Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

2013-06-06 Thread Wayne Beaton 

  
  
I've marked the recommenders bug as fixed; it's off the list.

Wayne

On 06/06/2013 04:40 AM, Andreas Sewe
  wrote:


  Hi Wayne,


  
If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things:

* Review documentation;
* PMC approval of review documentation; or
* An IP Team-approved IP Log.

The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases
should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.

If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me
know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss
something.

  
  
for of all, thanks for doing all the juggling.

Anyway, I think Code Recommenders should not be on the list. As Bug
408897 [1] states, 1.0.4 is a bugfix release (1.0.0 was
approved/reviewed for Juno) and thus does not require a review (and
hence PMC approval of the review documentation? Not sure about this
one). Also, the IP log has been approved.

Best wishes,

Andreas

[1] 




-- 
  Wayne Beaton
  Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
  Learn about Eclipse
Projects
  
  

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

2013-06-06 Thread Wayne Beaton 

  
  
Hi Ed.

The use of flags in the review bugzillas is something new that I
just started doing this year. I'm the one that I expect to be
setting the flag. If I'd expected otherwise, I'd have informed the
PMCs.

What I did ask was this:


http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg09061.html


  
  The deadline to submit your PMC-approved review materials
to EMO is June 5/2013. Earlier is
fine (better, even). Send me the document, or a link to the
document along with a link to the public approval discussion
with your PMC. Please do not be late. Let me know if you require
assistance.


I was trying to keep up with the PMC mailing lists, but some of the
discussions where a little more involved that simple +1s, so I fell
back on the usual practice of updating the records and scheduling
reviews as the information arrived in my inbox.

HTH,

Wayne

On 06/06/2013 12:12 AM, Ed Willink
  wrote:


  Hi Wayne
  I don't think MDT/OCL should be on the list, so I reviewed the
Bug 406441 dependencies. It appears that the only projects that
satisfy you are ones where you have added the PMC approval
yourself.
  All other projects have a problem at the PMC stage. So it seems
that either you or the PMC are failing to complete the approval
by updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the
PMC mailing list.
      Regards
      Ed Willink
   
  On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton wrote:
  Greetings
folks.

I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that
are missing something that I require for the review.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737

If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three
things:

* Review documentation;
* PMC approval of review documentation; or
* An IP Team-approved IP Log.

The corresponding records for projects that are doing service
releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be
on this list.

If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let
me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's
easy to miss something.

If you're not on this list, you should be included in the
"upcoming reviews" section of the Projects Gateway page:

http://eclipse.org/projects/

Let me know if you're missing.

If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with
PMC-approved review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This
was due today. The review starts tomorrow; if I don't have your
materials in my inbox tomorrow AM, then you miss the review. If
you've submitted your review documentation and your IP Log, but
the IP Log hasn't come back, I'll schedule you for the review
anyway (the review cannot be declared successful until after the
IP Log is approved).

I do not intend to hold a call for this review. If anybody feels
strongly in favour of holding a call, let me know.

If you're having trouble meeting any of the requirements, please
let me know.

My thanks go out to the projects that paid attention and heeded
the deadlines.

Wayne
-- 
  Wayne Beaton
  Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
  Learn about Eclipse Projects
  
  
  I
  
   
   
  
  
  
  ___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



-- 
  Wayne Beaton
  Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
  Learn about Eclipse
Projects
  
  

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Sewe 
Hi Wayne,

> If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things:
> 
> * Review documentation;
> * PMC approval of review documentation; or
> * An IP Team-approved IP Log.
> 
> The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases
> should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.
> 
> If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me
> know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss
> something.

for of all, thanks for doing all the juggling.

Anyway, I think Code Recommenders should not be on the list. As Bug
408897 [1] states, 1.0.4 is a bugfix release (1.0.0 was
approved/reviewed for Juno) and thus does not require a review (and
hence PMC approval of the review documentation? Not sure about this
one). Also, the IP log has been approved.

Best wishes,

Andreas

[1] 

-- 
Codetrails UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
The knowledge transfer company

Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt
Mobile: +49-170-811-3791
http://www.codetrails.com/

Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch
Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

2013-06-06 Thread Sven Efftinge 
modeling.emf.mwe is not on the list, although it should. I don't see what's 
missing.

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409763

On Jun 5, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Wayne Beaton  wrote:

> Greetings folks.
> 
> I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that are missing 
> something that I require for the review.
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737
> 
> If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things:
> 
> * Review documentation;
> * PMC approval of review documentation; or
> * An IP Team-approved IP Log.
> 
> The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should 
> already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.
> 
> If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We 
> juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something.
> 
> If you're not on this list, you should be included in the "upcoming reviews" 
> section of the Projects Gateway page:
> 
> http://eclipse.org/projects/
> 
> Let me know if you're missing.
> 
> If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with PMC-approved 
> review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This was due today. The review 
> starts tomorrow; if I don't have your materials in my inbox tomorrow AM, then 
> you miss the review. If you've submitted your review documentation and your 
> IP Log, but the IP Log hasn't come back, I'll schedule you for the review 
> anyway (the review cannot be declared successful until after the IP Log is 
> approved).
> 
> I do not intend to hold a call for this review. If anybody feels strongly in 
> favour of holding a call, let me know.
> 
> If you're having trouble meeting any of the requirements, please let me know.
> 
> My thanks go out to the projects that paid attention and heeded the deadlines.
> 
> Wayne
> -- 
> Wayne Beaton
> Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
> Learn about Eclipse Projects
> 
> 
> I
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review

2013-06-05 Thread Ed Willink 
 

Hi Wayne 

I don't think MDT/OCL should be on the list, so I
reviewed the Bug 406441 dependencies. It appears that the only projects
that satisfy you are ones where you have added the PMC approval
yourself. 

All other projects have a problem at the PMC stage. So it
seems that either you or the PMC are failing to complete the approval by
updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the PMC mailing
list. 

 Regards 

 Ed Willink 

On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton
wrote: 

> Greetings folks.
> 
> I've built a little Bugzilla query that
lists the projects that are missing something that I require for the
review.
> 
>
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737
[1]
> 
> If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three
things:
> 
> * Review documentation;
> * PMC approval of review
documentation; or
> * An IP Team-approved IP Log.
> 
> The corresponding
records for projects that are doing service releases should already be
marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list.
> 
> If you believe
that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a
lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something.
> 
>
If you're not on this list, you should be included in the "upcoming
reviews" section of the Projects Gateway page:
> 
>
http://eclipse.org/projects/ [2]
> 
> Let me know if you're missing.
>

> If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with
PMC-approved review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This was due
today. The review starts tomorrow; if I don't have your materials in my
inbox tomorrow AM, then you miss the review. If you've submitted your
review documentation and your IP Log, but the IP Log hasn't come back,
I'll schedule you for the review anyway (the review cannot be declared
successful until after the IP Log is approved).
> 
> I do not intend to
hold a call for this review. If anybody feels strongly in favour of
holding a call, let me know.
> 
> If you're having trouble meeting any
of the requirements, please let me know.
> 
> My thanks go out to the
projects that paid attention and heeded the deadlines.
> 
> Wayne
> 
>
-- 
> Wayne Beaton
> Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse
Foundation [3]
> Learn about Eclipse Projects [4]
> [5]
> 
> I




Links:
--
[1]
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Log&bug_status=NEW&o5=substring&n2=1&f1=blocked&o3=substring&v3=Documentation&o1=equals&f4=attachments.description&v5=pmc_approved&query_format=advanced&f3=keywords&o4=equals&f2=OP&f5=flagtypes.name&v1=406441&list_id=5794737
[2]
http://eclipse.org/projects/
[3] http://www.eclipse.org
[4]
http://www.eclipse.org/projects
[5]
http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2013
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev