for hosted or local? I have them listed in locals. No domains are listed in any other configuration file. I've attached a copy of locals. Thanks, David M. Stowell -- The 5 year plan: In five years we'll make up another plan. Or just re-use this one. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Suggested patch: check mail before entering IDLE mode
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:15:14AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: This is definitely wrong. If no mailbox is open, you SHOULD NOT open INBOX due to IDLE! Sam, Not having looked carefully at the patch, are you speaking in all caps because you're quoting an RFC (in which case SHOULD NOT could be == to YOU CAN) or can you expand on this? -- The 5 year plan: In five years we'll make up another plan. Or just re-use this one. ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Suggested patch: check mail before entering IDLE mode
Peter C. Norton writes: On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:15:14AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: This is definitely wrong. If no mailbox is open, you SHOULD NOT open INBOX due to IDLE! Sam, Not having looked carefully at the patch, are you speaking in all caps because you're quoting an RFC (in which case SHOULD NOT could be == to YOU CAN) or can you expand on this? No. You simply can't open a mailbox except by, well, actually opening it. That's it. -- Sam ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] secure esmtp transmissions
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, alan milligan wrote: I have been following the changes Gordon made for secure esmtp, but am a little lost, and think I am using the full-blown Courier extensions instead. The changes I made were for incoming SMTP over SSL (using alternate port rather than STARTTLS). They don't apply to mail being delivered from your mail server out. -- If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have, I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
