Re: [css-d] Most popular fonts for browsers

2008-04-08 Thread Fora
Know Google?
Keywords: web standard fonts

http://www.ampsoft.net/webdesign-l/WindowsMacFonts.html




 
 Does anybody know about a list of commonly used fonts?
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 ~ Cristian Palmas ~
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Font name

2008-02-25 Thread Fora
Hi,

This is... like... SO off-topic ;o)
So, be prepared to see an ADMIN thingy coming up soon.


Anyway... If ever you need to know what a font type is, try this:
http://www.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont/

It identifies a big percentage of the fonts correctly.

Anyway... The font you're looking for is GillSans.

Mind you that not all your users have GillSans installed on their system, so 
make sure you have a backup-font in your style sheet.


HTH,
F.


- Original Message - 
From: Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: 25 February, 2008 4:21 PM
Subject: [css-d] Font name


Hi,

Does anyone know the font name that is used in this picture ?

http://www.absinto.org/einstein.010.png

I'd like to use it in a site, but I can't figure out what it is.

Any help would be appreciated.

Warm Regards,
Mário Gamito
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Fonts in Vista Office 2007

2008-02-05 Thread Fora
The best thing (and probably the best thing about Vista in general at the 
moment) is that all Windows Vista fonts are OpenType fonts, so theoretically 
you could actually embed them in your website.

Embed them with CSS. In the CSS stylesheet- not practical CSS, but at 
least it's about CSS now ;o)

F.




- Original Message - 
From: Geoffrey Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: 06 February, 2008 6:50 AM
Subject: [css-d] Fonts in Vista  Office 2007


I installed Office 2007 on my box at work and really like some of the new
 fonts that came with it.

 http://neosmart.net/blog/2006/a-comprehensive-look-at-the-new-microsoft-fonts/

 Anyone know if you can buy them separately somewhere? (I really don't need
 Office 2007 nor Vista on my Win XP box at home.)

 I spent a half hour searching on Microsoft.com and could not find them for
 sale alone without buying Vista or Office 2007.

 I think I'll start doing...

 body {
   font-family: Calibri, Arial...
 }

 but I can't test it locally. :-/

 - Geoff
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] hand coders vs wsywig coders...I had no idea

2008-01-28 Thread Fora
I think we'll soon be slapped on the wrist for off-topic material, since 
this doesn't really have anything to do with what's mentioned in the list 
policies' practical CSS stuff...

I'm hand coding all that I do. I'm not saying I know everything (far from 
it), but with what I do I know why I'm doing it.
First off, hand coding provides a lot cleaner coding than any WYSIWYG editor 
will give you. Second, I think the main problems with users using WYSIWYG 
editors is that they don't really know what's going on behind the scenes. If 
a problem turns up and the WYSIWYG for some reason doesn't or can't solve 
it, they're at a loss of how to solve it.

I think it's important to know why something is why it is.
The guy at the job interview could've probably been a bit more tactical, but 
I see his point.

M. 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] (no subject)

2007-12-20 Thread Fora
Hi Juliann,

I'm not sure why you would want to make so many different stylesheets in the 
first place, since you can make an almost 100% accurate stylesheet with one 
file to cover all browsers, but that's a different thing.

Anyway... I think your css is in the wrong directory...
You're using relative URLs. The css you're calling should be in 
www.pcg-advisors.com/new/theteam. It is in www.pcg-advisors.com/new


Arno






- Original Message - 
From: juliann wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: 20 December, 2007 11:33 PM
Subject: [css-d] (no subject)




 Does anyone know why this page is not picking up the css style sheet like 
 the javascrip is telling it to?

 http://www.pcg-advisors.com/new/theteam/brent.html

 It is supposed to look like this one which happens to be working:

 http://www.pcg-advisors.com/new/index.html

 I can't tell why it's working with the home page and not the other one.

 Thanks!

 _
 The best games are on Xbox 360.  Click here for a special offer on an Xbox 
 360 Console.
 http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/wheretobuy/
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Anchors not linking

2007-09-27 Thread Fora
Neither of your links are working...?

(Requested URL was not found on this server)

Arno

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Fw: image problem..

2007-09-23 Thread Fora
Hey Mike,

Not quite sure what you mean (or if it's css related), but I don't see the 
problem (FF 2.0.0.7).
Can you elaborate a bit more?



Did see that the validator sums up 19 HTML errors...


Arno



 Put an image in my siteand its appearing as if it has watery marks
 around the edges, if anyone can  quickly  look at it, would appreciate
 it.


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with the footer position

2007-07-19 Thread Fora
I think we are going to need a bit more information than just the CSS and 
markup of the footer.
Test page online would be better.

BR
Arno 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Right columns drops under the rest in IE

2007-06-17 Thread Fora
http://www.poetryin-e-motion.com/larissa/lessen.html
http://www.poetryin-e-motion.com/larissa/styles/lessen.css


Hi,

I have a problem with the right column that drops under the rest in IE.
I figure it has something to do with the margins, but it didn't help when I 
tried to reduce the size / delete the margins of any of the columns.

Any help greatly appreciated.

Fora 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Right columns drops under the rest in IE [SOLVED]

2007-06-17 Thread Fora
@ Fiona,
Thanks for that, that solved the problem. I miscalculated the total width of 
the columns and I completely overlooked that the right column was outside 
the wrapper.

@AC
I made the wrapper in case they decide at some point to center the page in 
the viewport. Better put it there now than having to solve the problem later 
in a lot of files. Thanks for the advise anyway.

F.

 Original Message - 
From: Fiona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Right columns drops under the rest in IE


 Just at a quick glance, your right div is placed outside of the wrapper 
 div
 holding the other elements, so will be displayed after the rest of the
 content.  Also, the set width of the wrapper is 800, but the set widths of
 the left div, content div and right div add up to more than that 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Gap in box

2007-05-09 Thread Fora
Hi list,


HTML
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/modeling/altia2004.shtml
CSS
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/styles/modeling.css


Please disregard the directive errors. I haven't put those up yet. The 
problem is the following:

The image is in #imagebox
I haven't set the height of the box, nor any padding. Yet there is a gap at 
the bottom of the box inside the frame.
I ran through a good part of the archive, but I couldn't find anything that 
would be causing this.
Can anyone shed some light?

TIA
Fora


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Gap in box

2007-05-09 Thread Fora
Dang! That was easy. I must've stared blind in finding the problem.
Thanks a lot, Nigel and Gunlaug! :o)

Fora



snip

Add: 

img { display: block; }

/snip

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Validator

2007-04-25 Thread Fora
Error Line 12 column 29: required attribute TYPE not specified.
script language=JavaScript
The attribute given above is required for an element that you've used, but you 
have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML document types the type 
attribute is required on the script element and the alt attribute is 
required for the img element. 
Typical values for type are type=text/css for style and 
type=text/javascript for script. 
✉ 
Error Line 68 column 29: required attribute TYPE not specified.
script language=JavaScript
The attribute given above is required for an element that you've used, but you 
have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML document types the type 
attribute is required on the script element and the alt attribute is 
required for the img element. 
Typical values for type are type=text/css for style and 
type=text/javascript for script. 
✉ 
Error Line 68 column 29: document type does not allow element SCRIPT here.
script language=JavaScript
The element named above was found in a context where it is not allowed. This 
could mean that you have incorrectly nested elements -- such as a style 
element in the body section instead of inside head -- or two elements that 
overlap (which is not allowed). 
One common cause for this error is the use of XHTML syntax in HTML documents. 
Due to HTML's rules of implicitly closed elements, this error can create 
cascading effects. For instance, using XHTML's self-closing tags for meta 
and link in the head section of a HTML document may cause the parser to 
infer the end of the head section and the beginning of the body section 
(where link and meta are not allowed; hence the reported error). 




It's all about the JavaScript.
But what I don't understand is that the toolbar in the browser gives 3 errors 
and if I manually type the URL in the checkbox in validator.w3.org everything 
validates.


Arno
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Validator

2007-04-25 Thread Fora
 Try:
 script type=text/javascript src=whateveritis.js/script
 
 ~dL



It is just that. Which is why I don't understand the error.

www.proimage.fi


Arno

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Validator

2007-04-25 Thread Fora
Glenn, I hadn't put a link up earlier.

See www.poetryin-e-motion.com/arno/crap/scrshts.jpg.

Top shows my tool bar with the 3 errors.
Middle shows the validator page accessed by clicking the button in the tool 
bar with the 3 errors.
Bottom shows the validator page after manually typing the URL 
www.proimage.fi in the check box.


Arno 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Validator

2007-04-24 Thread Fora
Hi list,

I'm confused.

I have the page validation tool working in my toolbar (FF).
When I check a site I've made with the toolbar offline, it says that it's 
validated. When I upload the same files to the server, it says in the 
toolbar that there are 3 HTML errors. However, if I go to validator.w3.org 
and I type the URL in the box to check from there, it says again that it 
validates.

Anyone else come across this problem?

Arno 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Embedded Fonts

2007-04-01 Thread Fora
You need Open Type fonts for that. True Type or Postscript fonts aren't 
supported.

HTH

A. 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Frames or CSS? Dynamic section of page

2007-03-20 Thread Fora
 The only solution which I understand is to use frames.  It would work to
 reload the entire page with each selection, but avoiding is the main 
 purpose
 of CSS.  With my increasing knowledge of CSS, I'm trying to move away 
 from
 such hacks and to code according to standards.  This does do the job.

 i don't know how you envision your menu items working, but divs laid on
 top of one another in the center that become visible or hidden as need
 be would be a solution.

That would work effectively only if you have a few tabs that are laid on top 
of each other.
If you have a menu that consists of say 10+ items, I'd say it's easier to 
use SSI for the menu and static items.

Arno 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] png color and IE7

2007-03-05 Thread Fora
Are you using the Save for web option in Photoshop?

It should work fine even in IE.

What you can try still is to save your background as a png (2 or 4 pixels) 
in the same way you've saved the image. Then set the image as a background 
with repeat in your background properties.
In that way the background is saved the same way as the image and IE should 
render them the same way.



HTH

M. 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] page check :: ~dL [continued]

2007-01-13 Thread Fora
In Opera 9.10 there's a ~10px white gap between questions and the gray box 
(left column). The same space in FF 2.0.0.1, IE7, IE6 and Netscape is gray.
In IE5.5 and IE6 the Chevrolet logo is not found. Also the contents of that 
gray box (Chevrolet Question?) is not centered like in the other browsers, 
as is that blue medal a bit further down in the column.


PC WinXP Pro SP2.


HTH,
A. 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can't assign links specific styles

2007-01-13 Thread Fora
Hi Skip,

I'm not quite sure, but it looks to me like you're missing a specification 
in your a:visited.

Now you have .shoplogo a, a:visited {
stuff
}

The .shoplogo is not inherited so your a:visited is refering to ALL 
a:visited anchors.

Try with

.shoplogo a, .shoplogo a:visited {
stuff
}

.pagelink a, .pagelink a:visited {
stuff
}


I'm sure people will correct me if I'm wrong, or add when there's more to 
it.


HTH,

A.



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Site check [THANKS FOR ALL FEEDBACK!]

2006-12-12 Thread Fora
Thanks everyone for giving feedback!

A.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Site check

2006-12-11 Thread Fora
www.arnoenzerink.com

Mainly in MAC environment.

TIA,
M.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Site check

2006-12-11 Thread Fora
Only the front page is flash. There's a link on the bottom of the page to 
skip the flash.
I'm really wondering about the pop up It doesn't show on my end here, 
nor in my code...



 No flash installed and no-pops allowed on any browsers on this end.
 Worked fine.


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Fw: Site check

2006-12-11 Thread Fora
It must be related to the invisible webstats counter...
Dang



 I'm really wondering about the pop up It doesn't show on my end here, 
 nor in my code...



 No flash installed and no-pops allowed on any browsers on this end.
 Worked fine.
 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Site check

2006-12-11 Thread Fora
No, it's not the hosting company.
I have webstats running invisibly in a hidden div. I think that's what 
triggers the pop-up.


It's taken away now.
If someone can check again?








snip

When I checked it tried to pop two adds up. Could be the hosting company 
doing it?


/snip 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE doesn't want to display flash in div

2006-12-08 Thread Fora
Having this in your markup is sufficient. And it even validates :o)

object type=application/x-shockwave-flash data=yourswffilehere.swf 
width=xxx height=xxx
param name=movie value=yourswffilehere.swf /
/object




HTH



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE doesn't want to display flash in div

2006-12-08 Thread Fora
Having this in your markup is sufficient. And it even validates :o)object 
type=application/x-shockwave-flash data=yourswffilehere.swf width=xxx 
height=xxx
param name=movie value=yourswffilehere.swf /
/objectHTH


 I'm having (another) problem with IE on a draft page I'm working on:

 http://ambientglow.com/garage/nextrac/quiltstec/index.html


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] :hover in IE7 / IE6

2006-11-06 Thread Fora
I'm experiencing the same problem.

http://www.arnoenzerink.com/design/logos.shtml
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/styles/design.css


It works neither in IE6 nor in IE7, although I do have the :hover on the a 
elements.
I had a slightly different setup first which seemed to work in IE7, but 
messed things up in Opera. I prefer this last one, not only for simplicity's 
sake.

