Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Pierre-Charles David]

Le 29/11/2021 à 18:37, Wayne Beaton a écrit :
I've made the updates that have been requested so far. Let me know if 
anything else needs to be updated.


Ecore Tools will contribute version 3.3.4 instead of 3.3.3


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Wayne Beaton]

I've made the updates that have been requested so far. Let me know if
anything else needs to be updated.

LSP4E will most likely contribute a 0.20.1 and m2e a 1.19.0. Both are
> supposed to get released next week.


According to the simrel repository, you've made these updates, so I've
reflected that on the participation page.

Wayne

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:28 AM Patrick Tasse 
wrote:

> Hi Wayne,
>
> Eclipse Trace Compass will release version 7.2.0 in 2021-12.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:12 AM Wayne Beaton <
> wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!
>>
>> It's that time of the quarter again.
>>
>> Please have a look at the participation page
>> . If I have something
>> wrong, please let me know.
>>
>> I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's
>> software will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on
>> what I see in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need
>> to create release records for your contributions.
>>
>> If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version
>> selected, please ensure that you have created a release record with the
>> correct version number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to
>> this thread with the correct version information (or just send me a
>> separate note).
>>
>> If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not
>> engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the release
>> date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.
>>
>> Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release
>> review, *you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property
>> due diligence process has been completed for all of the contents of your
>> release*. If you have open CQs for content that will be included in the
>> release, please reach out to emo-reco...@eclipse.org to request that
>> they expedite processing.
>>
>> If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool
>>  to review the license state
>> of your project's third party content.
>>
>> Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are
>> not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about
>> the status of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP
>> Log with a comment requesting that the EMO review your project for
>> conformance (when you submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that
>> you're initiating a release review unless you indicate otherwise).
>>
>> I've noticed a few things...
>>
>> Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is
>> the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but
>> will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?
>>
>> Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should
>> somebody remove the aggrcon file?
>>
>> Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository.
>> In June
>> ,
>> these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the
>> best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even
>> old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything)
>> special needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council
>> expressed any concerns in response to the declaration from the project
>> teams, so I've added them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem.
>> AFAICT there is no release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this
>> release.
>>
>> There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The
>> Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse
>> ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there
>> anybody on this list representing the interests of these projects?
>>
>> Thanks for your attention.
>>
>> Wayne
>> --
>>
>> Wayne Beaton
>>
>> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
>> ___
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>


-- 

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Patrick Tasse]

Hi Wayne,

Eclipse Trace Compass will release version 7.2.0 in 2021-12.

Thanks,
Patrick


On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:12 AM Wayne Beaton <
wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:

> Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!
>
> It's that time of the quarter again.
>
> Please have a look at the participation page
> . If I have something
> wrong, please let me know.
>
> I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's software
> will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on what I see
> in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need to create
> release records for your contributions.
>
> If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version
> selected, please ensure that you have created a release record with the
> correct version number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to
> this thread with the correct version information (or just send me a
> separate note).
>
> If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not
> engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the release
> date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.
>
> Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release
> review, *you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property
> due diligence process has been completed for all of the contents of your
> release*. If you have open CQs for content that will be included in the
> release, please reach out to emo-reco...@eclipse.org to request that they
> expedite processing.
>
> If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool
>  to review the license state of
> your project's third party content.
>
> Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are
> not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about
> the status of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP
> Log with a comment requesting that the EMO review your project for
> conformance (when you submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that
> you're initiating a release review unless you indicate otherwise).
>
> I've noticed a few things...
>
> Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is
> the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but
> will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?
>
> Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should
> somebody remove the aggrcon file?
>
> Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository.
> In June
> ,
> these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the
> best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even
> old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything)
> special needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council
> expressed any concerns in response to the declaration from the project
> teams, so I've added them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem.
> AFAICT there is no release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this
> release.
>
> There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The
> Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse
> ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there
> anybody on this list representing the interests of these projects?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Wayne
> --
>
> Wayne Beaton
>
> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Ondrej Dockal]

Hey Wayne,

Could you please also update the RedDeer version as well? From3.5.0 to
4.0.0?

Thank you very much

Ondrej Dockal
RedDeer project lead

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:12 AM Wayne Beaton <
wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:

> Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!
>
> It's that time of the quarter again.
>
> Please have a look at the participation page
> . If I have something
> wrong, please let me know.
>
> I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's software
> will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on what I see
> in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need to create
> release records for your contributions.
>
> If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version
> selected, please ensure that you have created a release record with the
> correct version number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to
> this thread with the correct version information (or just send me a
> separate note).
>
> If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not
> engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the release
> date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.
>
> Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release
> review, *you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property
> due diligence process has been completed for all of the contents of your
> release*. If you have open CQs for content that will be included in the
> release, please reach out to emo-reco...@eclipse.org to request that they
> expedite processing.
>
> If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool
>  to review the license state of
> your project's third party content.
>
> Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are
> not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about
> the status of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP
> Log with a comment requesting that the EMO review your project for
> conformance (when you submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that
> you're initiating a release review unless you indicate otherwise).
>
> I've noticed a few things...
>
> Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is
> the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but
> will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?
>
> Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should
> somebody remove the aggrcon file?
>
> Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository.
> In June
> ,
> these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the
> best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even
> old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything)
> special needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council
> expressed any concerns in response to the declaration from the project
> teams, so I've added them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem.
> AFAICT there is no release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this
> release.
>
> There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The
> Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse
> ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there
> anybody on this list representing the interests of these projects?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Wayne
> --
>
> Wayne Beaton
>
> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Mickael Istria]

Hi,

TM4E contributes 0.4.3 (released and added to SimRel earlier today).
LSP4E will most likely contribute a 0.20.1 and m2e a 1.19.0. Both are
supposed to get released next week.

