[courier-users] Re: file perl is not owned by any package

2002-06-23 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Alexander Skwar writes: 

 So sprach Sam Varshavchik am 2002-06-23 um 13:07:16 -0400 :
 This is wrong.  You probably have an old version of RPM which exhibits 
 this anomaly.
 
 [askwar@teich courier]$ rpm --version
 RPM Version 4.0.4 
 
 That's the latest, isn't it?  I think the issue is, that no package
 provides a file perl (no path here).

Something is broken: 

$ rpm -q --whatprovides perl
perl-5.6.1-34.99.6
perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 

-- 
Sam 



---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users



Re: [courier-users] Re: file perl is not owned by any package

2002-06-23 Thread Alexander Skwar

So sprach Sam Varshavchik am 2002-06-23 um 18:18:41 -0400 :
 $ rpm -q --whatprovides perl
 perl-5.6.1-34.99.6
 perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 

[askwar@klama SPECS]$ rpm -q --whatprovides perl
perl-5.601-14mdk

However, I'm not able to reproduce the bug anymore.  But I nonetheless
still think that it would be a good idea to specify /usr/bin/perl, so
that exactly this perl is used.  And ./webmail/cleancache.pl is also
using the full path to perl: /usr/bin/perl5.

EIther of the two should be fixed - remove the /usr/bin/perl5 from
cleancache, or add /usr/bin/perl5 to the webadmin scripts, I'd think.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:   http://www.iso-top.de  |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
   Uptime: 12 hours 48 minutes


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users



Re: [courier-users] Re: file perl is not owned by any package

2002-06-23 Thread Jesse Keating

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 01:39:04 +0200
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] issued forth:

# 
# However, I'm not able to reproduce the bug anymore.  But I nonetheless
# still think that it would be a good idea to specify /usr/bin/perl, so
# that exactly this perl is used.  And ./webmail/cleancache.pl is also
# using the full path to perl: /usr/bin/perl5.
# 
# EIther of the two should be fixed - remove the /usr/bin/perl5 from
# cleancache, or add /usr/bin/perl5 to the webadmin scripts, I'd think.

I vote for removal of specific path call to perl5.  To facilitate systems that
have perl in a different location.

-- 
Sysop


---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users