Not intended to hijack Jonathan's question.
Hopefully our problems are solved with the same answer(s).

TIA
A.




- Original Message - 
From: Bradley Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] :hover in IE7


 On 06/11/2006 05:20, Jonathan Berry wrote:
 Hello all,
 I have produced a website (http://eldercare.signonsandiego.com/redesign) 
 that
 exhibits a background-color highlight in IE6 and 7. Problem is, I can't
 remember how I did it. Now that I am working on a new site (
 http://sdasf.org/cms/index.php?id=9,36,0,0,1,0), I want to replicate the
 :hover pseudo-class effect on this site as well. Can someone illuminate 
 this
 once and for all for me so I can remember it from now on. I just saw a
 thread on here about li styles, but didn't want to interrupt that. I 
 also
 want to know in relation to this if the lia on my first site exhibits
 this because of the markup present, i.e. since the second site only has 
 a
 tags within the div in question. Any help much to be appreciated.


 IE6/Win only supports :hover on a elements, so your CSS would contain
 something like:

 div.class a:hover {
 /* change styles */
 }

 whereas IE7/Win seems to support :hover on most elements. I think in
 your case you only want to use a:hover, since the effect is part of the
 navigation.

 Brad
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] :hover in IE7 / IE6

2006-11-06 Thread Fora
Indeed, that solved the problem.
Is there any logical explanation for IE not reading the %? (or is it a 
completely stupid question to ask a logical explanation in combination with 
IE?).

A.

- Original Message - 
From: Bradley Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fora [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CSS Mailinglist css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] :hover in IE7 / IE6


 On 06/11/2006 09:18, Fora wrote:
 I'm experiencing the same problem.

 http://www.arnoenzerink.com/design/logos.shtml
 http://www.arnoenzerink.com/styles/design.css


 It works neither in IE6 nor in IE7, although I do have the :hover on the 
 a elements.

 Well, :hover works on your regular (non-image) links, so I'd say it's just 
 this (and the other rules like it) which is breaking the effect:

 .aave a:hover {
 background: url(../design/images/aave_thumb.gif);
 background-position: 100% 0%;
 }

 Try this instead:

 .aave a:hover {
 background: url(../design/images/aave_thumb.gif);
 background-position: -55px 0;
 }

 to shift the image 55 pixels to the left, thus making the coloured section 
 appear.


 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Positioning issue in IE7

2006-11-06 Thread Fora
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/manipulation/contact.shtml
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/manipulation/freedom.shtml
http://www.arnoenzerink.com/styles/manipulation.css


Hi,
The first one is the good one, the second one is the wrong one.
I used the first one for the second one, only changing the text in the right 
text box. Yet the text jumps into the left area.
I figure it has something to do with the float: left that I have on the 
right text box, but I'm wondering why it doesn't do that in the first 
example?
The one line difference isn't the problem. I copied the text from the first 
to the second, but that doesn't make any difference. The images have the 
same width, different height.

Can anyone shed some light here?

TIA
A. 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] No DOC TypE

2006-10-25 Thread Fora
Can you provide a link to the page?

The doctype clarification has to be completely at the top. There can't even 
be an empty line there.

A.




I know this is been covered before, however, I did not think it was 
important in the past. The W3C HTML validator is telling me there is no DOC 
TYPE when at the top of the file I have:

 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
 http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] IE7 Released

2006-10-19 Thread Fora

 I have used the configuration for 10 months now with few problems - none
 that I would be worried about.


Figured my question wasn't really CSS stuff, which is why I asked off-list.
I'm running standalone versions of IE5.0 and 5.5, too, without problems, but 
I've had some configurational problems with the _nt version in the past, it 
messed up my OS for some reason. Hence my worries.

But if it's good, then I can try :o)

Thanks for your reply.

Arno


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Search Form Box Over Graphic

2006-10-16 Thread Fora
snip

.searchbox {
left: 802px;
position: absolute;
color: #00;
font-size: 11px;
top: 65px;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
z-index: 413;
width: 87px;
vertical-align: middle;
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
}/snip


You're positioning the searchbox absolutely.

I remember one particular person on this list trying to hammer into my thick 
skull to steer clear from absolutely positioning items as much as possible.
It took me awhile to get it, but he was right.
You positioning your searchbox absolutely at 802px is why people with 
800x600 screen resolution don't see it. It's positioned outside their 
viewport.
Try floating it right, maybe in its own div, within the #bigbox.


HTH
Arno 


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/