Cheers,

-- 
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE  developer, for Red Hat
Developers 
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Nanivadekar, Nikhil J via cross-project-issues-dev]

Hi Wayne,

For Eclipse Collections, we will still contribute the old version. 11.0.0 is 
slated to release soon, but getting that on the simrel train might not happen 
on time. Can you please update it to 10.4.0?

Thanks,
Nikhil

From: cross-project-issues-dev  
On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 12:12 AM
To: Cross project issues 
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

CAUTION: External email. Please exercise caution with links and attachments. 
Never enable any macros.

Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!

It's that time of the quarter again.

Please have a look at the participation 
page.
 If I have something wrong, please let me know.

I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's software will 
be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on what I see in the 
simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need to create release 
records for your contributions.

If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version selected, 
please ensure that you have created a release record with the correct version 
number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to this thread with 
the correct version information (or just send me a separate note).

If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not engaged in 
a progress or release review within one year of the release date, then please 
engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.

Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release review, 
you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property due diligence 
process has been completed for all of the contents of your release. If you have 
open CQs for content that will be included in the release, please reach out to 
emo-reco...@eclipse.org to request that they 
expedite processing.

If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License 
Tool
 to review the license state of your project's third party content.

Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are not 
engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about the status 
of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP Log with a 
comment requesting that the EMO review your project for conformance (when you 
submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that you're initiating a 
release review unless you indicate otherwise).

I've noticed a few things...

Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is the 
status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but will 
Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?

Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should somebody 
remove the aggrcon file?

Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository. In 
June,
 these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the best 
of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even old 
bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything) special 
needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council expressed any 
concerns in response to the declaration from the project teams, so I've added 
them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem. AFAICT there is no 
release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this release.

There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The Eclipse 
Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse ACTF is 
more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there anybody on 
this list representing the interests of these projects?

Thanks for your attention.

Wayne
--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation

--
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential 
and is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. Access, copying 
or re-use of the e-mail or any attachment, or any information contained 
therein, by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended 
recipient please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it from your 
computer. Although we attempt to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, we 
do not guarantee that either are virus-free and accept no liability for any 
damage sustained as a 

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Pierre-Charles David]

Le 18/11/2021 à 06:11, Wayne Beaton a écrit :

Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!

It's that time of the quarter again.

Please have a look at the participation page 
. If I have something 
wrong, please let me know.


* GMF Runtime will still contribute version 1.13.1 this time.
* Sirius will contribute version 6.5.1 (maybe 6.5.2), not 7.0.0 which 
has moved to January (I've updated the record).
* Ecore Tools *might* ship a version 3.3.4 instead of the current 3.3.3 
if I can find the time to fix a specific bug.


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 2021-12 project participation

[Matthias Sohn]

EGit will ship 6.0.0 not 6.0 I fixed the release record accordingly

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:12 AM Wayne Beaton <
wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org> wrote:

> Greetings Simultaneous Release Participants!
>
> It's that time of the quarter again.
>
> Please have a look at the participation page
> . If I have something
> wrong, please let me know.
>
> I've made my usual best guesses at what version of each project's software
> will be included in the 2021-12 simultaneous release. Based on what I see
> in the simrel repository, though, I think that a few of you need to create
> release records for your contributions.
>
> If your project is pushing a new version and I have the wrong version
> selected, please ensure that you have created a release record with the
> correct version number and date. If that's in place, then please respond to
> this thread with the correct version information (or just send me a
> separate note).
>
> If your project is contributing a major or minor release and has not
> engaged in a progress or release review within one year of the release
> date, then please engage the EMO ASAP to schedule a review.
>
> Note that even if you do not need to engage in a progress or release
> review, *you are responsible for ensuring that the intellectual property
> due diligence process has been completed for all of the contents of your
> release*. If you have open CQs for content that will be included in the
> release, please reach out to emo-reco...@eclipse.org to request that they
> expedite processing.
>
> If you haven't yet, consider trying the Eclipse Dash License Tool
>  to review the license state of
> your project's third party content.
>
> Remember that you do not need to submit your IP Log for review if you are
> not engaging in a progress or release review. If you are uncertain about
> the status of your project's intellectual property, you can submit the IP
> Log with a comment requesting that the EMO review your project for
> conformance (when you submit an IP Log for review, the EMO will assume that
> you're initiating a release review unless you indicate otherwise).
>
> I've noticed a few things...
>
> Several Eclipse Mylyn features are disabled. Is this a problem? What is
> the status of this? It feels a little late to be asking this question, but
> will Eclipse Mylyn be updated in time to be included in the release?
>
> Eclipse EGF dropped out starting with the 2021-09 release. Can/should
> somebody remove the aggrcon file?
>
> Eclipse XWT and Eclipse Papyrus have been reactivated in the repository.
> In June
> ,
> these projects "decided to opt out of the train for this release". To the
> best of my knowledge, opting out completely (that is, not contributing even
> old bits) of a release is unprecedented, so I'm not sure what (if anything)
> special needs to be done here. AFAICT, nobody from the Planning Council
> expressed any concerns in response to the declaration from the project
> teams, so I've added them back in. Please let me know if this is a problem.
> AFAICT there is no release record for Eclipse XWT that corresponds to this
> release.
>
> There are some very old components in the simultaneous release. The
> Eclipse Data Tools features are, AFAICT, more than three years old. Eclipse
> ACTF is more than four years old. Are these features being tested? Is there
> anybody on this list representing the interests of these projects?
>
> Thanks for your attention.
>
> Wayne
> --
>
> Wayne Beaton
>
> Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev